Monday, April 29, 2019

Milo: "Francis Playbook": Stonewall, Detraction & "then Distracting the Press with a Left-wing Stunt"

The homosexual journalist Milo Yiannopoulos in his book "Diabolical" described "the usual Francis playbook":

"[R]efusing to comment, sticking it to opponents in his sermons, and then distracting the press with a left-wing stunt.
(Diabolical, Page 15)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Why have the Vatican II Popes been Afraid of Schism by "holding together the Conservative [Catholic] and Liberal [Heretic] Factions" within the Church?


The homosexual journalist Milo Yiannopoulos in his book "Diabolical" reported:

""Since Vatican II, most popes have been preoccupied with holding together the conservative [Catholic] and liberal [heretic] factions that emerged in its wake."

Why were the Vatican II popes and why are almost all the conservative present day cardinals and bishops so afraid of a schism with the heretic faction?

Their fear of schism has led to the following results according to Yiannopoulos:

"Is the pope [liberal Francis] Catholic? That's not a joke: some of us have been wondering since Francis described bishops accused of raping children, or covering up the rape , as 'like Jesus on Good Friday.'"
(Breitbart, "Pope Francis says accused Pastors are like Jesus on Good Friday," 9/18/2018)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Sunday, April 28, 2019

Why have Bishops & "Journalists... Leapt to the Defense of a Pope [Francis] who Protected and Rehired Child Molesters" like they did for McCarrick?

Homosexual journalist Milo Yiannopoulos who is a sex abuse victim in his book "Diabolical" said:

"[J]ournalists have leapt to the defense of a Pope [Francis] who protected and rehired child molesters... [like] Theodore McCarrick... [whose] crimes have been described as 'some of the worst in Church history.'"

Not just the journalists, but the cardinals and bishops indefensible defense of Francis appears to be Act II of how they promoted the child molester Ted McCarrick.

As the media was full of "Ted Talks" so now the media is full of "Francis Talks" which shines his celebrity star to the highest heaven.

As the media hyped Ted, he was nothing more than a media protected child molester so now as they hype Francis, he is nothing more than a child molester protector.

In 2002, McCarrick assumed the role as the Catholic Church spokesman against child molestation as he was a child molester and now Francis has assumed the role as the Catholic Church spokesman against child molestation as he protects child molesters.

Why did the U S. Bishops allow this contempt of justice in 2002?

Why are the World Cardinals and Bishops allowing this mockery of justice now?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Saturday, April 27, 2019

Francis Money, Gay Lobby Cdl.Maradiaga, the Honduran Migrant Caravan Gays, Human Trafficking & MS-13


Just noting some coincidences about the Honduran migrant caravan in Mexico:

1. "Pope Francis donated $500,000 to Mexico-based projects to help migrant communities as media attention has faded, the Vatican said Saturday."
[https://abcnews.go.com/amp/International/pope-francis-donates-500000-migrants-us-border/story?id=62675582]

2. The migrant caravan came from Francis's top papal advisor Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga's home country Honduras.

3. Maradiaga is known for his connections to the United States and Honduras gay lobbies.

 4. A news report says Honduran gays, "trans women [men]," involved in the caravan were accused by Guatamala officials of human trafficking.

 5. President Donald Trump said the caravan included criminals. The criminal organization from Honduras M-13 is known to be involved in human trafficking.

Here is the evidence that Maradiaga is connected to the McCarrick United States and the Honduran gay lobbies:

-"In his statement released Saturday, Archbishop Viganò refers to Cardinal Cupich as a man “blinded by his pro-gay ideology” who was appointed as archbishop outside of normal Church protocols because of the powerful backing of three influential cardinals... “The appointments of Blase Cupich to Chicago and Joseph W. Tobin to Newark were orchestrated by McCarrick, Maradiaga and Wuerl, united by a wicked pact of abuses by the first, and at least of coverup of abuses by the other two,” Viganò stated in his communiqué."
[https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/08/27/chicago-cardinal-astonished-by-allegations-his-career-aided-by-mccarrick/]

-“'Cardinal Maradiaga had not responded to questions submitted by the Register regarding the allegations of widespread homosexual misconduct at the Tegucigalpa archdiocesan seminary by the time this article was published. But an informed source said he views them as inventions. ‘He looks out for the guilty but doesn’t realize that over half the seminarians are homosexuals,’ the source said, adding that some formators recently refused to participate in priestly ordinations because of the candidates’ alleged homosexuality. ‘The cardinal ordained them himself’, the source said.'”

"And yet Rodriguez Maradiaga’s mandatory resignation at age 75 has not been accepted by Francis, even though he is, as Pentin notes, under pressure to explain what he knew and when he knew it concerning Pineda’s "'sexual misconduct with seminarians and lavish spending on his lovers that was so obvious to Honduras’ poverty-wracked faithful…'”
[https://fatima.org/news-views/why-is-rodriguez-maradiaga-still-a-cardinal-the-face-of-vatican-corruption/]

Are any of Maradiaga's gay Honduran associates connected with the Honduran gays in the caravan?

The radical gay Washington Blade reported Honduran gays are involved in the Honduran migrants caravan:

"Activists in San Pedro Sula and in the Honduran capital of Tegucigalpa with whom the Washington Blade spoke last week said upwards of 4,000 migrants are part of the caravan. The activists also said some of the migrants are LGBTI."

"The Blade’s attempts to speak with LGBTI migrants who are part of the caravan have thus far proven unsuccessful."
[http://www.washingtonblade.com/2018/10/21/new-migrant-caravan-hopes-to-reach-u-s/]

According to a news report some of those gays may be involved with human trafficking:

"Government officials in Guatemala were trying to charge the trans women [men] helping to support the children on the journey with 'human trafficking,'" according to Ferrera Sanchez, but with the help of human rights organizations in the area, these charges were dropped."
[https://rewire.news/article/2018/10/19/lgbtq-migrants-heading-to-the-us-from-honduras-are-not-going-to-give-up-on-their-american-dream/]

Guatamala officials who accused caravan gays with human trafficking are very knowledgeable about trafficking because the large criminal organization MS-13 in their country is known for this type of criminal activity.

MS-13 which is centered in the Northern Triangle countries of El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala is getting known for their human trafficking:

"The Mara Salvatrucha, better known by their acronym MS-13, is one of the largest and most violent transnational criminal organizations in the world. Their motto is “Kill, Rape, Control.” Since the 1980s, MS-13 members have typically engaged in a wide range of violent and criminal activity including, drug distribution, murder, rape, prostitution, robbery, home invasions, immigration offenses, kidnapping, carjacking/auto thefts, and vandalism."

"More recently there has been a rise in MS-13 engaging in human trafficking. MS-13 is found throughout the Americas but they traffick differently in the United States and in the Northern Triangle countries of El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala."

"In the United States, victims of MS-13 tend to be Latino immigrant girls or girls from the Northern Triangle countries who came into the country as unaccompanied minors. Once the unaccompanied minors are smuggled into the United States, they become prime targets for human trafficking."

"HHS places minors either in foster care, with family or a sponsor. The majority of unaccompanied minors end up in California, New York, Texas, and the Washington DC area that includes Maryland and Virginia—states that have large Central American populations and thus large MS-13 populations.[1] MS-13 preys on the vulnerability of the unaccompanied minors; some have previously suffered sexual abuse either in their home country or during the trip north; others lack a community and do not speak English. Members of MS-13 seek out the vulnerable young girls using violence and other coercive tactics to intimidate the girl into having sex for money to help financially support the gang."

