Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from June, 2019

Socci: Why did Benedict XVI purposefully choose "Pope Emeritus" instead of "Bishop Emeritus of Rome" & Claim this title "Corresponds to the Reality"?

Antonio Socci in his new book says that an authoritative canonist told Benedict XVI that his new title "ought" to be "bishop emeritus of Rome" since he would no longer be pope.

But, Benedict had it "announced" that his title would be "pope emeritus."

After the resignation, which later in the book Socci says is "at least... absolutely doubtful," Benedict's secretary Georg Ganswein said:

"He [Benedict] believes that this title corresponds to the reality."

Socci explains the "doubtful resignation" problem if Benedict thinks this "corresponds to the reality":

"The pope emeritus is logically still the pope, just as a bishop emeritus is still a bishop."
(The Secret of Benedict XVI,  Pages  64-73)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


60 Days that Shook the Church: Top Catholic Scholars: Francis is a Heretic then Top Cardinal: Francis's Amazon Synod is "Heretical" & "Apostasy"

The Catholic Resistance has scored major victories against Francis and his Vatican in the last 60 days that shook the Church.

They are losing not just because they have covered-up for sex-abuse predators as well as teach that the sacrilege of Communion for adulterers is morally acceptable and in the recent Amazon Synod promote heresy and apostasy.

Most of all they are losing because we are fighting them for God and He will not forsake us.

April 30 was the first major victory, 19 top Catholic scholars led by the world renowned theologian Fr. Aidan Nichols declared that "A heretical papacy may not be tolerated":

"[T]he world's bishops [must]... admonish the Pope and [he] must publicly reject heresy or face losing the papacy."
(EdwardPentin.co.uk, " Father Aidan Nichols Signs Open Letter Charging Pope Francis with Heresy," May 1, 2019),

The last remnant of the enablers of Francis and his Vatican who claim to believe in the orthodox infallible teachings …

Is the Journalist of the Benedict XVI "Pope is one; is Francis" Interview a Leftist British Operative?

The Italian Massimo Franco who interviewed Benedict XVI with "The Pope is one; [he] is Francis" quote appears to possibly be a leftist British operative of some type who is ambiguous.

LifeSiteNews stated the Franco quotations of Benedict were at best ambiguous:

"It is unclear from this introductory article if these particular quotations were from the reporter or Benedict XVI himself."
(LifeSiteNews, "Benedict XVI asserts Francis is pope in new interview," June 29, 2019)

According to Wikipedia, Franco "is [a] member of the [British establishment] International Institute for Strategic Studies" which according to "Transparify... gave it it's lowest rating [for a think tank], 'deceptive' on funding transparency."

Wikipedia, also, said Franco "was a Vatican commentator at The [leftist pro-UK British] Guardian" until "2011." Moreover, Wikipedia said according to "Journalist Glenn Greenwald [The Guardian …

Does Open Borders equal the "AntiChrist Demonic Parody of the Eucharist"?

Today, John Zmirak wrote "open borders equals abortion... immigration turns [pro-life] red states [into abortion] blue [states]."
(Stream, "Open Borders Equals Abortion, June 28, 3019)

Does this means that the open borders mania of Francis and the U.S. Bishops could be by the logical consequences of their promoting abortionist politicians be considered Satanic or demonic?

Peter Kreeft said:

"Abortion is the AntiChrist's demonic parody of the Eucharist. That's why it uses the same holy words, "This is my body," with the blasphemous opposite meaning."

Almost on cue, this week Church Militant reported that the man most responsible for the arguments used by Francis and the U.S. Bishops to push for abortionist politicians and open borders was a Satanist.

