Catholic Monitor

Tuesday, April 18, 2017

Does Gay Mafia Control Pope Francis?



Pope Francis strolls hand in hand with the gay rights advocate Fr. Luigi Ciotti.


Author and gay mafia expert Fr. Dariusz Oko according to ChurchMilitant.com affirmed that homosexual clerics "control...many diocese." Oko said:

"There is...a problem with homosexual bishops...There is a gay mafia...They create informal unions, and they infiltrate the Church." (ChurchMilitant.com, April 18, 2017)

Has the gay mafia infiltrated the diocese of Rome and do they control Pope Francis?

Vatican expert Sandro Magister said Francis has a "number of homosexual priests in the inner circle of his closest collaborators and confidants." (Chiesa.espressolineit.com, December 16, 2016)

Bishop Battista Ricca, for example, was appointed by Francis as head of the Vatican Bank. The Bishop is "well known for homosexual conduct." (Lifesitenews.com, July 14, 2015)

The appointment of the gay Bishop to run the Vatican Bank was "a totally personal one made by Francis" according to Asia News.

The Pope, after a long day of papal work, goes home to the homosexual Ricca who is the head of Francis's personal "residence at the Casa Santa Marta hotel." (Asianews.it.com, 06/26/2013)

On March 21, 2014, in his desire to accompany someone who is a "strong promoter of homosexuality" and gay rights who "participates in a 'gay parade'" as well as is advertised as fighting the Italian Mafia, Francis decided to pay homage to Fr. Luigi Ciotti.

Ciotti is a advocate or "a strong promoter of homosexuality...of 'gay marriage' and the adoption of children by homosexuals." (Vebuumdei.blogspot.com, June 23,2014)

Two very telling photos of Pope Francis and Ciotti can be viewed if one googles: Fr. Luigi Ciotti.

Francis is actually holding hands with the priest, who is a gay rights advocate, as they stroll.

Just because the Pope's home is run by a bishop "well known for homosexual conduct" and he holds hands as he strolls with a gay rights advocate doesn't necessarily mean he is controlled by a gay mafia agenda.

Unfortunatedly, another of Francis's appointments after Ricca begins to show a pattern of homosexual activist influence on papal policy.

The Pope's appointment of Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia to head the Pontifical Council for Life showed the direction of papal policy.

Archbishop Paglia's coat of arms features the gay activist symbol of the rainbow and he commissioned a gay artist to paint a massive "homoerotic" pornographic mural at his former cathedral.

Lifesitenews.com reported the mural depicts:

"Jesus carrying nets to heaven filled with naked and semi-nude homosexuals, transexuals, prostitutes, and drug dealers, jumbled together in erotic interactions." (Lifesitenews, March 3, 2017)

In the painting is the homosexual image of a shirtless Paglia affectionately embracing a naked man. (Lifesitenews, March 16, 2017)

If Paglia was painted affectionately embracing a naked woman that would be a heterosexual image. There is no dought it is a homosexual image of the Archbishop.

This is not the end of Pope Francis's appointee to head the Pontifical Council for Life exploits in the homoerotic.

Psychologist Gerard van den Aardweg and sex abuse expert Rick Fitzgerald M.D., in an article titled "Is the pontificate of Francis in the clutches of the gay lobby?" wrote that Paglia produced  a sex education program that "contained homoerotic and heterosexual pornography which was like that employed by adult predators of youth." (Lifesitenews, March 6, 2017)

The Paglia pornographic sex ed program called Meeting Point was released with the "apparent approval" of Francis on World Youth Day accordingly to the article.

The two sex abuse experts said the "homoerotic and heterosexual" porn predator like program "should be withdrawn as soon as possible by the Vatican and its website closed."

It is beginning to appear that Pope Francis just might be under the influence of his "homosexual...inner circle of...collaborators and confidants" who could be pushing the gay activist agenda.

Fr. Zuhlsdord at his website on April 16, 2016 posted:

"Pope Francis made it clear to everyone that he was backing the Kasper Proposal and Pope Francis knows how to use his absolute power!"

Fr. Z in the same article showed why Francis used his "absolute power" to attempt to bring about the ultimate purpose of the Kasper Proposal:

The "Trojan Horse Archbishop Bruno Forte stealthily snuck into the Synod's Interim Report... of the 2014 Synod...was the moment when many of us knew that 'homosexuality' was the bigger issue with the Kasperites...This is still the Kasperite strategy."

Lifesitenews.com summarized what Forte and Kasper were using Francis's "absolute power" to control the procedures of the Synod for:

-"'Earthquake': Vatican Synod mid-term report suggests emphasizing' positive aspects of cohabitation, homosexuality...'Accept and value' homosexuality."

