Tuesday, June 19, 2018

It's not about Child/Parent Separation, but Child Abuse, Smuggling & possibly Sex Trafficking by Parents handing their Children to "Human Smugglers" & Drug Cartels

Most Americans don't realize how dangerous and corrupt the Mexican border towns are:

When I visited a Mexican border town about 8 years ago to visit a relative of a in-law, the town mayor had just been killed probably by the local Mexican drug cartel.

A friend and relative of mind were attacked and beaten by the border townspeople when they protested about being cheated. Luckily, the Mexican police arrested them and they were able to bribe their way back to the USA.

Even Wikipedia admits that those who traffic in bringing people over the borders called "Coyotes" or "human smugglers" have a "growing association with drug cartels."

What kind of parents would allow their children to be involved with "human smugglers" and drug cartels or hand them over to them?

Yesterday,  DHS Secretary Kirsten Nielsen told Breitbart:

""10,000 of the 12,000 [ children "in the care of HHS right now"] were sent here alone by their parents."

If anyone in the US handed their children over to "human smugglers" and drug cartels, they would be arrested for child abuse.

Child abuse is when parents or caregivers through actions or failing to act, causes injury, death, emotional harm or risk to the underaged boy or girl.

Freedomoutpost.com, today, noted:

The "footage recently released by the HHS...[is]  only boys ages 10 and up. Where are the girls?"

What do drug cartels do besides sell drugs and do human smuggling?

Prostitution is usually another business of drug cartels.

What kind of child abusing parents would hand over their sons and daughters to "human smugglers" and drug cartels who possibly are, also, dealing in sex trafficking and prostitution?

"Where are the girls?"

Pray an Our Father now for the poor children of such parents.



Saturday, June 16, 2018

Hypocrisy: Cdl. Dolan's Double Standard for Citizen Lawbreakers vs. Illegal Alien Lawbreakers

Cardinal Timothy Dolan has never said that it is "God's law" that US citizen parents who break the law which causes them to be jailed can't be separated from their children.

If it is "God's law" that parents who break the law must never be separated from their children then Dolan needs to demand that all US citizen parents in New York City jails separated from their children immediately be released or placed in facilities where they can be together.

It appears that Dolan means only illegal aliens are above the law and may illegally break the laws of our country.

Apparently, Dolan supports New York City "sanctuary laws" which according to the New York Post says critics claim "shields undocumented aliens who commit... sexual abuse, prescription drug sales, bribery, money laundering, harassment, grand larceny and drunk driving, from federal detention and deportation." 

Staten Island Assemblywoman Nicole Malliotakis said:

"It's almost as if the City Council is more interested in protecting illegal immigrants than the safety of the very citizens they represent."
(New York Post, "This NYC laws shields illegal aliens who commit crimes," March 6, 2016)

Is Dolan more "interested in protecting illegal immigrants than the safety of" US citizens?

Does he think illegal aliens have rights while US citizens aren't allowed to have the same rights under "God's law"?

Dolan is a hypocrite unless he goes on CNN and demands all citizen parent lawbreakers who are separated from their children be immediately reunited.

According to pychopathfree.com, hypocrites are "hyper-aware of minor (or non-existent) wrongdoings, while actively dismissing anything that they themselves are doing wrong."

Here are a few examples of things that according to Dolan, apparently, are not against "God's Law":

- LifeSiteNews reported Dolan said Met Gala costumes of a "sexualized Blessed Virgin Mary, Rihanna dressed as a pope and 'flesh-flashing' outfits adorned with Christian  symbols" were not "blasphemous."

-Church Militant reported Dolan was sued by parishioners for "covering up for a homosexual priest who stoled millions from parishes to finance a sadomasochistic sex life."

According to Church Militant, Dolan allowed gay groups into the St. Patrick's Day Parade, but no "pro-life group has ever been allowed, though several applications have been made."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Friday, June 15, 2018

Rosenstein must be Fired for Obstructing Congressional investigation of Top FBI agent Strzok and the Upper Leadership of the FBI attempting to overturn US Rule of Law

The just released Department of Justice IG report reveals that top FBI agent Peter Strzok and the upper leadership of the FBI were attempting to overturn the rule of law by fixing the last presidential election.

Also, apparently, Department of Justice Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was obstructing "a congressional investigation" into the FBI scandal according to House Intel Committee Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes.

Personal attorney to President Donald Trump Rudy Giuliani, yesterday, said "Strzok should be in jail":

"Rosenstein and Jeff Sessions have a chance to redeem themselves and that chance comes about tomorrow. It doesn't go beyond tomorrow. Tomorrow, Mueller should be suspended and honest people should be brought in, impartial people to investigate these people like Peter Strzok. Strzok should be in jail by the end of next week."
[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/06/14/giuliani_mueller_must_suspend_investigation_send_strzok_to_jail.html]

There is no reason to believe Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein will redeem himself. Rosenstein needs to be fired immediately and replaced by "impartial people to investigate these people like Peter Strzok."

Yesterday, House Intel Committee Chairman Rep. Nunes (R-CA) called the Strzok-Page text messages released with the Department of Justice (DOJ) IG report which were redacted a "classic case of obstruction" against Congress by Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein's DOJ:

 "Why did I find out about that, today, at noon?" Nunes asked. "How could that have possibly have been redacted?"

"I mean, this is a classic case of obstruction, but then, the question is, who’s going to go investigate these guys?" he said.

 "These are emails or text messages that somebody held from us, so every day that goes by, there is a new example of obstruction of a congressional investigation," Nunes said. "The same people in charge today still believe they can run the clock out, and they're trying to run the clock out for the rest of this Congress so we can't finish our investigations."

