Above, Beatriz Varela; below, son Gabriel Ferrini. Varela said: “Bergoglio was aware of this situation [the sex-abuse of her son] because no one can be installed in the Vicar’s House without the authorization of the Archbishop... This is Bergoglio’s compromise: He speaks against cases of pedophilia in the Church, but uses hypocrisy, lies and complicity to cover them." [https://traditioninaction.org/bev/220bev06_29_2018.htm]
Author Atila Sinke Guimarães, in the Tradition in Action blog, implicitly says that there is a media cover-up, "probably due to pressure from the Vatican," of Beatriz Varela's accusation that Pope Francis was involved of a cover-up of a paedophile priest who abused her son, Gabriel Ferrini, in 2002:
"Marco Tosatti from La Stampa in Turin, Italy, posted an article on his website Stilum Curiae reporting the involvement of Pope Francis in a cover-up for a pedophile priest in Buenos Aires when he was Archbishop of that city. The article refreshed some little-known old data reported by the Spanish blog Publico. Soon after, however, Tossatti's article was removed from that site, probably due to pressure from the Vatican." [https://traditioninaction.org/bev/220bev06_29_2018.htm]
In the February 5, 2013 Publico article which Tosatti used in his piece the headline is a quote:
"El Papa encubrio al cura que abuso de mi hijo"
My translation is:
"The Pope covered-up for the priest (cura) who abused my son"
According to the Tradition in Action article, Varela said:
“Bergoglio was aware of this situation [the sex-abuse of her son] because no one can be installed in the Vicar’s House without the authorization of the Archbishop... This is Bergoglio’s compromise: He speaks against cases of pedophilia in the Church, but uses hypocrisy, lies and complicity to cover them." [https://traditioninaction.org/bev/220bev06_29_2018.htm]
Arch. Bergoglio did not receive the mother's victim and sent his bodyguards against her
Guimarães says Pope Francis when Archbishop hosted "the pedophile priest in a comfortable residence under his jurisdiction." The same priest who abused Varela's son. Archbishop Bergoglio at the "same time" he was hosting the paedophile priest "refused to receive her [Varela] and ordered his bodyguards to prevent her from entering his residence":
"Since the Bishop delayed in punishing the priest, Beatriz Varela tried to communicate with Archbishop Jorge Bergoglio. However, he refused to receive her and ordered his bodyguards to prevent her from entering his residence. Symptomatically, at the same time the Archbishop of Buenos Aires was hosting the pedophile priest in a comfortable residence under his jurisdiction."
Beatriz Varela was employed in a diocesan school of Quilmes when the abuse took place on August 15, 2002 so she knew who to contact to demand "justice" for her son. Guimarães documents what happened after she found out her son was abused:
"Beatriz went straight to Bishop Luis Stöcker. She stated: 'Initially, he showed consternation, but, as the time went by, he did not take any action.' Instead, she continued, the Bishop 'tried to minimize the case, saying that I had to be merciful with persons who chose celibacy as a vocation because they have moments of weakness.'”
"Beatriz told the Bishop that she wanted “truth, justice and the guarantee that such a thing would not happen to anyone else.' The Bishop then threatened to cut her employment. “I worked for a school in the Diocese,' she said, explaining her difficult situation."
"Next, Beatriz had recourse to the Church Tribunal, whose president 'refused to accept the denunciation.' Fifteen days later, she was interviewed by four priests 'who submitted me to a humiliating interrogation with lascivious and tendentious questions, as if I were the one who had induced the abuse, when they knew for sure that the abuser had admitted the fact 96 hours after the episode before the Bishop, who reprimanded him.'”
"The mother of the victim also went to the Archdiocese, the residence of Archbishop Jorge Bergoglio. He refused to receive her and sent his security guards to expel her from the property. Soon afterwards, she learned that Fr. Ruben Pardo was a guest at the Vicar’s House in the Flores neighborhood, directly dependent on the Archbishop of Buenos Aires. She observed: 'Bergoglio was aware of this situation because no one can be installed in the Vicar’s House without the authorization of the Archbishop.'”
Guimarães says Marco Tosatti's full article from La Stampa has "been transcribed by another Italian website – Acta Apostolicae Sedis. The reader can find a snapshot here; the second part of the posting is Tossati’s article. The Brazilian blog Fratres in Unum made the piece accessible in Portuguese, where I found it, with its various Spanish and Italian links. I thank the blog for this important public service. I am translating the data into English and passing the information on to my readers."
Obviously, other than Tosatti there was a total media cover-up of the Publico article which itself, the Tosatti article, was covered-up or deleted. If it wasn't for these few blogs the cover-up would have apparently been complete.
Pray an Our Father now that Beatriz Varela and her son get justice.
Below is the Tossati article that the "Brazilian blog Fratres in Unum made... accessible in Portuguese":