Friday, September 28, 2018

Is there a Vatican Gay Lobby and Chinese Communist Alliance?

The radical gay New Ways Ministry, who are notorious dissenters according to a 2011 US Bishops statement, revealed in 2012 that Cardinal Paolo Romeo apparently was part of the Vatican gay lobby:

” GayStarNews reports:
“Three Italian Catholic cardinals have agreed to prayer vigils held by the religious group Gionata for the victims of gay hate and discrimination for the first time.“LGBT groups will pray for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people in Milan, Florence and Palermo, in Sicily as part of the International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia (IDAHO) to be celebrated . . . in an estimated 100 countries around the world. . . . 
“Cardinal Paolo Romeo, in Palermo, . . . [has] backed it, even though he banned the vigil last year. The liturgy there will be celebrated at 9pm . . . in the San Gabriele Arcangelo church.” [https://www.newwaysministry.org/2012/05/17/three-italian-cardinals-support-prayer-vigils-for-international-day-against-homophobia-and-transphobia/
The pro-gay Romeo, a year after coming out of the closet about supporting LGBT “liturgy,” in China spoke of an assassination threat on Pope Benedict XVI to “Italian businessmen and Chinese representatives of the Catholic Church” according to the Telegraph in 2012:

“Cardinal Romeo reportedly made the startling prediction of the Pope’s death during a trip to China in November 2011.”

“He seemed so sure of the fact that the people he spoke with, including Italian businessmen and Chinese representatives of the Catholic Church, were convinced that he was talking about an assassination attempt.”

“… The extraordinary comments were written up in a top-secret report, dated Dec 30, 2011, and delivered to the Pope by a senior cardinal, Dario Castrillon Hoyos, a Colombian, in January.”

“The Vatican has reportedly opened an investigation into the claims.”

“The report was written in German, apparently to limit the number of people within the Vatican who would understand it if it was inadvertently leaked.”

“It warns of a “Mordkomplott” – death plot – against Benedict.”

“‘The story was broken on Friday by an Italian daily, Il Fatto Quotidiano, with the headline ‘Plot against the Pope – he will die within 12 months'”.

“The newspaper, which has a reputation for scoops, published a page from the confidential report. ‘During his talks in China, Cardinal Romeo predicted the death of Benedict XVI within 12 months. His remarks were expressed with such certainty and resolution that the people he was speaking to thought, with a sense of alarm, that an attack on the Pope’s life was being planned,'” the paper reported.”

“‘Cardinal Romeo could never have imagined that the indiscreet remarks he made on the trip to China would be communicated back to the Vatican by third parties.'”

“Asked about the reported comments on Friday, however, Romeo said that the words attributed to him were ‘absolutely without basis.'” [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/vaticancityandholysee/9073811/The-Pope-will-die-within-a-year-Vatican-assassination-fears-revealed.html]

Despite Romeo’s denial Benedict’s close associate Cardinal Hoyos thought the assassination threat serious and delivered the “top-secret report” to the then Pope.

On September 26, the liberal and apparently pro-Chinese regime Maria Antonietta Calabrò, who is considered a well-informed and highly respected Italian journalist, claims there is a connection between the “obscure threat” of an assassination threat alleged to have been spoken of by the pro-gay Romeo and the “obscure threat” of former Apostolic nuncio Carlo Maria Viganò’s testimony about Pope Francis’s gay sex abuse cover-ups.

Calabrò in Italy’s HuffPost (link) wrote:

“Surprisingly, the pope referred to the attack against him, launched exactly a month ago, by the former Apostolic nuncio Carlo Maria Viganò. The Pope did not call him by name, but he said:

“When there was that famous communiqué of a former Apostolic nuncio, the episcopates of the world wrote to me saying that they felt close, praying for me; Even the Chinese faithful have written [a letter], and the signature of this writing was of the Bishop – say so – of the traditional Catholic Church and the Bishop of the Patriotic Church: Together, both, and the faithful of both churches. For me, this was a sign of God”.

“… No one can deny that the accord of the Vatican with China takes on a geopolitical value beyond a spiritual and religious value.”

“Just when the United States of Trump has begun a trade war with Beijing, the American Catholic right in recent days recalled the role of unofficial negotiator carried out by the now former Cardinal McCarrick precisely with China.”

“It is precisely about a trip to China by McCarrick in 2013 that the former Nuncio Viganò spoke in his ‘statement,’ as proof of the Pope’s condescension towards him.”

“… The Viganò case, in short, ended up speeding up the Pope’s agreement with China.”

“No one can deny that the Vatican’s agreement with China assumes a geopolitical value as well as spiritual and religious. Just at the time when the United States of Trump started a trade war with Beijing, the American Catholic Right has recalled in recent days the role of unofficial negotiator played by the now McCarrick in 2013 spoke the former nuncio Viganò in His “communiqué”, as proof of the pope’s condescension towards him. Also the predecessor of Francis, Pope emeritus Benedict XVI, also a extensor of an open letter to Chinese Catholics, received at the beginning of 2012 obscure threats after a trip to China of another prelate. And that document ended up in the first Vatileaks scandal.” [Italy’s HuffPost, ESTERI  26/09/2018 16:25 CEST  |  Aggiornato26/09/2018 16:26 CEST  Papa Francesco, il caso Viganò e il “segno di Dio” che ha accelerato l’accordo con la Cina]

Dr. Robert Moynihan writing on the Calabrò article in Letter 61 said:

“So her argument is that the attacks on Pope Francis and the calls for his resignation are in some way animated by… forces close to the present US government, seen as in strong opposition to the Holy See’s new 'opening' to China.”

“In today’s piece, Calabrò notes that former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, 88, the man at the center of Vigano’s Testimony(which is, essentially, a 'who’s who' of those in the Church hierarchy whom Vigano charges ‘covered’ for McCarrick over the past two decades) made at least 8 trips to China over many years, including at least one during this pontificate of Pope Francis.”

“She notes that it was precisely a trip that McCarrick made to China in June of 2013, with Francis’ evident knowledge and blessing — after a period of about 7 years under Pope Benedict when McCarrick made no trips to China — which was used by Vigano as ‘proof’ that Francis ‘favored’ or ‘rehabilitated’ McCarrick though (Vigano says) Francis knew of allegations sexual abuse against McCarrick.”

“In other words, she is pointing out that the trip of McCarrick to China in June 2013 is a key hinge point in Vigano’s Testimony.”

“This is interesting, as a thesis.”

“But the concluding lines of this report today by Calabrò seem a bit odd.”

“… This is puzzling. An allegation that someone has covered up for someone who has sexually molested young men (the allegation made against Francis by Vigano) is seemingly not comparable to the prediction that a Pope will die of poisoning due to a plot against him by his enemies (the prediction made by Romeo about Pope Benedict). Why are they compared?[On Sep 26, 2018 7:58 PM, “Dr. Robert Moynihan” MoynihanReport@xxxxxx]

The answer to Moynihan’s puzzle may be:

– That the Chinese regime is and was involved or allied with the Vatican gay lobby represented by McCarrick (and Cardinal Pietro Parolin who Viganò has testified covered-up for McCarrick) in the betrayal of the Chinese Church.

– That possibly the Chinese regime and the gay lobby represented by Romeo while in China spoke of the alleged assassination threat just prior to Pope Benedict’s resignation to “Chinese representatives of the Catholic Church” some of whom may have been Communist operatives as part of a operation to pressure Benedict to resign.

Were there Communist operatives in that group of “Chinese representatives of the Catholic Church”?

According to Moynihan’s Letter 61 there is “one bishop from the 'underground' Catholic Church loyal to Rome” apparently willing to betray his own Chinese Church to the Communist in a letter to Francis:

… one bishop from the 'Patriotic' Catholic Church… and… one bishop from the 'underground' Catholic Church loyal to Rome.”

Or as the Pope said one of the bishops "of the traditional Catholic Church" apparently was willing to betray his own Chinese Church to the Communist in a letter to Francis:

“When there was that famous communiqué of a former Apostolic nuncio, the episcopates of the world wrote to me saying that they felt close, praying for me; Even the Chinese faithful have written [a letter], and the signature of this writing was of the Bishop – say so – of the traditional Catholic Church and the Bishop of the Patriotic Church."

Was China involved or allied with the Vatican gay lobby in the assassination threat just prior to Pope Benedict’s resignation as part of a operation to pressure Benedict to resign?

 Was the alleged assassination threat one of the reasons Benedict resigned?

Say an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church?











Saturday, September 22, 2018

Chinese Bishops must Disobey Francis's Parolin/McCarrick Deal that is Abuse of Papal Power as did Saintly Bp. Grosseteste who was "One of the most Learned Men of the Middle Ages"

The author of the the deal to give control of the Chinese Church to the totalitarian Communist regime Cardinal Pietro Parolin according to Archbishop Carlo Vigano's testimony was among the prelates who covered-up for ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick and gave him influence:

McCarrick "made no fewer than eight trips to China in recent years, the last few at the specific request of Pope Francis in pursuit of an agreement "accordingly to China expert Steven Mosher as reported by LifeSiteNews.