"Runaways are also appealing to the MS-13. Family problems, transitions from foster care and economic problems are some of the reasons that unaccompanied minors run away from their homes. Many of the unaccompanied minors may have experienced sexual abuse, exploitation or physical abuse in their home countries or during their migration to the United States and even more suffer from poverty and lack of a stable social network. These are all factors that make young girls more susceptible to human trafficking."

"Violence against girls and women is widespread in Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala—the same nations dominated by MS-13. Women in these countries are disproportionately subjected to domestic violence, sexual abuse and exploitation, sex trafficking and other forms of largely gendered violence."
[http://humantraffickingsearch.org/the-connection-between-the-mara-salvatrucha-and-human-trafficking/]

Is it likely that if criminals known to United States intelligence were involved in the caravan that they would probably be MS-13 gang members?

President Trump who has intelligence sources says that criminals are involved in the caravan:

"Trump on Oct. 18 said he would 'call up the U.S. military and close our southern border' if the Mexican government did not “stop this onslaught.” He has also described the migrants as a 'large flow of people, including many criminals.'"
[http://www.washingtonblade.com/2018/10/21/new-migrant-caravan-hopes-to-reach-u-s/]

Pray an Our Father now for the United States and the victims of human trafficking

'Without Doctrine there is No Evangelization" in Francis's Apostolic Constitution or Holiness

The National Catholic Register reported that "Pope Francis’ new apostolic constitution for the Roman Curia" appears to give "evangelization" priority "over doctrine":

"Capuchin Father Thomas Weinandy, a former executive director of the U.S. bishops’ committee on doctrine, expressed misgivings over the document’s ambiguity, as reported so far."

"If evangelization is being emphasized over doctrine in order to give evangelization priority, Father Weinandy said he would have 'no problem' with that as it would be in keeping with Christ’s command and the Church’s tradition."

"But if, within such a stress on evangelization, it meant Church doctrine would not be emphasized at the same time, then that would not be a 'true evangelization' as the Church’s doctrines 'are at the heart of evangelization.'"

'Without doctrine there is no evangelization!' he said."
[http://m.ncregister.com/daily-news/vatican-reform-plan-takes-shape-evangelization-prioritized-over-doctrine]

The new apostolic constitution, like Francis's document Gaudete et Exsultate which are supposed to be calls to evangelization and holiness, unfortunately, appears not to be calls to either evangelization or holiness. Below is the reason why:

This is why Dan Hitchens in First Things says of the document "there is an orthodox interpretation," but then writes:

"But there is a different interpretation: that when someone says 'The Church teaches that X is intrinsically wrong,' he is probably a bit of a Pharisee. The history of Amoris Laetitia suggests that more expansive interpretation often gains the upper hand." (First Things, "An Ambiguous Exhortation," 4-12-18)

Hitchens suggests that this papal document is mocking those Catholics who believe and teach the infallible moral doctrines of Divine Revelation.

Obviously if one knowingly rejects Divine Revelation, one rejects God and loses his salvation.

But there is another reason why Gaudete et Exsultate will not make you holy and could help you lose your salvation.

St. Augustine said that no one can save his soul if he doesn't pray.

Augustine is talking about true prayer.

Prayer simply means to communicate or have dialogue with God. St. Teresa of Avila says prayer is conversation with God.

An excellent book on prayer by Tim Gray titled "Praying Scriptures for a Change: An Introduction to Lectio Divina" explains what is needed to have true prayer:

"With the effects of original sin distorting both the book of nature and the book of the human person, how can we hear God's communication?... When the Word became flesh, God's voice at last could be heard... Only through Jesus can we come to discern and hear clearly God's Word to us."

"This Word of divine revelation is handed down to us through Scripture and Tradition [infallible Church doctrines], which provide us with the Rosetta Stone for deciphering all that God wants to communicate to humanity. God desires enter into dialogue with us." (Pages 13-14)

St. Ignatius of Loyola couldn't have put it better on how to pray and make discernment.

Unfortunately, Francis's Gaudete et Exsultate says " the Holy Spirit... discernment... develop[s]... [by] prayer, reflection, reading and good counsel" (First Things, "An Ambiguous Exhortation, 4-12-18)," but not through Divine Revelation.

In fact, the document apparently condemns or as Hitchens says "criticizes... 'dogmatism'" and thus those who discern or pray using "dogmatism" or Divine Revelation as the only foundation to true prayer.

As all saints in history have taught, the only way to become holy is by prayer using Divine Revelation as it's only foundation.

So, Gaudete et Exsultate's method of prayer and discernment apparently will not make you holy and could help you lose your salvation if all the saints and St. Augustine are correct.

Pray an Our Father now for more Catholics to come to true prayer and discernment.

The "Pope Francis Era" is "Symbolize[d]" by the "Corruption" & Sex Abuse Cover-ups of Top Papal Advisor Maradiaga

Liberal Vatican expert John Allen affirms who is Francis's top advisor and that he "symbolizes" the "Pope Francis era":

Cardinal Oscar Rodríguez Maradiaga "symbolizes" the "Pope Francis era... he comes off as virtually a 'vice-pope,' the coordinator of Francis’ all-important council of cardinal advisors [C9] and his most visible and outspoken interpreter."
[https://cruxnow.com/church/2015/05/12/comeback-of-honduran-vice-pope-symbolizes-pope-francis-era/]

LifeSiteNews in the article "Corruption of Pope Francis’ reform chief portrayed in groundbreaking new book" reported that Martha Alegría Reichmann, the widow of former Vatican ambassador Alejandro Valladares Lanza in her new book  “Sacred Betrayals” (“Traiciones Sagradas”) revealed:

"Pope Francis’ reform chief Cardinal Óscar Rodríguez Maradiaga has maintained an abusive and mafia-like regime in Honduras for decades, promoting false investment schemes, diverting money from the local university and from the government to shadowy and immoral purposes, and ruthlessly protecting his corrupt auxiliary bishop, who was forced to resign in 2018 following accusations of sexual abuse of seminarians."

"Moreover, the conduct of the cardinal is well-known to senior members of the Vatican curia and even to Pope Francis himself, who appears to be beholden to Rodríguez Maradiaga and is unable – or unwilling – to correct the wayward prelate."
[https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.lifesitenews.com/mobile/news/corruption-of-pope-francis-reform-chief-revealed-in-groundbreaking-new-book#ampshare=https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/corruption-of-pope-francis-reform-chief-revealed-in-groundbreaking-new-book]

Moreover, the Cardinal who "symbolizes" the "Pope Francis era" "symbolizes" it's systematic sex abuse cover-up:

Italian journalist Emiliano Fittipaldi is one of the two Italian journalists charged in the Vatileaks 2 trial. The Vatican put him in court because of his last book on Vatican financial corruption. In his new book "Lust: Sins, Scandals, and Betrayal of a Church Made of Men," he reports that Francis and his top advisors, specifically Maradiaga, are covering-up or undermining investigations on sex abuse on a global scale.

