Sunday, February 26, 2017

Is Pope Francis Denying Sin when he says Child Molesters who he Reinstated into Priesthood are "Diseased" Psychologically?

The Associated Press revealed that Pope Francis reversed the decision of Pope Benedict XVI to kick pedophiles out of the priesthood.

Francis is now reinstating sex abusers back into priesthood. The AP wrote that Francis "recently" said:

"[H]e believed sex abusers suffer from a 'disease' - a medical term used by defense la wyers to seek mitigating factors in canonical sentences."[https://cruxnow.com/global-church/2017/02/25/pope-quietly-trims-sanctions-sex-abusers-seeking-mercy/]

Abuse victim Marie Collins, a founding member of Francis’ sex-abuse advisory commission, apparently responding to the Pope's claim that sex abusing priests are "diseased" psychologically and not responsible for their crimes or sins, said:

"All who abuse have made a conscious decision to do so. Even those who are paedophiles, experts will tell you, are still responsible for their actions. They can resist their inclinations...

"While mercy is important, justice for all parties is equally important. If there is seen to be any weakness about proper penalties, then it might well send the wrong message to those who would abuse."[http://metro.co.uk/2017/02/26/pope-francis-reversed-decisions-to-kick-paedophiles-out-of-the-priesthood-6473481/#ixzz4ZpmwUPVe]

Vatican spokesman Greg Burke told AP that "Francis’s emphasis on mercy applied to 'even those who are guilty of heinous crimes."

The Associated Press reported that serial child molester Mauro Inzoli who, because of the Pope's emphasis on mercy, was allowed to be reinstated back to be priesthood "is now facing a second church trial after new evidence emerged against him."

Rod Dreher of The American Conservative presented the case that Pope Francis's "mercy" for child molesters is a word that is being used in such a way that it is "perpetuating" clerical crimes and sins as well as injustice. He, first, quoted a church official and then said:

“'With all this emphasis on mercy … he is creating the environment for such initiatives,” the church official said, adding that clemency petitions were rarely granted by Pope Benedict XVI, who launched a tough crackdown during his 2005-2013 papacy and defrocked some 800 priests who raped and molested children...

"And so, the precious concept of mercy becomes a byword for perpetuating clericalism and injustice, swaddling it in a slanket of sentimentality."[https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/pope-francis-mercy-for-child-molesters/]

Is the "merciful" Pope Francis denying sin when he says child molesters who he reinstated into priesthood are "diseased" psychologically?

Francis appears to be denying mortal sin by redefining it out of existence using terms like "disease" and "irregular relationships."  

The Pope as well as his inner circle of clerics and bishops appear to have redefined mortal sin and adultery in a way that is contrary to the 2,000 year infallibly doctrine of the Catholic Church.

They redefine adultery and fornication as "irregular relationships" and say mortal sin is not mortal sin because of the ultimacy of conscience.

This redefinition of Catholic conscience tells the sex abuser, the person in adultery and fornication or anyone in objective mortal sin that they are not in mortal sin if they are at "peace" with it, if the sinful behavior is "humanly impossible" to change, "if they can't change their sinful behavior" or don't know it is wrong. 

Under these conditions, they say those in objective mortal sin without forming their conscience and changing their sinful behavior can do the following:


-Adulterers may receive Holy Communion. 

-Sex abusers, it appears, may be reinstated into the priesthood.

-Cohabiting fornicators, it appears, may continue fornicating without forming their conscience and changing their sinful behavior.[http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2017/01/is-pope-francis-trying-to-empty-cross.html?m=1]

An example of the new Vatican redefinition out of existence of mortal sin is the bishops of Malta pastoral letter. The pastoral letter published in the Pope's clerical semi-official newspaper L'Osservatore Romano wrote:

 -"[A] separated or divorced person who is living in a new relationship manages, with an informed and enlightened conscience, to acknowledge and believe that he or she are at peace with God, he or she cannot be precluded from participating in the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist (see [Amoris Laetitia], AL, notes 336 and 351)."

-" 'It is possible that in an objective situation of sin – which may not be subjectively culpable, or fully such – a person can be living in God’s grace, can love and can also grow in the life of grace and charity, while receiving the Church’s help to this end' (AL 305). This discernment acquires significant importance since, as the Pope teaches, in some cases this help can include the help of the sacraments (see AL, note 351)."

-"On the other hand, there are complex situations where the choice of living “as brothers and sisters” becomes humanly impossible and give rise to greater harm (see AL, note 329
[http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Item/5346/a_malta_laetitia.aspx]

Another example is Pope Francis did not ask priests to form the conscience of cohabiting couples or to call these couples to change their mortally sinful behavior of cohabiting fornication, but instead the Pope urged clerics to "welcome...those young people that prefer living together without getting married" according to a February 27 article on LifeSiteNews.com.

The article, farther, reported: "Last year Francis said that cohabiting couples...have 'the grace of a real marriage.'"