The betrayal of the Chinese Church can thus be called Francis's Parolin/McCarrick deal.

The Parolin/McCarrick deal is a abuse of papal power which can be disobeyed in good conscience as shown by the saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste.

In 1253, Bishop Grosseteste disobeyed Pope lnnocent IV who ordered that a benefice within his jurisdiction be given to the papal nephew. Benefices were a form of financial exploitation given to prelates who didn't reside in the diocese and never saw their flock so souls were lost for lack of true shepherding or pastoral care.

Grosseteste said that benefices have only one end: "the salvation of souls." Exploitative use of benefices was a abuse of papal power so he disobeyed Pope Innocent IV.

Innocent reportedly raged in anger, but his advisors told him to back down because all of Christendom knew Bishop Grosseteste was "one of the most learned men" of the age and a saintly bishop.

The Catholic Encyclopedia said of Grosseteste:

"Bishop of Lincoln and one of the most learned men of the Middle Ages... That he opposed... abuses of the papal administration is certain, but a study of his letters and writings... destroy the myth that he disputed the plena potestas of the popes."
(Catholic Encyclopedia, new advent.org, "Robert Grosseteste")

If a pope could be disobeyed by "one of the most learned men of the Middle Ages" for the lost of souls due to benefices then there is no doubt that Pope Francis's Parolin/McCarrick betrayal of the Chinese Church to the totalitarian Communist regime which will result in the loss souls must be disobeyed.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Thursday, September 20, 2018

Is Vatican/Mainstream Media: Francis/Vigano & Kavanugh/Ford Propaganda becoming Brainwashing?

Christine Blasey Ford's allegations against Brett Kavanugh have zero witnesses and her only proof is a polygraph test that is "inadmissible in court because the tests are not reliable" according to LawandCrime.com.

All the witnesses that have come forward say Kavanugh was a moral and honorable young man. Evidence is coming forward that Ford was not so moral or honorable.

According to Cultofthe1stAmendment.blogspot, Ford or someone else recently scrubbed her internet high school yearbooks which disappeared on September 17. The scrubbed website according to the blogspot paints a picture of Ford involved with drunkenness and promiscuity. The website said headlines should read:

"Christine Blasey Ford and the Drunken White Privileged Racist Playgirls of Holton-Arms."
(Cult of 1st Amendment, "Why Christine Blasey Ford's High School Yearbooks were Scrubbed: Faculty approved Racism, Binge Drinking and Promiscuity," September 19, 2018)

On the other hand, Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano's allegations against Pope Francis have credible witnesses who have come forward and said that his testimony is true such as Monsignor Jean-Francois Lantheaume.

Numerous witnesses have come forward and said Vigano is moral and honorable.

However, Francis's Vatican is known to promote fake news such as the recent Lettergate and Barros Lettergate which forced the Pope to reverse his protection of sex abuse cover-up Bishop Juan Barros.

Macmillan's dictionary says propaganda is:

"[I]nformation, especially false information... spread in order to influence people's opinions and beliefs."

Whereas, Macmillan's dictionary says brainwashing is:

"[T]o force someone to accept a particular set of beliefs by repeating the same idea many times so that the person cannot think in an independent way."

Has the mainstream media/Vatican narrative moved from propaganda to brainwashing?

Despite the facts and opposed to the evidence the various forms of the brainwashing narrative of the mainstream media/Vatican which is "repeating the same idea many times so that the person[s or the gullible public] cannot think in a independent way" is:

Vigano is not a credible witness.

Despite the facts and opposed to the evidence the various forms of the brainwashing narrative of the mainstream media which is "repeating the same idea many times so that the person[s or the gullible public] cannot think in a independent way is:

Ford is a credible witness.

Has the mainstream media/Vatican narrative sunk from promoting propaganda to brainwashing?

Say an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Sunday, September 16, 2018

St. Joseph Prayer: To "Render Possible for us the most Impossible Things"

St. Francis de Sales's hard to find St. Joseph prayer:

"Glorious St. Joseph, spouse of Mary, grant us thy paternal protection, we beseech thee by the Heart of Jesus Christ. O thou whose power extends to all our necessities and can render possible for us the impossible things, open thy fatherly eyes to the needs of thy children."

"In the trouble and distress which afflicts us, we confidently have recourse to thee. Deign to take under your charitable charge this important and difficult matter, cause of our worries. Makes its happy outcome be for God's glory and for the good of His devoted servants. Amen."

If you are troubled in any way remember to go to the humble Joseph because he and Mary are the Royal Road of King David to Jesus who can't resist their requests because he loves them so much and because of the Commandment to honor your parents.

The great scholar Fr. Andrew Doze said go to St. Joseph and he will help you even if you don't understand at the moment:

"Normally, one understands and then does; in the case of Joseph, one does and then understands."


Saturday, September 15, 2018

Are Pope Francis, Google & Chinese Operative Feinstein's Democrats Allied with Communist "Repression" in China?

Today, the internationally recognized authority on China Steven Mosher said:

"The Vatican is set to sign an agreement with China by the end of the month, one that cedes control over the appointment of bishops to Beijing. In return, we are told, Beijing has agreed to recognize the pope as the head of China’s Catholics."

"... The Chinese Party-State, on the other hand, will undoubtedly use the pretext of a Vatican-China agreement to increase its persecution of the Underground Church in China. It will insist that each and every one of China’s 12 million Catholics worship only in churches approved by the Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association.  It will use the borrowed authority of the Vatican to further clamp down on unregistered churches in so-called underground communities led by bishops loyal only to Rome.

"Those in the Underground Church, who have suffered so much over the decades, may be in for yet another season of suffering."
[https://onepeterfive.com/vatican-to-allow-beijing-to-name-bishops/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Onepeterfive+%28OnePeterFive%29]

Pope Francis's action of cooperating with the "absolute evil" Chinese Communist regime against the Chinese Underground Catholics is almost too much to comprehend.

Mosher said on the "horrors" he "witnessed in China":

"On a scale of evil from one to ten, this was a ten... absolute evil... Crosses are currently being ripped off the top of churches, and home church leaders are being arrested and tortured... Any political party that will kill 400 million of its own unborn citizens... will stop at nothing to achieve its goals."
(Church Militant, "China Expert Steven Mosher: Regime Poses 'Mortal Challenge' to US Interests," November 27, 2017)

As Francis apparently is working to allow the Communist regime "to increase its persecution of the Underground Church in China," it appears the Communist Chinese are infiltrating the American tech industry and Democratic Party.

Google like Francis apparently is working to "accommodating the Chinese authorities’ repression" as shown by this Amnesty International Open Letter to the tech giant: 

"To: Sundar Pichai, Chief Executive Officer, Google Inc

Dear Mr Pichai"

"Like many of Google’s own employees, we are extremely concerned by reports that Google is developing a new censored search engine app for the Chinese market. The project, codenamed “Dragonfly”, would represent an alarming capitulation by Google on human rights. The Chinese government extensively violates the rights to freedom of expression and privacy; by accommodating the Chinese authorities’ repression of dissent, Google would be actively participating in those violations for millions of internet users in China..."

"...Signed, the following organizations:
Access Now
Amnesty International
Article 19
Centre for Democracy and Technology
Committee to Protect Journalists
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Human Rights in China
Human Rights Watch"
(Amnesty.org, "Open Letter: Google must not capitulate on human rights to gain access to China," August 28, 2018)

Also, apparently part of the Communist Chinese alliance with Google appears to be a Chinese totalitarian censorship-like plan developed by a Clinton/Soros operative against President Donald Trump and opponents of the leftist Democratic Party who as we will see are, also, allied with the Communist regime:

 "A secret scheme to destroy President Donald Trump and silence conservative voices online, hatched by Clinton hack David Brock and funded by billionaire extremist George Soros and other globalists, is back in the headlines after first being exposed last year. The reason for the renewed interest: With Big Tech social-media and Internet giants purging and silencing viewpoints the globalist establishment and its far-left “useful idiots” disagree with, the secret plot has taken on new relevance. One analyst even said the accelerating online censorship campaign of the tech giants “mirrors” the Soros-Brock plot exactly."

"... The secret Soros-Brock plan to destroy Trump and censor the Internet was first revealed publicly by the online Washington Free Beacon last year. Meeting at a ritzy South Florida resort in late January of 2017, Brock — the longtime Clinton operative who founded the Soros-funded “Media Matters” — presented the controversial plan to a network of mega-donors. Headlined “Democracy Matters: Strategic Plan for Action,” the document outlines a plot involving a battery of bigoted and hateful organizations working in partnership with Big Tech to muzzle Christians, conservatives, libertarians, Trump supporters, and others."

