Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from September, 2019

TnT Guest Co-Host Fr. Nix joins Bp. Gracida & Attorney Chris Ferrara in Calling for a "Imperfect Council" to Investigate if Francis is a Antipope

Frequent guest co-host on Dr. Taylor Marshall's YouTube TnT show Fr. David Nix apparently joined Bishop Rene Gracida and pro-life attorney Christopher A. Ferrara in urging for a "imperfect council" to be called to investigate the validity of the 2013 conclave that elected Francis, the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI and possibly for declaring Francis to be a explicit heretic. Fr. Nix on Twitter in responding to Journalist Edward Pentin's Tweet called for "an imperfect council" : Edward Pentin   @EdwardPentin Sep 28 At 3.30pm today on vigil of Michaelmas, priests will be privately praying Leo XIII's Prayer of Exorcism (the longer prayer to St Michael) at a church near Castel Sant'Angelo w/ intention to expel the "diabolical influence from the Vatican, especially in view of the #AmazonSynod " View details ·

What is Francis's Gay Agenda?

Pope Francis strolls hand in hand with the anti-gangster and gay rights advocate Fr. Luigi Ciotti. On September 1, Crux reported that Pope Francis said: "Let's call unions between the same sex 'civil unions.'" (Crux, "'I consulted a psychoanalyst,' Pope Francis reveals in new book," September 1, 2017) The gay/lesbian dissenting New Ways Ministry said: "Pope Francis has never, as pontiff, stated his endorsement of civil unions so flatly. (He did support civil unions as a compromise to his opposition towards marriage equality... As pontiff, he did make a ambiguous statement about civil unions...)." (New Way Ministry Bondings 2.0 Blog, "Pope Francis Allows for Civil Unions for Lesbian and Gay Couples," September 2, 2017) The gay movement New Way Ministry endorsed Francis's apparent endorsement of the civil unions of cohabiting homosexual couples. On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, head of

The Francis Creed

"I believe in Francis and that it is infallible dogma that he is pope no matter what evidence shows that he violated the Pope John Paul II constitution that governed the validity or invalidity of the 2013 conclave. He suffered under Bishop Rene Gracida who classified the evidence that the constitution was violated and called the cardinals to investigate. He descended into the Vatican gay lobby. He ascended to the papal throne where he sits surrounded by the gay lobby cardinals from where he shall judge the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Ten Commandments and all the infallible Catholic teachings." "I believe in Amoris Laetitia, the Communion of adulterers, Francis's representation of globalist teachings which embodies the Soros gospel of unlimited mass immigration, climate change, a one-world government and the goddess Mother Earth everlasting." I wrote this ecumenical creed with the hope that it will help all the Francis traditionalists and the Francis libe

What does it Mean that Francis is only a Noun "Christian"?

Francis according to a CNN article thinks the meaning of the word "Christian" is only a noun. Moreover, the article says he "is 'allergic' to adjectives." According to the first definition of the Oxford Dictionary of "Christian" as a noun, it means "a person who has received Christian baptism." While the the dictionary says "Christian" as a adjective means "professing Christianity or its teachings." It is understandable why Francis who teaches Communion for adulterers sees himself as a "Christian" noun that is having "received Christian baptism" while having problems with seeing himself as a "Christian" adjective that is "professing Christianity or is teachings." Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Will Skojec join Mirus' Communion for Adulterers Heretics against St. Francis de Sales & Cd. Burke?

- Updated November 21, 2019 One Peter Five's Steve Skojec has been joined by Francis apologist Catholic Culture's Dr. Jeff Mirus in his name-calling. They are both calling everyone "sedevacantist" including Doctors of the Church who say a "Pope [who]... is explicitly a heretic" can "cease to be pope" by the Church establishing and declaring that he is a manifest heretic. Mirus inferred that Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales is sedevacantist for saying a explicit heretic pope can "cease to be pope." (Catholic Culture, "Sede Vacantism: An attack on the Church's Authority Principle," November 21, 2019) Mirus is now officially a collaborator of Skojec in calling everyone a sedevacantist who shows evidence that Francis is in heresy for making Communion for adulterer his "authentic Magisterium" teaching or showing evidence that the Francis conclave was invalid. Mirus was already a official member of t

Cdl. Burke called Francis "Friend" & Jesus called Judas "Friend"