-The "Voice of the Family coalition charging that it amounts to the 'betrayal' of the Catholic faith." (Lifesitenews.com, October 13, 2014)

Remember what Fr. Z said of the Kasper Proposal. It is ultimately the strategy to achieve the gay agenda:

Homosexuality is "the bigger issue...This is still the Kasper strategy."

Is this Pope Francis's strategy?

Is Amoris laetitia the strategy to achieve the Kasper Proposal which is ultimately the means to impose the gay agenda?

Pope Francis strolled hand in hand with the gay rights advocate Fr. Luigi Ciotti.

Is Francis hand in hand, that is closely working together, with the Kasperites who would betray the Catholic faith?

Is Pope Francis hand in hand with those who call for the acceptance and imposing of the gay agenda "pastorally" by sex ed and other abuses on the little ones in the Church without supposedly changing doctrine?

If he is truly hand in hand with those who would cause one of these little ones to fall into sin then he needs to listen to Jesus's words:

"If you cause one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for you to have a great millstone fastened around your neck and be drowned in the depths of the sea." (Matthew 18:6)






Pope Francis strolls hand in hand with the gay rights advocate Fr. Luigi Ciotti.


Friday, April 14, 2017

Is Soros Through Kushner Infiltrating Trump White House?

Is President Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner in cahoots with George Soros and the Democratic party?

The Jewish Business News (JBN) on January 31 ran the headline:

"George Soros Backed Jared Kushner Venture Cadre With $250 Million"

The Real Deal said that "Soros has had a long and productive relationship with the Kushner family" according to the JBN January 31 article.

If Kushner is in cahoots with Soros, the first item on the agenda would be to oust conservatives.

The second agenda item would be to get Democrat and Soros operatives into the Trump administration.

The third agenda item would be to get Trump to break his campaign promises.

The New York Times on April 12 claimed conservative Stephen Bannon's White House "job may be in danger" because of longtime Democrat Kushner's growing control of the Trump adminstration.

Another longtime Democrat is in cahoots with Kushner to oust Bannon who is the most important conservative Republican in the Trump White House.

The Times article said longtime Democrat and former president of Goldman Sachs Gary Cohn who is Trump's chief economic adviser has "aligned himself against Mr. Bannon."

Goldman Sachs and the Democrat party are both known to have strong ties to George Soros.

Not by accident was Cohn's colleague at Goldman Sachs Steve Mnuchin confirmed as U.S.Treasury Secretary.

Mnuchin "also worked at Soros Fund" as a Soros employee. (Collective-Evolution.com, February 18)

Soros has at least two Trump officials with direct connections to his financial empire or financial dealings in the White House: Mnuchin and Kushner.

Agenda items one and two on the hypothetical Kushner/Soros agenda seem to be progressing towards accomplishment.

The third item in the agenda was breaking campaign promises.

The President's son-in-law apparently used his wife to get Trump to break his implicit campaign pledge to not attack Syria.

Britain's The Daily Telegram on April 11 reported Trump's son Eric said that Kushner's wife Ivanka convinced the President to bomb Syria.

By the bombing Trump contradicted a implicit campaign pledge he made mockingly against Hillary Clinton.

In October he said:

"Hillary wants to start a shooting war in Syria, in conflict with a nuclear-armed Russia which could lead to World War III."

Kushner's growing domination of the Trump administration was shown by the attack on Syria over the opposition of Bannon who argued for the President to keep his campaign "America First doctrine" promises according to a April 7 New York Magazine article.

On April 12, The Washington Free Beacon noted for "breaking significant news stories" by Wikipedia reported that there is a "White House civil war."

Senior staff in the White House say Kushner is acting like "a one-man show and that's creating a lot of frustration" and he has "caused confusion as to what exactly the adminstration's policy is when it comes to a range of key issues" according to the Beacon.

The article revealed senior staff said Trump's son-in-law's "aggressive action to micromanage" the White House's National Security Council is "highly unusual and damaging to the country's national security infrastructure."

The Beacon reported a White House official said Kushner is being "pegged as the 'shadow secretary of state'...but in a way he's kind of also the shadow national security adviser and secretary of defense."

Cosmopolitan on March 29 in a piece call "Who is Jared Kushner?" revealed he "'enjoys a Rasputin-like power' with Trump" and is "incredibly close with his father" so much so that "they work on the same floor 666 Fifth Ave...New York City."