"... Google, which dominates global Internet searches and controls what information is seen by literally billions of people, received from Brock and his allies “the information necessary to identify 40 of the worst fake new sites” so they could be shut down and bankrupted by Google. Analysts said the giant firm, which is owned by Alphabet, which also owns video giant Youtube, appears to have moved on Brock's plan in 2016 when a number of top conservative sites were crushed by the company. Among the victims cited in media reports were the Gateway Pundit, Breitbart, the Drudge Report, Infowars, Conservative Treehouse, and Zero Hedge. The New American magazine also reported last summer that Google had started blatantly suppressing its website."
[https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/computers/item/29902-amid-google-scandal-soros-backed-plan-to-censor-web-draws-fire]

Not only are Francis and Google working with the Chinese Communists and against Trump and conservatives (historian Henry Sire in the book "The Dictator Pope" reported a reliable source said Francis gave Vatican funds to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign), but even Wikipedia revealed as early as 1996 the Marxist regime was funding their collaborators in the Democratic Party:

-"The 1996 United States campaign finance controversy was an effort by the People's Republic of China to influence domestic American politics prior to and during the Clinton administration and also involved the fund-raising practices of the administration itself."

"While questions regarding the U.S. Democratic Party's fund-raising activities first arose over a Los Angeles Times article published on September 21, 1996,[1] China's alleged role in the affair first gained public attention when Bob Woodward and Brian Duffy of The Washington Post published a story stating that a United States Department of Justice investigation into the fund-raising activities had uncovered evidence that agents of China sought to direct contributions from foreign sources to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) before the 1996 presidential campaign."

"The journalists wrote that intelligence information had shown the Chinese embassy in Washington, D.C. was used for coordinating contributions to the DNC[2] in violation of United States law forbidding non-American citizens or non-permanent residents from giving monetary donations to United States politicians and political parties."

"A Republican investigator of the controversy stated the Chinese plan targeted both presidential and congressional United States elections, while Democratic Senators said the evidence showed the Chinese targeted only congressional elections. The government of the People's Republic of China denied all accusations."
[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_United_States_campaign_finance_controversy]

It appears that Clinton operative Senator Dianne Feinstein as early as 1996 had a Communist Chinese spy working in her office. The spy was her employee for 20 years. The evidence points to Feinstein being a Chinese regime operative:

- "Turns out that Communist China had a spy in her office. A 20-year employee of Feinstein’s, the agent had been reporting back to China’s Ministry of State Security for well over a decade before he was caught in 2013, according to the FBI."

"... In June 1996 — after the staffer had begun working for Feinstein — the FBI detected that the Chinese government was attempting to seek favor with the senator, who at the time sat on the East Asian and Pacific affairs subcommittee of the Foreign Relations Committee, which oversees US-China relations. Investigators warned her in a classified briefing that Beijing might try to influence her through illegal campaign contributions laundered through front corporations and other cutouts.'

"... China investments have helped make Feinstein, who lives in a $17 million mansion in San Francisco and keeps a $5 million vacation home in Hawaii, one of the richest members in Congress."

"Feinstein has insinuated that Trump is compromised by a foreign power. But it’s clear Feinstein has an alarming blind spot when it comes to China and national security."
[https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2018/08/08/dianne-feinstein-was-an-easy-mark-for-chinas-spy/amp/#ampshare=https://nypost.com/2018/08/08/dianne-feinstein-was-an-easy-mark-for-chinas-spy/]

- "In other words, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) would get the trade status it coveted, without having to do anything of significance to improve its abysmal human-rights record.China was admitted to the World Trade Organization and has used that trade access to build the world’s second-strongest economy, and a world-class military."

"If anything, the CCP’s human-rights record is worse today. Certainly, their repressive technologies are far more powerful.At the time, Feinstein’s colleague, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) expressed grave concerns about the deal."

“'Once they get permanent (normal trade relations status), all leverage from the US on behalf of business is over because they have what they want permanently,' Pelosi said, in the San Jose Mercury article. 'They have violated their agreements in terms of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, they have violated their agreements in terms of trade, they have violated their agreements on international covenants on human rights. Why is that we think they are then going to honor their commitments they make for WTO?'”

"All in all, it was an incredible victory for the Chinese government. Feinstein has done more for the CCP than any other serving U.S. politician."
[https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theepochtimes.com/feinsteins-ties-to-china-extend-beyond-chinese-spy_2616284.html/amp#ampshare=https://www.theepochtimes.com/feinsteins-ties-to-china-extend-beyond-chinese-spy_2616284.html]

Chinese Communist collaborator Feinstein is, also, a close friend of Hillary Clinton. Feinstein said of Hillary: "I love that woman."
(Rollcall.com, "Hillary Clinton Returns to Senate for Dinner date," December 8, 2016)

According to Naturalnews.com, Communist collaborator Feinstein's friend Hillary Clinton allowed "Chinese spies... [to] get essentially... a classified American intelligence briefing every day":

- "Then this week, a report from The Daily Caller claimed that U.S. intelligence became aware that one-time-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s homebrew, unsecured, private email server was not only hacked by China, but Beijing’s cyber spies placed malicious code within the server to give them real-time access to Clinton’s emails. When she saw them, the Chinese spies saw them; when she sent emails and email replies, the Chinese saw those, too."

"China’s Clinton operation was managed out of a China-linked business near Washington, D.C., and all information was summarily sent back to Beijing. Without her knowledge – and because she felt too entitled to follow standard rules of government record-keeping and transparency – China essentially got a classified American intelligence briefing every single day."
[https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-08-31-espionage-by-china-hillary-clinton-and-dianne-feinstein-cia-operatives.html]

Say a Our Father now for the suffering Chinese people and that every person on the earth with a shred of decency cry out against the actions of Francis, Google and the Democratic Party.






Monday, September 10, 2018

With the Upcoming Vatican's Vigano "Clarification" expect a “False Flag” or Fake News: Lettergate 2

The Associated Press (AP) reported today:

"The Vatican is preparing the "necessary clarifications" about accusations that top Vatican officials including Pope Francis covered up the sexual misconduct of a now-disgraced American ex-cardinal, Francis' top advisers said Monday."
[https://www.yahoo.com/news/vatican-promises-clarifications-pope-cover-claims-161805683.html]

With the upcoming Vatican's Vigano "clarification" expect, if the pattern I chronicle below holds up, a “false flag” or fake news: planting of propaganda.

In other words expect: Lettergate 2.

The award winning The Intercept revealed that Pope Francis's Argentina knows all about “false flag” operations as done by British intelligence:

"While the full extent of JTRIG’s tactics used in the Falklands mission is unclear, the scope of JTRIG’s approved capabilities offers an idea of what may have been done. The group, first revealed last year by NBC News and The Intercepthas developed various techniques — including “false flag” operations, sexual “honey traps,” and implanting computer viruses — to collect intelligence, plant propaganda and diminish or discredit opponents."

"As reported in The Intercept last year, JTRIG “has developed covert tools to seed the internet with false information, including the ability to manipulate the results of online polls, artificially inflate pageview counts on web sites, ‘amplif[y]’ sanctioned messages on YouTube,” and plant false Facebook wall posts for “entire countries.” According to a study of the group by the U.K.’s Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL), “the language of JTRIG’s operations is characterized by terms such as ‘discredit,’ promote ‘distrust,’ ‘dissuade,’ ‘deceive,’ ‘disrupt,’ ‘delay,’ ‘deny,’ ‘denigrate/degrade,’ and ‘deter.’”"
[https://theintercept.com/2015/04/02/gchq-argentina-falklands/]

Here is a summary of the most famous of the Francis Vatican “false flag” or fake news operations: Lettergate 1.

When the Letter came out all of the secular media, all of the leftist Catholic media and surprisingly the conservative Catholic media such as Life Site News as well as the traditional Catholic media such as the Remnant went along with the Francis Vatican's disinformation that Pope Benedict XVI was 100 percent behind Francis's failed papacy after reading 11 books on Francis's teachings.

As soon as the letter came out the Catholic bloggers and Canon 212 immediately screamed in headlines that it was obviously fake news.

The headline at the Catholic Monitor was:

Benedict says Pope Francis is "Profound" Philosopher, has X-Ray Vision & can Leap Tall Buildings in a Single Bound

The Internet and Twitter was flooded with similar headlines and twits calling the Letter fake news and ridiculing the idea that Benedict called Francis profound.

Francis's Vatican, in the face of the Band of Bloggers ridiculing, blinked.

The seemingly all powerful Vatican media apparatus backed down, knuckled under, the Internet and Twitter confrontation of the Catholic blogger's ridicule of the Letter.