Pope John Paul II in Veritatis Splendor wrote:


"Certain currents of modern thought have gone so far as to exalt freedom to such an extent that it becomes an absolute, which would then be the source of values. This is the direction taken by doctrines which have lost the sense of the transcendent or which are explicitly atheist. The individual conscience is accorded the status of a supreme tribunal of moral judgment which hands down categorical and infallible decisions about good and evil. To the affirmation that one has a duty to follow one's conscience is unduly added the affirmation that one's moral judgment is true merely by the fact that it has its origin in the conscience. But in this way the inescapable claims of truth disappear, yielding their place to a criterion of sincerity, authenticity and "being at peace with oneself."[http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Item/5346/a_malta_laetitia.aspx]


Are we witnessing, in these "currents of modern thought" which Pope John Paul spoke of, the impact of the successful infiltration of the papacy, Catholic “publishers, seminaries, even convents and monasteries” by a psychological “scientific paganism” that calls for an inversion of worship and the Judeo-Christian worldview?

Are we looking at an outright “denial of original sin and personal sin” by clerics who reject the basic Christian starting point that there is a need for forgiveness from God?

Psychological and therapeutic assumptions are what appear to lie behind Pope Francis's explaining away the sin of sex abuse as a "disease." 

Below is a chapter of my book "Hidden Axis" which explains the history of how humanistic psychology supplanted the Faith in the Church and fuelled the sexual clerical sex abuse scandal:

NIETZSCHEAN PSYCHOLOGY


Professor Allan Bloom - a philosopher who wrote The Closing of the American Mind [1987] - thought that Friedrich Nietzsche was the father of modern America. He said that "Words such as 'charisma,' 'lifestyle,' 'commitment,' 'identity,' and many others, can easily be traced to Nietzsche and are now practically American slang." But, the most important Nietzschean slang word is "values."

"Values" are the death of Christian morality because values simply mean opinions. If opinion is how things are decided then might makes right. One must remember that whenever someone in Modern America talks about values - family values or religious values or place the blank in front of values - they are saying there is no real or objective right or wrong, only opinions of the self and its will to power.

'Will to power': imposing values

Nietzsche’s philosophy is summed up this way by Bloom: "Commitment values the values and makes them valuable. Not love of truth but intellectual honesty characterizes the proper state of mind. Since there is no truth in the values, and what truth there is about life is not lovable, the hallmark of the authentic will is consulting one’s oracle while facing up to what one is and what one experiences. Decisions, not deliberations, are the movers of deeds. One cannot know or plan the future. One must will it."

Nietzsche, a philologist, believed there was no original text and transferred this belief to reality, which he thought was only pure chaos. He proposed will to power in which one imposes or "posits" one's values on a meaningless world.

Nietzsche's writings speak of the unconscious and destructive side of the self previous to Freud. In fact, Freud wrote that Nietzsche, "had a more penetrating knowledge of himself than any other man who ever lived or was likely to live."

Birth of the therapeutic culture

The two writers most responsible for Nietzschean language in America are Max Weber and Sigmund Freud. Few know that Freud was "profoundly influenced by Nietzsche," according to Bloom. Freud much more than Weber profoundly changed America from a Christian culture to a therapeutic or self -centered culture.

The therapeutic approaches, which started with Freud, have a basic assumption that is not Christian. The starting point is not the Christian worldview, which is summed up in the parable of the prodigal son. A fallen and sinful world with persons needing God the Father to forgive them so they can return to be his sons and daughters.

The therapeutic, unlike the Christian, starting point is that the individual must overcome personal unconscious forces in Freud, and in Carl Jung the person must unite to the collective unconscious which is shared by all humans. In both cases, the therapist assists his client to change himself to 'become his real self.' What are needed are not God and His Forgiveness, but a therapist assisting a self to reach the fullness of itself.

Freud under the influence of Nietzsche moved psychiatry away from the mechanistic and biological to the previously "unscientific" model of the "symbolic language of the unconscious." Freud’s pupil, Carl Jung took the symbolic language of the unconscious a step further.

Complexes: the unconscious urge and idolatry of self

Unlike his mentor, Jung’s unconscious theory is not just about making conscious sexually repressed or forgotten memories. His symbolic therapy used what he called the "active imagination" to incorporate split off parts of the unconscious (complexes) into the conscious mind.

He believed with Freud that dreams and symbols are means to the unconscious, but for Jung the dream and symbol are not repressed lusts from stages of development. They are a way to unite to the collective unconsciousness.

Many Christians thought this "language of the soul" was a step forward from what they considered the cramped scientific reality of modernity. What they didn’t understand was that Jung’s theory was part of a movement that led to the rejection of objective morality and truth. Jungian (and Freudian) psychoanalysis reduces Christian concepts such as God, free will and intelligence to blind reactions, unconscious urges and uncontrollable acts. Even more disastrous, he inverted Christian worship.

Leanne Payne, a Christian therapist, considers "Jung not a scientist, but a post-modernist subjectivist. Jung’s active imagination therapy is hostile not only to the Judeo-Christian worldview, but to all systems containing objective moral and spiritual value. Within this world the unconscious urge becomes god. What the unconscious urge wants is what is finally right or moral," Payne said. "These psychic persona [complexes] are literally called "gods"(archetypes), and so an overt idolatry of self follows quickly."