In an interview with ComunidadeCulturaeArte.com, Fittipaldi said Maradiaga protected a pedophile priest, claimed that "Cardinal Law was a saint" and said that he "would never denounce" pedophile priests to the FBI:

"Maradiaga [Honduran Cardinal], from whom we have not yet spoken, but who is the coordinator of C9 and is a great friend of Francisco. The pope gave no importance to the fact that Maradiaga had protected a priest from the Costa Rica pedophile, fugitive from Interpol, who was found in bed with an eight-year-old child by his mother. This pedophile priest went around North America to Central America until he arrived in Honduras. In Tegucigalpa, which is the diocese of Maradiaga, he found hospitality for six months."

"Maradiaga is someone who in Rome, in 2004, when there was the ' Spotlight ' scandal, due to the investigation of our colleagues from the Boston Globe, said that the Boston Globe and CNN were beasts, Friends of the Jews of Israel, that the denunciations were not true and that Cardinal Law was a saint. He also said that he would never denounce a priest to the FBI, even if he was a pedophile, because priests are not cops. A man who says that kind of thing, ten years later, thanks to Francisco, has become one of the most powerful men in the Vatican." (ComunidadeCulturaeArte.com, "Emiliano Fittipaldi: ‘Para Francisco, a pedofilia é uma questão secundária,'" October 20, 2017, Google translation)
[https://www.comunidadeculturaearte.com/emiliano-fittipaldi-para-francisco-a-pedofilia-e-uma-questao-secundaria/]

In the interview Fittipaldi, also, said "Ratzinger [Pope Benedict XVI]... was very traditionalist and conservative, and so the journalists did not like him, but he did important things. The things he did in relation to pedophilia, which was not much, but double the time for prescribing crimes in the Vatican, sent away almost 600 priests in a few years. The incredible thing is that Francis did a lot less."

Journalist Hilary White confirmed the Fittipaldi understatement reporting that Francis "has all but completely dismantled" the "effective" reforms instituted against clerical sex abuse by Benedict:

"Pope Benedict installed effective procedural reforms on clerical sex abuse; Francis... has all but completely dismantled or reversed those changes... Benedict 'had defrocked or suspended more than 800 priests for past sexual abuse between 2009 and 2012'... His reforms specifically included bishops who refused to act against priest-abusers... 'This Pope has removed two to three bishops per month'... These reforms - and - removals - have ceased entirely under Francis."
(Remnant, "Pope Francis Accused of Inaction in Notorious Sex Abuse Cases, January 25, 2017)

It appears that Francis is solely responsible for almost completely dismantling Pope Benedict's effective sex abuse reforms.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Tuesday, April 23, 2019

"The Future is with God... we have a Perfect Model... in St. Joseph"

In this time of crisis and chaos in the Church and the world it did me good to read the great Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange's "Providence."

I thought it might bring consolation to everyone out there fighting the good fight for the Church and their families to read his words of wisdom which show that our only hope is in God's providence:

"The future is with God, future events are in His hands. If the merchants to whom Joseph was sold by his brethren had passed by one hour sooner, he would not have gone into Egypt, and the whole course of his life would have been changed. Our lives also are dependent on events controlled by God."

"... We must also abandon ourselves to God in all that concerns the present, in the midst of the difficulties we may be experiencing right now; even our past life, our past actions with all their consequences should be abandoned to the divine mercy."

"We must likewise abandon ourselves to God in all that affects the body, in health and sickness, as well as in all that affects the soul, whether it be joy or tribulation, of long or brief duration."

"We must abandon ourselves to God in all that concerns the good will or malice of men. Says St. Paul:

If God be for us, who is against us?.. I am sure neither death, nor life... shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord."

"... We have a perfect model of this abandonment to divine providence in St. Joseph, in the many difficulties that beset him at the moment of our Lord's birth at Bethlehem, and again when he heard the mournful prophecy of the aged Simeon, and during all the time that elapsed from the flight away from Herod into Egypt until the return to Nazareth."

"Following his example, let us live our lives in the same spirit, fulfilling our daily duties, and the grace of God will never be wanting. By His grace we shall be equal to anything He asks of us, no matter how difficult it may sometimes be."

Mary and Joseph pray that we may be equal to anything Jesus asks of us and that we receive the grace to be abandoned to his divine providence.


Saturday, April 20, 2019

Francis's False Humility doesn't lead to True Humility in Christ & the Resurrection of Easter

The great theologian Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange said "Humility... consists in abasing ourselves before God."
(Christianperfection.info, "The Three Ages of the Interior Life")

True humility or abasement is shown to involve repentance from sin and abasement in and with Jesus to God the Father:

"Catechism of the Catholic Church

 537: Through Baptism the Christian... must enter into this mystery of humble self-abasement and repentance, go down into the water with Jesus in order to rise with Him, be reborn of water and the Spirit so as to become the Father's beloved son in the Son."

Pope Francis in his Palm Sunday liturgy homily said:

"[Jesus] knows that true triumph involves making room for God... self-emptying. To remain silent, to pray, to accept humiliation."

Francis in a homily in 2014 explained what he means by humiliation:

"That is the path of Jesus Christ: abasement, humility, humiliation... if a thought, if a desire takes you along the road of humility and abasement, of service to others, is from Jesus."
(Catholic News Agency, "Pope Francis: the path of "humiliation' leads us to Jesus," January 7, 2014)

Francis is wrong if he means that "humility and abasement, of service to others" by themselves are the "path of Jesus Christ."

The true path of Jesus Christ to true humility and true charity is "abasing ourselves before God" in repentance from sin and in adoration of the Father by going "down into the water with Jesus in order to rise with Him, be reborn of water and the Spirit so as to become the Father's beloved son in the Son."

After "abasing ourselves before God" and adoring Him then "service for others" flows from our repentance from sin, abasement before God and love of Him.

Catholics following the Apostle St. James's "faith without works is dead" are not Martin Luther Protestants who believe that good works are useless, but we don't abase ourselves before man or do service for man unless it is ultimately pointing to abasement and service to God.

Sadly, it appears for Francis that humility and abasement doesn't necessarily involve or include repentance from sin, abasement before God and adoration of Him.

St. Paul put it best:

"Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things and consider them as dung."

Yes, even humiliation and service to others unless it flows from adoration and love of God is "dung," but if it flows from true humility and charity it is precious for "faith without works is dead."

Sadly, self-humiliation is not always good and can be evil. We find this out by a little research into a dung word, coprophilia, of Francis that is related to perversion and moral evil:

"[I]n Psychopathia Sexualis... categorize foot fetishism [such as foot kissing] and coprophilia under the same heading... Self-humiliation."
(Book. google.com, "Dada and Surrealist Films,"Page 165)

This brings us to a historical fact of Francis:

Never before in the history of Catholicism has a healthy pope repeatedly refused to kneel in front of the Holy Eucharist and meanwhile kneeled spontaneously to kiss the feet of politicians.

To put this in perspective, imagine if Pope John Paul II while he was still healthy had repeatedly refused to kneel in front of the Holy Eucharist, but meanwhile kneeled spontaneously to kiss the feet of Mikhail Gorbachev, President Ronald Reagan or a Muslim politician.

Pray Francis comes to understand true humility and starts kneeling before the Holy Eucharist.