The next day, the Vatican in a attempt to show that the Letter wasn't fake admitted that Benedict hadn't read the 11 books, after that they admitted to manipulating the photo and finally the great Vatican expert Sandro Magister, through his sources, revealed that there were missing paragraphs which showed Benedict refused to endorse the books and was angry that the 11 books had heretical theologians who had attacked him and Pope John Paul Il's Vetitatis Splendor.

Anyone who has read Vetitatis Splendor knew that it condemns the teachings of Pope Francis's Amoris Laetitia.

The secular media and the Catholic media, after the facts started coming out, finally admitting the Band of Bloggers under the banner of Canon 212 were right.

They admitted that the Letter was fake news or a “false flag.”

 The Francis Vatican's disinformation attempt to create the lie that there is no contradiction between Benedict and Francis's failed papacy was outed by the Band of Bloggers and Canon 212.

Here is the pattern of some of the previous Francis Vatican “false flag” or fake news operations. Remember the key questions to ask are "Who is lying?"and "Why are they lying?":

In Barroslettergate or the Bishop Juan Barros sex abuse cover-up scandal, Francis said he had not received any evidence about the sex abuse case when a member of his inner circle of nine Cardinals and chief adviser on sex abuse personally deliver a letter of evidence to the Pope.

Who is lying and why?

In Lettergate, when the Letter came out all of the secular media, all of the leftist Catholic media and surprisingly the conservative Catholic media such as Life Site News as well as the traditional Catholic media such as the Remnant went along with the Francis Vatican's disinformation that Pope Benedict XVI was 100 percent behind Francis's failed papacy after reading 11 books on Francis's teachings.

On the day the letter came out the Catholic bloggers and Canon 212 immediately screamed in headlines that it was obviously fake news and eventually it was outed as planted propaganda.

Who is lying and why?

In Hellgate, the questions that needed to be asked is:

Who is lying?

Why are they lying?

Here is lawyer Christopher Ferrara's summary of Hellgate:

"This is the second time that Pope Francis, according to Scalfari, has professed the “annihilationist” heresy, the first being Scalfari’s interview of Francis in 2015. Even allowing for Scalfari’s self-admitted tendency to publish interviews with the Pope that are reconstructions rather than verbatim transcripts, the question remains: Is this in substance what the Pope said?"

"At this point, only one sort of denial will suffice: An unequivocal statement that Francis wishes it to be known that the words attributed to him by his friend are a total fabrication and that in no way, shape or form did Francis profess that there is no hell and that the souls of the damned are merely annihilated upon death."

What is the answer to all the above questions of: "Who is lying?" and "Why are they lying?"

The only possible ones who could be lying could be:

1. Francis
2. Francis's Vatican apparatus, closest friends, collaborators, confidants and inner circle.

Why were they lying?

The only possible answers are:

1. To falsely promote Francis.
2  To cover-up for Francis.
3. To protect themselves.
4. Either the old man is senile or lying or for the sake of the strange fun of saying an elderly man might continuously maybe be misquoting Francis and that is why the Pope keeps seeking him out, but maybe not since no unequivocal denial were ever made by Francis or his Vatican.

Next, Lettergate 2 is probably coming up if the pattern holds up.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Sunday, September 09, 2018

Pedophilia Endorser Yiannopoulos' Ex-Boss Bannon says Pope Francis Should Not Resign

Today, Reuters brought out Steve Bannon to proclaim that Pope Francis should not resign. The Reuters headline is:

"Pope should not resign but church abuse tribunal needed: Bannon"

Bannon who was a former White House adviser and the former executive chairman of Breitbart who was fired or forced to resign by President Donald Trump as well as Breitbart.

The former executive chairman is the ex-boss of the former Breitbart tech editor Milo Yiannopoulos who "was forced to resign... over a recently unearthed video showing him endorsing pedophilia" accordingly to wrap.com.

The Wrap says the former chairman is quoted praising the former tech editor whom he discovered for Breitbart. He said Yiannopoulos' work is "valuable."

The pedophilia endorser credits Bannon with "discovering him, telling the Washington Post: 'He made me a star.'"
(The Wrap, "Steve Bannon and 'Daddy' Trump Silent on Milo Meltdown over. Pedophilia Comments," February 21, 2017)

The Wrap says Bannon never called for pedophile endorser Yiannopoulos to resign.
Now, he is not calling for Francis who is credibly accused of sex abuse cover-up to resign.

Reuters in the article said "[d]uring his time in Rome, Bannon met with the head Dignitatis Humanae Institute (DHI) [whom the article didn't name]."

What the article didn't mention is that Bannon's associate who apparently is the President of the Board of Trustees and director of the DHI Benjamin Hartwell who issued a statement, on September 1, attacking Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano for giving "testimony" that the DHI honorary President is "member of a Homosexualist party in the Vatican."

The Hartwell attack came after the honorary President of the DHI Cardinal Renato Martino was named by Archbishop Vigano as part of the Vatican's "homosexual current" or "a member of a homosexualist party in the Vatican" according to LifeSiteNews.
((LifeSiteNews, "A who's who of the Vigano testimony," August 28, 2018)

Vatican expert Sandro Magister has called Martino "a Cardinal out of control." He quotes the Cardinal saying "Castro knows the social teachings of the Church" and catalogs how he was a liberal promoter of Muslim causes in Italy long before the Francis papacy.
(Magister's Chiesa website, "Renato Martino, a Cardinal Out of Control," March 14, 2006)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Saturday, September 08, 2018

If Reuters' Canon Law Expert is Right then Pope Benedict is Probably or Surely still Pope not to Mention the Bishop Gracida Evidence that the Francis Conclave was Invalid

Reuters is saying that if pressure is put on "Pope Francis to resign [it] could make it difficult, if not impossible, for him to do so, Church experts say.":

“'The pope has the right to freely resign. That’s what the canon says. The doubt is whether the situation Francis is in now really allows for a free choice because there is a political faction in the Church trying to force it,' said Nicholas Cafardi, former dean of Duquesne University School of Law."

“'I don’t see how (the pope can resign freely) when you have people campaigning for it,' said Cafardi, who is also a former member of the Board of Governors of the Canon Law Society of America."
[https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1LN1IL#ampshare=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-pope-abuse-law/can-the-popes-accusers-force-him-to-resign-idUSKCN1LN1IL]

If Reuters and Canon Law expert Cafardi are right that it is "difficult, if not impossible" for a pope to resign "if a political faction in the Church if trying to force it" then Pope Benedict XVI probably, if not for sure, is still Pope which would mean Francis is not a valid or real pope.

On August 27, author and philosopher Dr. Taylor Marshall reported that force or pressure from financial blackmail apparently lead to Benedict's resignation. He said:

"Sexual deviancy, that is paired up with financial irregularity. This is what moves the Pope to resignation. And just to make sure there is enough pressure on him to do it and do it quick something funny goes on with the Vatican Bank beginning on January 1, 2013."

The author and philosopher on YouTube in "Dr. Taylor Marshall ties together Vatican financial scandal with homosexual activity" summarized what lead to Pope Benedict XVI's resignation and Pope Francis's papacy:

If Archbishop Carlo Marie Vigano is telling the truth then it appears that the Vatican gay lobby apparently forced Pope Benedict's resignation and it appears that Pope Francis has "reinstated and promoted" all those who brought about the pressured resignation according to the author and philosopher.

Marshall stated:

"First of, Vigano blew the whistle on money laundering."

"Two, the accusations of money laundering leads to the Vatileaks scandal."

"Three, the Vatileaks scandal leads Benedict to form a secret investigation with three cardinals."

"Four, those three cardinals expose moral rot, sexual deviancy, that is paired up with financial irregularity."

"This is what moves the Pope to resignation. And just to make sure there is enough pressure on him to do it and do it quick something funny goes on with the Vatican Bank beginning on January 1, 2013."

There is more evidence that Benedict was forced or pressured to resign.

Akacatholic.com reported that evidence points to financial blackmail being involved in the Benedict abdication who appeared to be attempting to uncover "financial improprieties.":

"An article by Italian journalist Maurizio Blondet is making the rounds alleging that Pope Benedict XVI was blackmailed into abdication by forces allied with SWIFT (the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication), which had a hand in the shutdown of ATM and bank card services at the Vatican in January of 2012."

"According to Blondet:

There was a blackmail of Benedict XVI, coming from who knows where, through SWIFT. The underlying reasons for this have not been clarified, but it is clear that SWIFT has intervened directly in the management of affairs of the Church..."

"...It strikes me as interesting that more attention isn’t being paid to the role played by Ronaldo Hermann Schmitz, the acting President of the IOR [Vatican Bank] Board at the time, given his ties to Deutsche Bank."

"I mean, one would think that the former Deutsche Bank Executive Director, even if unable to leverage his contacts within the German banking giant to forestall such a drastic move, would have at the very least been well aware of what was coming and could have perhaps taken steps to secure the services of another financial institution, as happened in short order soon afterwards."