"I want to read, to you, an exchange between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, the star-crossed lovers. She basically said, you know, she was worried (ph) he’s -- Donald Trump’s not going to get elected, right, right. And he answers, basically, don’t worry, we’ll stop it. No, no, no, no, we’ll stop it," FOX News' Ingraham Angle host Laura Ingraham said to the Congressman.

"He was the lead investigator on the Clinton e-mail case," Nunes responded. "He’s the lead investigator that starts off the counter intelligence investigation, using our intelligence agencies to go after and target the Trump campaign. This is the guy who leads that off, but worse than all that, worse than all that, and I just want to repeat what I said, in the opening."
[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/06/14/nunes_on_strzok_text_how_could_that_have_possibly_been_redacted_classic_case_of_obstruction.html]

Nunes said his staff has "felt threatened" by Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein and people should be concerned about "obstruction" of a Congressional investigation:

 "The staff definitely have felt threatened. Just recently, the staff were all kicked out of the room. What people should be concerned about the most right now is obstruction of a valid congressional investigation by the Department of Justice," House Intel Committee Chairman said.

 "The problem we have here is who's going to investigate the investigators?" Nunes stated.[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/06/14/nunes_rosenstein_obstructing_a_congressional_investigation_whos_going_to_investigate_the_investigators.html]

Pray an Our Father now for the complete restoration of the rule of law to the United States.

Saturday, June 09, 2018

Peronist Pope Francis's Theology is "Strongly Evocative of the [German] National Socialist concept of the 'Volk'" according to Renowned Theologian Rowland

The executive director of Catholic News Agency and the editor of a papal biography on the current pope, Alejandro Bermudez, says:

The "biggest impact on Francis' thought were Jesuit Fr. Juan Carlos Scannone... a professor of young Fr. Bergoglio- as well as Argentinian Fr. Lucio Gera."
(Catholic News Agency, "The theological formation of Pope Francis," March 17, 2018)

Scannone is a "second generation disseminator" of Gera's Theology of the People which governs Francis's thought and papacy according to Latin America and Pope Francis expert Claudio Ivan Remeseira.

According to Remeseira, the "thinking of Pope Francis has been shaped by two specifically Argentinian factors... Peronist theologians and priests [such as Scannone who] seek to reconcile their political beliefs with the ecclesiology of the People of God championed by Vatican II."

This amounted to a mixture of Franco-like Fascist Peronism with Peronist leftist secular socialism that was the "Argentine social-welfare state" which Remeseira called "National-populist ideology" and the belief that "popular culture is... the sign of the Holy Spirit's presence in the community":

"[T]he Peronist... terminology was reminiscent of Francoist Spain, but instead of turning the country into a National-Catholic regime, Peron turned around the relationship between Church and State... Argentina morphed into a secular National-populist ideology.... [with] [o]ther characteristics of Peronism common with Fascism... fervent nationalism... the identification of Party and Nation as one."

"The centerpiece of this ideology was the charismatic relationship between Leader and People... the religious undertones of Peronism were captured by Evita [wife of Peron], the [Virgin Mary-like] mediator between the Leader and the masses [the "People"]... When Evita died... a saint-like cult of her memory rapidly spread across the country."

"... [D]uring his doctoral studies in Germany, Gera... 'became familiar with... the Tubingen school... teachings about the spirit of the people", the volkgeist."

"The ethnic essentialism associated with the notion of the volk had a peculiar spin in Argentina... the mestizo population that had been displaced by the those immigrants. The displacement of the lesser-skilled labor force by the [Peronist] gringos... [a] majority of the Argentinian churchmen- including Bergoglio- were themselves first or second generation European ["gringos"] immigrants; their awareness of, and in some cases, their feelings of guilt, help explain their support for Peron and their entrenched dislike of capitalism."

"In this theology, the People are defined in a narrow sense as the poor and the dispossessed..."

"... [the "People's"] Latin American Catholicism... a suspicious mélange of pre-Christian beliefs, half-baked Catechism precepts, and outright superstitions. Gera... develop[ed]... as key to the spiritual renovation of the Church."
(Medium, "Pope Francis, Peron and God's People: The Political Religion of Jorge Mario Bergoglio," September 17, 2017)

Renowned theologian Tracey Rowland says that the "Argentinian 'People's Theology" gives:

A "privileged epistemological standing to the 'people' similar to that given to the proletariat class by Marxist theorists and to the 'Volk' by the German National Socialist...To European ears', the notion of 'the people' enjoying some kind of special epistemological status is strongly evocative of the National Socialist concept of the 'Volk'... Scannone would argue... their spirituality is based on [popular culture as explained by Gera] Christian beliefs, not Norse mythology."
(Catholic Theology, page 182)

To a large extent, Pope Francis's Theology of the People, it appears, is not based on Revelation.

Francis's thinking appears, to a large extent, to be based on a theology that believes the "key to the spiritual renovation of the Church" is the People's "pre-Christian beliefs, half-baked Catechism precepts and outright superstitions" and is "strongly evocative of the [German] National Socialist concept of the 'Volk'" as well as the Argentinian Peronist mixture of Franco-like Fascist and leftist socialist secular political beliefs.

Please say an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Thursday, June 07, 2018

Behind the Scenes War between Pope Francis and Cdl. Parolin?

Is there a behind the scenes war between Pope Francis and Cardinal Pietro Parolin?

-As Vatican expert Sandro Magister reported on May 20, Francis did not follow Parolin's Vatican Secretariat of State script or text against the Venezuelan regime provided for the press.

-The Spectator in December said that "some Catholic observers are speculating" it was Parolin's  "forces inside the Secretariat of State" who leaked the scandal reports on Francis's close collaborator Vice-Pope Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga.

-Gloria.tv says " the second man in the Vatican Secretariat of State" Archbishop Giovanni Angelo Becciu "a blind follower of Francis" is rumoured to be in "conflict with his boss... Parolin" is in order to be made cardinal to "be removed."

-Why was the close collaborator, personal theologian and reportedly the writer of most of Francis's major Pontifical documents, Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez, suddenly promoted to a major diocese in Argentina and removed from the face to face intimate informal inner circle of the Pope in the Vatican which is the way Francis reportedly makes most of his decisions?

-According to Vatican expert Ed Condon the "inner circle's monopoly is strengthened by Francis's impatience with long meetings. He prefers brief personal chats and informal briefings." ( Catholic Herald, "Five years on: the paradox of Francis's papacy," March 8, 2017)

-According to a Gloria.tv headline in a February podcast from the Spectator Canon lawyer and Vatican expert Condon revealed "Parolin's Campaign to be Pope Desperate after China Fiasco."

-Parolin who apparently controls the Vatican communications apparatus it appears had a statement issued that said Francis stands behind his China disaster while the Pope told Chinese hero Cardinal Joseph Zen another narrative counter to the statement and has never personally confirmed the Vatican statement.

-Zen has rebuked Parolin calling him a "man of little faith" and Francis has not come to the Secretariat of State's defense.

-According to en.news and Choosing-him.blogspot Vatican expert Condon in the Spectator podcast "refers to Parolin's" failure of Francis's "Apostlic Journey to Chile" which is the biggest public relations disaster of the papacy which at least one commentator has said smelled like a booby trap.

Francis probably is not too happy with Parolin over the Chile disaster, as spoken about by Condon, whether it was a trap or not set by the Secretariat of State who is reported to have the ambition to be the next pope.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


-


Saturday, June 02, 2018

Is Pope Francis a Practical Atheist who is promoting Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit according to Pope John Paul II?

Pope Francis's Amoris Laetitia theology of conscience as the supreme tribunal can, to some extent, be summed up as promoting "the person who claims to have a 'right' to persist in evil-in any sin at all-and who thus rejects Redemption... as it were an impenetrability of conscience."

Many who follow Amoris Laetitia may apparently be rejecting Redemption.

Catholics who are open to the redefinition of “mercy” to mean the conscience is the supreme tribunal may cease to be Christians because they deny that the Incarnate God-man Jesus Christ died to save us from our sin. The conscience as supreme tribunal denies mercy because if there is no objective sin to be forgiven and one doesn’t have by grace the power to overcome sin then the cross of Christ is emptied of its power.

Pope John Paul II in DOMINUM ET VIVIFICANTEM On the Holy Spirit in the Life of the Church
and the World said:


"Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, then, is the sin committed by the person who claims to have a 'right' to persist in evil-in any sin at all-and who thus rejects Redemption. One closes oneself up in sin, thus making impossible one's conversion, and consequently the remission of sins, which one considers not essential or not important for one's life. This is a state of spiritual ruin, because blasphemy against the Holy Spirit does not allow one to escape from one's self-imposed imprisonment and open oneself to the divine sources of the purification of consciences and of the remission of sins."

"The action of the Spirit of truth, which works toward salvific 'convincing concerning sin,' encounters in a person in this condition an interior resistance, as it were an impenetrability of conscience... Pope Pius XII had already declared that 'the sin of the century is the loss of the sense of sin,'186 and this loss goes hand in hand with the 'loss of the sense of God.' In the Exhortation just mentioned we read: 'In fact, God is the origin and the supreme end of man, and man carries in himself a divine seed. Hence it is the reality of God that reveals and illustrates the mystery of man. It is therefore vain to hope that there will take root a sense of sin against man and against human values, if there is no sense of offense against God, namely the true sense of sin.'"
[http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_18051986_dominum-et-vivificantem.html]

Francis's apparent "loss of the sense of sin" and the "sense of offense against God" seems to point towards a type of practical atheism on his part.

The Catholic News Agency (CNA) headline on December 7, 2013 at the beginning of the pontificate of Pope Francis summarized his talk that day and his whole non-transcendent papacy in which he ironically spoke of 'practical atheism' as neglect of human dignity without talking about "the loss of the sense of sin" and the "sense of offense against God":

"Pope [Francis]: Neglect of human dignity causes 'practical atheism'"

In the CNA article Francis says "This false model of man and society effects a practical atheism (by) denying, de facto, the Word of God that says ' let us make man in our image," but then when speaking of  "rights," "dignity," and a "throw-away culture" never mentions "the loss of a sense of sin" or the "sense of offense against God" or the transcendent. 

The "Word of God" is used as a means to talk of the non-transcendent "material rights and dignity of the human person."

The Argentinain Pope's talk and, for the most part, his papacy has shown a "indifference to... the transcendent."

Pope John Paul II in a General Audience on April 1999, on the other hand, explained that practical atheism is "indifference to... the transcendent. The Polish Pope said:

"The contemporary era has devastating forms of 'theoretical' and 'practical' atheism. Secularism... with its indifference to ultimate questions and... the transcendent." (Vatican.va>hf_jp_ii_ 14041999)

Francis's primary focus on only earthly human dignity, it appears, could be a form of practical atheism or secularism.

The Pope rarely focuses on "ultimate questions and... the transcendent" such as heaven and hell as well as the Last Judgment, but almost always on non-transcendent issues that tend to bring leftist pro-abortion politicians into power such as radical environmental issues, leftist economic policies and unlimited immigration.