In Matthew 26:50, just before Judas was about the betray Him, Jesus Christ called him "friend." Today, Cardinal Raymond Burke with Bishop Athanasius Schneider in a joint statement called Francis "friend" and asked him to turn away from his heretical "authentic Magisterium" teaching approving and promoting the sacrilege of Communion for adulterers: - "[T]he almost general doctrinal confusion... particularly due to ambiguities regarding the indissolubility of marriage, which is being relativized through the practice of the admittance of persons cohabitating in irregular [adulterous] unions to Holy Communion [the Eucharist]... In view of this reality, our conscience does not allow us to be silent... we are the true friends of Pope Francis." (National Catholic Register, "Cardinal Burke, Bishop Schneider: Criticism of Errors is Fidelity to the Pope," September 24, 2019) It appears that the fall of Francis the "friend" of Ca

Doctor of the Church St. Catherine's Advice to Cdl. Burke: Issue the Correction & Don't Fear Schism

In 2016, Cardinal Raymond Burke in an interview gave a timeline on issuing the "formal correction" to Francis: "In an exclusive interview with LifeSiteNews, Cardinal Raymond Burke has given an indication of the possible timeline of a “formal correction” of Pope Francis should the Pope not respond to the five dubia seeking clarity on Amoris Laetitia , presented to the Pope by four Cardinals, including Cardinal Burke." “'The dubia have to have a response because they have to do with the very foundations of the moral life and of the Church’s constant teaching with regard to good and evil, with regard to various sacred realities like marriage and Holy Communion and so forth,' Burke said during a telephone interview." “'Now of course we are in the last days, days of strong grace, before the Solemnity of the Nativity of Our Lord, and then we have the Octave of the Solemnity and the celebrations at the beginning of the New Year - the whole mystery

Skojec, if Francis is a "Woman," a "Heretical Jesuit, Undispensed from his Vows" or "in Violation of... Law... for his own [Conclave] Election" is he "Eligible to Assume the [Papal] Office in the First Place"?

For the record, I am sick of Steve Skojec's despicable personal attacks on Ann Barnhardt. He appears to be a pitiful coward. He seems to attacks others because he is afraid to answer this post, the previous post and the 5 Dubia questions I challenged him with because he apparently is intellectually challenged or too egotistical to admit he is wrong. But, for his sake we need to pray that he finds a good priest to help him overcome this sinful behavior. However, getting back to the point, at times, I have found that the comments in the Catholic Monitor comment section are better than many of my posts. This was true of what  Justina  wrote about Skojec's pitiful idea "universal acceptance": "[T]here is something insidious about the truncated version of "universal acceptance" being peddled over at 1P5. Cut off, as this blog post correctly and vitally notes, from the concept of a valid election, "universal acceptance" can only mean eccle

Are Francis's Amazon Synod & the Green "Climate Strike" Rallies about a "Green Dictatorship" One-World Government?

Why are the globalist elite and Francis using youth Greta Thunberg to inspire so-called GREEN YOUTH rallies in the media propaganda spectacular called the "Climate Strike" in over 150 countries? What was the reason that Adolf Hitler inspired HITLER YOUTH rallies and wrote in Mien Kampf: "Whoever has the youth has the future"? Why is Francis making a "special invitee" to his Amazon Synod the one-world government advocate Hans Joachim (John) Schellnhuber according to journalist Edward Pentin on Twitter? Might Francis's main agenda at the Amazon Synod be not so much about undermining Catholic doctrine (which has already been greatly accomplished with Amoris Laetitia), but pushing for a one-world government? Hitler wanted a one-world government so he inspired the Hitler youth and others with the propaganda and scare tactics against the Jews and all the so-called racially inferior useless eaters. So, now, is it possible that the global elite and Fran

Skojec: Francis's Validity "is Infallibly Certain," but "Infallibility appears to be Tautological at Best... Superstition at Worst"

One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec is giving me some good laughs. Today, on Twitter, Skojec seriously wrote: "[A] pope universally accepted upon his election is infallibly certain. A dogmatic fact." "Francis was universally accepted. That's a dogmatic fact." He is claiming that it is "dogmatic fact" that Francis's papal validity "is infallibly certain," but the funny thing is that he said on Twitter on September 3 that he believes the Vatican I infallible dogma of papal "infallibility appears to be tautological [meaningless circular reasoning or logical fallacy] at best and borders on superstition [a unfounded belief] at worst." So, apparently, Skojec's "infallible certain" belief in the "dogmatic fact" of Francis's papal validity is meaningless circular reasoning or a logical fallacy "at best" or a unfounded belief "at worst." Humor aside, the ironic thing is that