May we all this Easter have true humility and abase ourselves before God "with Jesus in order to rise with Him, be reborn of water and the Spirit so as to become the Father's beloved son in the Son."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Sunday, April 14, 2019

Hitler may have had Dementia despite being Dynamic & Wrong: Is it Possible that Francis has Dementia, Too?

Did Adolf Hitler suffer from dementia?

Dr. Abraham N. Lieberman who was a eminent neurologist at the Barrow Neurological Institute in Phoenix and the clinical director of the National Parkinson Foundation thought the dictator suffered dementia in the form of Parkinson's disease according to the Los Angeles Times:

"Hitler's Parkinson's, he argues, may have been caused by a viral infection incurred around 1916, when a pandemic of Von Economo's encephalitis hit Europe. Encephalitis is an inflammation of the brain caused, in this case, by a still-unidentified virus."

'...The first symptoms of Hitler's Parkinson's were apparent, Lieberman says, in Leni Reifenstahl's 1934 film "Triumph of the Will," made when Hitler was 45 years old. The decreased and slowed movement of his left arm, a symptom called bradykinesia, was visible when he arrived at a Nazi Party congress in the morning, Lieberman says."

"... And finally, Lieberman says, Hitler was initially able to grasp theoretical and practical concepts and strongly supported basic research and weapons development. But after 1941, he failed to understand the importance of jet airplanes, atomic energy, radar and a host of other technological advances that were well within the reach of German research and development, Lieberman says. The Allies' development of these technologies played a major role in Hitler's defeat."

"While Lieberman blames Parkinson's for these tactical errors, [historian Sam] Goodfellow attributes them to bad luck. "He got away with a lot of decisions early on that look brilliant," Goodfellow said. "He was making the same sort of decisions later in the war, but they didn't work out as well. He just got lucky early, but it caught up with him."

"... Lieberman is unconvinced by such arguments. 'I've seen enough Parkinson's disease," he said. "I think that is the explanation. I think it did affect his conduct of the war.'" (Los Angeles Times, "Hitler's Inner Enemy : Study Suggests the Dictator Suffered From Dementia Brought on by Parkinson's Disease," February 22, 1996)  [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1996-02-22-me-38596-story,amp.html#ampshare=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1996-02-22-me-38596-story.html]

If it is possible that Hitler suffered from dementia is it possible that Pope Francis, also, suffers the same ailment since like Hitler he had a infection early in life and suffers like the dictator another ailment associated with dementia.

Fox News reported that Francis had a infection early in life:

"[A]nother book published last month, 'Pope Francis: Conversations with Jorge Bergoglio.'"

"The 'Conversations' book says Bergoglio was a 21-year-old seminarian when he fell feverish and was near death for days."

"'The doctors were worried. Finally, they diagnosed a severe lung infection. Because they found three cysts, when his condition was stabilized and a prudent amount of time had passed, he had to undergo the removal of the upper part of his right lung.'" [https://www.foxnews.com/health/vatican-clarifies-pope-francis-is-not-missing-a-lung-just-part-of-it]

Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association says there is a association between dementia and sciatica which is a ailment that Francis suffers:

"Tau deletion triggers age-dependent sciatic nerve morphofunctional deficits and motor impairment... Dementia is the cardinal feature of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) but the clinical symptoms of this disorder also include a marked loss of motor function. While Tau hyperphosphorylation and malfunction are well-established key events in AD neuropathology." [https://www.alzheimersanddementia.com/article/S1552-5260(15)02312-2/abstract]

Crux revealed in 2017 that the pope had sciatica:

" Pope Francis first revealed that he suffers from sciatica, a nerve condition usually resulting from the herniation of a spinal disk, in 2013, during an in-flight press conference on his return from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, following a World Youth Day celebration."

"In response to a question about his health, Francis said, 'The worst thing that happened - excuse me - was an attack of sciatica - really! - that I had the first month, because I was sitting in an armchair to do interviews and it hurt. Sciatica is very painful, very painful! I don’t wish it on anyone!'”
[https://cruxnow.com/vatican/2017/08/11/report-pope-francis-getting-massages-injections-sciatica/]

If Francis sufferers from dementia might this effect his papal validity?

Renowned papal validity theologian Arnaldo Xavier de Silverado in his book wrote that a "demented person" or person with dementia couldn't ""occupy the charge" of "Pope":

"The designation, as Pope, of a person who cannot occupy the charge, would constitute... a demented [dementia] person."
(Implications of New Missae and Heretic Popes," Page 86)

There is good reason to respect de Silveira's scholarship on papal validity has he himself explained:

"In the 1970 Brazilian edition of my study of the heretical Pope, in the French edition of 1975 and in the Italian in 2016, I stated that on the grounds of the intrinsic theological reasons underpinning the Fifth Opinion I considered it not merely probable but certain. I chose not to insist on the qualification 'theologically certain' for an extrinsic reason, namely, that certain authors of weight do not adopt it.43 This was also the opinion of the then Bishop of Campos, Bishop Antonio de Castro Mayer, as expressed in a letter of 25th January 1974, when he sent my work to Paul VI, asking him to point out any possible errors (which never took place), expressly stating that he referred to the study 'written by lawyer Arnaldo Vidigal Xavier da Silveira, with the contents of which I associate myself .'”
However, as de Silveira's scholarship shows, determining if Francis's papacy is invalid due to dementia or other reasons needs an investigation. This is why Bishop Rene Gracida's call for a cardinal investigation is important. 

Bishop Gracida is saying that the many questions about papal validity in the present pontificate require a cardinal investigation. He is, also, saying what Pope John Paul II's conclave constitution says about the question of if Francis was "lawfully elected" or not which is: only the cardinals can investigate it and interpret it.

Here is what de Silveira say in his book "Implications Of New Missae And Heretic Popes" about the subject of papal validity:

"4. The Election of a Person who Cannot Be Pope

"The designation, as Pope, of a person who cannot occupy the charge, would constitute
a special
case of dubious election. For it is a common opinion (3) that the election of a woman, of a child, of a
demented person and of someone who were not a member of the Church (a person not baptized, a
heretic, an apostate, a schismatic) would be invalid by divine law.


"Among these causes of invalidity it seems to us that it would be necessary to distinguish those
which would admit of a “sanatio in radice” from those which would not. A woman could not become
Pope under any hypothesis. But the same thing would not apply with a demented person, who could be
cured; with a child, who could grow; with a non-baptized person, who could be converted.


"This being laid down, we ask: in the hypotheses of invalidity which admits of sanatio in radice ,
would the eventual acceptation by the whole Church of the invalidly elected Pope remedy the vices of
the election?

"A complete answer to this question would require a detailed analysis of each of the cases of
invalidity. And this would exceed the objectives which we have set for ourselves.

"Such being the case, we shall only consider the hypothesis which is most relevant to the
perspective in which we place ourselves: The election of a heretic to the Papacy. What would happen if
a notorious heretic were elected and assumed the Pontificate without anyone having contested his
election?


(1) Billot , Tract de Eccl. Christi, tom. I, pp. 612-613.

(2) Saint Alphonse de Liquori , Verita della Fede, in “Opera...”, vol. VIII. P. 720, n. 9.

(3) See: Ferreres , Inst. Canonicae, tom. I, p. 132; Coronata , Inst, luris Canonici, vol. I, p. 360; Schmalzqrueber ,
lus Eccl. Univ., tom. I, pars II, p. 376, n. 99; Caietan , De Auctoriatate..., cap. XXVI, n. 382, pp. 167-168.

