Saturday, April 29, 2017

Pope Francis/Bill Clinton Crimes vs. Bill O' Reilly/Bishop Finn Crimes

If Pope Francis and Bill Clinton were Bill O'Reilly and Bishop Robert Finn would they have been fired or forced to resign?

Put in other ways:

Do the crimes of O'Reilly/Finn pale in comparison to the crimes of Clinton/Francis?

Do the the alleged sexually inappropriate acts of the conservative Bill O'Reilly appear lightweight compared to the gravity of the liberal Clinton's alleged sexual crimes?

Does the so-called cover-up of conservative Bishop Finn appear lightweight compared to the gravity of the liberal Pope Francis's act of placing youths at risk to a known sexual predator?

Sex abuse experts psychologist Gerard van den Aardweg and Rick Fitzgerald M.D. reported:

"Pope Francis' restoring to priestly ministry an Italian priest Fr. Mauro Inzoli, who was laicized by Pope Benedict XVI for homosexually abusing adolescent males. After his priestly facilities were restored, he again repeated his homosexual abuse of youth, was arrested and imprisoned."

In the United States, a member of the hierarchy who deliberately places youth at risk of abuse by a known sexual predator is expected to resign." (Lifesitenews, March 6,2017)

The website Veneremurcernui reviewed the Finn case:

"Bishop Finn followed legal protocol and advice in his treatment of defrocked Fr. Shawn Ratigan, and removed him from service after he was found to have taken upskirt photos of underage girls. But Fr. Ratigan repeated his (comparatively minor) crime and the KC media...mounted a relentless campaign of destruction." (veneremurcerni.word.com, April 27, 2017)

Freedom Outpost reported:

Juanita "Broaddrick claims that Bill Clinton raped her twice in a hotel room in 1978 and that Hillary Clinton was involved in covering it up." (FreedomOutPost.com, April 25, 2017)

The left wing Daily Beast reviewed the boorish sexual-harassment claims against O'Reilly:

-"O'Reilly tried to kiss her."

- Accused "O'Reilly of proportioning her."

--"O'Reilly called her "hot chocolate" (she was black) and would grunted and leer at her"

- "O'Reilly had made unwanted advances at her."

-"O'Reilly would masturbate while on the phone with Mackris." (TheDailyBeast.com, April 19,2017)

The allegations against O'Reilly if true are boorish and very wrong, but they are not the serious crimes of two times raping a woman which entails prison time.

To be fair to Clinton and O'Reilly in the United States you are not guilty until proven so in a court of law.

The case against Bishop Finn is plainly unjust. There is no reason he should have been forced to resign.

Pope Francis if he was a United States bishop would have been "expected to resign."






No comments: