Thursday, January 31, 2019

If Cdl. Kasper is Right then Pope Benedict is Probably or Surely still Pope

Yesterday, LifeSiteNews reported:

"Cardinal Walter Kasper – a close collaborator of Pope Francis – has expressed concern over a possible attempt at removing the current Pope from office but makes it clear that 'a forced resignation would be invalid.'”
[https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.lifesitenews.com/mobile/news/cardinal-kasper-a-forced-resignation-of-pope-francis-would-be-invalid#ampshare=https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cardinal-kasper-a-forced-resignation-of-pope-francis-would-be-invalid]

In September, Reuters made the same statement saying that if pressure is put on "Pope Francis to resign [it] could make it difficult, if not impossible, for him to do so, Church experts say.":

“'The pope has the right to freely resign. That’s what the canon says. The doubt is whether the situation Francis is in now really allows for a free choice because there is a political faction in the Church trying to force it,' said Nicholas Cafardi, former dean of Duquesne University School of Law."

“'I don’t see how (the pope can resign freely) when you have people campaigning for it,' said Cafardi, who is also a former member of the Board of Governors of the Canon Law Society of America."
[https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1LN1IL#ampshare=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-pope-abuse-law/can-the-popes-accusers-force-him-to-resign-idUSKCN1LN1IL]

If Kasper, Reuters and canon law expert Cafardi are right that it is "difficult, if not impossible" for a pope to resign "if a political faction in the Church if trying to force it" then Pope Benedict XVI probably, if not for sure, is still Pope which would mean Francis is not a valid or real pope.

Was there "a political faction in the Church trying to force" Benedict to resign which put into "doubt... whether the situation [Benedict was] in... really allow[ed] for a free choice" as Cafardi said to Reuters?

Was Benedict's stepping down "a forced resignation [which] would [make it] invalid" according to Kasper?

Was there "a political faction in the Church trying to force" Benedict to resign?

Respected pro-gay Italian journalist Emiliano Fittipaldi, one of two journalists charged in the Vatileaks trial in the Vatican court for obtaining confidential Church papers, inferred that "a political faction in the Church [was] trying to force" Benedict to resign:

“Ratzinger [Pope Benedict XVI]... was very traditionalist and conservative... but he did important things. The things he did in relation to pedophilia, which was not much, but double the time for prescribing crimes in the Vatican, sent away almost 600 priests in a few years. The incredible thing is that Francis did a lot less."

"... The story of the gay lobby has... importance in the Vatileaks and the dismissal of Pope Ratzinger... He destroyed the careers of those who were with them. To stop this group, a group of supporters of Ratzinger began to issue a series of documents, which was called Vatileaks... He destroyed the careers of those who were with them. To stop this group, a group of supporters of Ratzinger began to issue a series of documents, which was called Vatileaks. I can say this shock, this war of [Vatileaks] documents led to the end of Ratzinger."

"... Ratzinger made... war against pedophilia... [h]e just started and resigned."
[https://www.comunidadeculturaearte.com/emiliano-fittipaldi-para-francisco-a-pedofilia-e-uma-questao-secundaria/]

On September 26, the liberal Maria Antonietta Calabrò, who is considered a well-informed and highly respected Italian journalist, reported another link to Vatileaks related to Benedict's resignation which was an "2012 obscure threats after a trip to China of another prelate [pro-gay Cardinal Paolo Romeo].  And that document ended up in the first Vatileaks.":

[T]he predecessor of Francis, Pope emeritus Benedict XVI, also a extensor of an open letter to Chinese Catholics, received at the beginning of 2012 obscure threats after a trip to China of another prelate. And that document ended up in the first Vatileaks scandal.” 
[Italy’s HuffPost (link)ESTERI  26/09/2018 16:25 CEST  |  Aggiornato26/09/2018 16:26 CEST  Papa Francesco, il caso Viganò e il “segno di Dio” che ha accelerato l’accordo con la Cina]

According to a commenter on the Catholic Monitor this "obscure threats after a trip to China of another prelate' caused "Benedict XVI [to] renounce [resign]":

"Cardinal Dario Castrillón Restrepo, who was an extremely important Cardinal especially during JP II's & Benedict XVI's pontificates, and was a key negotiator during several world crisis like the cold war, was interviewed by Colombian Television Channel "Caracol". The video was uploaded on youtube May 10, 2018 and Cardinal Dario passed away May 18, if I remember correctly. So, this interview was very timely, only a few weeks before his death. In that interview, Cardinal Dario admits that he was the one who had received a very painful letter "written in chinese" which urged him to hand-deliver the letter to the Holy Father (Benedict XVI). Cardinal Dario said the letter contained the most horrific threats beyong imagination. So much, that it was too much for the Holy Father to bear and for that reason, said the Cardinal, His Holiness Benedict XVI renounced. Cardinal Dario says Benedict XVI renounced only months after he read the letter. He mentioned that after he read the letter, both Cardinal Dario and His Holiness Benedict XVI vowed to keep it a secret between the two, but Cardinal Dario said that 'someone knew and told everyone.'"

"So, the question about China being involved? Hmm..very likely?? FYI, the link to the video interview on youtube says the video is no longer available in our country (U.S.)"
[https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2018/09/is-there-vatican-gay-lobby-and-chinese.html?m=1]

What did the media report about this "2012 obscure threats after a trip to China of another prelate" and about that prelate: pro-gay Cardinal Romeo? 

The radical gay New Ways Ministry, who are notorious dissenters according to a 2011 US Bishops statement, revealed in 2012 that Cardinal Paolo Romeo apparently was part of the Vatican gay lobby:

” GayStarNews reports:
“Three Italian Catholic cardinals have agreed to prayer vigils held by the religious group Gionata for the victims of gay hate and discrimination for the first time.“LGBT groups will pray for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people in Milan, Florence and Palermo, in Sicily as part of the International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia (IDAHO) to be celebrated . . . in an estimated 100 countries around the world. . . . 
“Cardinal Paolo Romeo, in Palermo, . . . [has] backed it, even though he banned the vigil last year. The liturgy there will be celebrated at 9pm . . . in the San Gabriele Arcangelo church.” [https://www.newwaysministry.org/2012/05/17/three-italian-cardinals-support-prayer-vigils-for-international-day-against-homophobia-and-transphobia/
The pro-gay Romeo, after coming out of the closet about supporting LGBT “liturgy,” in China, according to news reports, spoke of an assassination threat on Pope Benedict XVI to “Italian businessmen and Chinese representatives of the Catholic Church” according to the Telegraph in 2012:

“Cardinal Romeo reportedly made the startling prediction of the Pope’s death during a trip to China in November 2011.”

“He seemed so sure of the fact that the people he spoke with, including Italian businessmen and Chinese representatives of the Catholic Church, were convinced that he was talking about an assassination attempt.”

“… The extraordinary comments were written up in a top-secret report, dated Dec 30, 2011, and delivered to the Pope by a senior cardinal, Dario Castrillon Hoyos, a Colombian, in January.”

“The Vatican has reportedly opened an investigation into the claims.”

“The report was written in German, apparently to limit the number of people within the Vatican who would understand it if it was inadvertently leaked.”

“It warns of a “Mordkomplott” – death plot – against Benedict.”

“‘The story was broken on Friday by an Italian daily, Il Fatto Quotidiano, with the headline ‘Plot against the Pope – he will die within 12 months'”.

“The newspaper, which has a reputation for scoops, published a page from the confidential report [Vatileaks]. ‘During his talks in China, Cardinal Romeo predicted the death of Benedict XVI within 12 months. His remarks were expressed with such certainty and resolution that the people he was speaking to thought, with a sense of alarm, that an attack on the Pope’s life was being planned,' the paper reported.”
[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/vaticancityandholysee/9073811/The-Pope-will-die-within-a-year-Vatican-assassination-fears-revealed.html]

The newspaper with "a reputation for scoops" II Fatto Quotidiano, Fittipaldi and Calabrò appear to be linking Vatileaks to strange happenings against Benedict.

Were Vatileaks and the Vatican financial scandal as well as the Vatican gay lobby tied together as the causes that "led to the end of Ratzinger [Pope Benedict XVI]"?

Apparently, Vatican expert Dr. Taylor Marshall says that if Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano is telling the truth then Fittipaldi's inference appears to be true.

On August 27, author and philosopher Marshall on YouTube in the video titled "Dr. Taylor Marshall ties together Vatican financial scandal with homosexual activity" summarized what led to Pope Benedict XVI's resignation and Pope Francis's papacy:

If Vigano is telling the truth then the Vatican gay lobby paired with the Vatileaks financial scandal apparently caused Pope Benedict XVI's resignation and it appears that Pope Francis has "reinstated and promoted" all those who brought about the resignation.

Marshall, on YouTube, summarized what led to Benedict's abdication:

"First of, Vigano blew the whistle on money laundering."

"Two, the accusations of money laundering leads to the Vatileaks scandal."

"Three, the Vatileaks scandal leads Benedict to form a secret investigation with three cardinals."

"Four, those three cardinals expose moral rot, sexual deviancy, that is paired up with financial irregularity."

"This is what moves the Pope to resignation
. And just to make sure there is enough pressure on him to do it and do it quick something funny goes on with the Vatican Bank beginning on January 1, 2013."

"And it seems the powerful cardinals within Vatican City wanted it to happen fast because they don't want the 300 page dossier released to the public because there is moral scandal in those pages."

"That binder was left with Pope Francis, but nothing has been done. And what we see is that those who were oppose to Benedict XVI theologically, but also on administration, have been reinvolved, reinstated and promoted."

Here is more evidence that Benedict was forced or pressured to resign.

Remember Benedict's resignation came about because of the "[gay] sexual deviancy, that is paired up with financial irregularity" tied to Vatileaks which was apparently orchestrated by the Vatican gay lobby supposedly to "reform the Vatican Curia."

According to the Italian website Corriere Della Sera Chronicles:

"Vatican City Father Silvano Fausti [the confessor of Cardinal Martini] said that the moment had been when Benedict XVI and [the most powerful pro-gay cardinal in the Church] Carlo Maria Martini saw each other for the last time... June 2, 2012... Martini, who died on August 31st, said to Ratzinger: Curia does not reform, you just have to leave... on 11 February 2013 [Benedict] declared his 'renunciation' to the pontificate."
(Corriere.it, Corriere Della Sera Chronicles, "When Martini told Ratzinger: the Curia does not change, you have to leave," July 18, 2015)

Moreover, the Italian website which has expertise on the Vatican, Monday Vatican reported:

"Fr. Silvano Fausti, a Jesuit who was Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini's confessor... recounted... their [Benedict and Martini's] last meeting... According to Fausti, Martini said this to Pope Benedict as if he were reminding him of an old agreement agreement between them. That resignation paved the way for Pope Francis, whom Fr. Fausti admires."

"But this story must be decoded... Benedict XVI's pontificate was constantly under attack at every level. The old hands of the Curia, in particular, could barely stand his rule."
(Monday Vatican, "Pope Francis: How the Narrative around Him was Constructed," Luglio 20, 2015)

Also, Akacatholic.com reported that evidence points to financial blackmail being involved in the Benedict abdication who appeared to be attempting to uncover "financial improprieties.":

"An article by Italian journalist Maurizio Blondet is making the rounds alleging that Pope Benedict XVI was blackmailed into abdication by forces allied with SWIFT (the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication), which had a hand in the shutdown of ATM and bank card services at the Vatican in January of 2012."
"According to Blondet:

There was a blackmail of Benedict XVI, coming from who knows where, through SWIFT. The underlying reasons for this have not been clarified, but it is clear that SWIFT has intervened directly in the management of affairs of the Church..."

"...It strikes me as interesting that more attention isn’t being paid to the role played by Ronaldo Hermann Schmitz, the acting President of the IOR [Vatican Bank] Board at the time, given his ties to Deutsche Bank."

"I mean, one would think that the former Deutsche Bank Executive Director, even if unable to leverage his contacts within the German banking giant to forestall such a drastic move, would have at the very least been well aware of what was coming and could have perhaps taken steps to secure the services of another financial institution, as happened in short order soon afterwards."

"This leads me to wonder where Ronaldo Hermann Schmitz’s own interests may have lied as this was taking place."

"Let me be clear; I have no information implicating Schmitz in any nefarious activity; I am simply making common sense observations and asking questions that, curiously enough, have apparently never been addresses by those in the media; in spite of the extensive coverage these events received."

"In any case, one is still left to wonder what motivated Gotti Tedeschi’s removal."

"Given that the reform of the IOR [Vatican Bank], for all intents and purposes, was all but halted while interim President Schmitz acted as caretaker until a new President could be found, one might assume that this interruption alone was the primary motive."

"It seems rather clear for reasons addressed below, however, that the motive went well beyond simply protecting the interests of those whose financial improprieties Gotti Tedeschi was laboring to uncover, making it seem far more likely Gotti Tedeshi’s demise was undertaken in order to set in motion the events that would secure the abdication of the man who appointed him."

"Circumstantial evidence strongly attesting to this being the case can be found in the fact that the Vatican reached an agreement with a Swiss firm to resume ATM and other bank card transactions effective February 12, 2013, just one day after Benedict XVI announced his intention to abdicate.

Indeed, as far as I can tell, nothing of note had changed between the cessation of bank card operations on January 1st and their resumption on February 12th relative to the Vatican Bank’s compliance with international banking standards. Rather, the only noteworthy thing to change was the status of Benedict’s pontificate."

"Further evidence suggesting that the motives for Gotti Tedeschi’s removal extended beyond mere financial concerns." [https://akacatholic.com/money-sex-and-modernism/]

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church. 

Tuesday, January 29, 2019

Pray that Francis will Slam Bishops & Cardinals for the "Denouncing of Heresy

Today, LifeSiteNews reported that Pope Francis made a public condemnation or denunciation of Catholic media, quoted below, for the following grievous crime:

"Even in Catholic media there is a lack of compassion. There is schism... the denouncing of heresy."
(Lifesitenews, "Pope Francis slams Catholic media for denouncing of Heresy," January 29, 2019)

Please pray that Francis will slam bishops and cardinals for the "denouncing of heresy."

There is only one St. Athanasius among the bishop of the whole world.

On December 2, 2017, Bishop René Henry Gracida in his official website declared Francis is teaching heresy:

"Francis' heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in the Acta Apostolica Sedes making those letters magisterial documents."
(Abyssus Abbyssum, December 2, 2017)

Will Bishop Athanasius Schneider or any other bishop in the whole world join Bishop Gracida so Francis can publicly condemn more than one bishop for the "denouncing of heresy"?

Will Cardinal Raymond Burke or any cardinal issue the correction so Francis can publicly condemn one cardinal for the "denouncing of heresy"?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church and that Francis will publicly condemn bishops and cardinals for the "denouncing of heresy."