"This leads me to wonder where Ronaldo Hermann Schmitz’s own interests may have lied as this was taking place."

"Let me be clear; I have no information implicating Schmitz in any nefarious activity; I am simply making common sense observations and asking questions that, curiously enough, have apparently never been addresses by those in the media; in spite of the extensive coverage these events received."

"In any case, one is still left to wonder what motivated Gotti Tedeschi’s removal."

"Given that the reform of the IOR [Vatican Bank], for all intents and purposes, was all but halted while interim President Schmitz acted as caretaker until a new President could be found, one might assume that this interruption alone was the primary motive."

"It seems rather clear for reasons addressed below, however, that the motive went well beyond simply protecting the interests of those whose financial improprieties Gotti Tedeschi was laboring to uncover, making it seem far more likely Gotti Tedeshi’s demise was undertaken in order to set in motion the events that would secure the abdication of the man who appointed him."

"Circumstantial evidence strongly attesting to this being the case can be found in the fact that the Vatican reached an agreement with a Swiss firm to resume ATM and other bank card transactions effective February 12, 2013, just one day after Benedict XVI announced his intention to abdicate.

Indeed, as far as I can tell, nothing of note had changed between the cessation of bank card operations on January 1st and their resumption on February 12th relative to the Vatican Bank’s compliance with international banking standards. Rather, the only noteworthy thing to change was the status of Benedict’s pontificate."

"Further evidence suggesting that the motives for Gotti Tedeschi’s removal extended beyond mere financial concerns." [https://akacatholic.com/money-sex-and-modernism/]

Moreover, besides the apparent likely probability that Francis is not pope, if Reuters' Canon Law expert is right, because Benedict was pressured or forced to resign there, also, appears to be strong evidence that the conclave that elected Francis was invalid.

Onepeterfive's Steve Skojec on May 7 apparently rejected Bishop René Gracida's call for the cardinals to judge if Francis's election to the papacy was valid calling the validity question itself a "potentially dangerous rabbit hole."
(Onepeterfive, "Cardinal Eijk References End Times Prophecy in Intercommunion," May 7, 2018)

At the time, Skojec referred back to his September 26, 2017 post where he said:

"JPII has removed the election-nullifying consequences of simony... nowhere else in the following paragraphs is nullity of the election even implied."
(Onepeterfive, "A Brief note on the Question of a Legally Valid Election," September 26, 2017)

Bishop Gracida shows that Skojec is wrong in his legally crafted Open Letter quoting Pope John Paul II's Universi Dominici Gregis' introductory perambulary and paragraph 76:

-"I further confirm, by my Apostlic authority, the duty of maintaining the strictest secrecy with regard to everything that directly or indirectly concerns the election process [the above which Gracida clearly shows in his Open Letter was not maintained thus making the conclave and Francis's papacy invalid according to the Bishop]."
(Introductory perambulary)

-"Should the election take place in a way other than laid down here not to be observed, the election is for this very reason null and void."
(Paragraph 76)

Gracida's Open Letter, moreover, shows that Skojec is wrong above:

"The clear exception from nullity and invalidity for simony proves the general rule that other violations of the sacred process certainly do and did result in the nullity and invalidity of the entire conclave."

On top of all that, Skojec ignores paragraph 5 and contrary to what canon lawyer Edward Peters has said about Universi Dominici Gregis when he suggests canon lawyers have a role in interpreting the John Paul II Constitution, the document says:

"Should doubts arise concerning the prescriptions contained in this Constitution, or concerning the manner of putting them into effect. I [Pope John Paul II] Decree that all power of issuing a judgment of this in this regard to the College of Cardinals, to which I grant the faculty of interpreting doubtful or controverted points."
(Universi Dominici Gregis, paragraph 5)

Later in the paragraph it says "except the act of the election," which can be interpreted in a number of ways.

The point is, as Bishop Gracida says and Universi Dominici Gregis said, only the cardinals can interpret its meaning, not Skojec or canon lawyers.

The Bishop is saying what the document says: only the cardinals can interpret it.

He, also, says put pressure on the cardinals to act and interpret it which both Skojec and Peters appear to prefer to ignore.

Moreover, Bishop Gracida's Open Letter and Pope John Paul II's document make a number of points which neither Skojec, Peters or anyone else to my knowledge have even brought up or offered any counter argument against.

I have great respect for both Skojec and Peters, but unless Gracida's Open Letter is squarely responded to my respect for them will greatly diminish for they will be neglecting their responsibility to God and His Church.

They are both wrong if they ignore this important Open Letter of Bishop Gracida.

If Skojec and Peters as well as the conservative and traditional Catholic media are ignoring Bishop Gracida because he isn't a cardinal and retired, remember that St. Athanasius wasn't a cardinal (that is involved in the selection or election process of the pope of the time) and was retired.

During the Arian heresy crisis, Pope Liberius excommunicated Athanasius. You don't get any more retired than being excommunicated.

Skojec gave blogger Ann Barnhardt's analysis of the papal validity a long article. The only bishop in the world contesting Francis in a meaningful way deserves as much.

Skojec and Peters need to answer Gracida's theologically clear and precise arguments and either clearly and precisely counter them or put pressure on the cardinals to put into action the needed canonical procedures to remove Francis if he was "never validly elected" the pope or else remove him from the Petrine office for heterodoxy.

Francis is not orthodox so there are only two things he could be:

1. A validly elected pope who is a material heretic until cardinals correct him and then canonically proclaim he is a formal heretic if he doesn't recant thus deposing him or

2. a invalidly elected anti-pope who is a heretic.

The point is whether you think using all the information available 1. is the objective truth or 2. is the objective truth you must act.

You must as the Bishop says put: "pressure on the cardinals to act" whichever you think. 

There are many ways to put pressure such as pray and offer Masses for this intention, send the Gracida link to priests, bishops and cardinals, make signs and pray the rosary in front of their offices as we do in front of abortion clinics. Use your imagination to come up with other ideas.

Gracida is calling the cardinals to "[a]ddress... [the] probable invalidity" before they attempt to depose him from the Petrine office for heterodoxy. But, just as importantly he is calling all faithful Catholics to act and not just bemoan Francis's heresy. 


Bishop Gracida in a email to me and through the Catholic Monitor to all faithful Catholics said:

"ONE CAN SAY THAT FRANCIS THE MERCIFUL IS A HERETIC UNTIL ONE DIES BUT IT CHANGES NOTHING. WHAT IS NEEDED IS ACTION... WE MUST PRESSURE THE CARDINALS TO ACT. SEND THAT LINK TO EVERY PRIEST AND BISHOP YOU KNOW": https://wp.me/px5Zw-95e.


Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church and for Catholics to not just bemoan heresy, but put pressure on the cardinals to act.

Friday, September 07, 2018

Are the Leftist Daily Beast & "Conservative" Moynihan Enablers in Pope Francis's Stonewalling of his Sex Abuse Cover-up?

The leftist Daily Beast which was called a "Democratic party mouthpiece" on Quora.com apparently has joined forces with the "conservative" Inside the Vatican editor Robert Moynihan.

They appear to be accomplices in Pope Francis's stonewalling against an investigation to bring out the truth of if he covered-up sex abuse as revealed by the credible Ex-Vatican Apostlic Nuncio Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano in a 11-page report.

The "Democratic party mouthpiece" Daily Beast's plot to enable Francis to cover-up the evidence that he protected sex abuse predator ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick is to change the narrative.

The Democratic party mouthpiece wants to change to story from: "Why is Francis stonewalling against revealing the evidence to prove or disprove the credible allegations of Vigano?" to today's Daily Beast headline: "The Plot to bring down Pope Francis."

The Beast's article says the present scandal isn't about the credibly alleged papal sex abuse cover-up, but about those bad "traditional conservatives":

"[T]he traditional conservatives... didn't want a cool... pope... they preferred the cold church... of immovable doctrines."

The Democratic party mouthpiece article quotes Moynihan saying:

"It... reveal[s] a profound struggle within the Catholic Church between factions... for "control of the narrative.'"

So for the "conservative" Moynihan and the Beast it is about a Marxist-like dialectic of power struggles and "narratives" and must not be about what is the truth on rather the Pope covered-up sex abuse.

In fact, the truth doesn't matter so long as the "cool" pope wins in the power struggle with the bad "cold" conservatives.

As all Marxist leaning and apparently some "conservative" postmodernists know there is no such thing as truth only "narratives."

The truth of "cold... immoveable doctrines" or abuse cover-ups don't matter if one can use the "narratives" to help the "cool" leftist Pope beat the "cold" traditional conservatives.

Of course, the "narrative" to enable the Pope to stonewall revealing the truth of if he covered-up is a bit different for the "conservative" Moynihan.

