Thursday, October 31, 2019

Taylor Marshall & Biggest Catholic Commentator Kuster: Francis's Pachamama is "Mocking" Catholic Church?

Today, Taylor Marshall, on his YouTube channel, interviewed Brazilian journalist Bernardo Kuster who is the biggest Catholic commentator in the world with 795,000 YouTube subscribers.

In the interview, Kuster apparently said Francis was "mocking" the Catholic Church when he stood in front of a Pachamama boat that was placed by his approval "just above St. Peter's tomb":

"[Kuster said:] The place the [Pachamama] boat is standing is just above St. Peter's tomb. We call the [Catholic] Church the Ship of Peter and there was the boat of Pachamama just above him. That is mocking. That is mocking. [Marshall interjected:] It is mocking..."

"... [Marshall said:] On the boat, it says Papa Francesco [Pope Francis]. It is almost like this is saying, there is the Ship of Peter and there is the ship of Francis. Who is in it? The idol Pachamama."
(Dr. Taylor Marshall Channel, "Brazil and Infiltration of Amazon Synod w Bernardo Kuster, October 31, 2019, 50:10-50:20 and 52:46-53:10)

Wednesday, October 30, 2019

Do Skojec & 1P5 think Athanasius was Wrong to Teach Jesus is God because "there [was] No Official Church Teaching on this Issue"?

Francis apologist Steve Skojec and his website, One Peter Five, have come to the defense of their beloved it is infallibly impossible that Pope Francis can be a antipope and, also, if he is a heretic, he can't be deposed anyway.

This time they didn't bring up the totally discredited "universal acceptance" argument, but presented laughable strawman arguments.

The One Peter Five article claims that a invalid papal conclave that elected a antipope can't happen during the time of Francis (which happened during the time of St. Bernard of Clairvaux) "because the underlying assumption is that Francis can't be the pope because Francis is a heretic."
(One Peter Five, "Is Francis the Pope?", October 29, 2019)

This is a laughable strawman argument because the supposed "pope" during St.Bernard's time wasn't a heretic, but was a invalidly elected antipope because his conclave didn't follow the conclave constitution of the previous pope.

(Whether the supposed "pope" was a heretic or not a heretic is beside the point. The main point is and was did the conclave follow the conclave constitution of the previous pope.)

By the way, Mr. Skojec, the main argument of Bishop Rene Gracida is that the Francis conclave didn't follow the conclave constitution of the previous pope.

Also, can someone get Skojec and his writers a Catholic history book?

The next laughable argument is a pope who is a heretic can't he deposed even though Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales explicitly states so because "there is no official church teaching on this issue" according to the One Peter Five piece.

According to Skojec's website, St. Athanasius was wrong to fight for the undefined teaching that Jesus is God because there it wasn't a "official church teaching" so, like the Francis apologists at One Peter Five, Athanasius should have sat on his hands and said Jesus isn't God because there is no "official church teaching" defining the teaching.

By the way, Mr. Skojec, there is no "official church teaching" that a heretic pope can't be deposed, but there is a Doctor of the Church who explicitly teaches that a heretic pope can be deposed.

St  Francis de Sales declared:

"The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostlic See."
(The Catholic Controversy by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Tuesday, October 29, 2019

Thanks, Cd. Brandmuller for calling the Couragaous "Idol... Remov[ers]... Prophets;" Now you have a Moral Obligation to be a Couragaous "Prophet" & Issue the Dubia Correction

Today, LifeSiteNews reported that dubia cardinal, Cardinal Walter Brandmuller, said:

"These two young men who threw these tasteless idols into the Tiber... These two couragaous 'Macabees' who have removed the 'horrors of the devastation of a holy site' are the prophets of today."
(LifeSiteNews, "Couragaous... prophets of today': Dubia cardinal praises men who threw Pachamamas in Tiber, October 29, 2019)

Now, Cardinal Brandmuller, you have a moral obligation to issue the formal correction that was promised if it became "necessary" according to the other dubia cardinal, Cardinal  Raymond Burke, if the five dubia questions weren't answered specifically the first dubia question against "persistent adultery and reception of Holy Communion."
(OnePeterFive, "Remaining Dubia Cardinals Take the Next Step Towards Formal Correction," November 14, 2017)

