Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Pope Francis Adviser is Predator's Friend and has a Drug/Gay Orgy Secretary yet has Job Security

-Updated July 5, 2017-

Pope Francis's trusted adviser Cardinal Coccopalmerio's sercetary was arrested for a "drug-based homosexual orgy" in the Vatican.

Life Site News asked why Francis's close adviser Coccopalmerio doesn't get fired instead of Cardinal Gerald Muller.(lifesitenews.com, "A number of cardinals asked Pope Francis to fire Vatican doctrine chief: Jesuit mag," July 3,2017)

Apparently, being loyal to Francis's Amoris Laetitia agenda of Communion to adulterous couples is the best way to have job security with the present pope (is the implication of the pro-life website's article).

Coccopalmerio is a loyal supporter of the Amoris Laetitia agenda.

Francis's trusted adviser, also, put the pope in the position of having to reverse a sex abuse scandal where he placed youths at risk of a known sexual predator because he followed the cardinal's advice. (This Week, "A child abuse scandal is coming for Pope Francis," January 3, 2017)

This Week's Michael Brendan Dougherty said that Coccopalmerio intervened with Francis on behalf of known child sex predator Fr. Mauro Inzoli after Pope Benedict XVI had defrocked him. (lifesitenews.com, "Six cases where the sexual abuse scandal touches Pope Francis," January 25, 2016)

Francis returned Inzoli to the priestly state in 2014 and in 2016 the reinstated priest was convicted of sex abuse, again.

Sex abuse experts Gerard van den Aardweg and Rick Fitzgerald M.D. said:

"In the United States, a member of the hierarchy who deliberately places youth at risk of a known predator is expected to resign." (lifesitenews.com, "Is the pontificate of Francis in the crutches of the gay lobby?," March 6, 2017)

It was reported on June 28 that Francis re-deflocked Inzoli, after placing youths at risk in 2014 by reinstating him to the priestly state following pro-gay Coccopalmerio's advice three years ago.

Francis's pro-gay adviser made more news with Gloria TV.

Gloria TV posted that the Italian paper Il Fatto Quotidano reported that Vatican police arrested a unnamed curial official for involvement in a homosexual drug party:

The Vatican police "disrupted a homosexual drug-party in an... apartment" that "belongs to a monsignor, who was caught in flagrant... Quotidano writes that the cardinal, for whom the monsignor was working, is well over 75. This is only true for two cardinals at the Roman Curia... Cardinal Angelo Amato (79)... and pro-gay Cardinal Francesco Coccopalmerio (79)." (Gloria TV, "Homosexual Vatican Monsignor Arrested: Drugs And Gay Party," June 28, 2017)

It is all over the internet today which of the two Cardinals is the secretary's boss.

Coccopalmerio's office has a drug using gay orgy "flagrant" for a secretary who was reportedly almost about to be appointed a bishop on the recommendation of his boss, the trusted papal adviser to Francis.

What does this say of Coccopalmerio and Francis?









Saturday, June 24, 2017

Is Dictator Maduro's Pope Francis the Real "Hitler's Pope" not Pope Pius XII?

John Cromwell's book "Hitler's Pope" is a disinformation work with the narrative that Pope Pius Xll was pro-Hitler.

Rabbi David Dalin and others have "provided detailed evidence of misquotation, misrepresentation and even malice" in Cromwell's text that slanders Pius who worked against the Nazi regime. (Catholic Herald, "The end of the 'Hitler's Pope myth," March 9, 2017)

Unfortunately, it appears that Pope Francis fits the Cromwell narrative in his apparent propping up of the leftist dictator Nicolas Maduro.

First, we'll do a parody of Wikipedia's summary of "Hitler's Pope" replacing Francis for Pius then show that the facts appear to fit the parody:

The author examines the actions of Pope Francis during the leftist dictatorship era of Nicolas Maduro and explores the charges that he assisted the legitimization of the dictator's regime in Venezuela, through the pursuit of "dialogue" and silence.