187

"At first sight, the answer to this question is, in theory , very simple: since God cannot permit that
the whole Church err about who is her chief, the Pope peacefully accepted by the whole Church is the
true Pope (1). It would be the duty of the theologians, on the basis of this clear theoretical principle, to
resolve the concrete question which would then be put: either proving that in reality the Pope had not
been a formal and notorious heretic at the moment of election; or showing that afterwards he had been
converted; or verifying that the acceptation by the Church had not been pacific and universal; or
presenting any other plausible explanation.

"A more attentive examination of the question would reveal, nevertheless, that even on purely
theoretical grounds, an important difficulty arises, which would consist in determining precisely what is the concept of pacific and universal acceptation by the Church.

For such acceptation to have been
pacific and universal would it be enough that no Cardinal had contested the election?
Would it be
enough that in a Council, for example, almost the totality of the Bishops had signed the acts, recognizing
in this way, at least implicitly, that the Pope be the true one?
Would it be enough that no voice, or
practically no voice had publicly given the cry of alert?
Or, on the contrary, would a certain very
generalized though not always well defined distrust be sufficient to destroy the apparently pacific and
universal character of the acceptance of the Pope?
And if this distrust became a suspicion in numerous
spirits, a positive doubt in many, a certainty in some, would the aforementioned pacific and universal acceptance subsist?
And if such distrusts, suspicions, doubts and certainties cropped out with some
frequency in conversations or private papers, or now and again in published writings, could one still
classify as pacific and universal the acceptance of a Pope who was already a heretic on the occasion of
his election by the Sacred College?"
[https://archive.org/stream/ SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissa eAndHereticPopes/Silveira% 20Implications%20of%20New% 20Missae%20and%20Heretic% 20Popes_djvu.txt]

Along with de Silveira's scholarship on papal validity, below is more evidence that Francis possibly might have dementia which could be used as a starting point in a cardinal investigation:

In an 2017 article called "Pelosi Questions President Trump's Fitness Then Lapses Into Insanity," journalist Onan Coca wrote:

Nancy Pelosi "repeatedly calls President Trump, President Bush. She routinely gets simple facts about the nation and world, wrong... butchering the English language and confusing... with her rambling nonsense."

"The same thing has happens with other anti-Trumpers, like Maxine Waters, Hillary Clinton and John McCain. The one common threat among all of them is their extreme old age. Science teaches us that as we age our abilities (both mental and physical) decline." (Freedom Outpost, June 11, 2017)

82 year old anti-Trumper Pope Francis, who in 2016 called Trump "not Christian," may fall into this select group.

Philosopher Edward Feser wrote:

Francis made "the statement that the death penalty is 'incomparably worse than' the crime for which an offender might be executed... Does any sane person really believe that executing Bundy was 'incomparably worse than' what Bundy himself did." (edwardfeser.blogspot, "The curious case of Pope Francis and the new natural lawyers, "June 3, 2017)

Feser bending over backwards in the post to be charitable to Francis says the above remark could be "mere rhetorical flourish."

Another explanation could be that the 82 year old pope may be experiencing dementia.

A reasonable way to look into Francis's possible senility is to compare the pope to former President Reagan.

Reagan was accused of having dementia by the Left of his day as Pelosi is accusing Trump in the present moment of being mentally unfit.

In March 30,2015 The New York Times, 30 years after his presidency, said when "Ronald Reagan became the oldest elected president, his mental state was a political issue. His adversaries often suggested his penchant for contradictory statements, forgetting names and seeming absent-mindedness could be linked to dementia."

The media then and now reported Reagan's leftist adversaries claims that he was mentally impaired. The Times, March 2015, report's purpose was to claim to find a new scientific method showing the President's senility.

In 1980, Reagan said he would resign his office if he was found mentally unfit.
Craig Shirley, author of two historical books on the President responded to the The Times article by saying:

"Each year, Reagan went to the Mayo Clinic for a battery of tests, both physical and psychological and each year, he passed with flying colors... Stories abound about his total recall of important and not so important facts."

If the former president had not passed those tests or if he had spoken some of the things which Pope Francis has said, The Times and others would have had articles quoting his adversaries and psychological experts claiming Reagan was probably mentally unfit.

For example, if Reagan, instead of Francis, had accused the president of Paraguay of being a Nazi and Stalinist who kidnapped someone when the simplest of fact searches would show the opposite was the objective truth, would not the media have asked that the president of the United States receive a battery of psychological tests?

On June 13, 2016 Vatican expert Sandro Magister on his Chiesa website wrote:
"The name that Francis had 'not managed to grasp' was that of Edelio Murinigo, an official kidnapped more than a year before not by the regular army of Paraguay - as the pope had understood - but by a self-styled 'Ejército del pueblo paraguayo,' a Marxist-Leninist terrorist group active in the country since 2008.

"And yet, in spite of his stating and emphasizing his ignorance of the case, Francis had no qualms about using the few and confused facts he had grasped poorly a short time before to accuse that blameless president of Paraguay of nothing less than a crime compared with the worse misdeeds of the Nazis and Stalinists."

The Chiesa website lists eight "mistakes, gaffes, memory lapses, urban legends... errors in the discourses of Francis" that would have the media quoting experts or adversaries claiming that person had Alzheimer if it were a certain former president.

Here are some examples from Magister's Article The Pope Is Not Infallible. Here Are Eight Proofs:

  -"'As Benedict XVI said, 'the tolerance must be zero': thus Pope Francis in his interview with 'La Croix' of last May 16, concerning the sexual abuse of minors.

But if one searches through all the writings and discourses of pope Joseph Ratzinger, the formula 'zero tolerance' is simply not to be found."

-"In responding to the barrage of questions on 'Amoris Laetitia,' Francis pointed to Cardinal Christoph Schönborn as the right interpreter of the document...he added: 'He was secretary of the congregation for the doctrine of the faith.' Which is not true, because on this congregation Schönborn was and is only a member.

Moreover, in that same press conference, Francis replied with an improbable “I do not remember that footnote” to a question on the crucial footnote 351 of 'Amoris Laetitia,' the one that envisions “the help of the sacraments” for the divorced and remarried."

-"Pope Francis said:

'Paul VI - the great! - in a difficult situation, in Africa, allowed the nuns to use contraception for cases of violence.'

And he added that "avoiding pregnancy is not an absolute evil, and in certain cases, as in those that I mentioned of the blessed Paul VI, [that] was clear."

...Now, that Paul VI explicitly gave this permission is not evident at all. No one has ever been able to cite a single word of his in this regard."

-"Another error, the imaginary citation that Francis put into the mouth of the composer Gustav Mahler in the speech - packed with admonitions - given to Communion and Liberation on March 7, 2015...In none of Mahler’s writings, in fact, can the phrase cited by Francis be found."

-"And finally, another phrase very dear to Jorge Mario Bergoglio but by an imaginary author: 'Ipse harmonia est.'