Monday, January 28, 2019

Francis's Abortion Lullaby will Promote a even greater Abortion Holocaust

Pope Francis according to the Tablet advises women who have aborted their unborn babies to "sing them a lullaby."
(Tablet, "Pope offers new pastoral strategy on abortion by calling for consolation and reconciliation," January 28, 2019)

Francis's abortion lullaby of removing shame will promote a even greater abortion holocaust.

Why?

Philosopher Edward Feser explains:

[P]eople have gotten used to giving in to the temptation so quickly and so readily now that they're ready to kill the innocent, indeed their own flesh and blood - i.e. via abortion - in order more easily to keep giving in. Removing the shame associated with abortion is one reason... Catholics... will never make much headway on abortion until they start being willing to sound "mean..."

"... It will be interesting to hear the souls of the aborted babies ask "nice" Catholics... "So how'd that 'niceness' approach work out for you guys? Didn't work out so well for us, alas..."
(EdwardFeser.blogstop, "Canine theology," January 3, 2016, Comments: Edward Feser, January 4, 2016 at 11:43)

Yes, women who have killed their unborn babies should and will be forgiven by God if they are truly sorry and ashamed, but singing abortion lullabies by removing shame is only going to lead to a greater abortion holocaust.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Sunday, January 27, 2019

CNN's & Francis's Hitler inspired Big Lie Propaganda Technique is putting in Danger the Covington Kids and Vulnerable Adults

Wikipedia explains what the Hitler inspired big lie propaganda technique is:

"A big lie (German: große Lüge) is a propaganda technique. The expression was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, about the use of a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone 'could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously'."

"... The phrase [big lie] was also used in a report prepared during the war by the United States Office of Strategic Services in describing Hitler's psychological profile:[5]
"His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it." [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie]
CNN and Native American propagandist Nathan Phillips in "his Saturday interview with CNN" gives an example of the Hitler inspired big lie propaganda technique against the Covington boys:
"It looked like these young men were going to attack [the Black Israelites]. They were going to hurt them. They were going to hurt them because they didn’t like the color of their skin. They didn’t like their religious views. They were just here in front of the Lincoln — Lincoln is not my hero, but at the same time, there was this understanding that he brought the (Emancipation Proclamation) or freed the slaves, and here are American youth who are ready to, look like, lynch these guys. To be honest, they looked like they were going to lynch them. They were in this mob mentality."[https://www.thenewneo.com/]
Phillips was echoing Hitler's "people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it" as the New Neo Blog shows:

"The lie wasn’t a one-off, either. This incredibly misleading article in Rolling Stone (written that same Saturday) is typical of reactions to the incident as well as to another statement by Phillips that he gave (in an interview with the Detroit Free Press) on Saturday [emphasis mine]"
“'There was that moment when I realized I’ve put myself between beast and prey,' Phillips told the Detroit Free-Press. 'These young men were beastly and these old black individuals [the Black Israelites] was their prey, and I stood in between them and so they needed their pounds of flesh and they were looking at me for that.''[https://www.thenewneo.com/]

Meanwhile, Francis was echoing Hitler's big lie propaganda technique of "never admit a fault or wrong" in an attempt to make it appear that he hasn't covered up clerical sex abuse yesterday when it was reported:

"Pope Francis told an American pilgrim taking part in World Youth Day that clerical sex abuse is a 'horrible crime' and that 'even if it is just one person, the Church should not tolerate it.'"
[https://thetablet.org/pope-to-california-pilgrim-clerical-sex-abuse-is-a-horrible-crime/]

As everyone who has followed the clerical career of Francis before and after he became pope know, he has displayed different examples of the Hitler inspired big lie propaganda technique of double-talk.

One example, is his "disposing of inconvenient facts by denying their existence" as historian Henry Sire reported in an article for the Traditionalist magazine shows:

After Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio's predator "priest Ruben Pardo... died of AIDS... the Catholic Church [paid] the family compensation for the harm they suffered... Perhaps more significant is a remark by Cardinal Bergoglio to Rabbi Abraham Skorka, published in 2010, a year after [Bergoglio's predator priest] Father [Julio] Grassi's conviction, that cases of abuse "had never arisen in his diocese."
(Traditionalists, "Francis: More Questions," Winter 2019)

As in the case of CNN and Phillips, double-talk, also, involves not just denying the existence of inconvenient facts, but of using the Hitler big lie technique of saying the exact opposite of what really happened.

This is the other type double-talk that Francis uses.

In this type of double-talk Francis will speak "one thing while he intends to do quite the opposite" as lawyer  shows:

"As [journalist Philip] Lawler had rightly concluded nine days before this new evidence surfaced:



'The Zanchetta case demonstrates that Pope Francis continues to protect his friends and allies, regardless of his professed commitment to accountability. This one case illustrates how, since Francis was elected, the Vatican has actually moved backward [his emphasis] on two crucial fronts: the fight against sexual abuse and the quest for financial transparency. In this pontificate, the cause of reform is dead, unless the reform begins with the Pontiff himself.'"


"Note well:  Even a commentator who had never previously been inclined to level strong criticism of any Pope now declares that the reform of the Church under Bergoglio [Francis] is impossible unless it begins “with the Pontiff himself.” Lawler’s piece demonstrates that there is scarcely a responsible Catholic commentator left who has not had quite enough of Bergoglio’s double-talk and crooked maneuvers."
"The Bergoglian double-talk now reportedly includes some carefully timed statements in an upcoming book-interview wherein he suddenly recognizes that homosexuality is a problem in the Church after all and that homosexuals should not be admitted to seminary. This, Life Site rightly observes, fits Bergoglio’s 'established… pattern of saying one controversial thing which deflects attention from another controversial matter.'  The same would be true concerning reports of statements Bergoglio made behind closed doors to the Italian bishops last May to the effect that that 'it is better' that homosexuals not be admitted to seminary if there is “the slightest doubt” about their fitness."

"There will never, of course, be any official and binding declaration from Bergoglio to the universal Church strictly banning those afflicted by the homosexual disorder from admission to seminaries or barring their path to ordination should they succeed in being admitted.  On this issue, as with so many others, Bergoglio will say one thing while he intends to do quite the opposite—in this case, nothing. Nothing, that is, except to protect friends and allies who engage in or cover up homosexual activity."
chris graphic viperschris screenshot 2

"Worse than the Borgias?"

"Among those friends and allies is Cardinal Oscar Rodríguez Maradiaga, the Archbishop of Tegucigalpa, Honduras, who is no less than the coordinator of Bergoglio’s “Council of Cardinals.”  Maradiaga is not only mired in allegations of financial corruption but is also orchestrating a determined coverup of  a 'widespread and entrenched pattern of homosexual practice in Tegucigalpa’s major seminary,” under the supervision of Maradiaga’s friend, former auxiliary Bishop Juan Jose Pineda Fasquelle, who was forced to resign  last July after evidence surfaced of his own homosexual activity with seminarians. '"
 
"'Forty-eight seminarians in Tegucigalpa joined in a letter protesting the homosexual infestation of their seminary, citing “irrefutable evidence” that “a homosexual network pervades the institution and is being protected by its rector.”  The evidence includes “graphic photographic evidence of homosexual pornography, exchanged on WhatsApp between seminarians who did not sign the letter, as well as other obscene messages.' Maradiaga, who continues to protect a cadre of homosexuals in the seminary after sending some of them away, has denounced the protesting seminarians as “gossipers.”  He remains fully a member of Bergoglio’s inner circle."