Autonomous inner "beings" and "scientific" paganism

Within the modern French Nietzschean schools of thought, a type of Jungian unconscious urge is replacing the old existential conscious self who chooses. The post-modernist is moving from the idolatry of self to the idolatry of autonomous inner "beings" that according to Payne are similar to pagan "gods." As C. S. Lewis predicted in The Screwtape Letters, we are moving to a "scientific" paganism. C. S. Lewis’s name for the "scientific" pagan was the Materialist Magician and the name of the autonomous inner "beings" was the "Forces."

Click to Purchase


In The Screwtape Letters, his character who is a senior evil spirit said, "I have high hopes that we shall learn in due time how to emotionalise and mythologise their science to such an extent that what is, in effect, belief in us, (though not under that name) will creep in while the human mind remains closed to the Enemy [God]. The "Life Force," the worship of sex, and some aspects of Psychoanalysis may here prove useful. If once we can produce our perfect work - the Materialist Magician, the man, not using, but veritably worshipping, what he vaguely calls "Forces" while denying the existence of "spirits" - then the end of the war will be in sight."

Some of the largest audiences for this "scientific" paganism with its inversion of worship and the Judeo-Christian worldview are followers of Christ. By using Christian symbols and terminology, Jungian spirituality has infiltrated to a large extent Christian publishers, seminaries, even convents and monasteries.

Post-modern Nitzschean insanity and the occult

Many Christians are using Jung’s active imagination as a method of prayer. Psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover, M.D., thinks this is dangerous "because this fantasy life has no moral underpinnings, because it helps to reinforce an experience of autonomous inner "beings" accessible via the imagination, and because it is a defense against redemptive suffering, it easily allies with and quickly becomes a Gnostic form of spirituality with powerfully occult overtones."

If one is under the influence of the autonomous inner "beings," uncontrollable urges can overpower the self. One can go temporarily or permanently insane. And in the Christian worldview, the autonomous inner "being" is not always just an imaginary being, but can be a personal being which then makes possession a rare, but not impossible occurrence.

In fact, according to one Jungian therapist, Nietzsche himself went insane permanently when an autonomous inner "being"(archetype) overpowered him. So, unfortunately with the widespread acceptance of Jungian spirituality, mainstream Christianity seems to be moving to post-modern Nietzschean insanity and possibly, in some cases, possession.

Jung’s autobiography is full of insane or occult experiences. He was continually hearing 'voices.' In his autobiography he said his home was "...crammed full of spirits...they were packed deep right up to the front door and the air was so thick it was scarcely possible to breathe."

During the Hitler regime which itself was obsessed with the occult, Jung edited a Nazi psychotherapeutic journal where he said, "The 'Aryan' unconscious has a higher potential than the Jewish." Keep that word "potential" in your mind. It will be used by American psychology.

Once opinion is master then might makes right.

In Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche proclaimed a new morality - "Master morality," which was different from Christian morality or "slave morality" as he called it. He thought the weak have the morality of obedience and conformity to the master.

Masters have a right to do whatever they want since there is no God, everything is permissible. In what Nietzsche considered his masterpiece, Zarathustra, he said the new masters would replace the dead God. The masters were to be called Supermen or the superior men.

'Will to Power' becomes Self-Actualization

After Freud and Jung came Alfred Adler, also a follower of Nietzsche, with "Individual Psychology," which maintains that the individual strive for what he called "superiority" but now is called "self-realization" or "self-actualization," and which came from Nietzsche's ideas of striving and self-creation. The "human potential movement" and humanistic psychology of Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers are imbedded with these types of ideas. The psychologists of "potential" teach the superior man.

Edward Munch said:

"Alfred Adler translated Nietzsche’s philosophical idea of 'will to power' into the psychological concept of self-actualization. Thus, Nietzschean thought forms the foundation for and permeates Alfred Adler’s Individual Psychology, Abraham Maslow’s Humanistic Biology, Carl Rogers’s Person-Centered Psychology, and has influenced many other psychological ideas and systems...

"Alfred Adler was the first psychologist to borrow directly from Nietzsche, making numerous references to the philosopher throughout his works. Adler took Nietzsche’s idea of 'will to power' and transformed it into the psychological concept of self-actualization, in which an individual strives to realize his potential."

Nietzschean insanity in Catholic schools and seminaries

Mary Kearns in an address to the Catholic Head teachers Association of Scotland spoke of the Nietzschean ideas now being taught in Catholic schools in the name of "scientific" psychology. Kearns said:

 "The methods are based on 'the group therapy technique' first developed in America in the 1970s by two psychologists, Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow. They described how emotional conditioning should be carried out by a group 'facilitator.' The facilitator does not impart knowledge like the old fashioned teacher. Instead he/she initiates discussions encouraging children to reveal their personal views and feelings. The facilitator's approach is 'value free.'