Trump's son-in-law gave "large sums to mostly Democratic candidates, including Bill and Hillary Clinton" according to the March piece. It also said:

He has "an appetite for revenge... recall Gov. Christie's role in Jared's father's downfall...Jared...was the agent behind...'a Stalinesque purge' of anyone close to Christie" and Christie himself from the Trump adminstration.

In 2005, U.S. Attorney Chris Christie put Jared's father Charles Kushner in prison on 18 counts of illegal campaign contributions, tax evasion and witness tampering.

The witness tampering incident appears to show that Jared got his appetite for revenge from his father. Wikipedia reported:

"The witness-tampering charge arose from Kushner's act of retaliation against William Schulder, his sister Esther's husband, who was cooperating with federal investigators; Kushner hired a prostitute to seduce his brother-in-law, arranged to record an encounter with the two, and had the tape sent to his sister."

Monday, April 10, 2017

Pope Francis, Cuba and Leftist ALBA attempt to Prop Up Dictator Maduro

Today, Reuter reported that "Venezuela's leftist, regional allies pledged to support...President Nicolas Maduro."

Cuba and the leftist ALBA of 11 Latin American countries vowed to prop up the dictator as massive anti-Maduro demonstrations demanded democracy.

Before the Leftist countries pledged support, Pope Francis, also, attempted to prop up the dictator.

The Miami Herald on February 8, in headlines, said:

"Pope Francis, get out of Venezuela. You're only making things worse."

The Herald said that Francis's mediation effort "has legitimized that country's authoritarian ruler Nicolas Maduro, throwing him a lifeline when millions of protesters were demanding his resignation on the streets in October 2016."

Maduro officially became a dictator on December 6, 2015 when he stripped all "major powers from the National Assembly."

The Herald article ended by saying:

Pope Francis... stop being an obstacle in the restoration of democratic rule in Venezuela."



Saturday, April 08, 2017

Betrayal: Trump turned into Hillary threatens World War III with Russia

In October, Trump said:

"Hillary wants to start a shooting war in Syria, in conflict with a nuclear-armed Russia which could lead to World War III."

Trump betrayed his campaign promise in bombing Syria because he heard Russian enemy Turkey's so-called unbiased report on who launched the chemical attack. (Info Wars)

The President saw "unbiased" CNN narrative pictures on TV and believed Shajul Islam who was a "primary spokesman and source" for the chemical attack narrative. Islam had been jailed in the UK on charges of aiding ISIS. (Mahound's Paradise.com)

Many experts say that it could have been ISIS that launched the chemical attack not Syrian President Assad. They say Assad would have to be suidical to do it while ISSI had nothing to lose and everything gain by the attack.

Syrian Catholic Bishop Khazen denounced the Trump bombing:

"One thing that baffles, in the face of the U.S. military attack on Syria territory, is the speed with which it was decided and carried out, without any adequate investigation into the tragic massacre with chemical weapons."(Crux)

Thursday, April 06, 2017

Does Pope Francis Believe Man and Everything is Becoming Nothing?

The Vatican II school of the Nouvelle Theologie (New Theology) appears to be very influential in Pope Francis's thinking.

This theology can emphasize becoming over being.

Francis says Cardinal Kasper's theology is "profound." His theology is one extreme example of this school of thought.

Kasper appears to not believe in being, but only in becoming because of his Hegelian philosophy.

The philosopher Thomas Stark said that one of Kasper's central beliefs is "historical process," that is man's historical becoming or change.

In "German Idealism and Cardinal Kasper's Theological Project" for The Catholic World Report, Stark wrote:

"Kasper's...'spirit' that--Kasper himself says--is not identical to the third divine person, but is much more reminiscent of Hegel's absolute spirit, who in a historical process, synthesizing it's dialectical opposites in itself, develops into the whole."

Speaking of the more orthodox members of Nouvelle theologie who believe in process or becoming and the dangers of this thinking, Fr. James McLucas, the former editor of the Latin Mass magazine, in a lecture said:

"It appears to emphasis the Person of Jesus, the Person of the Holy Spirit and the Person of the Father and the personal manner of each individual's sanctification as being created in the image of God."

"But here is the key.This is all true.We certainly need this emphasis. But personhood if it is not fully subjected to being and the objective nature of God, then personhood becomes often the vehicle for the substitution of man's becoming for God's being."

If one substitutes man's becoming for God's being then man is becoming nothing. Here is why:

If one believes in being, one believes a thing is a thing.

God is the fullness or total actuality of all things or being and is their creator. Our purpose or goal in life to go to God.

If one believes only in becoming without being, one believes nothing is becoming nothing.

G. K. Chesterton put it best:

"Most thinkers on realizing the apparent mutablility of being, have really forgotten their own realization of the being and believe only in the mutablility...It is only change."

"It would be more logical to call it nothing changing into nothing than to say (on this principles) that there ever was a moment when the thing was itself. St. Thomas maintains that the ordinary thing at any moment is something, but it is not everything it could be...While they describe a change which is really a change in nothing, he describes a changelessness which includes the change of everything."

"Things change because they are not complete, but their reality can only be explained as part of something that is complete. It is God." (The Dumb Ox)

If man goes to God who is Being Itseft then he receives the gift of grace, truth and eternal life.

If man substitutes, that is exchanges or replaces, man's becoming over or against God's Being then he gets nothing and death.









Saturday, April 01, 2017

Pope Francis's Porn-Related Scandals

It started with the minor scandal of Pope Francis blessing "a green parrot belonging to a rather well-known porn actor in Italy named Francesco Lombardi" on January 29, 2014 according to Relevant magazine.com.

The next scandal was the supposed "action" and Vatican "arrest" of Francis's Vatican against accused paedophile Archbishop Josef Wesolowski.

Betty Clermont of the Dailykos.com on August 13, 2015 wrote:

"Had the trial taken place, testimony would have confirmed that the pope allowed Wesolowski to remain a free man for 14 months regardless of how many times the Pope said he was taking "action" against prelates on the issue of sex abuse; and that during this time, Wesolowski acquired more than 100,000 computer files of pornography with disturbing photos of children who were likely victims of human trafficking."

Journalist Clermont on September 28, 2016 in Churchandstate.org, in a follow up article, reported:

"In August 2013, Pope Francis removed...Wesolowski for soliciting and engaging in sex with poor street boys. He did not notify the police or the public. A TV expose brought Wesolowski's crimes to the public's attention."

"The pontiff left Wesolowski a free man until September 2014 when the Italian newspaper Il Corriere Della Serra reported that Wesolowski was arrested by order of the pope because "there was a serious risk that the nuncio would be arrested on Italian territory at the request of the Dominican authorities and extradited." At the time, Wesolowski had more than 100,000 computer files of pornography...Images show youngsters...filmed naked and forced to have sexual relations with each other and with adults."

"Even under house arrest in the Vatican, Wesolowski was still able to access child porn on his internet. Wesolowski died unexpectedly before his trial began."

The next outrage was Pope Francis allowing his close collaborator Cardinal Marx and his German bishops to continue in the porn business.

Marx and the German bishop's huge porn publishing company sold pornography for over a decade. The bishops were rebuked by Pope Benedict after he was informed. After the papal rebuke, the German bishops promised the porn business would be sold according to Lifesitenews.com articles on October 31 and November 23, 2011.

The blog Vox Cantoris on September 18, 2015 wrote that Cardinal Marx and the German bishops were still in the same porn business and Francis did not "call them out." The blog asked:

"Why is Pope Francis blind to Germany's rich and porn producing bishops?"

In 2016, Francis's next x-rated outrage was appointing Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia to head the Pontifical Council for the Family. The papal appointee commissioned a pornographic mural at his former cathedral which was called "blasphemous," "disgusting," and "demonic" according to Lifesitenews.com on March 15, 2017.

Finally, the most disgraceful scandal:

Pope Francis appointed mural pornography commissioner Paglia to produce a sex education program which was released with the "apparent approval" of Francis on World Youth Day according to a March 6, 2017 article.

The article was written by psychologists Gerard van den Aardweg and Rick Fitzgerald on Lifesitenews.com.

Paglia's sex ed program used porn "like" that used by "sexual predators."

The psychologists stated that the Vatican approved and released the program called Meeting Point that "contained homoerotic and hetersexual pornography which was like that employed by adult predators of youth."

The two experts said the porn predator-like program "should be withdrawn as soon as possible by the Vatican and its website closed."









Friday, March 24, 2017

Does Pope Francis Believe in Truth or Power?

Catholic common sense, following St. Thomas Aquinas's philosophy, believes that our senses and reason are reliable.

Truth can be known.

In Edward Feser's philosophy blog a commenter named Rank Sophist argued against truth saying that Eastern philosophy believes that the senses and logic "lie."

Reality, truth and reason in Eastern Philosophy are "Maya" which means they are ultimately total illusion.

The sophist made me laugh.

Why is the dummy bothering to write (sense of sight) and agrue (logical presentation) if the guy believes the senses and reason are illusion?

The theologians that Pope Francis believes to be reliable such as the Hegelian Cardinal Kasper and the Postmodernist Michel de Certeau (Bergoglio's favorite theologian), like the sophist, don't believe in objective truth or reason.