"Another protected Bergoglian ally is Cardinal Francesco Coccopalmerio, former head of Bergoglio’s Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts, who endorses Bergoglio’s catastrophic authorization of Holy Communion for the divorced and “remarried.”  As the whole Catholic world knows and as Life Site News reported, in 2017 Coccopalmerio’s secretary, Monsignor Luigi Capozzi, “was arrested by Vatican police after they caught him hosting a cocaine-fueled homosexual orgy” in an apartment Bergoglio had secured for him, located in the same Vatican building as the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith." 

"It was later revealed that Coccopalmerio, who has since retired to Milan, was not only present during the orgy but was ‘was presiding’ over it when the Vatican Gendarmes broke in, and that they instructed him to absent himself before they started making arrests,” including the arrest of Capozzi. As LifeSite further reports: 'At the time of the arrest, Capozzi was allegedly so high on cocaine that he was hospitalized for detoxification for a short period in the Pius XI clinic in Rome. He is currently in an undisclosed convent in Italy undergoing a spiritual retreat…'”


"Not surprisingly, Coccopalmerio had earlier argued for the Church’s recognition of 'positive elements' in 'homosexual unions,' an abomination in keeping with the infamous 'midterm report' of the 2014 sham Synod on the Family, written by Bergoglio ally Bruno Forte, another 'gay'-friendly propagandist Bergoglio handpicked as the Synod’s general secretary. The report declares that 'homosexual unions' can exhibit 'mutual aid' to the point of sacrifice [which] constitutes a precious support in the life of the partners.”  Bergoglio reviewed and approved the report before it was released to the press without the Synod Fathers having had a chance to review what was supposed to be their own document."

 "Also not surprisingly, it was Coccopalmerio who 'generally spoke against the laicization of a priest as a punishment' for homosexual predation, which he viewed as 'a kind of ‘death penalty’ for a priest.'  Accordingly, while serving as a member of the CDF’s review board for priest sex abuse cases, to which he was appointed by Bergoglio,  he 'regularly proposed mild punishments…'”


"LifeSite’s commentary on the Maradiaga scandal is appropriately entitled: “The new Borgia pope? Francis and the Maradiaga catastrophe.” Life Site quotes Riposte Catholique on the significance of the Coccopalmerio-Capozzi scandal: 'One thinks one is dreaming: in the most deplorable of ways, the Rome of today seems to have fallen lower than the Rome of the Borgias.'”

"Another Sham Summit"  
"Once again, it’s all about protecting minors. Nothing whatever to do with homosexual priests and bishops and their acts of sodomy with legal adults—not even vulnerable adults in their very late teens or early twenties exploited by clerical authority figures.  Minors, minors, minors, that’s the ticket!  Repeat after me: minors. Clerical sodomy between “consenting adults” is of no concern to Bergoglio and his collaborators, including the homosexuals among them. The event might as well be entitled: 'The Protection of Homosexual Priests in the Church.'" [https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/4311-anatomy-of-a-coverup-francis-vatican-exposed]"


CNN and the media are putting the Covington Kids in danger of deadly violence while Francis is putting minors and venerable adults in danger of sex abuse by their Hitler inspired big lie propaganda technique.
 
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.






 

Friday, January 25, 2019

Why does Francis's Top Official Cdl. Parolin "Willful[ly] Lie" as disclosed by Cdl. Zen?

Cardinal Joseph Zen told Breitbart news that Pope Francis's Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin is a "willful" liar who is selling out the Chinese Church.

Parolin's "lack of respect for truth. Intelligent as he is, the sophistry and half-truths can only be willful lies," Zen said:

"To us, a terrifying scenario is unfolding, the sellout of our Church!"
(Breitbart, "Exclusive: Cardinal Zen Says China's Catholics Are Witnessing 'The Sellout Of Our Church,'" January 25, 2019)

It appears that many of Francis's closest collaborators are liars such as ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, Parolin and the disgraced Cardinal Donald Wuerl who apparently is a "shameless liar" as he was called by Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò.

Why are so many of Francis's inner circle liars?

One of Francis's closest friends Archbishop Manuel Fernandez, known as the Kissing Bishop for a book he authored on that subject, may have given the answer in a interview he gave attacking Archbishop Viganò when he said:

"I see a consecrated person who gives priority to his well-known ideological interest... They think that their supposed defense of traditional doctrine authorizes them to bear false witness and lie."
(Religion Digital, "Victor M. Fernandez: "It is not advisable  defend oneself from the people who seek protagonism," September 17, 2018)

Apparently, Fernandez and his close friend Francis as well as many of the pope's inner circle may think that the Revelation of Jesus Christ which Viganò "gives priority to" is not infallible "traditional doctrine," but "ideology" as the Kissing Bishop called it.

It may be that Fernandez is actually pointing his finger at the himself, his close friend Francis and the papal inner circle who are "consecrated person[s] who give priority to [their] well-known ideological interests.... They think they that their supposed defense of [liberal] doctrine authorizes them to bear false witness and lie."

If it is true that they think that traditional moral doctrines are only "ideology" then it is possible for persons committing adultery to receive Holy Communion because ideology is changeable according to liberal theology.

If it is true that they think traditional moral doctrines are only "ideology" then it is possible for persons bearing false witness to lie because ideology is changeable according to liberal theology.

Remember Francis warned against "the temptation of making idols of certain abstract truths."

Were the "abstract truths" he was warning against the infallible traditional doctrines of the Catholic Church which is the Revelation of Jesus Christ?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Why Caesar Chavez wore a MAGA Hat & "Conservatives" like "Francis Catholic" George attack the Covington Kids and Trump while Supporting Gay Activists

Featured Image
Robert P. George with Pope Francis appointed Vatican consultant gay activist Fr. James Martin.


The Make America Great Again (MAGA) hat symbolizes fighting for American workers and against unlimited and illegal immigration.

Caesar Chavez wore a MAGA hat in the sense that he was fought for what it symbolizes.

Chavez fought for American workers and against unlimited and illegal immigration as Tucker Carson explains:

"Cesar Chavez hated illegal immigration."

"He was Hispanic, obviously, and definitely on the left, but he fought to keep illegal Mexican immigrants out of this country. He understood that peasants from Latin America will always work for less than Americans will. That’s why employers prefer them. Chavez knew that. 'As long as we have a poor country bordering California,” he once explained, 'it’s going to be very difficult to win strikes.'"

"In 1969, Chavez led a march down the center of California to protest the hiring of illegal immigrant produce pickers. Marching alongside him was Democratic Senator Walter Mondale, and the Rev. Ralph Abernathy, the longtime aide to Martin Luther King."

"Ten years later, Chavez dispatched armed union members into the desert to assault Mexican nationals who were trying to sneak across the border. Chavez’s men beat immigrants with chains and whips made of barbed wire. Illegal aliens who dared to work as scabs had their houses fire-bombed and their cars burned."

"Chavez wasn’t embarrassed about any of this. He bragged about it."

"No matter. Chavez remains a progressive hero. President Obama declared his birthday a commemorative federal holiday. It’s an official day off in half a dozen states. There’s a college named after him, and dozens of public schools."

"... Two decades later, leading Democrats were still wary of mass immigration, especially illegal immigration. As Bill Clinton put it in the 1995 State of the Union address, '…Americans… are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country. The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public services they use impose burdens on our taxpayers.'”

"No prominent Democrat would say anything like that today without being denounced as a racist. Clinton got a standing ovation."

"... Twenty years after Bill Clinton told Americans they had the right to be upset about illegal immigration, his wife scolded the country for enforcing border controls.'
"So, what changed?"