"There is no right or wrong answer to any religious or moral question. Each person discloses what is right or wrong for them. All choices are equally valid even if they are opposites. Everything depends on feelings or emotions. Reason and conscience are discouraged. If anyone attempts objective evaluation, they are to be treated as an 'outsider' and there will be a strong emotional reaction against such 'judgemental' intolerance."

If it is true that Catholic education now uses these techniques for "teaching religious and moral education," then the Catholic education system has entered into the Nietzschean insanity.

If these are the techniques being used in education and in the seminaries then sexual misconduct charges against priests are a symptom of "scientific" paganism replacing Christianity.

"Value Free" clerical abuser

Santa Rosa priest Don Kimball who is charged with sexual misconduct is an example of someone whose "approach was 'value free'," that is where "there is no right or wrong answer to any religious or moral question." In 1996, Karyn Wolfe and Mark Spaulding of Pacific Church News wrote:

"THE WEDGE! You can't do youth ministry (any ministry for that matter) without it... Basing his theory on psychologist Abraham Maslow's 'Hierarchy of Needs,' the Rev. Don Kimball developed this model for the growth and maturity process of a group."

Another example of the value free approach is Thomas Zanzig, a major leader of youth ministry in the Catholic Church plus an editor and writer of Catholic textbooks. According to Mark S. Winward, in a book on youth ministry Zanzig "bases his 'Wedge Model' on a similar model developed by Fr. Don Kimball."

Homeschool leader Marianna Bartold said, "Sharing the Christian Message by Thomas Zanzig has students come up with as many slang or street words as possible for penis and vagina in three or four minutes."

Now many might say these are only isolated cases of misuses of Maslow and Adler until one reads the original text. According to William Coulson, a former collaborator of Carl Rogers:

"Maslow was always a revolutionary... In 1965, working a radical idea about children-and-adult sex into his book about management, In Eupsychian Management: A Journal, [Maslow said]: 'I remember talking with Alfred Adler about this in a kind of joking way, but then we both got quite serious about it, and Adler thought that this sexual therapy at various ages was certainly a very fine thing. As we both played with the thought, we envisioned a kind of social worker...as a psychotherapist in giving therapy literally on the couch'."

Therapeutic assumptions behind the Boston catastrophe

As one can see, the basic therapeutic assumption leads to certain results in the real world.

These thinkers don’t believe in the basic Christian starting point that there is a need for forgiveness from God. Instead they believe there is no sin, only selves needing to reach the fullness of themselves.

It is understandable that atheists such as Nietzsche, Maslow and Adler could hold these basic assumptions, but that Christians and priests also hold these assumptions is a disgrace.

The denial of original sin and personal sin is, in large part, behind the headlines of the Boston catastrophe and other dioceses.

The failure is a failure to teach the faith and moral teaching of Jesus Christ.

Getting rid of a few priests will not solve the problem if these basic assumptions stay because more pedophiles will rise up to take their place - only cleverer.

I feel sorry for these Bishops and other Church leaders if they do not take a look at themselves and repent of these basic assumptions in their Dioceses.

They must eventually come face to face with the Living God. He is the Father of these little ones who have been scandalized and abused.

Friday, February 24, 2017

"Refuse/Resist P.F.": Parody Rally Song if he Commands Sin

Bishop Athanasius Schneider said you must "refuse" & "resist" even Pope Francis if he commands you to Sin!

So far, the Pope has only had his inner circle, bishop friends and the Vatican newspaper promote allowing and, it appears, ordering priests to sin by giving sacrilegious Holy Communion to those in adulterous relationships.

Here's a parody rally song if Francis ever openly commands priests or lay people to directly sin, instead of having his inner circle & bishops do it. Remember that the Malta and German bishops said they are only promoting Holy Communion to the divorced and remarried in response to Francis's Amoris laetitia.

"When asked about the recent threats to be suspended a divinis addressed to priests on the Island of Malta if they were to refuse to give Communion to the “remarried," Bishop Schneider said if a bishop orders a priest to give Holy Communion to the divorced and remarried "he commits a grave abuse of power. And when a bishop – or even a pope – commands me to sin. I have to refuse this because I have to obey God" according to One Peter Five.com.[http://www.onepeterfive.com/bishop-schneider-if-a-bishop-or-pope-commands-me-to-sin-i-have-to-refuse/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Onepeterfive+%28OnePeterFive%29]

Parody of "Refuse/Resist" lyrics by group called Sepultura which I call "Refuse/Resist P.F.":

Chaos P.F.
Tanks on the streets
Confronting priests
Bleeding the Plebs
Raging Pope
Burning saints
Bloodshed starts
Who'll be saved?!

Chaos P. F.
Army in siege
Total alarm
I'm sick of this
Inside the Church
War is created
No man's land
What is this coprophilia?

Refuse, Resist
Refuse P.F.

Chaos P.F.
Disorder unleashed. 

"Refuse" & "Resist" Even Pope Francis if he Commands you to Sin!

Bishop Athanasius Schneider, in an interview with Rorate Caeli, said if a bishop orders a priest to give Holy Communion to the divorced and remarried "he commits a grave abuse of power. And when...even a pope - commands me to sin. I have to refuse this because I have to obey God."