This form of practical atheism has brought about the Pope's seamless garment teachings which we will see appears to be a form of Kantian practical atheism.

The upcoming abortion holocaust in Ireland can, to some extent, be blamed on the Irish bishops following Pope Francis's seamless garment "pro-life" teachings that equates killing innocent human life with pro-abortion politician issues such as the death penalty, leftist economic policies and radical ecology policies.

Even after the abortion referendum was overwhelming lost, to some extent, due to the seamless garment focus as well as inaction by Francis and the Irish bishops, Dublin Bishop Diarmuil Martin had the gall to call for more seamless garment Kantian practical atheism. Martin said:

"Pro-life means being alongside... economic deprivation, homelessness and marginalization." (Crux, "After abortion loss, Irish prelates look to pope's vision of 'pro-life," May 27, 2017)

The seamless garment teachings of Francis and the Irish bishops, to some extent, can be blamed for the coming death of thousands even millions of babies

This teachings come about because of their conscious or unconscious Kantian practical atheism which is this world materialistic and tends to exclude the eternal.

The practical atheist Immanuel Kant while not explicitly denying the existence of God said:

"God is not a being outside me but merely a thought within me." (Fr. Stanley Jaki, Angels, Apes and Men, page 10)

Below is a summary of the type of Kantian practical atheism which appears to be part of the thinking of Francis and the Irish bishops.

In this part of the academic article "Categorical imperatives impair Christianity in culture" by scholar Douglas A. Ollivant it is explained that Kantian practical atheism infiltrated Catholicism and gives a background, to some extent, to why the protection of the unborn ended in Ireland.(July 20, 2010, Religion and Liberty, Volume 13, Number 4):

"In his must-read Christian Faith and Modern Democracy, Robert Kraynak introduces us to the concept of 'Kantian Christianity.'  Kraynak claims that the 'Kantian influence on modern Christianity is … deep and pervasive.'” 

 "What he means is that Christian thinkers no longer speak about culture and politics in terms of the more enduring principles of moral virtue, law, and the common good but now focus on social justice, understood as solely the immediate, material rights and dignity of the human person..."


"The rights and dignity of each person replaces moral and theological virtues: rational and spiritual perfection. Further, an emphasis on personal autonomy or personal identity diminishes long-established Christian teachings about the dependence of the creature on the Creator, original sin, grace, and a natural law through which human beings may share or “participate” in eternal law..."

"But the most flagrant use of categorical imperatives in our current political culture deals with life issues. It must be stated up front that no practicing Christian disputes that life is one of the most precious gifts that God has given to us. The second century “Letter to Diognetus” bears testimony to early Christians not taking part in the Roman custom of 'exposing [or 'discarding'] their offspring' – the preferred method of pagan infanticide for the weak or unwanted."


"But to speak of a “culture of life” – if used simply to express a “seamless garment” univocal defense against any taking of life – has become a categorical imperative. For instance, the core of what we might call the “Bernadin project” is that Christians (in this case Catholics) must dogmatically oppose and fight against any early termination of human life. But this understanding fails to see that there may be an important, and even a critical, difference between a true culture of life and a “culture of merely life.” The former taking into account the authentic existence of human beings within not only the material realm, but also the immaterial, the spiritual; the latter limiting human existence to the breathing of the air in this temporal world only."


 "To quote at length from Kraynak:

'Proclaiming a right to life easily turns into the claim that biological existence is sacred or that mere life has absolute value, regardless of whether it is the life of an innocent unborn child, or the life of a heinous criminal. And the claim that life is a “right” diminishes the claim that life is a “gift” from God: How can a gift be a right? Proclaiming a right to life eventually leads to the mistaken idea of a “seamless garment of life” that is indistinguishable from complete pacifism or a total ban on taking life, including animal life, even for just and necessary causes. It also makes one forget that the good life, not to mention the afterlife, is a greater good than merely being alive in the present world – an unintended but significant depreciation of Christian otherworldliness.'"
This "depreciation of Christian otherworldliness" appears in certain teachings in Amoris Laetitia which are exactly the opposite of Church doctrine in Familiaris Consortio as well as "explicitly atheist" and deny the existence of objective truth according to Veritatis Splendor.

 Father Raymond J. de Souza said:


 "Veritatis Splendor, entitled 'Lest the Cross of Christ Be Emptied of Its Power,' warns precisely against the view that the demands of the moral life are too difficult and cannot be lived with the help of God’s grace. Chapter 8 of Amoris Laetitia appears to be exactly what St. John Paul II had in mind in writing Veritatis Splendor."
[
http://m.ncregister.com/daily-news/debating-amoris-laetitia-a-look-aheaquestionsXOIYwi]

The Pope's semi-official newspaper L'Osservatore Romano wrote:


"There are complex situations where the choice of living “as brothers and sisters” becomes humanly impossible and give rise to greater harm (see AL, note 329)."[http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Item/5346/a_malta_laetitia.aspx]



Pope John Paul II in Veritatis Splendor wrote:

"Certain currents of modern thought have gone so far as to exalt freedom to such an extent that it becomes an absolute... This is the direction taken by doctrines which have lost the sense of the transcendent or which are explicitly atheist. The individual conscience is accorded the status of a supreme tribunal of moral judgment which hands down categorical and infallible decisions about good and evil... But in this way the inescapable claims of truth disappear."[http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Item/5346/a_malta_laetitia.aspx]

Pope John Paul II in Familiaris Consortio wrote:


"This means, in practice, that when, for serious reasons, such as for example the children's upbringing, a man and a woman cannot satisfy the obligation to separate, they take on themselves the duty to live in complete continence, that is, by abstinence from the acts proper to married couples."[http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Item/5346/a_malta_laetitia.aspx]

Pope Francis and the papal inner circle appear to have redefined mortal sin and adultery in a way that is contrary to the 2,000 year infallibly doctrine of the Catholic Church.

They redefine adultery as a "irregular relationship" and say mortal sin is not mortal sin because of the ultimacy of conscience.


 This redefinition of Catholic conscience tells the murderer, rapist, sex abuser, the person in adultery or anyone in objective mortal sin that they are not in mortal sin if they are at "peace" with it, if the sinful behavior is "humanly impossible" to change, "if they can't change their sinful behavior" or don't know it is wrong. 


Under these conditions, they say those in objective mortal sin may receive Holy Communion without forming their conscience and changing their sinful behavior.


 Their redefinition of conscience is wrong. As St. Thomas said "An erroneous conscience may bind, but it does not excuse" as the great moral philosopher Ralph McInerny wrote:


 "I think murder is wrong, but make up your own mind...It is pretty clear that we do not really accept the ultimacy of conscience in this way. That the rapist and the one raped have different views on the morality of rape does not much interest us when we consider the kind of deed it is."


"Each agent is obligated to follow his conscience, but this is not tantamount to saying that every agent has a well formed conscience. It is erroneous to believe that theft is permitted. It is wrong to hold that adultery is all right...If it is erroneous, we will be interested in his changing it. Indeed, we often prevent people from acting on their real or alleged views when those views are erroneous. Professional thieves are not considered to have an interesting and defensible concept of private property. As Thomas put it, an erroneous conscience may bind, but it does not excuse." (Ralph McInerny, "Ethica Thomistica," 1982, 1997, page 110-111)


Carl Olson wrote that Amoris Laetitia moves Nietzsche-like beyond even invincible ignorance or a erroreous conscience to the depravity of making the individual conscience a "supreme tribunal of moral judgement... in this way the inescapable claims of truth disappear":

"Amoris Laetitia, especially chapter 8... As Dr. E. Christian Brugger
argued in these pages back in April 2016, remarking on AL 305: 'In this passage, the German bishops get all they want':"



"But the passage does not presume that the sinner is in invincible ignorance or that the pastor supposes that. The passage supposes that people who are objectively committing adultery can know they are 'in God’s grace', and that their pastor can know it too... The pastor must help them find peace in their situation, and assist them to receive “the Church’s help”, which (note 351 makes clear) includes 'the help of the sacraments... '"

"Pastors should help them discern if their situation is acceptable, even if it is 'objectively' sinful, so they can return to the sacraments."
[http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Item/5346/a_malta_laetitia.aspx]


 
Every Pope and saint in the history of the Catholic Church would have rejected the above passage of Amoris Laetitia.

Every Pope and saint in history would say every Catholic is obliged to have a well formed conscience and have a firm amendment not to commit mortal sin in order to receive Holy Communion. 


The infallible Church doctrine of Trent teaches that God gives everyone the grace to repent and overcome sinful behavior. 

These Catholic Church doctrines can't be redefined, even by the Pope, because they are part of Revelation.


Catholics who are open to the redefinition of "mercy" to mean the conscience is the supreme tribunal may cease to be Christians because they deny that the Incarnate God-man Jesus Christ died to save us from our sins.

Pope John Paul II's Veritatis Splendor warns against this passage of Amoris Laetitia in the third part called "Lest the Cross of Christ Be Emptied of its Power."

The conscience as supreme tribunal denies mercy because if there is no objective sin to be forgiven and one doesn't have by grace the power to overcome sin then the cross of Christ is emptied of its power.

Pope Francis and the papal inner circle who are ostracizing the Dubia Cardinals for questioning the parts of Amoris Laetitia that reject Veritatis Splendor are apparently rejecting the cross of Christ and saying it has lost its power.

They talk a lot about atheistic secular issues and social work, but rarely or never about life after the death of the body, salvation and damnation.

Francis and his inner circle say Jesus had authority because he was (past tense) a servant, but rarely or never that Jesus had authority because he is (eternal now) God.

One reason that they rarely or never talk about the four last things is that apparently in making individual conscience supreme, they deny truth, the authority of God and implicitly the existence of God.

Pope John Paul II said in Veritatis Splendor:

"Certain currents of modern thought... are explicitly atheist. The individual conscience is accorded the status of a supreme tribunal of moral judgment... about good and evil... in this way the inescapable claims of truth disappear."


This may be a valid question to ask Pope Francis and the papal inner circle who promote these redefinitions:

Do you believe that the conscience is the supreme tribunal or do you believe in the Incarnation and salvation, as every Pope and saint in history has believed, since you appear to deny the very words of Jesus Christ and his Church that He died to save us from our sins by your theology of conscience?


 John Paul II taught that anyone who thinks as you do on the individual conscience being a supreme tribunal is a "explicit atheist."

 Pray a Our Father now for the restoration of the Church. 
























Monday, May 21, 2018

Heretical: Francis's "God made you" Gay attributed quote must be Publicly Denied or Pope will answer for it on Judgement Day

Worldwide headlines are quoting gay priest abused victim Juan Carlos Cruz as saying that Pope Francis heretically stated that homosexuality is not intrinsically disordered contrary to the Catholic Church's infallible teachings as reaffirmed by Pope Benedict XVI and Pope John Paul II.