He subordinated opposition to the murderous tyranny to the goal of leftist ideology. He farther argued that Francis was anti-capitalist and that this stance prevented him from caring about the brutalized and starving Venezuelan people who protested against the leftist regime.

Francis in "Laudato si" said of the free market economic system that:

"Such an economy kills"

The Pope appears to think that socialist economies such as the Venezuelan system are the model to oppose the free market system.

This may be the reason why Francis is silent about:

- the planning of government snipers to kill peaceful protesters (Miami Herald, "In secret recording Venezuelan general pushes for snipers to control demonstrators," May 18, 2017)

- of at least 70 murders by the dictatorship

-of over 3,000 arrests of demonstrators by the Maduro forces. (The Washington Post, "In Venezuela, prisoners say abuse is so bad they are forced to eat pasta mixed with excrement," June 24, 2017)

Ideology instead of reality may drive the silence.

On April 25, 2017 Caracas Chronicles.com reported:

"The U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) said this Monday that Venezuela is at risk of a food crisis.

It appears that it is the socialist economy that kills.

It appears ideology not reality may drive the silence of Francis.

Today even the left-leaning Crux, for a moment supported the above narrative saying as "the crisis deepens and the brutalization of the Venezuelan people continues, the curious case of Vatican diplomacy continues. The Pope goes silent."

Fr. Raymond de Souza in the article also wrote:

"As I wrote earlier, lack of clear condemnation by Pope Francis of the Maduro regime, at a time when the local bishops had been courageous, was compromising the credibility of the Holy See's diplomacy. It appeared that leftist Latin American autocrats were immune from the fierce language the Holy Father routinely uses for financiers or arms traders."

However, being true to the leftist tendencies of the website the article retreaded from the above narrative saying "Francis was following a master plan that just needed time to bear fruit." (Crux, "The curious diplomacy in Venezuela," June 24, 2017)

Top exiled Venezuelan freedom leader Professor Carlos Casanova disagrees with Crux about Francis having a master plan against the dictator.

The professor asked the Pope to stop continuously calling for Chamberlain/Hitler-like dialogues as Francis did again on June 5.

The Venezuelan exiled leader said foreign born dictator Maduro's regime had caused a food crisis in the country.

Casanova addressed the following to Francis saying:

"Nazi Germany held dialogues... just to have time to consolidate it's power... Not every use of force is violence. When you have a gang of foreign genocidal maniacs trying to starve a people... you are inciting a very evil form of violence, without perhaps realizing it, just by failure to rightly assess the situation." (Onepeterfive.com, "The Current Destruction of Venezuela & The Role of the Church," June 6, 2017)

The Miami Herald on February 8 said that Francis's dialogue and mediation efforts "legitimized... Maduro, throwing him a lifeline... Pope Francis... stop being an obstacle in restoration of democratic rule in Venezuela." (Miami Herald, "Pope Francis get out of Venezuela. You're only making things worse," February 8, 2017)

Thursday, June 22, 2017

Insidious Pope Francis with Bumbling Ivereigh & Walford lead to "Dissolution, Confusion, and Death"

Insidious means to proceed "in a gradual, subtle way, but with very harmful effects." (Oxford Dictionary)

Is Pope Francis insidious in bringing about Communions to the those in adulterous "second marriages" through Amoris Laetitia?

The Pope's personally chosen Special Secretary for the synods on marriage and family Archbishop Bruno Forte revealed Francis's "gradual, subtle way" of bringing about adulterous Communions to the website Zonalcale.it:

"If we speak explicitly about communion for the divorced and remarried." Archbishop Forte, reporting on a joke of Pope Francis, "you do not know what a terrible mess we will make. So we won't speak plainly, do it in a way that the premises are there, then I will draw out the conclusions." (Zonalcale.it, May, 3 2016)

Papal biographer and Crux editor Austen Ivereigh and all of Francis's inner circle as well as loyal supporters know that Forte spilled the beans on the Pope's purpose for the synods and Amoris Laetitia.

It is a given that they have to pretend that Forte didn't reveal Francis's insidiousness.