Schneider, also, said to priests ordered to sin by giving sacrilegious Holy Communion to those in adulterous relationships:

"He has to resist even to the extent that he will lose his office. Better to lose all, but not commit sin against the Commandment of God in this case."[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjKrDMZOb_k]

Cardinal Gerhard Muller, Perfect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith, according to the Catholic website Peter One Five, said:

"A pope could not change 'inherent criteria of admission to the Sacraments' and 'sacramental absolution and allow Holy Communion for a Catholic who is in a state of mortal sin without repentance or a firm resolve to henceforth avoid that sin without thereby himself sinning with regard to the Truth of the Gospel and the Salvation of those faithful who are thus being led astray into error.'"[http://www.onepeterfive.com/bishop-schneider-if-a-bishop-or-pope-commands-me-to-sin-i-have-to-refuse/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Onepeterfive+%28OnePeterFive%29]

Parody of "Refuse/Resist" lyrics by group called Sepultura which I call "Refuse/Resist P.F.":

Chaos P.F.
Tanks on the streets
Confronting priests
Bleeding the Plebs
Raging Pope
Burning saints
Bloodshed starts
Who'll be saved?!

Chaos P. F.
Army in siege
Total alarm
I'm sick of this
Inside the Church
War is created
No man's land
What is this coprophilia?

Refuse, Resist
Refuse P.F.

Chaos P.F.
Disorder unleashed. 

Sunday, February 19, 2017

Are Pope Francis & Cupich Pro-Abortion like Kaine, Hillary & Hitler Despite Lip Service?

Would Cupich give Hitler Communion since he says Cutting up Babies is Moral Equal, much the same as, Joblessness & Anti-Environmentalism which Hitler fought Against?

Cupich: Was Hitler Pro-Life since he Agreed with many of your & Pope Francis's Consistent Ethic of Life Stances?

-Updated on November 9, 2017-


Pope Francis and Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich appears to be pro-choice like Hillary Clinton's ex-running mate Catholic Tim Kaine.

Kaine's ex-running mate Clinton, Francis and the Media liken Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler.

Ironically, it is Kaine, Hillary, Cupich and Francis who appear to resemble Hitler in his pro-choice policies.

As the German Media covered up Hitler's many scandals, the Nazi Media, also, promoted the pro-choice Hitler.

In 1933, when the Nazis came to power, one of Hitler's first acts was to legalize abortion for the "health of the mother" which meant abortion on demand. By 1935 Germany had 500,000 abortions a year.[http://www.klannedparenthood.com/nazis-and-abortion/hitler-was-pro-choice/]

Pro-choice Hitler's next step after legalizing abortion was sterilization which lead to eugenics which lead to the mass murder of not only the innocent unborn babies, but the disabled, poor, unemployed, Nazi opponents, gypsies and Jews.[http://www.klannedparenthood.com/nazis-and-abortion/hitler-was-pro-choice/]

Hillary Clinton like Hitler said she supports legalize abortion for the "health of the mother" which like Hitler means abortion on demand.

Clinton supports the killing of the 58,000,000 unborn babies aborted in the U.S.A. since 1973.

In the final presidential debate she said she supported even partial-birth abortion. Trump said it best in the debate:

"If you go with what Hillary is saying, in the ninth month, you can take the baby and rip the womb out of the mother, just prior to the birth of the baby."

The Clintons, also, followed Hitler in pushing sterilization for unwanted minorities. On March 15, 2016, the left leaning Counterpunch.com, in an article on the Clinton era called "The Clintons Do Haiti: Keep the Natives From Breeding," said:

"Clintonian population policy in Haiti...revealed in an internal U. S. Agency for International Development report, the fundamental goal of the American government is to keep the natives from breeding...and the establishment of 23 facilities to provide sterilization."[http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/15/the-clintons-in-haiti-keep-the-natives-from-breeding/]

Hillary, again, followed Hitler in supporting eugenics. Like him she thinks the disabled can be killed.

Clinton said she was in "awe" of Nazi admirer and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger who wrote that the disabled "should never be born" and promoted abortion against minorities and "morons" according to the following article by The American Spectator.

On September 22, 2016, The American Spectator in "She is not their champion at the beginning of life" said:

"She promised Planned Parenthood that she will not let concerns about eugenic abortion undermine its gains. When Indiana legislators proposed protection for unborn children diagnosed with disabilities, Hillary blasted it, saying earlier that year that "I will defend a woman's right to make her own health-care decisions" and "I'll defend Planned Parenthood against this attacks."[https://spectator.org/eugenic-hillarys-pitch-to-the-disabled/]

Of course, the Media like the Nazi Media who promoted the pro-choice Hitler, promote the Planned Parenthood eugenic abortion supporting Hillary while they cover up the scandal of the Nazi foundations of Planned Parenthood.

Clinton's vice presidential running mate "Catholic" Tim Kaine said "My faith is central to everything I do." He claims he is a faithful Catholic who accepts the teachings of the Church and is "personally opposed" to abortion.