Benedict when still a Cardinal heading John Paul's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith wrote:

"Although the particular inclination of the homosexual person is not a sin, it is a more or less tendency ordered toward an intrinsic moral evil; and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder."
(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Pastoral Care of Homosexual Persons," October 1, 1986)

The Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2357 and 2359, states:

"[H]omosexual acts are intrinsically disordered... Homosexual persons are called to chastity."

Cruz quotes Francis as saying:

"God made you [a homosexual which is a objective disorder which tends to intrinsic moral evil] like this and loves you like this and it doesn't matter to me."

To put this quote in the proper context, one needs to put the quote in the context of another intrinsic disorder such as pedophilia:

"God made you [a paedophile which is a objective disorder which tends to intrinsic moral evil] like this and loves you like this and it doesn't matter to me."

God makes no one a paedophile or a homosexual.

Original sin, fallen nature, homosexual sex abuse such as Cruz experienced and other experiences such as family pathologies as well as misuse of free will can bring this disorders into existence which are allowed by God, but not made by Him.

To say that God makes someone objectively disordered with a tendency to do intrinsic moral evil is a heretical statement.

A intrinsic disorder is an evil.

Many heresies in the history of the Church have been condemned for claiming God made or created evil.

Obviously, God loves everyone, but because He loves them He calls them not to commit intrinsically evil sexual sins such as pedophilia or homosexuality and to live in chastity.

Those who experience same-sex attraction (such as journalist Doug Mainwarin and many others) who are living in chastity are being thrown under the bus by the attributed quote. Mainwarin said:

"Many of us who experience same-sex attraction and remain chaste are troubled by the Pope's departure from... Church teaching." (LifeSiteNews, "'God made you gay': Did Pope Francis just tell the lie of the century?," By Douglas Mainwarin, May 21, 2018)

Today, LifeSiteNews' headline stated:

"Bishop Schneider: Priests who 'bless' gay unions will answer for it on Judgement Day"

What Bishop Athanasius Schneider said of the priests applies to Francis if he doesn't publicly deny the Cruz quote.

LifeSiteNews in the article wrote "Schneider said that priests who do that are committing an even greater sin than the sodomy they are endorsing." Bishop Schneider, in the piece, said:

"When clerics are promoting the blessing of homosexual relationships, they are promoting a sin... exposing them consequently to the real danger of eternal condemnation."

If Francis doesn't publicly deny the attributed heretical quote "God made you" gay then he "will be committing a greater sin than the sodomy" that he is giving the appearance of endorsing which he will be answerable to on Judgment Day.

As Mainwarin, in his article, said:

"More significantly, embrace of a harmful self-identity as 'gay' or 'lesbian' in the core of their being is not rejected by St. Peter's successor... is... a gospel foreign to Catholic ears. Even to many same-sex attracted Catholics like me, it is foreign; it rings wholly untrue."

Eastern Orthodox Christian Rod Dreher put the "massive" scandal of the heretical quote attributed to the Pope in perspective:

"Francis has a grave obligation to clarify the public record. This is hugely important... if the Pope has said homosexuality is morally neutral and/or willed by God, then it is a massive thing... the Pope will have taken the side of the [heretical] modernists... against 2,000 years of consistent teachings based on the clear meaning of Holy Scripture."
(The American Conservative, "Report: Pope Says God Makes People Gay," May 19 2018)

Say an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.




Monday, May 07, 2018

Is Cardinal Eijk implying that Pope Francis is acting in the Spirit of the Antichrist?

Did Netherlands Cardinal Willem Jacobus Eijk today imply that Pope Francis is acting in the spirit of the Antichrist? Eijk said:

"Observing that the bishops and, above all, the Successor of Peter fail to maintain and transmit faithfully and in unity the deposit of faith... I cannot help but think of Article 675 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

'The Church's ultimate trial

Before Christ's second coming... will unveil the 'mystery of iniquity' in the form of religious deception... apostasy from the truth.'" (National Catholic Register, "Cardinal Eijk: Pope Francis Needed to Give Clarity on Intercommunion," May 7, 2017)

According to Onepeterfive, the Catechism of the Catholic Church Article "675 is... footnoted with... eight" scriptural footnotes. Two of those footnotes explicitly speak of antichrists:

2 John 7- "[T]his is a seducer and an antichrist."

1 John 2:18- "Antichrist cometh, even now there are many Antichrists." (Onepeterfive, "Cardinal Eijk References End Times Prophecy in Intercommunion Debate," May 7, 2017)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church?


Saturday, May 05, 2018

Join Bishop Gracida's Resistance against the Amoris Laetitia Heresy

"Judas received the first sacrilegious Communion. St Paul has to warn against receiving the Holy Eucharist unworthily making the receiver “guilty of the blood” – meaning guilty of the equivalent of murder. (Blood guilt in the OT is murder)."[https://mum6kids.wordpress.com/2012/06/07/corpus-christie-saints-who-lived-on-the-eucharist-alone/"

"[T]he currently prevalent abomination of Holy Communion being received by everyone at Mass, without regard to whether the recipient is in the State of Grace, whether he believes in the Real Presence (and all other Catholic doctrines), or whether he is even a Catholic. To receive Holy Communion under any of these conditions is a mortal sin of sacrilege. To receive Holy Communion worthily, a Catholic in the state of mortal sin must first confess all his mortal sins to a priest in Confession and be absolved of them, after which Our Lord will be pleased to come once again into his heart in Holy Communion." [http://www.catholictradition.org/Eucharist/blessed-eucharist9.htm]

Almost all the faithful orthodox Catholic bishops and cardinals, it appears, are too cowardly to join the sensus fidilium lay resistance against the heresy of sacrilege Communion to adulterous couples promoted by Amoris Laetitia except a very few exceptions.