...But Francis didn’t give up, and twenty months later he came back to citing the motto, attributing a paternity to it himself: “‘Ipse harmonia est’, Saint Basil says.” And this time as well it ended up in the record without a footnote, because no one was able to discover where Saint Basil might have said those words." [http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/1351315?eng=y ]

Another example of confusion was the Pope equating Islamic violent conquest with Christian evangelization in stating that the "idea of conquest is inherent to the soul of Islam," then adding that "one could also interpret the end of Saint Matthew’s gospel, where Jesus sends out his disciples to all nations, as the same idea of conquest."

Islam expert Robert Spencer responding to this quote said "Pope Francis is profoundly confused. Christianity has no doctrine mandating warfare against and the subjugation of unbelievers. Islam does. And he is supposed to be the head of the Catholic Church, the largest Christian body in the world. He should thus be defending Christianity, not indulging in politically correct and fallacious moral equivalence."

[https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/05/pope-francis-the-idea-of-conquest-is-inherent-to-the-soul-of-islam-but-hey-one-can-see-christianity-that-way-too]

Francis was 76 in coming into office. He is now 82-years-old. (Reagan was 69 in coming into office and left at age 77.) Has the pope possibly been suffering cognitive impairment throughout his papacy and before?

According to The New York Times Health Guide:

One symptom of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) includes:
  • Forgetting recent events or conversations
On June 17,2016 the LifeSiteNews wrote:

"Later in his reply Pope Francis spoke of couples preferring to cohabitate, and told priests not to tell them to marry, but to accompany them instead.  'They prefer to cohabitate, and this is a challenge, a task. Not to ask ‘why don’t you marry?’ No, to accompany, to wait, and to help them to mature, help fidelity to mature.'"

Earlier in the article the Pope said “I’ve seen a lot of fidelity in these cohabitations, and I am sure that this is a real marriage, they have the grace of a real marriage because of their fidelity.”

Pope Francis is telling priests to tell fornicators it's okay to sin if there is fidelity. 

The pope at the beginning of his office knew the difference between infallible Catholic doctrine and his personal opinion. Francis appears to possibly be falling into dementia or has just got worst.

Pope Francis like President Reagan needs to say he will resign his office if he is found mentally unfit.

It appears at the very least the Bishops, Cardinals and Catholic media have to ask the Pope to receive a battery of psychological tests. 


At worst they need to ask him to resign for his own good to get the care he needs and for the good of the Church.

Something is very wrong with a pope when he tells sinners not to repent, but to continue in their sin with a papal blessing.

Three commenters on the famous Fr. Z  blog said it best:

-" Slam dunk, no wiggle room. It’s completely contrary to Catholic moral teaching and is godless, humanist nonsense. 'It’s OK to shack up… so long as you don’t cheat.' This from a Pope."

-"Pope Francis is not our 'crazy old uncle' who 'everyone knows' is a little off his rocker. When the Pope says something, he gets headlines in many media venues."
  
-"[O]ne can legitimately wonder if the Holy Father is suffering the signs of dementia... [stating] that people cohabitating are enjoying the grace of a sacramental marriage...[is] cuckoo." [ http://wdtprs.com/blog/2016/06/lawler-on-papal-off-the-cuff-remarks-wherein-fr-z-rants/ ]
     
The Fr. Z blog bends over backwards to be fair and respectful to Pope Francis, but does call a spade a spade. The blog's commenters are intelligent, well read and middle of the road faithful orthodox Catholics.

As stated before, the pope at the beginning of his office seemed to know the difference between Catholic doctrine and his personal opinion.

Besides Francis's current apparent confusion between his opinion, Church teaching and objective facts, might the pope's many expressions of anger at those who follow the teachings of Pope John Paul II and the 2,000 years teachings of the Catholic Church be another symptom of dementia?

Dementia.com says a symptom of mid-stage dementia is becoming "angry... perhaps owing to frustration, or they may become overly attached to a certain person." [http://www.dementia.com/symptoms.html]

Psychiatrist and anger expert Richard Fitzgibbons, October 3, at Lifesitenews.com wrote Pope Francis and the Vatican under his control have demonstrated attempts at "undermining" the 2,000 year old Church doctrine and in particular have shown expressions "of excessive anger at St. John Paul II's remarkable legacy... almost inexplicable."

Amoris Laetitia and Pope Francis's letter to the Argentinean Bishops according to Fitzgibbons an expert in cognitive therapy research, an author of a book on resolving anger and a consultor to the Vatican's Congregation for the Clergy in the article says the pope "directly opposes St. John Paul II's... Familiaris Consortio, n. 84, and 2,000 years of Church teaching.  [https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/exploring-the-excessive-anger-at-st.-john-paul-ii]

The New York Times article "Has Pope Francis Failed?" by Matthew Schmitz showed that the present pope is angry at those who uphold the 2,000 year old infallible teachings of the Church,

 According to Schmitz, the current pope has called faithful Catholics:

-"little monsters"
-having an "obsession" with abortion
-"Pelagian" heretics
-those who "throw stones "
-"spiritual Alzheimer's"

Vatican expert Sandro Magister at chiesa.com showed that Francis and one of his closest friends is not just mad at faithful Catholics, but particularly angry at St. John Paul II.

The Vatican expert has presented solid evidence that Francis's intimate friend and ghostwriter of many parts of the Amoris Laetitia document, Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez, did a paste and copy job.

Magister proved on chiesa.com that Fernandez did a cut and paste of some ten year old extreme anti-Pope John Paul II articles against Veritatis Splendor.
 [http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/1351303?eng=y&refresh_ce ]

A decade ago, those articles forced then Archbishop Bergoglio to risk his own promising path to the papacy by fighting "tooth and nail" to save his intimate friend from charges of heresy and to save Fernandez from losing a promising clerical educational position due to those charges. [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2016/05/amoris-laetitia-was-copy-and-paste-of.html?m=1]

Besides the anger Francis appears to have for John Paul II and faithful Catholics it might be possible the pope's attachment to the archbishop may be another symptom of dementia which as dementia.com said is becoming "overly attached to a certain person."

It seems possible that the elderly pope is overly attached and influenced by the ideas of the younger ghostwriter of many parts of Amoris Laetitia.

Unfortunately, The Spectator, in the original May 25,2016 article "Pope used Argentinian' ghostwriter' for controversial document on family, claims Vatican expert," wrote that Fernandez is looked upon by other theologians as a "joke figure." [http://www.unsealed.org/2016/05/pope-used-silly-left-wing-ghostwriter.html?m=1]

The archbishop and friend of Francis didn't help his theological or priestly reputation by writing a silly book with the adult literature sounding title of "Heal Me with Your Mouth. The Art of Kissing."

It seems the pope may be overly attached and surrounded by certain persons with unhealthy thought processes and strange conspiracy ideas.

The Vatican Insider usually a solid news source which has access to ranking Vatican insiders close to the Pope on October 19 wrote a tabloid like paranoid article.

It slandered anyone remotely criticizing questionable prudential actions where Francis has no expertise or promise of being guided by the Holy Spirit and the non-infallible teachings of his which contradict the teaching of scripture and all previous popes as being in a global conspiracy with Russian strongman Putin against the Pope.

Almost ironically, Phil Lawler, and his CatholicCulture.org, which defends Francis's teachings and even the Argentine norm of Amoris Laetitia yet when commenting on this article, said that it is "likely...people surrounding Pope Francis" have a "paranoid style" and have fallen into "conspiracy" thinking that "see enemies wherever there is resistance to their agenda." [https://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/the-city-gates.cfm?id=1367]

It is also likely, that if those who surround Francis have fallen into paranoid and conspiracy thinking, that the Pope himself might exhibit this same types of fearful thought processes.