Kaine while offering lip service to being against abortion has "a 100 percent pro-choice voting record for his time in the Senate from NARAL and Planned Parenthood" according to Religion and Politics writer Megan Sweas.[http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/05/tim-kaines-catholic-problem/]

In other words, he like Hitler and Hillary is pro-choice and for abortion on demand.

It appears that Pope Francis and Cupich like Kaine are "personally opposed" to abortion, but their actions, except for lip service, appear to show that like Kaine they are 100 percent pro-abortion.

The action records of Cupich and Francis show they are pro-choice (Francis being the first pro-choice Pope in history) who are following in the footsteps of Kaine, Hillary and Hitler?

On February 7, Lifenews.com stated 150 million to a billion babies have been killed since the twentieth century pro-abortion legislation began.

The pro-life website, farther, said that Francis "had done nothing of any substance" to stop this holocaust (after noting he is the first Pope to use a pro-abortion euphemism "interruption of pregnancy" condemned by Pope John Paul II):

"Pope Francis, while he has made some brief references to abortion in homilies or speeches, has done nothing of any substance to address this mass killing."[https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pope-francis-marks-pope-francis-marks-day-for-life-with-abortion-language-c]

Cupich like Francis has made brief references to abortion and done nothing of any substance to address the genocide of unborn babies.

Unfortunately, Cupich and Francis have not just done nothing to help the unborn babies, it appears they promotes abortionists and their anti-life causes.

The Pope and Cardinal have acted like Kaine in giving lip service to being against abortion while in action being 100 percent pro-choice.

Francis, like Clinton's running mate, has promoted abortion, anti-pro-life statues and abortionists.

Going one step farther than the Pope on the religious side, Cupich even promotes giving Holy Communion to pro-abortion politicians.

While on the policy side, Francis said he is "gratified" by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals which "promote universal access to abortion" according to Voice of the Family.com.[http://voiceofthefamily.com/pope-francis-gratified-by-un-goals-that-demand-universal-access-to-sexual-and-reproductive-health/]

The Pope "removed every single member of the Vatican pro-life academy" and changed its statues to remove "the requirement for members to sign a pro-life declaration" according to Lifenews.com.[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-has-removed-every-single-member-of-the-vatican-pro-life-academ]

Francis received, for a private audience in the Vatican, Emma Bonino. She is Italy's leading promoter of abortion, sterilization and euthanasia.

He said she was a great historical figure and stated that she was one of Italy's "forgotten greats." She performed illegal abortions and worked "with the Information Centre on Sterilization and Abortion which boasted over 10,000 abortions" according to Lifenews.com. [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/2016-the-year-pope-francis-finally-showed-his-hand]

Pope Francis's Vatican hosted Paul Ehrlick who has "called for forced abortion and mass sterilization" according to Lifenews.com.[https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pope-francis-marks-pope-francis-marks-day-for-life-with-abortion-language-c]

The Chicago Cardinal Cupich has gone farther than Francis, in terms of being sacrilegious, in saying on Face the Nation in 2014 that he would give Holy Communion to pro-abortion politicians.

Would Cupich give Hitler, who was a pro-abortion politician, Holy Communion since the Nazi dictator agreed with many of what he and Francis call their consistent ethic of life stances?

The Cardinal explicitly said cutting up babies is, morally equal, much the same as, joblessness and anti-environmentalism.

Fighting joblessness, anti-environmentalism and other secular issues are the new euphemism or cognitive re-definition of pro-life.

The progressive pro-Francis magazine Commonwealth reported that the current Pope in an article titled "How Pope Francis Refamed the Politics of Being 'Prolife'" now says:

Being "prolife" is is not a "single-issue" and, also, means '''the environment devastated by man's predatory relationship with nature'... undocumented immigrants and unemployed workers."
(Commonwealth, By John Gehring, September 13, 2017)

In 2015, the Chicago Cardinal sounded like a Nazi sympathizer when he compared the genocide of unborn babies to joblessness. He compared the "Planned Parenthood grisly traffic in aborted babies body parts to... joblessness and a broken immigration system."
("Leftist CDL Cupich In Running to Chair US Bishops' Pro-Life Committee," Church Militant, October 24, 2017)

By Cupich's Nazi sympathizer-like reasoning then Hitler's grisly death camp genocide should be conterbalanced by the fact that the Nazis government reduced unemployment from six million to one million and was one of the first to create environmental protection laws.

Francis and the Cardinal in their statements down play the abortion genocide while making climate change a top priority and appear to, also, equate environmentalism (and even tobacco smoking which was just outlawed in the Vatican) with having a consistent ethic life position.

By their reasoning Hitler was pro-life since it's not a single issue and he agreed with many of Pope Francis's consistent ethic of life stances.

Hitler had a "stance against Tobacco use" and the "Nazi's were the first to create environmental protection laws in history" according to the europeanknights project.com. (12 Things You We're Not Told About Adolph Hitler and Nazi (NSDAP) Germany," January 13, 2017)

Lifesitenews.com pointed out that Cupich said abortion "is a 'controversial issue.' It needs to be 'put behind us so the government can focus on it's budget.'"