The next step for persons that are not bumblers is to invent a convincing narrative or spin that Catholics could halfway buy.

Instead Francis supporter Ivereigh claims Stephen Walford's article for the Vatican Insider is "irrefutable." (Vatican Insider, "The Magisterium of Pope Francis: His Predecessors Come to His Defence" February 2, 2017)

Walford's central argument is that Amoris Laetitia is a case of papal ordinary magisterium and to deny it's authority is to "call into question the teaching authority of previous popes and the entire fabric of Catholicism."

He claims three great Church theologians "ruled out" that a Pope can teach heresy.

His claim that the great Fr. Francisco Suarez agreed with his thesis is worst than sloppy writing. It is the opposite of the truth.

Suarez taught "it is a given that a pope could be a formal heretic." (Crisis, "Can a Pope be a Heretic?," March 4, 2015)

Scholar James Schall, S.J. said:

"Bellarmine and Suarez considered a de facto possibility of an heretical pope. They granted that the Church would have to depose him if he did not self-declare his heresy." (The Catholic Thing, "On Heretical Popes," November 11, 2014)

Walford said St. Robert Bellarmine and St. Alphonsus Liguori agreed with him.

As Schall's quote shows Bellarmine taught that the possibility of heretical popes could be piously believed despite what the saint personally believed.

As with Bellarmine, Liguori personally believed that popes could not be heretics, but like the former he did not disallow Catholics to believe in the possibility of heretical popes.

Villanova University theologian Jessica Murdoch explains magisterium authority for Walford:

"Responding faithfully to the trans-temporal magisterium of the Church (and not just to the magisterium of one's own time) requires holding in view two other principals of interpretation. First, 'the minor gives way to the major.' Second, the 'one gives way to the many.'.. Thus, Amoris Laetitia cannot supersede the encyclical Veritatis Splendor... One must privilege the harmony of the many pontificates in union with each other, and their unanimity with the Fathers and Doctors of the Church over the one seemingly dissonant voice." (First Things, "Creeping Infallibility," 9-27-16)

The article shows that to disbelieve papal teachings that are dissonant from every single magisterium teaching in the history of the Church is the only way not to "call into question the teaching authority of previous popes and the entire fabric of Catholicism."

Resisting such dissonant papal teachings, as Amoris Laetitia, is the only way not to bring about "dissolution, confusion, and death" into the Church.

In the same article, Murdoch said:

"By contrast, doctrinal evolution in which a new teaching sublates and eliminates the earlier teaching in a quasi-Hegelian fashion breeds dissolution, confusion, and death."




Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Pope Francis's & Barron's "Love Affair" with Luther's Dung/Grace Heresy & their Denial of Catholic Grace/Justification

Martin Luther, the father of the Protestant movement, believed in the heresy of imputed grace justification.

Luther's image of imputed grace was that man was a pile of dung covered with snow.

Protestant "justification" for him was totally corrupted man being covered by grace and unfree because of his corruption to fulfill the moral law.

Bishop Robert Barron on June 13 wrote Martin Luther is "a mystic of grace" and "the religious movement he launched was 'a love affair.'"

Pope Francis's love affair with Luther's justification heresy goes even farther than Barron who said "I disagree with lots of his ideas."

Francis referring to Luther said:

"Lutherans and Catholics, Protestants, all of us agree on the doctrine of justification. On this point, which is very important, he did not err." (patheos.com/blog/scotticalt, "Pope Francis is Wrong about Luther and Justification," April 5, 2017)

Francis & Barron need to explain what part of man being a pile of dung covered with snow (grace) so corrupt that he isn't free to fulfill the moral law is "not err" and a "love affair" of a "mystic of grace."

Theologian Dr. E. Christian Brugger and First Thing editor Elliott Milco agree that Francis's grace/justification teachings in Amoris Laetitia and his Argentine letter apparently are condemned as heretical by the Council of Trent.