But unlike the Rank Sophist, they can't be laughed away. They believe in power.

Eminent Austrian philosopher Thomas Stark, in an interview with the National Catholic Register, said that Kasper's theology is Hegelian idealism (senses are not reliable) which "historicizes truth" in a way that "is not coherent" and that "violates the law of non-contradiction."

"Historicized truth" means nineteenth century "truth" is different form twentieth century "truth."

"Violating the law of non-contradiction" means in Hegel's dialectic non-logic that sin can become non-sin and then evolve into something else.

As Francis's close confidant Fr. Spadaro who is called "the Pope's mouthpiece" wrote:

"2+2 in #Theology can make 5."

There is no objective truth or reason.

For Kasper there are not eternal infallible truths for all time. History or time is greater that truth. As Francis said:

"Time is greater than space."

The sin of adultery can become the non-sin of "irregular relationship" which can evolve into cohabitation/fornication which has "the grace of a real marriage" as Pope Francis said.

For St. Thomas adultery is adultery. Marriage is marriage. A hen is a hen. A egg is a egg.

Hegelians disagree with Aquinas. G.K. Chesterton explained how they think:

"The Hegelian may say that an egg is really a hen, because it's a part of an endless process of Becoming."

For Kasper, and it appears for Francis, there is no objective truth or reason.

This is bad. But, even worst is the end result of Hegelism.

In the book "The Ominous Parallels," philosopher Leonard Peikoff wrote of the ultimate end or Becoming of Hegel:

"'All the worth which the human being possesses,' writes Hegel, 'all spiritual reality, he possesses only through the state.'"

The Hegelian philosophy of history of superior states evolving from inferior states (or the bringing about of the super state from a inferior state by a process of Becoming) brought us:

The totalitarian states of the mass murdering holocausts of Hitler's National Socialist Germany (implicitly) and Marxist Russia (explicitly).

Philosopher Stephen Hicks in the book "Explaining Postmodernism" demonstrated how Marxism and Nazism are not just the direct product of Hegel's totalitarian state philosophy, but while using different names and tactics they both have the same ideology: socialism. Hicks wrote:

"Hitler, for example,  declared that 'basically National Socialism and Marxism are the same.' And Josef Goebbels, who had a Ph. D. in philosophy...argued the same point...that the Communists believed that socialism could be achieved at the international level, while the National Socialist believed that it could and should occur at the national level."

Marx and Lenin explicitly turned Hegelism into the Marxist historically evolved dialectic internationalist states.

Hitler implicitly turned the German Hegel's philosophy into the historically evolved superman racist national state.

Following in their Hegelian footsteps came the historically evolved Latin American Marxist/Socialist/Fascist tyrannies and disasters such as Peron's Argentina (and Nazi haven), Castro's Cuba and Maduro's Venezuela.

Francis supported Peron and Castro.

The Pope appears to be propping up the Maduro tyranny against the will the people of Venezuela who want freedom.

These tyrannies are the end result of Kasper's Hegelian philosophy.

In Kasper's theology, his "spirit" and "truth" are not the Holy Spirit or the infallible truths of the Catholic Church, but the historical process of Hegel's philosophy.

In an article called "German Idealism and Cardinal Kasper's Theological Project" for The Catholic World Report, the philosopher Stark said:

"Kasper's...'spirit' that--Kasper himself says--is not identical to the third divine person, but is much more reminiscent of Hegel's absolute spirit, who in a historical process, synthesizing it's dialectical opposites in itself, develops into the whole, that is the truth."

Pope Francis, four days after his election as Pope, called Kasper a "good theologian." (Wikipedia)

In 2014, Francis said:

"I read and re-read the work of Cardinal Kasper, I would like to thank him because I found profound theology."(Catholic Herald)

As Jeff Mirus said of the Pope, when Francis praised Bernard Haring who defends intrinsically evils acts, he "must be ignorant, confused, or subversive."

Either the Pope is ignorant and confused, or Francis believes in the "spirit" of Kasper.

That "spirit" is not the Holy Spirit.

That "'spirit' that-- Kasper himself says--is not identical to the third divine person."

Does Pope Francis believe in Kasper's "'spirit'...in a historical process" or the Holy Spirit who is eternally God and who insures the infallible eternal truths of the Catholic Church or the the Hegelian changeable god of historical process and the changing with time "truths" of Kasper, Hegel, Marx, Castro, Peron and Hitler?

After all, Francis in his uninspired and non-infallible writings says he believes in "initiating processes rather than possessing spaces" and "time is greater than space."







To be continued...