The Inside the Vatican editor's attack against the "traditional conservatives" in his Letter #54 email today is all about his great concern of the "danger" of "a split in the Church" and his hope that "Francis, even now, could lead a reform."

He is sticking to this narrative despite the fact that he as a Vatican expert is well aware that Francis's inner circle is riddled with homosexual and financial corruption.

He apparently doesn't want a "split" between the honest and morally upright Catholics who believe in "immoveable doctrines" who are "exploiting this... against a popular Pope" whose inner circle is in large part made up of the corrupt "gay lobby" in the Vatican and the McCarrick pro-gay bishops network. Here is some of Moynihan's "narrative":

"One danger is a split in the Church."

"... And many powerful conservative Catholics in America are exploiting this [papal gay sex abuse cover-up] revulsion... against a popular Pope."

"... This does not mean Pope Francis should resign."

"... Francis, even now could lead a reform."

Of course, the Vatican expert Moynihan knows who will help Francis with those reforms: the Pope's inner circle.

The papal inner circle of Francis's "closest collaborators and confidants" includes Vatican Bank Msgr. Battista Ricca of the alleged "gay affairs" scandal who houses the Pope in his Vatican hotel. Vice-Pope Cardinal Rodriguez Maradiaga of the gay Honduras seminary scandal. C9 Cardinal Ezzati who is Francis's collaborator of the Chile gay Barros scandal; and confidant Cardinal Coccopalmerio whose secretary is of the gay drug/orgy scandal which happened a few hundred yards away from where Francis lives in the gay Ricca's hotel.

As Moynihan knows, these are only some of the names.

According to Vatican expert Sandro Magister, Francis has a "number of homosexual priests in his inner circle of closest collaborators and confidants."
(Magister's Chiesa.com, December 16, 2016)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.








Thursday, September 06, 2018

Newsweek: Only 35% of Americans think Pope Francis shouldn't Resign while Whopping 65% give Francis No Confidence Vote

Newsweek reported that only 35% of Americans think Pope Francis shouldn't resign because of the sex abuse scandals according to a YouGov/Economist scientific poll.

41% of President Donald Trump voters wanted Francis to resign, while only 13% of pro-abortion LGBT candidate Hillary Clinton voters thought the Pope should resign.

Francis got a whopping no confidence vote from 65% of Americans according to the poll.

26% thought the Pope should resign. 39% were not sure, while 35% didn't want Francis to resign.

(Newsweek, "Pope Francis Should Resign Amid Church Abuse Scandals, 1 in 4 Americans say: Poll," September 5, 2018)




Wednesday, September 05, 2018

Washington Post & BBC: Pope Francis on Sex Abuse was "Totally Silent" & helped "Out of Control" Pedophilia Priest "Avoid Jail" & Reside near where Predator had Abused a "Boy" as a Argentine Archbishop

Pope Francis is now totally silent on Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano's credible testimony that he covered-up the sex abuse of ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick.

The Washington Post on

[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/pope-francis-was-often-quiet-on-argentine-sex-abuse-cases-as-archbishop/2013/03/18/26e7eca4-8ff6-11e2-9cfd-36d6c9b5d7ad_story.html?utm_term=.edbf9eb41231]

Francis who was "widely viewed as close to the young [pedophile] priest" Father Julio César Grassi and helped him with a "document" that "helped Grassi avoid jail'  and the "document," also, 'helped" or "[allowed] him to continue residing across the street from the classroom and dormitories of Happy Children" where he had abused a "boy":

"The case of Father Grassi has been particularly troublesome to children’s advocates here because Bergoglio was widely viewed as close to the young priest, who told reporters before his conviction that he spoke with Bergoglio often and that the archbishop 'never let go of my hand.'”

"Grassi was not expelled from the priesthood after the guilty verdict. Instead, church officials led by Bergoglio commissioned a lengthy private report arguing that Grassi was innocent."

"The report was submitted as part of the priest’s legal appeal, which is pending, and prosecutors say the document has helped Grassi avoid jail time so far. A court has granted him a provisional release that allows him to continue residing across the street from the classroom and dormitories of Happy Children."
[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/pope-francis-was-often-quiet-on-argentine-sex-abuse-cases-as-archbishop/2013/03/18/26e7eca4-8ff6-11e2-9cfd-36d6c9b5d7ad_story.html?utm_term=.edbf9eb41231]

The BBC reported on September 24, 2013, that the "out of control" pedophile Grassi, despite Bergoglio's best efforts to allow the predator to remain free, was jailed. Prosecutor Alejandro Varela, by implication, said that Bergoglio's efforts to free the predator were "almost like colluding with his crime":

"A court in Buenos Aires province rejected an appeal by Father Julio Cesar Grassi, who has been sentenced to 15 years in jail, to remain under house arrest."

"He was convicted in 2009 of abusing the boy at his 'Happy Children' foundation."

'... Prosecutor Alejandro Varela argued that there was a risk that the priest would escape if he was not detained."

"Three courts in Argentina had already confirmed his 2009 conviction, before the Supreme Court of Buenos Aires province ratified the 15-year prison sentence last week."

"'To leave Grassi free is almost like colluding with his crime,' said Mr Varela."

"... A lawyer for the prosecution, Juan Pablo Gallego, described him as 'a convicted paedophile, who is out of control'."
[https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-24216253]

 Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Tuesday, September 04, 2018

Is Pope Francis Silent and Lying now as he was Silent and Lied in Sex Abuse Cover-up Case as a Argentine Archbishop according to Documentary on German National TV?

Is Pope Francis silent and lying (by his implication that accuses Vigano of causing scandal) about Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano's credible testimony that he covered-up the sex abuse of ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick as he was silent and lied about the sex abuse cover-up case of the "now-infamous Father Julio César Grassi who has been imprisoned for 15 years because of his abuse of children" when Francis was then Argentine Archbishop Jorge Maria Bergoglio according to a German documentary?

LifeSiteNews reports that the German national TV channel ZDF is currently running a documentary by Martin Boudot which is being aired now and "making the rounds in the German-speaking world called the 'The Silence of the Shepherds.'"

The documentary says six alleged victims of abuse all say that then-Archbishop Bergoglio was silent and "never answered their own specific complaints when they wrote to him as the archbishop of Buenos Aires." Journalist Maike Hickson wrote:

"When asked by the documentary journalists whether or not they ever received an answer, they all shook their heads in the negative. Asked about the above-quoted statement that Bergoglio never having a pedophile priest in his diocese and whether he says here the truth, one abuse victim, a woman, answered: 'He [Francis/Bergoglio] wants people to believe that, but it is a lie.'”
[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/francis-ignored-covered-up-abuse-in-argentina-before-becoming-pope-german-d]

Hickson below reveals that the documentary shows Francis lying about "a counter-inquiry" he commissioned to cover-up for the priest predator. She quotes the documentary saying “How can the Catholic Church retrieve itself from these guilty silences?”:

"The documentary states that, Bergoglio, as Pope Francis 'never publicly commented on the Grassi case.' The journalists themselves had tried for eight months to obtain an interview with the pontiff on the subject, but to no avail. Since they failed, the journalists stood in line at Saint Peter's during one of the papal audiences and were able to call out to Pope Francis: 'Your Holiness! Your Holiness, in the Grassi case, did you try to influence Argentine justice?' Pope Francis, making a stunned face (caught on film here in the documentary), replied 'No!' The journalists continued, saying: 'No? Then why did you commission a counter-inquiry?' The Pope responded, with a similar face: 'I never did.' The documentary then asks: 'How can the Catholic Church retrieve itself from these guilty silences?'”
[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/francis-ignored-covered-up-abuse-in-argentina-before-becoming-pope-german-d]

A better question is:

How can the Catholic Church retrieve itself from the Francis/Bergoglio guilty silences?

According to Journalist Hickson, the documentary says victims believe Bergoglio “willfully tried to divert the course of justice” and cover-up for a sex abusing priest:

"Reference was here made to Father Grassi. 'The Argentinian Church did all in its power to have him acquitted,' explained the speaker. Juan Pablo Gallego, the defense attorney of the abuse victims, pointed out that the Argentine bishops in 2010 – after the first punitive sentence was spoken about Grassi – had asked a penal law professor (Marcelo A. Sancinetti) to conduct a study, which was compiled in a confidential dossier for internal use, dealing with the Grassi case."

"This dossier, which was called 'Studies on the Grassi Case' and contained 2,800 pages, came to the conclusion that 'the court was wrong,' that Grassi was innocent and therefore should be acquitted. The author also claimed that the abused children spread 'falsifications, lies, deceit and invention.'”

"This study, as the documentary pointed out, was made on behalf of the Argentine bishops under the leadership of Archbishop Jorge Bergoglio, who was, at that time, also the President of the Argentine Bishops' Conference (2005-2011). This information is written on the back cover of the dossier. 'So the Pope,' the speaker in the documentary concluded, 'did then commission a counter-inquiry to try to have a priest who had been sentenced for pedophilia acquitted.'”