Cardinal Joseph Bernardin, who was reportedly a Satanist, was the man who produced the "seamless garment" arguments used by Francis and the U.S. Bishops to promote abortionist open bord…

Feser: Francis & U.S. Bishops "Obliged" to answer this Dubia Question "No" or they are in "Heterodoxy"

The greatest American Thomist philosopher Edward Feser on Tuesday wrote:

"So, every Catholic is obliged to affirm, on pain of heterodoxy, the following sentence, which for ease of reference I will label"

"The Sentence: 'Capital punishment is not always and intrinsically wrong.'"
(Edwardfeser.blog spot, "Just say the damn sentence already," June 25, 2019)

So, if Francis and the U.S. Bishops cannot answer "No" to the following dubia question then they are in "heterodoxy":

Is capital punishment always and intrinsically wrong?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church

Border Drowning Death Photo taken by La Jornada Correspondent whose Pro-Castro/Maduro Newspaper supports Leftist Oppression

Julia Le Duc, a correspondent for La Jornada according to Wikipedia, took the now famous photo of the border drowning deaths.

Most people in the United States don't know her newspaper is a extremist left-wing promoter of leftist oppressive regimes.

The pro-Marxist Mexican La Jornada editor Carmen Lira Saade is well-known to have been a promoter of the repressive regime of Dictator Fidel Castro while he was alive.

The Mexican newspaper, also, is an unabashed supporter of the Dictator Nicolas Maduro in his oppression and starvation of the Venezuelan people.

It seems very hypocritical for the pro-Marxist newspaper which has shown no concern for the numerous deaths brought about by the Cuban and Venezuelan regimes to suddenly be so concerned about the drowning of two people.

Also, how much credibility does this leftist newspaper which supports oppressive regimes have?

Can anyone trust their narrative?

Have any real journalists confirmed that the narrative of the border photo is not f…

Why is Francis Catholic Media trying to Discredit "Team Francis['s]" Martel "Hit Job" on "their Conservative Enemies"?

It is very amusing to see pro-Francis "conservative" Vatican expert Robert Moynihan in Letter #35 say the "Team Francis, indulged" gay activist Frederic Martel's gay gossip book is very confusing to him and bad because it wants to put pressure on Francis's Team:

"[I]t [Martel's book] seems to me part of some larger strategy, for a purpose I did not fully understand, to put pressure to bear on the Holy See."

Gay activist Michael Winters on February 22 for a National Catholic Reporter article titled "Martel's Vatican city closet book exposes his motives and mistakes, not truth", also, thought it was bad because it is the "gay equivalent of a Viganò testimonianza."

Might it be Moynihan and Winters are terrified that the general public might realize that Francis's Vatican is controlled (and 80 percent gay populated according to Martel) by the Vatican gay lobby as Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò's testimony revealed?

Pro-Gay Bannon says close "to 90%" of Francis's Vatican is "Homosexual"

Former President Donald Trump adviser Steve Bannon said according to LifeSiteNews that "his own independent sources in the [Francis] Vatican verified... that the vast majority of clergy in the Vatican are homosexual."

Bannon said:

"I was told it is not 80 percent, it is closer to 90 percent."
(LifeSiteNews, "Steve Bannon hints at making film exposing homosexuality in Vatican," June 24, 2019)

Bannon and anti-chastity as well as anti-morality Frederic Martel who is a radical gay activist may become allies and are "hinting" at making a homosexual exposé film on the Francis Vatican according to the LifeSiteNews article.

It is not unusual for Bannon to ally with homosexuals according to the conservative BuzzFeedNews which says that the former presidential adviser has a "gay agenda":

"Steve Bannon isn't out to promote a socially conservative agenda on homosexuality... This makes him an uncertain player in fights over LGBT rights.&q…

Socci: Was Benedict XVI attempting to be Ambiguous about Papal Primacy for Union with the Russian Orthodox Church?

Antonio Socci in "The Secret of Benedict XVI" makes the case that Benedict XVI in his ecumenical dialogues with the Russian Orthodox Church specifically with Russian Orthodox metropolitan Bishop Hilarion Alfeyev was talking about being ambiguous about the primacy of the papacy.

