Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from 2020

Barrett's Supreme Court: "Arresting People for Attending Church"?

Breitbart reported "Idaho Police Arrest 3 at Outdoor Church Worship":"Officers arrested Gabriel Rench, Rachel Bohnet, and Sean Bohnet, according to Moscow Report, a local independent news outlet. A video uploaded to social media shows Bohnet, a local music teacher, and his wife telling officers they refused to comply with an inaudible order. Moscow Report says the apparent infraction is that they refused to show identification.""Footage of the couple’s arrest shows the church body singing the hymn “Praise God from Whom All Blessings Flow” as officers place them in handcuffs." [https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2020/09/24/idaho-police-arrest-3-at-outdoor-church-worship-event-in-defiance-of-mask-mandate/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+breitbart+%28Breitbart+News%29]Will an Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court allow "arresting people for attending church"?Lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and co…

Is Barrett another Roberts?: "Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh & Thomas... Refutes... #Barrett Pro-Lockdown Decision"

Lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and constitutional law reports that "Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh & Thomas... refutes and directly disagrees w/ the #Barrett pro-lockdown decision":Robert Barnes @Barnes_Law 28mRead the excellent opinion by Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh & Thomas, that refutes and directly disagrees w/ the #Barrett pro-lockdown decision: "it is a mistake to take language in Jacobson as the last word on what the Constitution allows." https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf [https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law]However, it appears that Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts are in agreement on the "pro-lockdown decision."Is Barrett another Roberts?
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

John Paul II, Taylor Marshall & Francis' Apparently Pure Kantian/Modernist "Catholic... Freemasonic Naturalism"

 "[T]he [Kantian/Modernist] Blondelian schema holds that justification for the faith is to be found by turning inwards to the personal experience of the human subject. This turn to the subject is characteristic of modern philosophy, from Descartes right up to the Idealism of Kant and Hegel and beyond, and presented a major challenge to the traditional Catholic apologetics... If it were the case that inner experience justified the faith, if each person was to find the proof of God’s existence within their own life, then what would be the basis for the teaching authority of the Church?"
- Liberal AnthonyCarroll  [https://www.thinkingfaith.org/articles/20090724_1.htm]
Scholar Douglas Flippen in the philosophical article "Was John Paul II a Thomist or a [Kantian] Phenomenologist?" gives an intellectual history of  Pope John Paul II(Karol Wojtyla). He shows how Kantian philosophy mostly in the form of the Kantian philosopher Max Scheler's phenomenology becam…

Lawyer Robert Barnes: "#Barrett" is "your Gal" if "you're for Lockdowns" and are "an Authoritarian"

Lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and constitutional law exclaimed on Twitter via a retweet of OcrazioCornPop that Amy Coney Barrett is "your gal" if "you're for lockdowns" and are "an authoritarian":
Despacita Latina O'Crazio CornPop liked Robert Barnes @Barnes_Law · 2h If you're for lockdowns, #Barrett's your gal.  If you're for forced vaccines, #Barrett's your gal.  If you're for cops bashing in your door in the presence of your minor child w/o any probable cause of a crime, #Barrett's your gal.  If you're an authoritarian, #Barret's your gal. [https://twitter.com/OcrazioCornPop]
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Premiere Lawyer Barnes: "Attorney General Barr Strongly Disagreed w/ #Barrett, calling the Lockdown Orders the Worst Violation of Civil Rights in American History since Slavery"

Today,premiere lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and constitutional law reported on Twitter that Attorney General William Barr "strongly disagreed" with Amy Coney Barrett's "lockdown orders [ruling which are] the worst violation of civil rights in American history since slavery." The Barrett lockdown ruling apparently may be anti-U. S. Constitution according to Barnes:"A reminder: Attorney General Barr strongly disagreed w/ #Barrett, calling the lockdown orders the worst violation of civil rights in American history since slavery." "One of the lies being spread to support #Barrett is that her lockdown opinion didn't say anything about the US Constitution. The #Barrett pro-lockdown ruling made very clear it 'took off the table' ANY challenge to ANY lockdown order based on ANY claim of 'protection of liberty.'" [Robert Barnes on Twitter: "A reminder: Attorney General Barr strongly disagreed w/ #Barrett,…