"Not the economics of it. The law of supply and demand remained in effect. It’s not a coincidence that as illegal immigration surged, wages for American workers stagnated. What changed is that Democrats stopped caring about those workers. About the middle class, really."

"Why?"

"Here’s the answer, in four simple facts."

"One: According to a recent study from Yale, there are at least 22 million illegal immigrants living in the United States."

"Two: Democrats plan to give all of them citizenship. Read the Democrats’ 2016 party platform."

"Three: Studies show the overwhelming majority of first-time immigrant voters vote Democrat."

"Four: The biggest landslide in American presidential history was only 17 million votes."

"The payoff for Democrats: permanent electoral majority for the foreseeable future. In a word: power."

"That’s the point, no matter what they tell you; American workers be damned.'
It appears that one reason why "conservatives" like Robert George, who said "I am a Pope Francis Catholic" according to Crux, attacked the pro-life Covington teen-age heroes is because they were wearing the MAGA hats which symbolizes what Caesar Chavez believed that unlimited and illegal immigration hurts American workers.
(Crux, "Conservatives defend Pope Francis," November 20, 2014)

George is a "Francis Catholic" who apparently believes in some form of unlimited immigration according to Wikipedia:

"George... [in] his own words, he "fiercely opposed" the candidacy of Donald Trump, saying that he was "a person of poor character."..  he characterized his attempts to restrict immigration to the United States from certain countries as "unnecessary and therefore unjust."
Moreover, why is George despite claiming to be against gay marriage supporting Francis appointed Vatican consultant gay activist Fr. James Martin?

George defends gay activist Fr. James Martin who on YouTube said chasity is not required of homosexuals.

Does he want pro-gay marriage Democrats to take control of the country?

Back in 2000, former Gov. Pete du Pont pointed out in a Wall Street Journal article after the Bush-Gore 2000 presidential race that, when he compared maps, the adult video rental map and the map of the counties that went for Gore were the same.

Democrats get more political power as homosexual and heterosexual sexual perversion increases and as persons identify themselves with their gay or heterosexual "gender" assorted porn vices as for example identifying oneself as a pedophile.

Again, why is the "pro-life" George constantly attacking the most pro-life President in history as Francis constantly does?

Does he want pro-abortion Democrats to take control of the country?

Dr. Theresa Burkes’s book "Forbidden Grief: The Unspoken Pain of Abortion" shows that abortion is connected to the horror games that our culture plays.

“The college students I witnessed playing "baby soccer"were actually trying to master their trauma by belittling it through a game with decapitated baby doll parts,” Burkes said, “This amusement and mesmerizing allure to engage in the traumatic play is a symptom of our cultures need to overcome the horror-like the baby in the blender jokes, which all surfaced coincidentally after Roe v Wade passed.”

The baby soccer game and other horror genre are symptoms showing that millions of Americans need to overcome the “collective guilt” associated with abortion. Burkes says, “As the group's enthusiasm for this game demonstrated, the acting out of post-abortion trauma can be contagious...collective guilt and trauma have the capacity to disguise massive injustice. ”

According to Life Dynamic’s Mark Cruther, this massive injustice-in which millions are killed- can be stopped by ending access to abortion bound women. His booklet "Access" states between 40 to 60 percent of American women of childbearing age have had at least one abortion. There are also a similar percentage of males who are post-abortive as well.

The booklet claims that the reason for our increasingly pro-abortion elective government is these percentages of persons who are in internal conflict. After violating the moral commandment of thou shall not kill, they vote pro-abortion seeing the stance of the pro-life politicians as a personal attack on themselves.

“What I’m saying is that since the vast majority of elections are decided by slim margins, anything which influences even a small percentage of voters can be a powerful force,” Cruther said:

"The point is that the potential impact is staggering. Moreover, this force grows considerably more powerful everyday as another 4,000 abortions are racked up.”

Like Pope Francis who talks against abortion, but supports pro-abortion candidates as well as welcomes pro-death leaders to speak at the Vatican and who says gays shouldn't be in the priesthood, but surrounds himself with homosexual predators (like ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick and Bishop Gustavo Zanchetta) and gay sex abuse cover-up bishops, George appears to use weaponized ambiguity in his lip service against abortion and gay marriage.

However, both Francis and George are unambiguous on their hatred of President Trump and what the MAGA hat symbolizes. They are against Caesar Chavez who wore a MAGA hat in the sense that he fought for American workers and against unlimited and illegal immigration.

It appears that the self proclaimed "Francis Catholic" George and the pope he defends aren't so pro-life or pro-family after all since they apparently wants the the pro-death Democrats to come to power which will bring about the United States becoming a failed state such as California and Venezuela.

If the President Donald Trump Wall is not build then the one party pro-death state of California will spread like a disease to rest of the United States.

We see the post-Reagan amnesty Hispanic immigrants voting in Democrat abortion and gay extremists who claim murder of the unborn children and homosexual perversion is the highest good.

If the United States becomes like California then the Democrat's one party Venezuela-like regime will gain power over all persons of faith in the God of the Bible.

Then as in California we will began to live in a Stalinist or Nazi-like regime that outlaws Christianity. Like Stalin and Hitler they claim evil is good.

Christians, in the future, who want to raise their children in the sexual morality of the faith or want to stop the murder of unborn babies must be jailed for the “hate crimes" against the one party state in this regime.

These post-Reagan Latino immigrants want to bring the Democrat regime into power. They are like crazy people who want to destroy their new country.

We must demand the Wall so the anti-Christian regime doesn't come into power by changing the Christian pro-life demographics of the voters of the USA.

If the Latin American immigrants whom President Ronald Reagan granted amnesty and the illegal immigrants who followed them into California had voted for pro-life and pro-family candidates, I would be the first in line saying bring in more legal immigrants.

But the vast majority of them have voted for abortion and homosexuality. It appears they want their children to be taught abortion and homosexuality in the public schools.

Moreover, they appear to want a failed state similar to Venezuela for their children's future as Washington Examiner writer Jared Whitley graphically shows:

"California is responsible for pulling the Democrats so far left they’re no longer Democrats, and without California, the Democrats’ presence on the national level disappears. Without California, Trump goes from losing the popular vote by 3 million to winning it by 1.5 million."

"Without California, the current Republican edge in the House of Representatives almost doubles. California is the only thing keeping the Democratic Party alive, but it’s also the thing that’s killed the Democratic Party."

"With no grown-ups in Sacramento to say 'Hey, wait a minute,' California has abandoned the virtues of liberalism and replaced them with the totalitarian drumbeat of progressivism. And the sparkling, golden example of the failure of progressive politics is California itself."

"Because California is a disaster."

"Despite the insistence that so-called progressives can solve income inequality, California boasts the worst income inequality in the country. U.S. News & World Report ranked it dead last for quality of life. In the last 10 years, 1 million more people fled the state than moved in from other states. It has somehow managed to accrue $2 trillion in debt — about one-tenth of the federal government's entire debt, including the cost of all the wars we’ve ever fought."

"And they call this "progress"? Can the word "progress" sue California for defamation of character?"

"Drill down and it gets even worse: Los Angeles is a nightmare of gang violence, homelessness, and pollution — a New York Times op-ed aptly compared it to a third-world country."

"Meanwhile, San Francisco boasts California’s worst instance of income inequality, has vanquished the biological urge to procreate, and is literally covered in poop."

"California wants to save the world from Trump, but maybe it could start by saving California first."