This statement sounds like something similar to what a Nazi sympathizer would say:

The Jewish genocide is a "controversial issue," it needs to be put behind us so the government can focus on it's budget.

The pro-life news service responding to the Chicago Cardinal's statement said:

"Your Eminence, abortion is immoral because it kills... Dietrich Bonhoeffer didn't fret about train prices in Nazi Germany. He spoke truth to power about the genocide of Jews and eventually lost his life."
("Cardinal Cupich shows his priorities in responses to two different tragedies," November 8, 2017, Lifesitenews.com)

Why is the Media, and even most of the Catholic Media, covering up that Pope Francis and Cupich, in terms of their actions, appears to be pro-choice like Kaine, Hillary and Hitler?

Hillary & Pope Francis and Media Sex Abuse Cover Ups

Pope Francis, Hillary Clinton and the Media liken Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler.

However, the evidence shows that Francis, Hillary and the Media have a much better chance of winning a look-alike contest for resembling Hitler than Trump.

They resemble him in one of his most distinguishing traits as a sex-abusing pedophile pervert.

Fatvox.com reports that two studies "commissioned by the U.S. government during WWII" and a psychological analysis of Hitler said he was a "pedophile" and a "corprophile" (a person who gets perverted sexual pleasure from human feces).

GayDemon.com's gay dictionary says the homosexual street term for corprophilia is "scat." The homosexual dictionary defines it as:

"Sexual play involving human feces, including ingestion as well as decorative."

Pope Francis is not a corprophile like the Nazi tyrant. But, he appears to have a fixation on corprophilia since he has twice publicly spoken of this perversion which is rarely spoken of except in exceptionally perverted homosexual websites.

This papal knowledge of the rare perversion of Hitler, which appears on extremely depraved homosexual websites, is understandable since according to Vatican expert Sandro Magister there are a sizable "number of homosexual priests in the circle of his closest collaborators and confidants."

Francis, while a not a pedophile, has protected priests who like Hitler are pedophiles. He is widely known to cover up for and even reinstated back into the priesthood known pedophile sex abusers.

Allegedly sexually abused Juanita Broaddrick who credibly accused Bill Clinton of raping her said Trump apologized. Where is Hillary's apology? She said of Hillary's cover up of Bill's alleged rape of her. It should be added:

Where is the Media's apology for covering up for Clinton's alleged, but credible rape of Broaddrick (especially considering their bringing forward non-credible accusers against Trump of charges not as serious as rape)?

In the footsteps of the Nazi Media, Hillary, Francis and the Media will cover up for sex abuser who they think are fellow ideological comrades and attack anyone whom they think opposes their ideological agenda.

On October 14, Newt Gingrich said that on that day another media accuser of Trump was proven to be a liar.

Why was the Media so fast to bring forward proven liars to accuse Trump?

Doesn't it seem that the Media tactics resembles the Nazi Media tactics of falsely accusing Nazi opponents and covering up Nazi scandals?

Why has the Media been covering up against credible accusers of the Clintons and Francis?

The National Catholic Reporter, the respected journalist Michael Brendan Dougherty and child advocate attorney Elizabeth Yore have provided solid evidence that Francis covered up for pedophile sex abusers and even reinstated to the priesthood a known pedophile, Mauro Inzoli.

Why is the Media covering up Pope Francis's pedophile sex abuse cover up scandals?

Saturday, February 11, 2017

Pro-Abortion Pope Francis/Spadaro's Attack on Pro-Life "Value Voters" Counters John Paul II/Benedict "Emphasis" according to Vatican Expert John Allen

- Updated July 16, 2017-

Is Pope Francis pro-abortion?

Is Pope Francis's close confidant Fr. Antonio Spadaro who is called the papal "mouthpiece" directly speaking for the Pope when he attacked pro-life "value voters?"

Does the leading Catholic Vatican expert in America think Francis is going against the pro-life "emphasis" of the previous two Popes before him?

Crux editor left-leaning John Allen, who is said to be "America's leading Vaticanist" by Wikipedia, writing on the Spadaro attack piece reported:

"If you want to know what Francis himself makes of the Trump phenomenon... this is the best place to go."

"Second, this is not business as usual. It's rare for a Vatican media outlet... to comment directly on the politics of another nation, especially in a fashion that can't but be seen as fairly partisan..."

"Pope Francis and his team consciously are trying to reorient the ethos of the American church, away from the emphasis on Catholic identity and the cultural battles that dominated during the John Paul II and Benedict XVI years." (Crux, "Agree or not, it's good to know what Vatican insiders think of America," July 16, 2017)

"Value voters" and "cultural battles" are leftist code words for pro-life and pro-family Catholics whose first priority is the infallible Church teachings not liberal or secular political issues.

The Vatican expert Allen clearly shows that Spadaro's attack on pro-life "value voters" is approved and "consciously" directed by Francis himself for his own liberal and secular agenda.