St. Bernard: “One Merits more by Devoutly Assisting at a Holy Mass than... "

“One merits more by devoutly assisting at a Holy Mass than by distributing all of his goods to the poor and traveling all over the world on pilgrimage.”
-St. Bernard [https://liturgyguy.com/2014/01/06/10-great-quotes-on-the-holy-mass/]Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

High-profile Lawyer Barnes: Amy Coney Barrett would be a Disaster

High-profile trial lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and constitutional law reported on Twitter that Amy Coney Barrett would be a disaster.
The Barnes Twitter report shows that Coney Barrett has "sid[ed] with the government on the lockdowns, on uncompensated takings, on excusing First Amendment infringements & Fourth Amendment violations... [and] exclaimed the benefits of Jacobson, the decision that green-lit forced vaccines & carved out an emergency exception to Constitutional protection in "public health" or "emergency" cases used to justify forced sterilizations & detention camps... [and] hid behind precedent... to prohibit pro-life activists from exercising their free speech."The Avvo.com lawyer directory reports that attorney "Robert Barnes embraces the challenge to defend the little guy and stand up for what is right. This is why he left the prestigious Yale Law School, whom publicly stated their unwillingne…

Is Coney Barrett Possibly Semi-Pro-Abortion & did she write "a Terrible Decision supporting Democrat Governor Pritzger’s [COVID] Draconian Shutdown"?

The Catholic Monitor reportedthat Amy Coney Barrett may possibly be semi-pro-abortion because "Barrett said she would 'follow all Supreme Court precedent without fail' and would regard decisions such as Roe v. Wade as binding precedent" according to the Voice of America:"Republicans view her as reliably conservative and a future Supreme Court vote to overturn the landmark 1973 decision legalizing abortion rights in the U.S., but Barrett has offered conflicting comments on how she might vote on abortion cases."
"During her confirmation hearing to the appeals court, Barrett said she would 'follow all Supreme Court precedent without fail' and would regard decisions such as Roe v. Wade as binding precedent.“I would never impose my own personal convictions upon the law,” she said."But she also has written that judges should not be held to upholding Supreme Court precedents, such as the abortion decision." [https://www.voanews.com/…

Voice of America: "[Possibly Semi-Pro-Abortion] Barrett said she would “Follow all [Pro-Abortion] 'Supreme Court Precedent without Fail'"

It appears that Amy Coney Barrett may be a neo-liberal Trojan Horse like Justice Neil Gorsuch. It seems she would possibly be semi-pro-abortion. Voice of America revealed that "Barrett said she would “[f]ollow all [pro-abortion] 'Supreme Court precedent without fail' and would regard decisions such as Roe v. Wade as binding precedent":"Republicans view her as reliably conservative and a future Supreme Court vote to overturn the landmark 1973 decision legalizing abortion rights in the U.S., but Barrett has offered conflicting comments on how she might vote on abortion cases."
"During her confirmation hearing to the appeals court, Barrett said she would 'follow all Supreme Court precedent without fail' and would regard decisions such as Roe v. Wade as binding precedent.“I would never impose my own personal convictions upon the law,” she said."But she also has written that judges should not be held to upholding Supreme Court precedents, …

NO MORE Gorsuchs!: Ginsburg/Gorsuch Court Ruling will lead to the Legalization of "Child Pedophil[a]"!

An internationally known attorney, with knowledge of "the DC elite," told the Catholic Monitor by email that the Ruth Bader Ginsburg/Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court ruling for transgenderism and homosexuality, Bostock v. Clayton County, will lead tothelegalization  of "child pedophil[a]":

"Child pedophiles will be the next protected SCOTUS class. Trump made a big mistake relying on the DC elite at the “conservative” Federalist Society to screen his SCOTUS candidates"

President Donald Trump and the Republican Party need to take notice that he and his party will own this disastrous ruling and its consequences including, "Child pedophiles [being]...  the next protected SCOTUS class":

"According to Politico, 'the Republican Party seemed generally supportive of both the substance and process by which the Supreme Court extended Civil Rights Act protections to gay, lesbian and transgender workers. President Donald Trump declined to trash the …