Milco in his article "Francis's Argentine Letter And The Proper Response" counters Francis's idea of grace with the infallible Catholic teaching which says:

Trent's doctrine of infused grace said "that graces truly sanctify and liberates, and that baptized Christians are always free to fulfill the moral law, even when they fail to do so."

Pope Francis is denying the very concept of Catholic sanctifying grace and justification.

This is the greatest material error by any Pope is the entire history of the Church.

It needs to be "loudly and forcefully condemned" or it will lead to apostasy and will destroy the vast majority of Catholicism like it did European Protestantism.

Today, former Congregation for the Doctrine consultor Msgr. Nicola Bux under Pope Benedict XVI told Vatican expert Edward Pentin:

Pope Francis could stem the 'confusion and apostasy"... by 'correcting' his own 'ambiguous and erroneous words and acts." (lifesitenews.com, "Only Pope Francis can end the 'apostasy' his words caused: Italian monsignor," June 21, 2017)


Thursday, June 15, 2017

"Dante's Warning": Burke & Cardinals Remember that "Darkest places in Hell... for... Neutrality in Times of Moral Crisis" says Vatican Expert

Before we get to the Vatican expert statement in this post we need to rehash a previous post:

If Francis or any Pope "formally professed heresy," he would "automatically" cease to be Pope" according to Cardinal Raymond Burke.
(Catholic World Report on December 19, 2016)

On December 23, 2016 Cardinal Walter Brandmuller, one of the four Cardinals of the dubia, said:

"Whoever thinks that persistent adultery and reception of Holy Communion are compatible is a heretic and promotes schism."[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/dubia-cardinal-anyone-who-opens-communion-to-adulterers-is-a-heretic-and-pr]

What Brandmuller declared is a heretical position is Pope Francis's heretical position unless he corrects the Argentina Bishop Msgr. Macin who he appointed in 2013.

Unless Francis formally corrects the apparent heretical position which Bishop Macin announced is Francis's position he risks correction and could "automatically" cease to be Pope by the judgment of the College of Cardinals according to Burke. (To read the previous post click below.)[http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2016/12/if-kasper-is-right-then-pope-francis.html?m=1]

Rotate Caeli reported:

Macin "publicly announced that according to norms send in a letter 6 months ago by Pope Francis... the... divorced and remarried... (by order of the Pope) To Include Them In Full And Sacramental Communion... in the ceremony. At no point was mention made that those people had taken a vow of chastity... "

"In the same way, communion was given to all those mentioned (some 30 couples)." (Rotate Caeli.com, June 13, 2017, "Breaking: Argentinian Bishop Organizes Special Mass to Give Communion to Adulterous Couples, Cites Pope Francis")

If it is true that the 30 divorced and " remarried" couples have not made a vow of chastity, then the Pope must stop the adulterous Communions.

The Bishop Macin adulterous Communion "ceremony" must be corrected by Pope Francis or the four Cardinals must issue the correction to the Pope if there is no vow of chastity involved with the "ceremony." (Life Site News has confirmed the Rotate Caeli report.)

The moral crisis, and "doctrinal anarchy" as Vatican expert Edward Pentin wrote of yesterday, in the Church caused by Francis has reached the point where all faithful Catholics must plea that Cardinal Burke and the four Cardinals issue the correction.

That is the purpose of this post.

A Vatican expert who has met Pope Francis and wishes to remain anonymous gave the Catholic Monitor a impassioned statement to this purpose saying:

"Raymond Burke is the epitome of humility, holiness and brilliance."

"I love Cardinal Burke, but I've run out of patience. I am in the spitting nails mood after the latest Pontifical Academy for Life abortion advocate appointment."

This impassioned statement is titled End the Bergoglio Borgata:

The persistent silence of the College of Cardinals and the Bishops signifies their cowardice and neutrality. They invoke omerta in the face of the Bergoglio Borgata which has knee-capped the Catholic Church, decimating it with modernism and secular populism.  The Cardinals seemingly choke with fear as Francis supplants the Magisterium with his own doctrinal brand of liberation theology. They watch silently as he guts the FFI, the Knights of Malta, the Pontifical Academies, and stacks the  College of Cardinals with his liberal lackeys to ensure that Francis minions dominate the Chair of Peter for generations.