The two obvious exceptions are maybe Bishop Athanasius Schneider and without a doubt Bishop Rene Henry Gracida.

Bishop Gracida and theologian Dr. John R. T. Lamont, Pd. D. show us what to do to resist the Amoris Laetitia heresy. Lamont gives an overview of the crisis, shows what needs to be done and points to Gracida as a leader in the resistance:

"The AAS statement thus settles an important and much-debated question. It establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense; that is, propositions that contradict truths that are divinely revealed and that must be believed with the assent of faith."

"It has not only established this; it has made it a religious duty for Catholics to believe that this is the case. Pope Francis is the Pope, and as such he has the power to exercise the papal teaching authority within the limits set to that authority by divine law. In the AAS statement, he has required Catholics to give religious assent of mind and will to the assertion that Amoris laetitia contains propositions that are heretical..."

"...It would be wrong however to think that Pope Francis is the worst scourge afflicting the Church. The election of a bad man as Pope can never be entirely ruled out. In a healthy Church the problem of a heretical Pope can and will be dealt with by the Catholic bishops, just as the immune system of a healthy body will react to disease and eradicate it. The immune system of the Church at the present is not operating. The bishops of the Catholic Church have remained silent about the heresy in Amoris laetitia, and have thereby abandoned the faithful."

"The heretical statements of Amoris laetitia have not been presented to the faithful as something that they can take or leave. Pope Francis has stated in official magisterial documents that they are papal teachings that they must accept. He has been supported in this by a large number of bishops. Pope Francis has thereby put pressure on all the Catholic faithful to reject divinely revealed truth."

"The faithful are not protected against this pressure by the bishops of Kazakhstan, or elsewhere, issuing a statement upholding the truths that Francis is denying. When encountering a difference of opinion between a papal document and a letter from a handful of Kazakh bishops, the faithful will naturally take the papal statement to be of higher authority."

"In order to protect the faithful from the attack on their belief and salvation that is being made through Amoris laetitia, it is necessary to address the falsehoods in that document itself, and to condemn them by appealing to an authority that justifies the rejection of a non-infallible papal letter; the authority of divine revelation expressed in the Scriptures and repeated by the magisterium of the Church."

"This appeal does not have to be a canonical warning to Pope Francis that could serve as the first step in his deposition. Such a canonical warning would have to be addressed to the Pope himself, and warn him of the nature of his crime and the consequences of persisting in it. It would be sufficient to take the lesser step of simply addressing the faithful to condemn Amoris laetitia as heretical. Aside from Bishops Bernard Fellay and Henry Gracida, no Catholic bishops have done this." [https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2018/02/important-guest-essay-meaning-of-amoris.html?m=1]

Bishop Emeritus of  Corpus Christi, Rene Henry Gracida said:

"Cardinal Burke is saying... the truth. What is more important... is for people in the pew to say:

No, that is not true!"

"It's more important for people in the pew to raise up and say in print, in letters, in phone calls, in email, in person, in interviews... for the laity to say no that is not true... than for a Burke to say this is the truth...."

"We don't need people to say this is the truth. What we need in the present moment is for the laity to say that is not true..."

"Just like in the fourth century when those people shouted down Arius. No, you're wrong. He is Divine... That is what we have to do today... We have to have people stand up to the homilist, priests and bishops... No, you're wrong."

"You cannot give Holy Communion to the abortionists, to the abortion promoters and providers, to the divorce and remarried. You cannot do it. St. Paul said you do not feed the Eucharist to dogs..."

"Right now they [the laity] are suffering in silence. They need to object. The laity, the sensus fidelium is that common sense among the laity who have accepted the magisterial teaching of the Church which is the foundation of their faith."

"Having accepted that when they hear something that is contradictory to the magisterial teaching of the Church, the sensus fidelium is a impulse that causes them to speak out and say no:

That is not true. Don't say that. Stop! That is the sensus fidelium in action!"

"Not to sit and suffer in silence. That's crazy. That's weird. That's wrong. Speak up! Resist! Object!"
(Church Militant video, "Laity, Rise Up!," April 4, 2017)

Bishop Gracida leads by example when he says: Speak up! Resist! Object!

On December 2, 2017, Gracida on his official website declared Pope Francis is teaching heresy:

"Francis' heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents."

Whether he acknowledges it or not, Bishop Gracida became our St. Athanasius (who lead the resistance against the Arian heresy in the fourth century) when he explicitly said Amoris Laetitia is heretical and said to resist sacrilege Communions. 

Where do we go from here to join Bishop Gracida's resistance?

Bloggers and all faithful orthodox Catholic laity need a coordinated organized plan at all levels. 

That gets us to the brass tacks.

You, who are reading this post right now, are one of the persons who God, Jesus Christ, is calling to defend his Bride, the Church:

First pray and ask God what He wants you to do.

Next, pray, fast and offer up your sacrifices and sufferings for the restoration of the Church.

Then do what you can do within your capacity and within your duties of life which God has called you to.

If all you can honestly do is pray and offer up your sufferings and sacrifices then do that.

That you are articulate or not doesn't matter. Talk to those closest to you and others.

If you can write then write for the restoration.

Have you the skills and media savvy to engage the media?  Then use those skills to defend the the Church in this crisis.

If your a leader then lead those who follow you and coordinate with other leaders to help restore the Bride of Christ.

When you accept God's call to defend the Church, then you need to do some deep praying at Mass and if possible in front of the Blessed Sacrament before starting.