The Alzheimer's Foundation of America says individuals "with dementia may become paranoid."

Wikipedia says paranoia "is a thought process believed to be heavily influenced by anxiety and fear... typically includes... beliefs of conspiracy."

EWTN commentator Robert Royal of The Catholic Thing said in the 2014 article "Pope Francis Needs New Friends" said:

"He's clearly in a bubble" with Cardinals like the German Kasper who wants "God to repeal the Laws of Non-contradiction" and radicals like the Honduran Maraiaga who were leading Francis to "connect... global poverty-with a kind of conspiracy theory about arms sales and war is simply bizarre."

Finally, here is the latest evidence of Francis's possible dementia:

Pope Francis's inappropriate ring-kissing behavior controversy where he appeared to play the immature children's "gotcha" game received headline sequences that explained the behavior as "bizarre," "awkward" and "cringeworthy."
(CatholicCulture.org, "The bizarre ring-kissing controversy, March 28, 2019)

This "inappropriate" and "childlike" behavior of Francis could be a sign of dementia according to dementia experts:

"[Y]our loved one's behavior may seem inappropriate, childlike or impulsive."
(Lewy Body Dementia Association, Ibda.org, "Understanding Behavioral Changes in Dementia," by Tanis German Ph.D, Mayo Clinic)

Gloria.tv reported Francis apparently inappropriately kissed some embarrassed politicians feet:

"Francis knelt down and kissed the feet of several [deeply embarrassed] South Sudan leaders."
(Gloria.tv, "Showtime: Francis Knees to Kiss Feet of South Sudan Politicians, April 11, 2019)

This inappropriate foot kissing behavior by Francis caused Bishop Rene Gracida on his website to comment in a headline:

"The Bizarre Behavior of Francis the Merciful is Beginning to cause Questions to be asked in Rome about his Behavior"
(Abyssus.org, April 11, 2019)

According to NeuroPsychiatry Online this could be a sign of dementia:

"Patients with bvFTD [frontotemporal dementia] can present with inappropriate personal comments or touching, violation of interpersonal space, and other personally intrusive behaviors such as kissing."
(NeuroPsychiatryonline.org, "Kissing or 'Osculation' in Frontotemporal Dementia," July 1, 2014)

Sadly, this isn't the Pope's first foot kissing behavior (Google: Images: "Pope Francis foot kissing" for other examples of this behavior). Francis's possible fixation on foot kissing may, also, be associated with his comment and possible fixation on coprophilia:

"[I]n Psychpathia Sexualis... categorize foot fetishism [such as foot kissing] and coprophilia under the same heading... Self-Humiliation."
(Book.google.com, "Dada and Surrealist Films," Page 165)

Francis's comment on poop eating is infamous. Many were outraged, but I think the proper response is pity.

Tragically, poop fixation and poop eating (coprophilia) fixation are more possible signs of dementia.
(AllNurses.com, "Coprophilia And Scatolia In Demented Elderly Residents, August 7, 2012)

Remember that the book "Dictator Pope" by historian Henry Sire claimed that a Jesuit assessment by the then Superior General of the Jesuits Father Peter Hans Kolvenbach thought Francis was "[u]nsuitable to be a [b]ishop" and lacked "psychological balance" even before his papal election according to a review by Gloria.tv:

"[T]he assessment Father Bergoglio received... accused Bergoglio of a series of defects... vulgar language to deviousness, disobedience concealed under the mask of humility, and lack of psychological balance... the habit of saying diametrically opposing things from one day to the next."
(Gloria.tv, "Unsuitable to be a Bishop," December 3, 2017)

Finally, we'll end with a coincidence:

Before Francis, there was never a healthy pope who repeatedly refused to kneel in front of the Holy Eucharist and who kneeled spontaneously to kiss the feet of Muslim politicians.

To put this coincidence in perspective, imagine if Pope John Paul II while he was still healthy had repeatedly refused to kneel in front of the Holy Eucharist, but meanwhile kneeled spontaneously to kiss the feet of President Ronald Reagan, Mikhail Gorbachev or a Muslim politician.

Catholics and even the secular media would have probably have thought something might be a little psychologically unbalanced with the person involved with that coincidence.

A commenter on the Catholic Monitor wrote in a previous post:

"Insane like a fox, maybe. I’m not seeing any signs of dementia. He seems pretty dynamic and clear-headed for his age."

"I don’t wish him ill. He’s just wrong, and malevolent."

My answer is:

One can be dynamic, wrong and demented such as, for example, Hitler:

Hitler who reportedly practiced coprophilia which is demented behavior was "clear-headed" enough not to talk about coprophilia in public despite possibly having dementia.

Do clear-headed or psychologically balanced persons publically talk of coprophilia, spontaneously kiss politicians feet, play pull away the Papal ring in front of cameramen; and maybe most importantly say diametrically opposing things from one day to the next even before his papal election?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.
       


Saturday, April 13, 2019

Inciting Violence: Leftists Vilify the Victim (12,000 Tweets calling for Trump's Assassination) as Leftists Play Victim on Trump's True Tweet on Omar's 9-11 Quote

Deceits favorite role is playing the victim!
- Paul Galindo

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
- George Orwell

Leftist presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren deceitfully said "President Donald Trump is trying to incite violence" for sharing the truth of Rep. Ilhan Omar's own words in a video before a "terrorist supporting front organization."

In the video she said that the horrific Islamic 9/11 attack that killed almost 3,000 innocent people was only "some people did something" so the Council on American- Islamic Relations organization (CAIR ) was founded which according to the Anti-CAIR website has been shown to be a "terrorist supporting front organization."

In the video Omar was speaking at the "terrorist supporting front organization" CAIR.

Omar and her leftist enablers such as Warren are justifing minimizing the Islamic 9/11 terrorist attack and her support for the "terrorist supporting front organization" by trying to end freedom of speech to speak the truth and promoting a anti-freedom of speech totalitarianism.

They are attempting to promote this deceit by claiming freedom of speech to speak the truth by tweeting true quotes incites violence against a woman who minimizes terrorist violence and supports a front group for it.

At the same time Omar, Warren, and the leftist media never condemn the numerous calls to assassinate President Trump by leftist media personalities, politicians, professors and 12,000 Tweets calling for the assassination of the President.
(Washable.com, "Over 12,000 tweets are calling for Trump's assassination,"  February 2, 2017)

Remember that the deceitful Adolf Hitler loved to claim the pure Germans were the victims as he vilified the Jews who were the true victims of his terrorist Holocaust.

Remember that evil people love to play the victim as they vilify the true victim.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church and our country.


Thursday, April 11, 2019

Papal Validity: Are Francis's "Inappropriate" Kissing & "Childlike" Behaviors Signs he may be Demented or have Dementia?

