Skip to main content

ACLU Defends Group that Advocates Sex Abuse

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/04/24/parents_of_slain_boy_drop_lawsuit_against_nambla/?p1=email_to
_a_friend

Parents of slain boy drop lawsuit against NAMBLA

Witness incompetent to testify, judge rules

By Jonathan Saltzman
Globe Staff

April 24, 2008

The parents of Jeffrey Curley, the 10-year-old Cambridge boy raped and smothered by two men who lured him into a car, have dropped their federal lawsuit against a group that advocates sex between men and boys, which the parents contended had incited their son's 1997 murder.

Lawyers for Robert and Barbara Curley filed papers Tuesday in US District Court in Boston ending their wrongful death and civil rights lawsuit against the North American Man/Boy Love Association and 18 reputed members after almost eight years of litigation.

Robert Curley said his lawyer recently told him that the plaintiffs had only one witness prepared to testify that the association somehow spurred Charles Jaynes, one of the boy's convicted killers, to commit rape and murder on Oct. 1, 1997. A judge ruled that the witness was not competent to testify, Curley said.

"That was the only link we were counting on," said Curley, a 51-year-old mechanic at the Cambridge Fire Department. "When they ruled that out, that was the end of the line."

Sarah R. Wunsch - a staff attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, which defended the association and most of the defendants in the suit - said the case never had any merit.

Jaynes did belong to the association for a year, Wunsch said. But, she said, there was nothing illegal about the magazines he obtained from the organization - they are available in some bookstores - or the association website that the Curleys alleged he viewed shortly before the murders.

"There was never any evidence that NAMBLA was connected to the death of Jeffrey Curley," Wunsch said. "It's been our view that for the last eight years, it's been the First Amendment that's been the defendant in this case. In America, there's freedom to publish unpopular ideas, and that's what this case was about."

Elizabeth A. Lunt, a private lawyer for an association member sued by Curley's parents, said the plaintiffs "did not have a shred of evidence to support their contention that NAMBLA somehow caused this terrible homicide to happen."

Jeffrey Curley was abducted in East Cambridge after he was lured into a car driven by a neighborhood resident, Salvatore Sicari, and Jaynes, of Brockton. Authorities said the men promised Curley a new bike.

When Jaynes made sexual advances toward the boy, he fought back in a struggle that authorities said lasted about 20 minutes in the back seat. Jaynes subdued and smothered Curley, stuffing a gasoline-soaked rag into his face.

The child's body was sexually assaulted in Jaynes's apartment in Manchester, N.H., before he and Sicari placed their victim in a 50-gallon plastic container, filed it with lime and concrete, and dumped it in a river in southern Maine.

Both men were convicted of murder charges and are serving life sentences.

After the slaying was solved, the outcry in Massachusetts and Robert Curley's public anger propelled the Legislature to within one vote of reinstating the death penalty. But Curley has turned against the death penalty in recent years, saying he is troubled by the possibility of the state executing the innocent by mistake.

In May 2000, the Curleys filed a federal suit alleging that Jaynes obtained materials from the North American Man/Boy Love Association and "became obsessed with having sex with and raping young male children." The Curleys received legal support from the Thomas More Law Center, a conservative advocacy group based in Michigan that has criticized both the ACLU and the organization it defended.
Robert Curley said the suit raised public awareness about the association.

In August 2000, a Middlesex County jury awarded Curley's family $328 million in a wrongful death lawsuit against the boy's killers. But it was strictly a symbolic victory, because neither of the men had any significant assets.

Jonathan Saltzman can be reached at jsaltzman@globe.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OPEN LETTER TO TAYLOR MARSHALL

Dr. Marshall, for many of us (myself included), your podcasts have been a source of enlightenment, entertainment, and—quite frankly—hope, during this very dark time in the history of the Church.  As someone who studied his way into the Catholic Faith, having the grace and the integrity to acknowledge the necessity of conversion from the Protestant sect to which you formerly belonged, you have not been content to rest on your laurels but have “put yourself out there,” launching the New Saint Thomas Institute and discussing current events sub luce aeternitatis.  Your willingness to deal with things the way they are, and not the way they would be if we were all painted on holy cards already, is refreshing and appreciated.
Accordingly, I am writing to you today in regard to your recent statements about being “open” to the idea that Jorge Bergoglio is not actually the pope.  For a person in your position, so much as admitting that possibility must require all the grace and integrity you h…

Our Lady of Good Success: Is Pope Benedict the "Prisoner in the Vatican... in that Greatest Crisis of the Church"?

The apparitions of Our Lady of Success have been approved by the Catholic Church. Moreover, Our Lady of Good Success has had many miracles associated with it.

Here is part of the "Fourth Apparition: January 21, 1610" which the influencial and prominent Catholic blogger Laramie Hirsch believes may possibly be referring to Pope Benedict XVI:

"The Supreme Shepherd and Vicar of Christ on Earth, who, being a prisoner in the Vatican... in that greatest crisis of the Church, he who is obligated to speak in due time will remain silent."
(The Story of Our Lady of Good Success and Novena, Dolorosa Press, Pages 40-41)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Sex-abuse Worldview Vs. Christian Worldview

By Fred Martinez

Professor Allan Bloom, a philosopher who wrote "The Closing of the American Mind," thought that Friedrich Nietzsche was the father of modern America. He said, "Words such as 'charisma,' 'lifestyle,' 'commitment,' 'identity,' and many others, all of which can easily be traced to Nietzsche ... are now practically American slang."

But the most important Nietzschean slang word is "values."

"Values" are the death of Christian morality because values simply mean opinions. If opinion is how things are decided, then might makes right.

One must remember that whenever someone talks about values in modern America – family values or religious values or place-the-blank-in-front-of values – they are saying there is no real or objective right or wrong – only opinions of the self and its will to power.

Nietzsche's philosophy is summed up by Bloom as

Commitment values the values and makes them valuable. Not love…