A piece in the Guardian once speculated that California might become 'America’s first failed state.'"
[https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-only-way-to-unify-america-is-to-kick-california-out%3f_amp=true#ampshare=https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-only-way-to-unify-america-is-to-kick-california-out]

California has become a failed state like Venezuela with "1 million" citizens fleeing the one party pro-death regime.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church. Please, pray an Our Father now for President Trump and our country now because this is the important fork in the road for the United States. Please, keep this intentions in your prayers.

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

Is Francis saying the Argentinian President & Legislator are "Crazy" because they are Banning Criminal Immigrants & want a Wall?

Pope Francis said today that "fear of migration is 'making us crazy'" supposedly attacking the President of the United States according to CBS News.

But, maybe Francis was attacking the government of his home country.

The Guardian reported that:

"President Mauricio Macri triggers backlash from Bolivia after banning entry for foreign citizens with criminal convictions - as legislator proposes border wall."
(Guardian, "Argentina sees migration ban and wall proposal in immigration row," February 3, 2017)

The Bubble headline on July 4, 2018 was:

"Argentina is Deporting More Foreigners While Granting Fewer Residency Permits"

Is Francis saying his country's president and legislator are "crazy" by his statement?

Is he saying President Donald Trump is "crazy" by his statement?

Francis is being hypocritical if he only attacks Trump and not the president and legislator of his home country.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.




Tuesday, January 22, 2019

Covington Teen-age Heroes: Evil CNN's Hate Crime & their Complicit "Conservative Pro-life" Hi-tech Lynch Mob

CNN committed a hate crime against the pro-life Covington High School kids which is evil.

CNN covered-up the hate crimes:

- Of a Native American man Nathan Phillips banging his drum inches from the face of a Catholic pro-life teen-ager while his Native group made racist remarks.

- Of a Black hate adult group who called the pro-life kids "fags" and other unspeakable names including calling Black pro-life teens with the Catholic group "niggers."

CNN lied about the hate crimes of the Native American and Black hate groups by pretending that the insulted and harassed pro-life kids were "mocking" the aggressors by heroically smiling in the face of insult and intimidation.

CNN is shameless. Today, it is still lying:

"The Covington Catholic High School students were... mocking Phillips."
(CNN, "White House expresses 'support' for Covington Catholic students," January 22, 2019)

CNN is well known for its hatred of Christianity, the pro-life movement and conservatives as well as for its lying.

So, there is no excuse for the so-called "conservative pro-life" mob that included the National Review, Rod Dreher, the March for Life president and the many others who were part of the hi-tech lynch mob.

They were complicit in the CNN hate crime that has put the innocent pro-life kids lives in danger

Shame on you.

If you are Catholic you need to go to confession for your hate crime.

CNN for your hate crime against the Covington kids' Catholicism as well as for their pro-life and conservative convictions you need to apologize and stop lying.

Pray an Our Father now for the safety of the Covington teen-age heroes.




Sunday, January 20, 2019

Native American Man Bangs Drum in face of Pro-life Kid after Black Protestors Verbally Harass Pro-life Kid's Friends vs. Media Lies

Covington Catholic high school kids who took part in the March for Life in Washington DC on Friday were approached by a Native American adult man Nathan Phillips who banged his drum within inches of one of the high school kids face.

The high school student responded peacefully by smiling as video of the incident confirm.

Videos, also, show that a radical adult group called the Black Hebrew Israelites were harassing the pro-life kids calling them "fags" about an hour before Phillips and his Native group approached them.

The kids smiled and responded peacefully to the harassment by both adult groups.

BuzzFeed and the mainstream media after making up the lie about the President Donald Trump and the Cohen Moscow narrative decided to make up this lie:

Evil White Catholic kids surround and harass poor Native American guy.

The media's lies have consequences:

Bladder Buzz is reporting today that a "Hollywood producer called for the [pro-life] teens to be murdered... actor... Ben Hoffman... called for "violent sexual crimes to be committed against the minor teens."
(Bladder Buzz, "Kentucky Prosecutor Fires Warning Shot to People Threatening Acts of Violence Against Covington Catholic High School, January 20, 2019)

Pray an Our Father now for the safety of the pro-life kids who are being threatened with violence as well as being harassed by other adults such as their high school and diocese because of the lies.


Saturday, January 19, 2019

Prophecy: Trump will "lead America back to God" & can he End the Nightmare of Abortion?





Latest Posts: Hermit of Loreto: The Prophecy that Trump would "lead America back to God."
It is incredible to say, but in terms of policies and actions, President Donald Trump is by a wide margin more pro-life, pro-family and even Christian than Pope Francis.

Also, incredibly there is a 1980's prophecy that Trump will "lead America back to God."

Father Giacomo Capoverdi on YouTube said a close confidant of his told him that in the 1980's the "Hermit of Loreto" (the author of the renown Pieta prayer book) made the prophecy that Donald Trump would "lead America back to God." Loreto is the site of the Holy House of the Blessed Virgin Mary.

Four decades ago, the close friend of Fr. Capoverdi in astonishment said, to the author of the famous Pieta prayer book, do you mean the playboy. The Hermit said yes.


Pray that the prophecy about President Trump bringing "America back to God" is fulfilled and, also, that he can end the nightmare of abortion in America.

Dr. Theresa Burkes’s book "Forbidden Grief: The Unspoken Pain of Abortion" shows that abortion has brought us a nightmare and horror culture:

"If you examine the women's movement you can see that many of the women who laid the groundwork were women traumatized by their own abortions. They believed that legalizing abortion would take away the trauma.”

Instead as Dr. Burkes shows they created trauma, which brought us the nightmare culture.

She applies psychology to cure this trauma, but says that the abortion-trauma can only be completely healed if one asks for and receives God’s mercy.

If the grief of abortion is not healed then the world becomes a Freddy Krueger-like horror culture.

Burkes maintains that the horror icons of the United States such as “Freddy Krueger” and the “evil child movies” are symbols of a culture running away from its guilt.

“I think that evil child movies are all around us. The child is the victimizer, the one who torments. Other movies, like Freddy Krueger, illustrate the horror of being tracked down by an "abortionist" figure who is out to kill her baby,” Burkes said:

“I've watched MTV where baby dolls are thrown off cliffs, discarded, abused and unwanted - revealing the unconscious conflict shared by all who have rejected children or been abused themselves after having been used for sexual pleasure.”

Forbidden Grief's thesis is that when one represses guilt one creates even greater monsters in the unconscious.

One example is when Lorena Bobbitt cut off her husband’s penis.

Bobbitt did this monstrous nightmare-like aggression on her husband because he forced her to abort their child.

This is only one example of what happens to a culture when millions of men and women have the memory of an aborted baby haunting their unconscious.

Burkes tells us in story after story of “bizarre” behaviors. In one account we find a dorm party in which the students, many post-abortive, played "baby soccer.”

The “baby soccer"story reminds one of a Stephen King novel with it’s broken heads of dolls being kicked around, their eyes gouged out, doll cheeks burned with cigarette butts and a boyfriend burning cigarette holes between the doll's legs as well as ripping off their legs, leaving only a scarred vagina hole.

This account and others convinced Burkes that abortion is connected to the horror games that our culture plays.

“The college students I witnessed playing "baby soccer"were actually trying to master their trauma by belittling it through a game with decapitated baby doll parts,” Burkes said, “This amusement and mesmerizing allure to engage in the traumatic play is a symptom of our cultures need to overcome the horror-like the baby in the blender jokes, which all surfaced coincidentally after Roe v Wade passed.”