Pope Francis's inappropriate ring-kissing behavior controversy where he appeared to play the immature children's "gotcha" game received headline sequences that explained the behavior as "bizarre," "awkward" and "cringeworthy."
(CatholicCulture.org, "The bizarre ring-kissing controversy, March 28, 2019)

This "inappropriate" and "childlike" behavior of Francis could be a sign of dementia according to dementia experts:

"[Y]our loved one's behavior may seem inappropriate, childlike or impulsive."
(Lewy Body Dementia Association, Ibda.org, "Understanding Behavioral Changes in Dementia," by Tanis German Ph.D, Mayo Clinic)

Gloria.tv reported Francis apparently inappropriately kissed some embarrassed politicians feet:

"Francis knelt down and kissed the feet of several [deeply embarrassed] South Sudan leaders."
(Gloria.tv, "Showtime: Francis Knees to Kiss Feet of South Sudan Politicians, April 11, 2019)

This inappropriate foot kissing behavior by Francis caused Bishop Rene Gracida on his website to comment in a headline:

"The Bizarre Behavior of Francis the Merciful is Beginning to cause Questions to be asked in Rome about his Behavior"
(Abyssus.org, April 11, 2019)

According to NeuroPsychiatry Online this could be a sign of dementia:

"Patients with bvFTD [frontotemporal dementia] can present with inappropriate personal comments or touching, violation of interpersonal space, and other personally intrusive behaviors such as kissing."
(NeuroPsychiatryonline.org, "Kissing or 'Osculation' in Frontotemporal Dementia," July 1, 2014)

Sadly, this isn't the Pope's first foot kissing behavior (Google: Images: "Pope Francis foot kissing" for other examples of this behavior). Francis's possible fixation on foot kissing may, also, be associated with his comment and possible fixation on coprophilia:

"[I]n Psychpathia Sexualis... categorize foot fetishism [such as foot kissing] and coprophilia under the same heading... Self-Humiliation."
(Book.google.com, "Dada and Surrealist Films," Page 165)

Francis's comment on poop eating is infamous. Many were outraged, but I think the proper response is pity.

Tragically, poop fixation and poop eating (coprophilia) fixation are more possible signs of dementia.
(AllNurses.com, "Coprophilia And Scatolia In Demented Elderly Residents, August 7, 2012)

Renowned papal validity theologian Arnaldo Xavier de Silverado in his book wrote that a "demented person" or person with dementia couldn't ""occupy the charge" of "Pope":

"The designation, as Pope, of a person who cannot occupy the charge, would constitute... a demented [dementia] person."
(Implications of New Missae and Heretic Popes," Page 86)

Remember that the book "Dictator Pope" by historian Henry Sire claimed that a Jesuit assessment by the then Superior General of the Jesuits Father Peter Hans Kolvenbach thought Francis was "[u]nsuitable to be a [b]ishop" and lacked "psychological balance" according to a review by Gloria.tv:

"[T]he assessment Father Bergoglio received... accused Bergoglio of a series of defects... vulgar language to deviousness, disobedience concealed under the mask of humility, and lack of psychological balance... the habit of saying diametrically opposing things from one day to the next."
(Gloria.tv, "Unsuitable to be a Bishop," December 3, 2017)

Finally, we'll end with a coincidence:

Before Francis, there was never a healthy pope who repeatedly refused to kneel in front of the Holy Eucharist and who kneeled spontaneously to kiss the feet of Muslim politicians.

To put this coincidence in perspective, imagine if Pope John Paul II while he was still healthy had repeatedly refused to kneel in front of the Holy Eucharist, but meanwhile kneeled spontaneously to kiss the feet of President Ronald Reagan, Mikhail Gorbachev or a Muslim politician.

Catholics and even the secular media would have probably have thought something might be a little psychologically unbalanced with the person involved with that coincidence.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Wednesday, April 10, 2019

Attendees: Latin Mass: Pro-Life & Real Catholics: 99℅ vs. New Mass: 78℅ Lapsed & 51℅ Pro-Abortion Heretics

The Catholic Herald reported that in the United States:

Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) attendees are over overwhelmingly real Catholics while New Mass or Novus Ordo Mass (NOM) attendees tend be lapsed and heretical Catholics according to a new study by Fr. Donald Kloster:

Fulfill Sunday obligation:

TLM: 99℅ vs. NOM: 22℅

Approve of abortion:

TLM: 1℅ vs. NOM: 51℅

Go to Confession at least once a year:

TLM: 98℅ vs. NOM: 25℅

Approve of contraception:

TLM: 2℅ vs. NOM: 89℅

Support same-sex marriage:

TLM: 2℅ vs. NOW: 67℅

"TLM attendees donate 5 times more in the collection" according to Fr. Kloster.
(Catholic Herald, "Traditional Latin Mass attendees more devout and orthodox, study says," February 27, 2019)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Sunday, April 07, 2019

Is 1P5 Skojec's Fear of a Cardinal Investigation of Francis's Validity & the "Skojec Little Book of Insults" Interconnected?

"Semantics: An argument, or a type of guarantee that the outcome of your statement can be taken in two or more ways which will benefit you in either way it’s perceived. The *careful* use of semantics can be applied to situations which allow you to be right in any reverse query."
[https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.urbandictionary.com/define.php%3fterm=semantics&=true#ampshare=https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term%3Dsemantics]

The Catholic Monitor received a third comment from the former public relations and (apparent) semantics expert OnePeterFive publisher Steve Skojec that was puzzling.

But before I respond to it I want to say I pray for him. I am praying because I am worried about him and I am worried specifically about his increasing and multiplying of disparagements for what someone is calling the "Skojec Little Book of Insults."

Before I respond to his first and third comments (the second one isn't pertinent) it is important to look at the phenomena that has started to be called the "Skojec Little Book of Insults."

In 2016, the website AKA Catholic was the first to notice the phenomena:

"This morning, a friend called my attention to a post over at One Peter Five wherein Steve Skojec took the opportunity to denigrate the Remnant and Catholic Family News for what he condescendingly called 'excessive snark and polemics.'”

“'It’s unfortunate that trads can always be counted on to warm up the circular firing squad,' he wrote. 'It’s time for us to drop the snark and the sharp elbows and actually gather people in from this storm.'”

"This he offered in reference to the Remnant / CFN recently joint-published three part series: With Burning Concern: We Accuse Pope Francis."

"... The reason Skojec decided to take a poke at two of Catholicism’s finest publications isn’t a mystery; he made his motives entirely plain when he immediately went on to say:
"There are probably any number of reasons why 1P5 has, in just two years, become one of the top three mainstream traditional Catholic publications online (in terms of audience size), but I suspect our attempt to find balance in our approach and not treat those who don’t yet see the point we’re making as the enemy are a part of that."
"If there is anything amazing here, it’s the shamelessness and ease with which Skojec can engage in cringeworthy acts of self-promotion, and it’s nothing new."

"Neither is his willingness to exploit an opportunity to bash what he clearly sees as competition (not their ideas) for almighty “audience size” and the benefits presumably derived therefrom; even if it means launching a calculated attack against those who are clearly on the side of the true Faith and have always treated him with every kindness."
[https://akacatholic.com/proud-and-puffed-up-skojec-exposed/]

At the time, Chris Ferrara called the as yet unnamed "Skojec Little Book of Insults" a "circular firing squad":

Reply Chris Ferrara Steve Skojec "Oh, I see. You get to belittle the Remnant for its excessive snark and polemics and boast of your own popularity because 1P5 is just so much more respectable, you see, and when I defend the newspaper I write for against your snide put-down this proves your point?"