Skojec is the Mirror Image of Dawn Eden

Leftist Catholic Dawn Eden never stops claiming that anyone who doesn't 100 percent support her beloved Francis's Amoris Laetitia Communion for adulterers or thinks his upcoming Amazon Synod is heretical is not a real Catholic. Ethnically Jewish Eden's trump card on anyone who doesn't 100 agree with her is to call them a anti-Semitic or in other words: "Shut up, anti-Semitic!" One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec never stops claiming that anyone who doesn't 100 percent support his infallible dogma that the Francis conclave was beyond any doubt valid and dares to claim that there is a possibility it was invalid is not a real Catholic. The self proclaimed traditionalist Skojec's trump card on anyone who doesn't 100 percent agree with him is to call them schismatic or in other words: "Shut up schismatic!" (Is it possible Francis got his whole new "shut up, schismatic" strategy from Skojec and his Twitter collaborator

Francis is in SCHISM from ALL Valid Popes in History who Reject his Sacrilege of Communion for Adulterers

Remember when Francis and his collaborators cry "SCHISM" it means they are AFRAID! What are they afraid of? They are AFRAID that it will finally get through the cowardly and apparently not too bright heads of the few faithful bishops that: Zero valid popes in the history of the Catholic Church have committed the sacrilege of instituting as the Vatican's official teaching that unrepentant adulterous couples can profane the Holy of Holy Jesus Christ who is true God by having unrepentant sinners receive Him in the Most Holy Eucharist. Nor have any of ALL the valid popes in history even come close to ambiguously teaching such a blasphemy which could be taken in either a orthodox or heretical way (for all the conservative and traditionalist Francis apologists). Next to this sacrilege against the Most Holy Eucharist, the proposed Amazonian Synod heresy of women's ordination is a minor sacrilege. Maybe these cowardly and apparently not too bright bishops might,

You are in Reality between Heaven and Hell

St. Francis de Sales: "[Y]ou are in reality between Heaven and hell... according to your choice, one or the other will be your final end." "... Jesus Christ looks down... 'Come, My child, My beloved, come... enjoy the everlasting happiness... of My Love.'" "... I renounce hell and all it torments... I turn myself heart and soul towards Heaven... O Jesus... Thy Love, which purchased for me my place in Heaven by the shedding of Thy Precious Blood upon the Holy Cross... I desire nothing else but to love Thee and bless Thee forever." Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church and the conversion of all sinners. Holy Mary Mother of God pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death. Amen.

Bp. Gracida & Bp. Fellay Must Issue "a Canonical Warning to" Francis for the Amoris Laetitia Heresy

The future heretical Amazon Synod is a unprecedented crisis which means the faithful bishops must forcefully act to forestall it. The best way to preempt this disaster is to act now. We already know beyond a shadow of a doubt that " Amoris laetitia contains propositions that are heretical" according to Bishop Rene Henry Gracida and Bishops Bernard Fellay as   Catholic theologian Dr. John R. T. Lamont, Pd. D. shows: "The AAS statement thus settles an important and much-debated question. It establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense... In the AAS statement, he [Francis] has required Catholics to give religious assent of mind and will to the assertion that Amoris laetitia contains propositions that are heretical... It would be sufficient to take the lesser step of simply addressing the faithful to condemn Amoris laetitia as heretical. Aside from Bishops Bernard Fellay and Henry Gracida, no Cathol

5 Dubia Questions for Taylor Marshall

- Vatican I expert Fr. Chad Ripperger, PhD, in his book "Magister Authority" shows that almost all Francis apologists be they liberal, conservative or traditionalist are "proximate to heresy": "[T]reating ALL papal statements as if they are infallible... is proximate to heresy because it rejects the precise formulation of the conditions of infallibility as laid out in Vatican I... by essentially saying the pope is infallible regardless of conditions..." "... Worse still, those who were to follow a pope who was in error in a non-infallible teaching which is taught contrary to something that is infallible is not, therefore, excused." (Magisterial Authority, Pages 5-14) - Pope Innocent III (1198-1216) in "Si Papa": "'Let no mortal being have the audacity to reprimand a Pope on account of faults, for he whose duty it is to judge all men cannot be judged by anybody, unless he should be called to the task of having deviated