Hilarion is quoted in the book:

"Ratzinger has made enormous efforts to clarify the question of the primacy of the bishop of Rome, shifting the emphasis from a juridical vision of primacy to understanding [the pope] primarily as a Christian witness of a particular type and as a service to unity in love"
(The Secret, page 27)

Socci says Benedict's goal is "the opposite pole from the 'rehabilitation' of Martin Luther attempted by Papa Bergoglio [Francis]... 'on the Eucharist and the Liturgy."
(The Secret, page 28)

Apparently according to Socci while Francis wants some type of union with liberal Protestantism and is willing to sacrifice the "Eucharist and the Lit…

Socci: Did Obama's Homo-Colonialism bring about the Overthrow of Benedict XVI & the Italian Government?

Antonio Socci in "The Secret of Benedict XVI" makes the case that the Barack Obama administration demonized Vladimir Putin calling him and Russia "homophobic" because he and his nation refused to "accept as its own" the Obama policy of imperialistic one-world homosexualization.
(The Secret, age 21)

Socci wrote that Pope Benedict XVI and the Italian government of Silvio Berlusconi were geopolitically allied with Putin's Russia against the Obama colonialism.

"The Secret" says there was a "coordinated campaign of scandal" that led to the overthrowing of the Berlusconi government in 2011 and the "abdication of  Ratzinger on February 21, 2013... At the height of the crisis, Italy saw the doors of access to international financial markets progressively close" as the Vatican Bank "was temporarily cut out of the [financial] Swift circuit" just before the Benedict resignation.
(The Secret, page 23)

With the "coordi…

Does Policeman Bp. Barron want to start a "New Reign of Terror" against Social Media Catholics? & a Prayer Request

- Updated January 30, 2020

Policeman Bishop Robert Barron like Semi-Arians who supported the Arian heretics uses ambiguity and Catholic sounding "language" as a cloak for his "real sentiment" of promoting a soft "reign of terror" on those who reject the heretical Francis creed of Communion for adulterers and other errors.

Barron is calling for the predator Theodore McCarrick created pro-gay American bishops to police non-heretical Catholics on social media. This policing call appears to want to mirror the Arian "reign of terror" on Catholics in the early Church.

 F.A. Forbes in his book "St. Athanasius" on the Arian crisis wrote how the Arians and their allies the Semi-Arians policed Catholics in the early Church:

"[A] new reign of terror began, in which all who refused to accept the Arian creed were treated as criminals."

Now, it appears that Barron wants a "new reign of terror, in which all who refused to accept the&q…

When Chicken Littles Skojec & Moynihan cry "Schism" know we are Winning so Fight Harder

The phrase "canary in the coal mine" is a metaphor of "any warning of serious danger to come."

This means run and run fast out of the coal mine or whatever situation you're in because you are about to lose or be killed.

One Peter Five's publisher Steve Skojec has become a "anti-canary in the coal mine" for me. In simple words, if Skojec says run it means to me: stay and fight.

He said Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales, Cardinal Raymond Burke and the Open Letter were wrong in saying the Church can depose a heretical pope so run away from their teachings because they'll cause "schism."

That told me to fight harder than ever.

Skojec said Bishop René Gracida was wrong in presenting solid evidence of papal invalidity and calling for a Cardinal investigation into the validity of the Francis conclave and Benedict XVI resignation so run away from Gracida's teachings because they'll cause "schism."

That told me to …

The Amazon Synod: The Nest of the Antichrist

http://rosarytotheinterior.com/teilhardian-evolution-and-the-amazon-synod-the-nest-of-the-antichrist/
Please read our Original ProposalBy James Larson
Teilhardian Evolution and the Amazonian Synod: The Nest of the AntichristYou shall be as Gods, knowing good and evil(Gen 3:5)
Introduction Teilhardian evolutionary theory, which is the dominant theology of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI and Pope Francis (see our article The Third Sorrowful Mystery: The Crowning with Thorns for irrefutable documentation in this regard), is rightly seen as the culmination of almost 2,000 years of Gnosticism eating away at the vital spirit of the Catholic Church. It is now poised for a quantum leap in its power of penetration into the heart of Catholic belief and worship through the scheduled October, 2019 Synod of Bishops, titled: Amazonia: New Paths for the Church and for an Integral Ecology.
The reality that Teilhardian evolutionary theology constitutes the underlying agenda for the “New Paths for the Chur…