How often have we heard cardinals, bishops and priests whisper, 'we will wait Francis out, he is old, and has only one lung.' 

How’s that strategy working? 

How much more destruction are you willing to endure, silently watching, remaining neutral in this time of moral crisis in the Catholic Church?

Remember the words of St. Cajetan, “you must resist the Pope who openly destroys the Church.” 

While the clerics sit on the sidelines, the laity is not content to watch Rome burn during this papacy, knowing that the true scandal is not the vociferous criticism of Francis; the real scandal is the papacy of Jorge Bergoglio and the complicit silence of the hierarchy.

And, questions persist about the hierarchy.

Is there a real man left in the Vatican to speak up and save Holy Mother Church from this disastrous papacy ? 

Is it too much to ask you to lay down your riches, titles, and honor, at the end of your earthly lives, for Holy Mother Church? 

Are you content to be made a laughingstock with your Dubia Demand which goes ignored and unanswered for nearly 9 months? 

Are there any men in the College of Cardinals left who are willing to fight for Holy Mother Church, like the legions of men in the traditional Catholic blogoshere?

Knowing that the St. Gallen Mafia plotted and schemed the spurious election of Bergoglio, why would you, Cardinals passively condone his scandalous appointments, his heretical pronouncements, and his tyrannical firings, without speaking out in united protest? 

It’s time to break the code of silence.  ‘Show up Time’ has long past. Time to put on your big boy pants and blow the lid off this modernist and heretical papacy. The Resistance is upon us.

What does the Resistance look like? 

The Rome Midnight Poster Brigade was a good first start.

The Dubia Demand offered hope and clarity, but unanswered remains a hollow threat. 

Creativity, bravery, and prayer are required to launch an offensive to SAVE OUR CHURCH.

Bergoglio is increasingly vulnerable, exposed, and obviously flawed. The time is long over to stop protecting this papal wrecking ball who scandalizes the faithful every time he opens his mouth. 

Who could forget the merciful Francis who haughtily chastised Cardinal Mueller, “I am the Pope, I don’t have to give you reasons for firing your 3 best priests at the CDF.”  Hardly the  conciliatory and humble words of a man who espouses dialogue and consultation.  As Aesop cautioned, “any excuse will serve a tyrant.” 

Time to shed the comfort of your mitre, your title, and your coat of arms. 

Have you forgotten that Dante warned that “the darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis?” 

In the words of St Catherine of Siena, “Proclaim the truth and don’t be silent through fear.”

Tuesday, June 06, 2017

Top Venezuelan: Pope Francis Stop "Inciting... Evil" by "Communists" with call for Hitler/Chamberlain-like "Dialogue""

Exiled top Venezuelan freedom leader Professor Carlos Casanova fled the country after he "received warnings and threats" from the leftist government.

He is pleading with Pope Francis to stop propping up the leftist tyranny.
(Onepeterfive.com, "The Current Destruction of Venezuela & The Role of the Church" by Carlos A. Casanova, June 6, 2017)

In the article for Onepeterfive.com, Professor Casanova explained in detail how the Chamberlain/Hitler-like dialogues that Pope Francis keeps calling for, and again called for on June, 5, are keeping the Colombian born tyrant and his regime in power.

Foreign born dictator Maduro's government is starving the poor people of Venezuela to the point that they are eating rats said the professor.

Casanova, hoping to save his country, wrote:

"I address the following to Pope Francis:"

"Totalitarian movements use dialogue just as an excuse to disarm the adversary, and only when they feel weak. Nazi Germany held dialogues... just to have time to consolidate its power... Once Hitler felt strong, he did not dialogue. The Communists in Venezuela do the same... The people of Venezuela have the right to legitimate self-defense."

"Not every use of force is violence. When you have a gang of foreign genocidal maniacs trying to starve a people to death... you are inciting a very evil form of violence, perhaps without realizing it, just by the failure to rightly assess the situation."