The baby soccer game and other horror genre are symptoms showing that millions of Americans need to overcome the “collective guilt” associated with abortion. Burkes says, “As the group's enthusiasm for this game demonstrated, the acting out of post-abortion trauma can be contagious...collective guilt and trauma have the capacity to disguise massive injustice. ”

According to Life Dynamic’s Mark Cruther, this massive injustice-in which millions are killed- can be stopped by ending access to abortion bound women. His booklet "Access" states between 40 to 60 percent of American women of childbearing age have had at least one abortion. There are also a similar percentage of males who are post-abortive as well.

The booklet claims that the reason for our increasingly pro-abortion elective government is these percentages of persons who are in internal conflict. After violating the moral commandment of thou shall not kill, they vote pro-abortion seeing the stance of the pro-life politicians as a personal attack on themselves.

“What I’m saying is that since the vast majority of elections are decided by slim margins, anything which influences even a small percentage of voters can be a powerful force,” Cruther said:

"The point is that the potential impact is staggering. Moreover, this force grows considerably more powerful everyday as another 4,000 abortions are racked up.”

His booklet says studies have found that these women do not have abortions unless there is easy and local access to abortion.

The vast majority of these women, according to these studies, will not travel long distances or pay large amounts of money for an abortion. Access says:

 “Our opponent’s ability to continue fighting comes from a high abortion rate. That is what fuels their political machine. As long as they have $64,000 an hour to draw on, and the potential for at least 4,000 new pro-abortion voters every day, the legal status of abortion will not change.”

The way to defeat the abortion nightmare on the political front, according to Cruther, is to sue doctors. And Steve Mosher, head of the Population Research Institute (PRI) says there are many legitimate reasons to sue. He said:

"The failure to stop an abortion procedure on request, or even depriving women of their right to full information, can be construed as a denial of a woman's freedom of access to reproductive health."

Access says very few new doctors want to be abortionists so malpractice suits makes the abortion medical business even more unattractive. As fewer young doctors enter the aging field, access to abortions becomes costly and inaccessible.

The abortionists and the pro-abortion media seem to agree. According to Access abortionist David Gritmes said:

"Distance clearly matters in women’s reproductive choices...abortion rates were found to be inversely related to the distance to a provider.” In 1998, The New York Times Magazine said, “... abortion is retreating into a half-lighted ghetto of pseudonyms, suspicion and fear... today 59% of all abortion doctors are 65 years old...nearly two thirds are beyond legal retirement age.”

Access presents 81 such quotes from abortionist and pro-abortion publications to show as it says ”access doesn’t just influence abortion politics; it is the determining factor in which side wins and which side loses.”

Along these lines, another way to end the abortion government is to reach out to the millions of post abortion trauma voters with God’s mercy as Dr. Burkes is doing.

If even a small percentage changes sides, as Cruther said, these slim margins in elections may start going to pro-life politicians. And it is never too late to start reaching out to persons in post abortion trauma.

“We had one woman come on our retreat who was 87 years old. She suffered over half a century with this secret that she had never revealed to anyone until she came to Rachel's Vineyard. She was so relieved to be with others and to finally receive God's forgiveness,” Burkes said:

"We can offer the Lord's mercy by not seeking to judge or condemn them, but by inviting them to thoughtfully reflect on their experience - by being the one ear that will listen, or the one heart that cries with them for the loss.”

That 87-year-old woman’s conversion represents millions of voters who could convert to voting for pro-life Republicans because the Democrats have steadfastly “positioned” themselves as the abortion party. The problem for the Republicans is that those women swing voters must be reached with psychological and religious help as happened to our 87-year-old.

The way this can be done is for President Donald Trump to attempted to pass legislation, which offers psychological assistance to women with abortion trauma.

The Democrats and media would go crazy, but if this legislation were positioned as a woman’s right to reproductive health; then the Republicans would have the moral high ground.

Even if the legislation doesn’t pass the mere publicity would get it into the consciousness of millions of woman in abortion trauma. The pro-life movement and conservative churches could then get into action and start offering those women the help they need.

After this is done then the Trump’s Justice Department must prosecute all abortionist who as PRI’s President Steve Mosher said fail "to stop an abortion procedure on request, or even depriving women of their right to full information.”

PRI‘s pro-life conference introduced legal campaigns to sue abortionist doctors that fail to provide complete information about the risks of abortion to their patients.

"We're working with these attorneys to inform more and more Americans of their rights,“ Mosher said:

"It's time America does an 'about face' on the abortion industry. Women deserve genuine health and human rights, not violations so routinely committed by the abortion industry."

According to Pennsylvania’s Chris Kahlenborn MD, there are 28 out of 37 studies that show induced abortion increases the risk of breast cancer. 13 out of 15 of those are done in the United States. And 13 out of 15 of those are positive [http://abortionbreastcancer.com/].

So the risk of an abortion to develop beast cancer is 50% if it’s your first baby. And if you’re under 18 it goes to 150%. If you’re under 18 and your baby is more than nine weeks old it goes up to 800%.

"As soon as there comes a woman who has breast cancer who has had an abortion and takes it to court. She‘s got a very strong case,” Kahlenborn said, “The problem is a lot of young women when they do get breast cancer die from it so quickly -because it’s so aggressive when you’re young- they might not make it to court."

As Kahlenborn showed this is not just about winning election, but about doing the right thing. Unfortunately or fortunately, for the Republicans this is also all about politics. Any increase in abortion- as Cruther graphically shows- is to demise of their party.

The California and other liberal state elections show that the Democrats will not hesitate to play baby soccer-type mind games with women voters in order to win.

But, the Republicans are running out of time. Their base is the conservative religious voters, so they can not allow the abortionists to have the “$64,000 an hour to draw on, and the potential for at least 4,000 new pro-abortion voters every day:” As Cruther said, “it is the determining factor in which side wins and which side loses.”

The Party of Lincoln must make a choice.

They can become the like the Whigs- who kept compromising on the issue of slavery until they were- replaced before the Civil War by the Republicans. Or they can stand firm like Lincoln and limit the spread of a great evil.

Lincoln never attempted to abolish slavery directly, before the war, because he knew if he limited its spread like a disease so that it was only in the South, then it would die a natural death.

The Democrats- the slavery party- knew this too. That is why they started the Civil War.

The Democrats- the abortion party- knows also that abortion will die a natural death if limited in its ability to exploit women. They will not start a civil war because they are cowards and have no moral high ground.

So Trump can go down in history as another Lincoln.

All that Trump has to do is pick pro-life Supreme Court justices to overturn Roe vs. Wade and limit its spread by allowing pro-life states to protect the unborn children as well as by protecting women’s health and human rights in abortion pro-death states like California.

The President needs to let women in abortion trauma know that he and others are there offering help to free them from their nightmare of abortion.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church. Pray an Our Father that President Trump help end the nightmare of abortion and that he bring America back to God as the 1980's "Hermit of Loreto" prophesied.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pray for President Trump

Keep President Trump in your prayers and penances because the hatred of the world and the devil that is usually directed at pro-life/family popes is targeting him. Pray that God protect the President and give him wisdom. Remember:

Father Giacomo Capoverdi on YouTube said a close confidant of his told him in the 1980's the "Hermit of Loreto" (the author of the Pieta prayer book) made the prophecy that Donald Trump would "lead America back to God".

Four decades ago, the close friend of Fr. Capoverdi in astonishment said, to the author of the famous Pieta prayer book, do you mean the playboy. The Hermit said yes.