“'And it is said,' the speaker in the documentary continued, 'that Jorge Bergoglio, the future Pope, actually sent it to the judges, with a shrewd sense of timing, before Father Grassi's various appeal hearings.' Carlos Mahiques was one of these judges. In an interview for this documentary, he made it clear that this study, as ordered by Bergoglio, 'is in some areas partial, and extremely partial in others,' and that is why he, as judge, did not allow himself to be influenced by it."

“'It was clearly in favor of Father Grassi,' the judge said. 'They were trying to exert a subtle form of pressure on the judges.” When asked whether he thought the Church tried to influence the judges, Mahiques replied: 'That's totally correct.'”

"In an interview in the documentary with one of the abuse victims of Father Grassi, it becomes clear that Grassi claimed to stand under the protection of Bergoglio."

“'Bergoglio never let go of my hand,' are the words as they are quoted by the abuse victim who claimed to have heard them from Grassi himself. The victim continued, saying that Bergoglio now 'is Pope Francis, but he has never gone against Grassi’s words. So I’m certain that he never did let go of Grassi’s hand!'"
[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/francis-ignored-covered-up-abuse-in-argentina-before-becoming-pope-german-d]

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

 The Silence of the Shepherds:









Monday, September 03, 2018

Catholic World Report Misdirects Credible Allegations that Francis Covered-up Sex Abuse calling them "Complex" & 5 Questions

  1. Why can't Pope Francis and the Catholic media answer: yes or no?
  2. Today, why did the Catholic World Report post an article that attempts to appear balanced, but is a whistleblower attack piece, by the Catholic News Agency "Benedict, Viganò, Francis, and McCarrick" calling Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano's credible allegations that Francis covered-up sex abuse "complex" and weakly say they "could" possibly maybe accept a investigation to find out the truth?
  3. Catholic World Report and Catholic News Agency do you think the Catholic media should protect credibly accused clerics or a pope himself should protected himself from a investigation if that pope is credibly accused of sex-abuse cover-up for any of the "complex" reasons listed in your article or for any reasons imaginable and that these Catholic media and pope should not strongly demand an investigation to find out the truth? Answer: yes or no.
  4. Would you, Catholic World Report or Catholic News Agency, write or post a article similar to this one if the whistleblower were a credible accuser of predator Harvey Weinstein or do you only protect credibly accused bishops and popes from investigations? Answer: yes or no.
  5. Can you pray a Our Father now that the Catholic World Report, the Catholic News Agency and Francis answer, yes or no, to the above questions?

Sunday, September 02, 2018

Is Soros/Francis Deep State Targeting Sex Abuse Whistleblower Vigano and Trump?

Everyone knows that the corporate media, such The New York Times, Reuter and others, are attempting to ruin Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano who is a whistleblower against the Pope Francis Vatican homosexual network and sex abuse cover-ups.

People are starting to wake up to the fact that the corporate media is controlled by the Deep State.

The United Kingdom magazine Christian Order in its latest exposé on the "complex corporate/financial/political" Deep State said:

"Occasionally, media scrutiny and/or public prosecution of global criminal scams... provide a glimpse like the Bank of Credit and Commerce International during the 1970s/80s and currently the Clinton Foundation... the first-tier all hold so much dirt on each other that mutual protection and continuing is assured."

"As for whistle-blowers, the lower-level variety are either bought off, blackmailed, ruined, or murdered with impunity. Exposure and defiance at the highest levels by uncontrollable presidential forces like JFK, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, on the other hand, sometimes leads to assassination (JFK) but more usually is handled by a controlled press."

"President Putin's complaint at the recent Helsinki summit of a massive swindle involving the transfer of $400 million... to Hillary Clinton's election campaign, for example, was either totally ignored, or mentioned but not pursued... [as was] Putin's further pointed reference to the transnational conniving of Hillary's nefarious backer, George Soros."(Christian Order, "Deep State Armageddon," August/September 2018)

Everyone who has read or seen on YouTube internationally respected investigator and attorney Elizabeth Yore's detailed research knows Francis's Vatican is in bed or in alliance with the Deep State and Soros. Yore revealed:

"George Soros operatives are embedded in the Vatican. They have drafted Vatican documents that set up the Soros agenda which mirrors the Francis agenda." (YouTube, "An Unholy Alliance: the UN, Soros, and the Francis Papacy," February 21, 2017)

The Christian Order article, moreover, shows that the Soros/Clinton Deep State doesn't just have the "controlled press" working for them, but the intelligence agencies:

"As George Neumayr commented... 'Obama via Brennan, did the equivalent for Hillary'... namely, by turning CIA HQ at Langley, Virginia, into the Clinton War Room."

"... For [Trump] his tenure is a providential opportunity to face down the Washington vermin; to thwart their occult designs. So let us pray that he [Trump] traps and eradicates them before they trap and eradicate him - or it's criminal game, globalist set, and godless match to the dirty rats."

Please pray that God protect President Trump and Archbishop Vigano because they are both fighting against cornered and often deadly enemies.

Pray an Our Father now for God to protect them. Please keep them in your daily prayers.

Saturday, September 01, 2018

Francis, Weinstein, McCarrick, their Media Enablers & the Vatican II Conservative Enablers

On October 6, 2017, The New York Times article "Harvey Weinstein's Media Enablers" explains why the media protected and covered-up for predator Weinstein and attacked abused women who were whistleblowers.

But, more importantly, why they, The New York Times, Reuter and others, are attacking whistleblower Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano as well as enabling and protecting Pope Francis who covered-up for a series of sex abusers and those who covered-up for them, the most famous examples being the recent Chile predator cover-up papal fiasco and now according to Vigano the ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick case.

The Times piece explains exactly why the media enables predators and those who cover-up for them as well as why it is now protecting Francis and attacking Vigano who blew the whistle on the Pope's predator cover-up:

"Harvey Weinstein... was 'the worst-kept secret' in Hollywood and New York."

"The real story didn't surface until now because too many people in the intertwined news and entertainment industries had too much to gain from Mr. Weinstein. Across a run of more than 30 years."

"... But... trouble finally found Mr. Weinstein because he was no longer the rainmaker and hitmaker he had once been."

"... 'The industry is passionate about [liberal] causes, 'but when it comes down to doing business, they're definitely capable of holding their noses.'"

Francis will stop having his media enablers protect him when they realize that like Weinstein that he can no longer be the "hitmaker" for their liberal "causes" such as immigration and global warming.

The only difference between the supposedly "objective journalistic" cover-up media and Weinstein and the cover-up liberal Francis and liberal McCarrick is that the ex-Cardinal and Pope pose to be holy men of the Church.

Unfortunately, it wasn't just the liberals such as Francis that enabled "men like McCarrick," but Vatican II conservatives who enabled "men like McCarrick." The ultimate "new springtime" of Vatican II conservative Catholic Matthew Schmitz, senior editor at First Things, on August 16, in the Catholic Herald said:

"[T]he post-Vatican II settlement [of]... Upholding Catholic teaching on paper but not in reality has led to widespread corruption... has required a culture of lies... that allowed men like McCarrick to flourish... we must sweep it away."

The Amoris Laetitia-like liberal Vatican II document Dignitatis Humanae on the Catholic state is what brought about the "[u]pholding Catholic teaching on paper but not in reality... has required a culture of lies... that allowed men like McCarrick to flourish."

Traditionalists said it was a façade which was ambiguous and not defined teaching that would eventually have to be corrected.

Francis's Vatican Archbishop Guido Pozzo who was negotiating with Society of Pius X for the Pope agreed with the Traditionalists that it was not defined teaching.

Pozzo said that Dignitatis Humanae "is not about doctrine or definitive statements, but... pastoral practice." (Die Zeit, August 2016, Interview with Archbishop Guido Pozzo)

The greatest living American Thomist Edward Feser gives a brief summary of the history before and after Vatican II of the teaching on this subject and the ambiguity of the document:

"That depends.  In the Catholic context, the traditional teaching, vigorously and repeatedly upheld by the 19th century and pre-Vatican II 20th century popes, is that ideally Church and state ought to cooperate.  Contrary to an annoyingly common misunderstanding, these popes were not teaching that non-Catholics ought to be coerced by the state into becoming Catholics.  Nor were they teaching that non-Catholics should be forbidden from practicing their own religions in the privacy of their own homes, their own church buildings or synagogues, etc.  Rather, the issue was whether, in a country in which the vast majority of citizens were Catholic, non-Catholics ought to be permitted to proselytize and thereby possibly lead Catholics to abandon their faith.  It was not denied that there can be circumstances in which such proselytizing might be tolerated for the sake of civil order.  The question was whether non-Catholics have a strict right in justice to proselytize even in a majority Catholic society.  And the pre-Vatican II popes taught that they did not have such a right, and that in a Catholic country the state could in principle justly restrict such proselytizing (even if there are also cases where the state might not exercise its right to such restriction, if this would do more harm than good)."