I recommend that you start praying, everyday, the Auxiliarum Christianorum prayers put together by exorcists for your spiritual protection.

If you are a leader or media savvy person coordinating with others in this battle to defend the Bride of Christ then you need to find at least one or two advisers, priests or deeply spiritual smart persons, who you can trust and openly discuss things as they unfold.

If you're are a priest then you need to do the above and offer Masses for the restoration.

This is the time to pray and act.

Pope Francis appears to be increasingly isolated even in the Vatican.

We, the resistance, are haunting Francis and his inner circle's minds.

That is why they were recently staging those events against us and putting out Gaudete et Exsultate suddenly.

They are clever and are not shy about using their papal and media power. But, when it comes to intelligence, they are inferior. Over and over again they are being bested.

Their only chance is to keep the facade going that there is even the slightest chance that what they are promoting and teaching is not contrary to everything the Church has always taught infallibly. 

If by the grace of God some how we can get a majority or a large segment of good unintellectual average sincere Catholics in the pews and in the bishop chairs to turn away from their idolatry that popes are always right and to be obeyed even if they are promoting sin and sacrilege then that could by God's grace be the tipping point in this battle.

No matter what happens in the immediate future or in our lifetime, we must do all for God in peace knowing eventually the Church will be restored.

God, and those who are with Him, always wins.

Those who resist God always lose.

That is why there is a heaven and hell as well as a last judgment.

You, dear reader, are in my prayers.

Pray an Our Father now that God give you the grace to do what He is calling you to do and for the conversion of those resisting God.

Wednesday, May 02, 2018

Holocaust?: Baby Alfie is only the Latest Baby Victim of the "Grotesque" Alder Hey which has "Stripped Hundreds of Dead Babies of their Organs"

Was physically disabled baby Alfie Evans only the latest baby victim of the Alder Hey "grotesque" hospital which is known for it's baby "body parts" Holocaust-like medical research scandal according to a British inquiry?

The "Alder Hey organ scandal" reminds one of the German Nazi regime human experiments scandal during it's genocide of the Jews and other groups called the Holocaust for it's grotesque medical research using human body parts:

"As accounts of the Holocaust expanded to include non-Jewish victims,... The medical community regularly received bodies and body parts for research."
(Wikipedia.com, "The Holocaust")

Moreover, physically disabled children like baby Alfie were targeted by the Nazis as "useless eaters":

"The Germans and their collaborators killed as many as 1.5 million children... [including] German children with physical and mental disabilities living in institutions."
(United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, ushmm.org, "Children during the Holocaust")

According to the award winning British Nursing Times magazine the Alder Hey medical institution targeted babies:

"Alder Hey had stripped hundreds of dead babies of their organs without permission of relatives."

"Body parts, some of which were also obtained by other hospitals, were then secretly held for medical research... The findings of the inquiry were described by then health secretary Alan Millburn as "grotesque."

"... Paula O'Leary['s]... 11-month-old son Andrew had his heart and 36 other body parts taken following his death from a brain hemorrhage."

(Nursing Times, "Alder Hey organ scandal ends with final burial," January 18, 2010)

Is there more than medical research involved at Alder Hey in its stripping of baby body parts?

Investigative journalist Scott Carney's book "Red Market: On the Trail of the World's Organ Brokers, Bone Thieves, Blood Farmers, and Child Traffickers" suggests hospitals like Alder Hey might not just be doing medical research, but selling baby body parts.

It is reported that body parts such as human hearts can bring in up to thousands of dollars alone.

Pray an Our Father now for all the babies in hospitals?




Monday, April 30, 2018

Sacrilege Communion: Pope Francis vs. Pope Benedict XVI

Vatican expert Maike Hickson at Onepeterfive reported:

"A possible reason as to why Pope Francis wishes this CDF [Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith] letter [accordingly to Kath.net approved by Francis rejecting the majority of the German bishops move to give Communion to Protestants] to remain unpublished is that he is not happy with it."

"... it was Pope Francis himself who... in 2015... opened up to the idea that a Protestant spouse could... [receive] Holy Communion... One well-informed clerical source therefore told Onepeterfive that this move was coming "from the very top in Rome [Francis]."
(Onepeterfive.com," A Crucial Moment For the Church: Intercommunion Debate in Rome in May," April 30, 2018)

Vatican expert Edward Pentin revealed:

""The Register understands from reliable and authoritative sources that Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI has given his full support to the seven [German] bishops and their letter to the Vatican [CDF which rejected the move to give sacrilege Communion to Protestants].
(National Catholic Register, "Complete Letter of Seven German Bishops on Holy Communion for Protestant Spouses Published," April 25, 2018)

If both reports are true then this is the first time that Benedict has directly went against Francis's moves to give Communion sacrilegiously.

Benedict never countered Francis's moves to give Communion sacrilegiously to adulterous couples, but is apparently directly moving against the current pope, if Onepeterfive's source is correct that the majority of German bishops move comes "from the very top in Rome," on sacrilegiously shared Communion with Protestants

Former consulter to the Congregation for the Doctrine the Faith Msgr. Nicola Bux told Pentin:

"[S]hared Eucharistic Communion... would 'go against Revelation and the Magisterium', leading Christians to 'commit blasphemy and sacrilege.'"
(National Catholic Register, "Theologian: Shared Communion With Protestants Would be Blasphemy and Sacrilege," January 2, 2017)


Pray an Our Father now for Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI to strongly move against all of Pope Francis's moves to promote sacrilege Communion and to work for a true restoration of the Church as did St. Pope Pius V.