Pray that the President is given the grace of conversion to Catholicism and the wisdom to bring America back to God.


Remember that the great catholic cultural historian Christopher Dawson said history is often changed more by saintly Catholics praying than the so-called great men of history.

The following article is posted with the permission of the author James Larson:
The Immaculate Heart of Mary, The Rosary, and The Survival of Our Faith
The rosary, because of its structural content, is something that requires a certain time set aside for its proper recitation. It is clearly the will of God and of Mary that it be part of every person’s daily prayer life. It is the basis of our spiritual childhood lived within Mary’s Immaculate Heart.

It is my belief, however, that especially in these times of virtual universal disorientation and distress, the structured rosary, while indeed being the foundation of our personal prayer life, requires much more in order that such spiritual childhood be protected throughout the day. The rosary itself requires less than one-half hour. If this is all we do, then the rest of the day may well be surrendered almost entirely to forces which seek our spiritual death.

The Hail Mary, on the other hand, takes only about fifteen seconds. There is almost no limitation to the situations and times in which it can be prayed, even in the midst of the most worldly activity; in situations of temptation, anger, doubt, confusion, or even despair; and, especially valuable, as we are falling into sleep. Even if there is only time to pray “Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee”, this provides a powerful means by which we may be affectively drawn into Our Lady’s Heart as her spiritual children. It is in itself, when said in the humble spirit of a simple moment of offering one’s own heart to Our Lady, a most profound act of love and consecration which flees from the world in order to take refuge in Mary’s certain and protecting faith.

Our Lord instructs us that we are “always to pray, and not to faint [lose heart]”. He further makes it quite clear that it is this heart which must be maintained if there is to be any faith upon His return (Luke 18:1-8). For us to truly take this seriously, we must first fully admit that we are extraordinarily vulnerable children who, especially in the overwhelming spiritual crisis of our time, must find refuge in Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart, or perish. The rosary, and especially the frequent praying of the Hail Mary, is the gift from Our Lady to secure us in this certainty of faith.

To Release Love

In his encyclical The Christian Meaning of Human Suffering, Pope John Paul II wrote that “suffering is present in the world in order to release love”. This is a statement that has haunted me for the past 31 years. It has become a principle necessary for my understanding of the crucifixion of the Church which I have witnessed occurring over the past 35 years since my conversion. It has pursued me in my own life, and especially in my children who I have watched grow from the innocence of childhood into being subjected as adults to the crucible of suffering which is this modern Christ-hating world.

It was Blessed Simeon who prophesied to Mary that “thy own soul a sword shall pierce, that out of many hearts, thoughts may be revealed”. This verbal image of Mary’s pierced heart calls to mind the artistic representation of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, pierced by a sword and releasing the flame of love towards Christ, and towards all men and women created in His Image. The spiritual maternity of Mary is, in its most profound essence, the transforming of human pain and suffering into the light and life of Christ. When, through the praying of the Hail Mary, we place ourselves and those we love within Her Heart, we are therefore exercising the supreme mercy towards souls for the glorification of God.

The Rosary and the Hail Mary are not therefore primarily about focusing on our own personal sanctification, but rather about striking the fire of love upon the flint of our hearts hardened by the effects of original and actual sin. If it be true, according to Christ’s words, that we must die to self in order to gain self, then it must be equally true that in our prayer life it is in loving God and praying for souls that we are meant to be perfected in that love which cannot help but be our sanctification. If our prayers are beset by dullness it is most likely because they are, at least secretly, turned inwards primarily towards ourselves.
Focusing on self-love, even in the virtuous cause of self-sanctification, inevitably leads to the torpidity of spirit which is possibly the most constant effect of original sin upon our minds and hearts. Interiorly, we are all dull unless our hearts erupt into love.

This is why the “other half” of the Fatima message concerns the necessity of reparation. We tend to conceive of the Catholic concept of reparation only in terms of “making reparation” for offenses committed against God. But the term reparation is a relational term. Reparation is therefore primarily concerned with the militant effort to “repair” souls to God. This is the most profound way in which we glorify God and make “reparation” for the offenses committed against Him.

The Rosary and Hail Mary are therefore prayers of “repair” not only for ourselves, but for others. And since our own hearts are most easily moved out of dullness not only by our own personal suffering but by the sufferings of those we love (our spouses, children, friends, and the whole suffering Church and world), then the Rosary and Hail Mary prayed for those we love should be the means by which our hearts are set afire. It is in this fire that our hearts become one with Mary, and through her to Jesus: “I am come to cast fire on the earth: and what will I, but that it be kindled?” (Luke 12: 49).

The Rosary is a violent prayer, demanding a violent love. Our Lord said that “the Kingdom of heaven suffereth violence and the violent bear it away”. Such a concept may indeed come as a shock to those who envision the Rosary as a prayer predominantly consisting of peaceful meditations and gentle consolations. If, however, St. Dominic is correct in considering that it is through the Scapular (consecration to Mary) and the Rosary that the world will be saved, then we should be willing to seriously consider that these devotions necessitate the violence and “fire” of which Our Lord speaks.

The nature of this “violence” is unraveled by Our Lord in that same parable which contains the two passages we have already examined concerning prayer and its relation to the question of Our Lord as to whether there will be any faith left when He returns:

"And he spoke also a parable to them, that we ought always to pray, and not to faint, saying: There was a judge in a certain city who feared not God, nor regarded man. And there was a certain widow in that city, and she came to him, saying: Avenge me of my adversary. And he would not for a long time. But afterwards he said within himself: Although I fear not God, nor regard man, yet because this widow is troublesome to me, I will avenge her, lest continually coming she weary me. And the Lord said: Hear what the unjust judge saith. And will not God revenge his elect who cry to him day and night: and will he have patience in their regard? I say to you, that he will quickly revenge them. But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth?"

We need to penetrate to the spirit of this passage if we are to understand Our Lord’s demand that we “always pray” and not lose heart, and the connection which this fervent and persistent prayer bears to the survival of faith.

The widow who is the object of this parable is clearly operating almost totally in the realm of passion – of vehement anger and vengefulness. Obviously, when considering what Christ is trying here to impart to his listeners, this is a metaphor for spiritual realities. We see this sort of figure of speech used often in scripture, as for instance when scripture speaks of God’s anger. God is not subject to sensible passions. The word “anger” is thus used as a metaphor for His judgment and chastisement. All the violent language used in this passage is therefore constituted as a parable signifying those “elect” who will retain their faith because they “cry to Him day and night”.

There is, however, another great distinction to be made between the widow and the “elect”. The widow’s cry comes naturally. She is consumed by passion, and her vengefulness consumes her night and day. She does not have to labor to make this thing come alive in her heart. This is not true of the “cry” of the elect.

The Rosary and Hail Mary are a cry of the will. They may sometimes be accompanied by sentiment or passion, but this certainly is not the norm, nor does it provide sufficient motivation for the “praying always’ commanded by Our Lord. In order for them to become habitual, we must make a very conscious commitment to militantly praying “day and night”. It is not enough therefore to sit back and rest in the fact that we “say” our daily Rosary. We must strive with all our heart to correspond with the unceasing love of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. This, I believe, can be accomplished by the constant effort to extend our daily Rosary throughout the day by the frequent praying of the Hail Mary. It is a work of love.

"Pray, pray a great deal and make many sacrifices, for many souls
go to Hell because they have no one to make sacrifices and to pray for them
.”
Our Lady of Fatima (Aug 17, 1917)
James Larson

(Click to read Larson's whole article: http://www.waragainstbeing.com/node/59)