"This was the teaching which Vatican II seemed to reverse, though the relevant document, Dignitatis Humanae, explicitly taught that it was “leav[ing] untouched traditional Catholic doctrine on the moral duty of men and societies toward the true religion and toward the one Church of Christ.”  Yet whether the principles set out in Dignitatis Humanae really can be reconciled with the principles set out by the pre-Vatican II popes, how exactly they are to be reconciled if they can be, and which principles are more authoritative and ought to be retained if they cannot be reconciled -- these have all been matters of controversy.  They are controversies most Catholics, including conservative Catholics, have avoided.  The reason, it seems to me, is that the older teaching is extremely unpopular in modern times, and thus whatever its current doctrinal status, most Catholics are happy to let it remain a dead letter and leave its precise relationship to Dignitatis Humanae unsettled.  Yet a question unanswered and ignored is still a real question, and there are scholars who have in different ways attempted to apply to this one a “hermeneutic of continuity,” including Thomas Storck, Fr. Brian Harrison, and Thomas Pink." 

One knows a Vatican II document is a disaster when a defender of Dignitatis Humanae (DR) like Fr. Brian Harrison says:

"The effect DR have been much more harmful than beneficial for the Church, the world and most important, the honor due to Christ the King . . . The form in which it presents its truth is so one-sided, so poorly explained, so perilously open to unorthodox interpretation, and so infected with the spirit of liberal humanism, that its promulgation has turned out to be a cause of rejoicing for the Church's worst enemies: freemasonry and all the other forces which seek to promote the ever more total secularization of society, the ever more complete exclusion of Our Lord Jesus Christ from His rightful sovereignty over the public life of nations, and confusion and division within the Church itself." [http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/05Dec/dec14agg.htm]

Christopher Ferrara stated why Dignitatis Humanae brought about "[u]pholding Catholic teaching on paper but not in reality has led to widespread corruption... has required a culture of lies... that allowed men like McCarrick to flourish":

"There is no question that the Popes before Vatican II consistently condemned the modern notion of "religious liberty"-----i.e., that everyone in society must have the right, both privately and publicly, to practice, preach and otherwise manifest the doctrines of the religion of his choice, even if that religion is filled with error and immorality. That such a "right" attacks both public morality and the very foundation of Catholic social order (where it exists) hardly needs to be proved. There cannot, obviously, be any "right" as such publicly to deny the Divinity of Christ or to preach in favor of contraception, abortion, divorce [,homosexuality] and other evils. No one has the right to do or to say what is wrong. A right to commit wrong is utter nonsense. Stated negatively, a right not to be prevented by the State from committing wrong is equally nonsensical. The State might for prudential reasons, as St. Thomas observed, tolerate certain public errors and vices, but there is no question of any right to be tolerated in spreading them." [http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/05Dec/dec14agg.htm]

Unfortunately, almost all conservatives such as Archbishop Charles Chaput thought Dignitatis Humanae was defined teaching and not a disaster.

Apparently, Chaput teaches that "error has no rights" in paper, but in reality error or a culture of lies has rights if "persons... choose falsehood over truth." The Archbishop wrote:

"Error has no rights, but persons do have rights - even when they choose falsehood [a culture of lies] over truth... freedom of conscience, is - along with the right to life - the most important right any human being has." (First Things, "Of Human Dignity," March 18, 2015)

So did conservatives such as Chaput think that they on paper could teach that homosexuality was error, but in reality error had rights if "persons [such as the liberal McCarrick]... choose falsehood [a culture of lies] over truth... freedom of conscience"?

In fact, in 2001 when then President Bush met with Catholic leaders and his "'longtime friend' Cardinal McCarrick" who was there with him according to liberal Catholic Betty Clermont: "McCarrick; Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver." ("The Neo-Catholics," pages 154, 159)

What did Chaput know about McCarrick when he sat with him in that meeting?

Did he think McCarrick as a person had a right to freedom of conscience to falsehood over truth?

Does Chaput think that on paper that he can teach that homosexuality is a error but in reality error has rights if "persons [such as the liberal Fr. James Martin]... choose falsehood [a culture of lies] over truth... freedom of conscience"?

On March 31, 2017, LifeSiteNews in "Numerous 'gay' affirming parishes unopposed by bishops" reported that Chaput agrees with Martin when he "expressed concern about the use of 'intrinsically disordered'" which is a defined Catholic teaching on homosexuality.

Chaput, also, defends gay activist Fr. Martin who taught on YouTube that chastity is not required of homosexuals. (Church Militant, "Father Martin: Homosexuals not Bound to Chastity, "September 20, 2017)

It appears that the "conservative" Chaput is using Dignitatis Humanae to build a bridge to hell for homosexuals by claiming on paper that the error of homosexuality has no rights, but in reality error has rights if "persons [such as Martin and McCarrick] choose falsehood [a culture of lies] over truth."

Unfortunately, one of the main writers of Dignitatis Humanae was Pope John Paul II before he became pope. It appears that John Paul II when it came to the documented evidence of the sex abuse of a bishop taught that "error has no rights" in paper, but in reality error has rights if "persons... choose falsehood [a culture of lies] over truth":

"In 1996, Kunz became a canon law adviser to the Roman Catholic Faithful (RCF), an Illinois-based group investigating the sexual abuse of boys by Catholic priests and bishops. Kunz was recommended to RCF by the Rev. John A. Hardon, SJ, a widely respected theologian and author who worked for several popes and had deep connections at the Vatican. The group was gathering information on Bishop Daniel L. Ryan of the Diocese of Springfield, Ill. Ryan was accused of sexually assaulting a mentally disabled man, soliciting sex from a 15-year-old boy, trolling area parks for teenage male prostitutes, and having sex with priests in his diocese. In sworn testimony to RCF investigators, one of the teen prostitutes said Ryan once heard his confession and blessed him, then told him, “go and sin no more.” Then the bishop winked at the teen and said, 'See you later.'”

"With help from Kunz and Father Fiore, RCF developed a dossier on the situation in the Springfield diocese. Father Hardon carried the report to Rome and presented it to Pope St. John Paul II, vouching for RCF and the accuracy of the document. Nothing was done with the explosive information. Hardon told RCF officials that at least a dozen American bishops supported Ryan in his quest to hold onto his bishopric in Springfield, according to RCF president and founder Stephen G. Brady. One of them was the late Joseph Cardinal Bernardin, then archbishop of Chicago, Brady said. When the group approached Bernardin for help in removing Ryan, he refused, Brady said. Ryan abruptly retired in October 1999, shortly before a lawsuit was filed accusing him of covering up the sexual abuse of a child by another Illinois priest. Sheriff Mahoney said Dane County investigators interviewed Ryan, but have no indication he is linked to the Kunz homicide. Ryan died in December 2015."

“Father Hardon told me to go to Kunz if I needed any contacts anywhere or needed direction in my investigations,” Brady told Catholic World Report. 'Father Kunz never discussed any other investigations with me except my own. He was tight lipped and you could trust him 100 percent. He had my files and answered any questions I had. He did work behind the scenes for me but kept it private.'”
"Brady said during the 14 years that RCF conducted its investigations, he received three death threats. One was serious enough to involve the FBI. An email circulated claiming a contract was out for Brady’s assassination. After Kunz was murdered, Brady bought a bulletproof vest." [https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2018/08/08/the-unsolved-murder-of-fr-alfred-kunz/]

Unfortunately, almost all conservatives such as John Paul II and Chaput appeared to think that Dignitatis Humanae was defined teaching that was a central document governing the Church after Vatican II. As Schmitz  said:"[T]he post-Vatican II settlement [of]... Upholding Catholic teaching on paper but not in reality has led to widespread corruption... has required a culture of lies... that allowed men like McCarrick [and those whom Fr. Kunz attempted to expose] to flourish... we must sweep it away."

In both cases with the media enablers of Weinstein as well as with the Vatican II conservative enablers of the homosexual bishops network in the Church made up of men like McCarrick, the gay activists like Fr. Martin and the cover-up Francis it appears that the culture of lies is almost like pornography, in this case homosexual porn, in its multiplying of lies as I wrote in my book "Hidden Axis":

"Pornography is not only bad, it is also an empty evil that can only mimic reality. It's men having imaginary relationships with glossed-over images of what was once a picture of a real woman, betraying her most intimate self and future relationships. The emptiness keeps multiplying."

I imagine this ugliness is part of what hell is like: empty selfish lovelessness and lies multiplying endlessly. Please pray that the Church no longer allow popes, bishops or anyone to enable the culture of lies.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church and that souls are given the grace to repent so they don't go to hell as Our Lady of Fatima requested.