tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22704303.post501585597105774101..comments2024-03-26T05:47:00.389-07:00Comments on The Catholic Monitor: Why is LifeSiteNews Afraid to "Investigate or Report" that apparently Canon 17 "Requires that Ministerium and Munus [must] be Understood as Referring to Two Different Things"?Fred Martinezhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11938859619399753890noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22704303.post-61078322058841807782019-12-10T16:41:58.459-08:002019-12-10T16:41:58.459-08:00Here, in part and with some editing for clarity...Here, in part and with some editing for clarity's sake, is what I said to Steve Jalsevac that got me banned (and by the way, I have exceded the recommended number of comments before, without triggering any reaction from the Lifesite moderators):<br /><br />"Did you yourself not say, earlier in this same thread, that as a news agency it is not Lifesite's role to take a firm position on controversies like whether or not the man attempting to foist heresy after heresy on the one true Church is even the Pope in the first place? (Yet you take other editorial stands--some of them, very strong ones indeed.) In other words, my question to you is, why shy from making a determination in this one area alone? At the very least, why not insist that the Cardinals, specifically empowered by UD Gregis to resolve such doubts, undertake this responsibility on behalf of the entire Church? Your willingness to wash Lifesite's collective journalistic hands in this way strikes me as rather glib."<br /><br />Too harsh? I thought the Liberals were supposed to be the snowflakes, not the conservatives. If Jalsevac wants the site he co-founded to be regarded as a serious news agency, it's time to pay his dues.<br />Justinahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09465934867471657275noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22704303.post-25413643142450754992019-12-09T21:46:36.858-08:002019-12-09T21:46:36.858-08:00@III, 12:14: Thanks for the tip.
On having "...@III, 12:14: Thanks for the tip. <br /><br />On having "exceeded their [LSN's] guidelines": I realized after the fact that I had too. But if that was the reason for my ban (using comments for discussion?), then I have to wonder why I hadn't already been banned. Of course, right before the block, I had also been engaging many over there on the evidence that Benedict is still Pope. So I imagine that might have had something to do with it. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22704303.post-25258763012005927772019-12-09T15:23:48.809-08:002019-12-09T15:23:48.809-08:00According to Lifesite, they themselves have been b...According to Lifesite, they themselves have been blocked by Twitter, but vow they won't be stopped.<br /><br />Hear, hear! Back at ya, Mr. Jalsevac!Justinahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09465934867471657275noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22704303.post-71978027461151305482019-12-09T12:14:44.027-08:002019-12-09T12:14:44.027-08:00@Cam, Justina, Br. Bugnolo, et al.. You probably ...@Cam, Justina, Br. Bugnolo, et al.. You probably know that you can use the disqus features to track down others who you may have been having discussions with at LifeSiteNews and other sites from which you have been banned. Some people are very sympathetic once they hear I've been banned and even willing to act as proxy commenters. It is war, is it not? At least Mr Matt from the Remnant said as much on one of his recent videos. lolIslam_Is_Islamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01445870034306061716noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22704303.post-58983105197507108672019-12-09T09:02:36.938-08:002019-12-09T09:02:36.938-08:00"you have been banned"
I got that messa..."you have been banned"<br /><br />I got that message from LSN months ago (no stated reason why).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22704303.post-44900754527304692242019-12-09T07:20:31.861-08:002019-12-09T07:20:31.861-08:00Yesterday, I was somewhat upset to find that I, to...Yesterday, I was somewhat upset to find that I, too, have been banned by Lifesite-- which I have long held in great respect.<br /><br />After reading Brother's remarks, I am deeply glad.Justinahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09465934867471657275noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22704303.post-14686995411836638372019-12-09T06:50:07.044-08:002019-12-09T06:50:07.044-08:00Unite the clans......BS!Unite the clans......BS!Debbiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06128673790036459245noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22704303.post-22940692831416886092019-12-09T06:29:37.164-08:002019-12-09T06:29:37.164-08:00Islam is Islam, it is not you.
AS far as I know, ...Islam is Islam, it is not you.<br /><br />AS far as I know, Lifesite had erased ALL of my comments in the last 9 months. ALL of them. I am worse than a pro abort, in their mind.Alexis Bugnolohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04163885124773316239noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22704303.post-30161209256212331512019-12-09T06:27:52.303-08:002019-12-09T06:27:52.303-08:00LifeSite is banning commentators permanently, even...LifeSite is banning commentators permanently, even though they claim they do not take a side. It seems they are only banning those who think the resignation is invalid. That is not being objective.<br /><br />But my question for LifeSite is?<br /><br />In the debate between Nazis and Jews whether Jews should be wiped off the face of the planet, does LifeSite think that their professional integrity means that they should take no side?<br /><br />In the debate over whether women can kill the babies in their own wombs, does LifeSite think that their professional integrity means that they should take no side?<br /><br />In the debate over who is the true vicar of Christ and who is the Vicar of Satan, does LifeSite really think that the professional thing to do is not to take a side?<br /><br />LifeSite by banning only one side, is however taking a side. In only reporting one side, is taking a side. They are acking just like Planned Parenthood.<br />Alexis Bugnolohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04163885124773316239noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22704303.post-57635276828997914912019-12-08T21:29:55.243-08:002019-12-08T21:29:55.243-08:00Yes, that is the question:
Is the Catholic media ...Yes, that is the question:<br /><br />Is the Catholic media seeking the truth?<br /><br />If you disagree with with Br. Bugnolo's scholarly thesis then counter it with reasonable counter arguments otherwise you have revealed that you are not seeking the truth.Fred Martinezhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11938859619399753890noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22704303.post-43888972643645981832019-12-08T20:29:44.974-08:002019-12-08T20:29:44.974-08:00In all fairness to LSN, I had exceeded their guide...In all fairness to LSN, I had exceeded their guidelines for the suggested number of comments per article, many of which were removed, before the one that apparently put the proverbial nail in the coffin, er plug in the inkwell.<br /><br />Are we not seekers of Truth anymore or what?Islam_Is_Islamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01445870034306061716noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22704303.post-62980170073820428272019-12-08T20:17:39.511-08:002019-12-08T20:17:39.511-08:00Good catch, Mr. Martinez. Here is the rest of the...Good catch, Mr. Martinez. Here is the rest of the conversation:<br />Avatar<br />Steve Jalsevac Mod Islam_Is_Islam • 24 minutes ago<br />Lifesite has indeed reported on that. Perhaps you are disappointed that we have not taken a firm position on the controversy. As a news agency that is not our role.<br />•Reply•Share ›<br /><br /><br />@Mr. Jalsevac: No, it is not a matter of what I like or do not like. It is a matter of transparency and full disclosure. I hope to see you address the following in the near future: Where are your reports on Prof Radaelli's Feb 18, 2013 public request for Pope Benedict to rescind and replace his statement otherwise his chosen words would lead to the election of an anti-pope? Where is your reporting on the facts that there are up to 40 errors in the Declaratio which would indicate a lack of due diligence if at least not negligence on the part of Cdl Sodano when he made his announcement calling for a conclave? Where is your reporting on the fact that <i>munus</i> and <i>ministerium</i> are never used interchangeably in Canon Law? Again, I hope that you will soon and very soon correct this oversight in either investigation and/or thorough reporting. Thank you for the opportunity to bring this information to your attention. There is more, if you'd like to have it. <b> We are unable to post your comment because you have been banned by LifeSiteNews.com. Find out more.</b>Islam_Is_Islamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01445870034306061716noreply@blogger.com