He appears to be either opposed to, or at least makes secondary, not just to the last two Popes teachings, but the 2,000 year old infallible Catholic doctrines of the Church if those teachings counter his present secular liberal papal agenda.

Internationally renowned theologian Dr. Tracey Rowland agrees with Allen that Francis's teachings counterdict the previous two Pope's teachings.

Tracey, also, said Francis's Evangelii Gaudium  tends "to give priority to praxis over theory... theory-praxis... tends toward an identification of Christianity with modern, secular (liberal or Marxist) process." ("Catholic Theology," Pages 174, 192, 198, 199)

Despite what Tracey and Allen write, some in the conservative media will immediately attack the unfortunate apparent reality that Pope Francis is pro-choice if pro-life moral teachings counterdict his secular agenda.

They will say look at his written and verbal pro-life statements.

The conservative media will say look how Francis verbally defended baby Charlie Chard against his own Vatican appointee.

The logical response is:

Why did he appoint a pro-abortionist to head the Academy for Life and why doesn't the Pope fired the papal appointee if Francis is really pro-life?

As for Francis's pro-life statements, it appears that the evidence shows that they are little more than lip service, very similar to leftist Catholic Tim Kaine's pro-life and Catholic statements.

Hillary Clinton's vice presidential running mate "Catholic" Kaine said "My faith is central to everything I do." He claims he is a faithful Catholic who accepts the teachings of the Church and is "personally opposed" to abortion.

Kaine while offering lip service to being against abortion has "a 100 percent pro-choice voting record for his time in the Senate from NARAL and Planned Parenthood" according to Religion and Politics writer Megan Sweas. (Breitbart, "Tim Kaine's Catholic Problem," October 5, 2016)

In other words, he like Hillary is pro-choice and for abortion on demand.

It appears that Francis like Kaine is "personally opposed" to abortion, but his actions, except for lip service, appear to show that like Kaine he is 100 percent pro-choice.

Does Francis's record show he is the first pro-choice Pope in history who is following in the footsteps of Kaine?

On February 7, Lifenews.com stated 150 million to a billion babies have been killed since the twentieth century pro-abortion legislation began.

The pro-life website, farther, said that Francis "had done nothing of any substance" to stop this holocaust (after noting he is the first Pope to use a pro-abortion euphemism "interruption of pregnancy" condemned by Pope John Paul II):

"Pope Francis, while he has made some brief references to abortion in homilies or speeches, has done nothing of any substance to address this mass killing."

Unfortunately, he has done the opposite.

He has acted like Kaine in giving lip service to being against abortion while in action being 100 percent pro-choice. The Pope, like Clinton's running mate, has promoted abortion, anti-pro-life statues and abortionists.

Francis said he is "gratified" by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals which "promote universal access to abortion" according to voiceofthefamily.com.

The Pope "removed every single member of the Vatican pro-life academy" and changed its statues to remove "the requirement for members to sign a pro-life declaration" according to Lifenews.com.

Francis received, for a private audience in the Vatican, Emma Bonino. She is Italy's leading promoter of abortion, sterilization and euthanasia.

He said she was a great historical figure and stated that she was one of Italy's "forgotten greats." She performed illegal abortions and worked "with the Information Centre on Sterilization and Abortion which boasted over 10,000 abortions" according to Lifenews.com.

Pope Francis's Vatican hosted Paul Ehrlick who has "called for forced abortion and mass sterilization" according to LIfenews.com. (Quotes above referenced in Catholic Monitor, "Is Pope Francis Pro-Abortion like Catholic Kaine Despite Lip Service?," February 19, 2017)





Wednesday, February 01, 2017

Pope Francis Reinstated a Serial Child Sexual Abuser & Other Scandals Requiring He Resign

Pope Francis needs to resign because:

He restored the priestly faculties of serial boy sex abuser Mauro Inzoli. Francis, in doing this injustice against the boy sex abuse victims, reversed Pope Benedict XVI's just sentence against this criminal.

He gave a position of honor at the Family Synod to the infamous sex abuse cover up enabler Cardinal Danneels who refused the request for justice of a young man sexually abused by one of Danneels's Belgian Bishops.

He appointed Cardinal Errazuriz to his inner circle of nine who covered up and protected Fr. Karadima, a sexual predator of children, for years according to Karadima's appeals judge.

He appointed Juan Barros to be Bishop of Osorno, Chile, whose longtime mentor was pedophile Fr. Karadima. The Pope ignored the protests of the families and friends of the pedophile priest's victims. He, also, ignored two former seminarians who said Barros was in the room when they were abused by Karadima. Francis even mocked their outcries. (This evidence against Barros and the Pope is documented by international child advocate attorney Elizabeth Yore.)

He recently made Bishop de Kesel a Cardinal who "appointed a man who had been convicted of sexually assaulting a 16-year-old boy as a parish priest" according to Breibart.

"Pope Francis has restored to office a man ultimately responsible for the distribution of condoms and abortifacient drugs, while removing from office the man who tried to ensure that Malteser International remained faithful to Catholic teaching" according lifenews.com.