In 2015, you, Cardinal Brandmuller stated:

"Whoever thinks that persistent adultery and reception of Holy Communion are compatible is a heretic and promotes schism."
(LifeSiteNews, "Dubia Cardinal: Anyone who opens Communion to adulterers 'is a heretic and promotes schism,'" December  23, 2016)

St. Thomas Aquinas demanded:

"If the faith were endangered a subject ought to rebuke his prelate even publicly. Hence Paul, who was Peter's subject, rebuked in public, on account of the imminent danger of scandal."
(Summa Theologiae ll-IIae, 33,4,2)

"Ought" means you have a duty or a moral obligation to make a formal canonical correction of Francis for the scandal of Communion for adulterers and now for the scandal against the First Commandment of, as you said, for the Vatican's bringing the "idols... 'horrors of devastation... [into] a holy site'" which you know Francis fully approved.

According to the greatest Doctor of the Church St. Thomas Aquinas, you, Cardinal Brandmuller have the duty or moral obligation to be a couragaous "prophet" and issue the canonical formal correction immediately to Francis.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.






Monday, October 28, 2019

Dr. Taylor Marshall: "This Comes down to... Francis, whether you are a Heretic, whether you are the Vicar of Christ [the Pope]?"

On his popular YouTube channel, Thomist scholar Dr. Taylor Marshall, Ph.D., questioned "whether" Francis is a "heretic" and "the Vicar of Christ [the pope]."

Marshall is the former chancellor of Fisher More College who presently is the head of the New Saint Thomas Institute which offers Certificates in Theology. 

The Thomist scholar in his popular YouTube channel addressed Francis who he has meet on at least two occasions with the following direct question on if he is "a heretic":

"If the pope says worship a Pachamama. We say, no! Hell, no! We will never do it. It is impossible. It is against the faith... Francis we, also, want to know are you a heretic?.. Are you a heretic or not. We the baptized don't know anymore. We don't know if Francis is a heretic or not... All of this comes down to whether you worship idols, Francis, whether you are a heretic, whether you are the Vicar of Christ [the pope]?"
(Dr. Taylor Marshall YouTube Channel, "Pope Francis says Pachamamas Retrieved from Tiber River - Taylor Struggles and Reflects (#323)," Streamed live on October 25, 2019, 44:42- 53:07)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Sunday, October 27, 2019

Do Most Actual Catholics Reject the Francis Amazon Synod as Idolatrous & Racist?

Francis collaborator Alberto Melloni, the director of the John XXIII Foundation for Religious Studies in Bologna, claims that the majority of actual Catholics support Francis's idolatrous and racist Amazon Synod.

Melloni in the liberal Atlantic said:   

"'We have a small, noisy minority and a large silent majority...' 'The noisy minority is struggling, with a certain success, to represent themselves as half of the Church, and they are not. They’re not even half the College of Cardinals, not even half the episcopate.'"
[https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2019/10/pope-francis-revolutionary-culture-war/600877/]

Do most actual Catholics support Francis's idolatrous and racist Amazon Synod?

Before we get to rather the Synod has the support of actual Catholics, first we'll prove that there was idolatrous worship at the Vatican and then later we will discuss if the Synod was racist.

Glolia.Tv reported in the article "Italian Police Confirms: Pachamama Idols Were 'Used For Prayer'”:

"In a highly embarrassing move, VaticanNews.va (October 25) published the communiqué of the Carabinieri of Roma San Pietro who recovered the three Pachamama idols who were disposed off in the Tiber."

"The communiqué explains that the three idols had been 'removed from a side altar' of Santa Maria in Traspontina church 'where they were used for prayer by the 'Itinerant Team'."

"The text describes them as 'a Catholic group based in South America that takes part in the Synod on the Amazon.'"

"According to Cruxnow.com (October 19) the group bought its idols years ago at an artisan’s market in Manaus, Brazil, and uses them since."
[https://gloria.tv/post/9WAEcFzDmGDA6MWGqC4QgQAnU]

Moreover, LifeSiteNews reported that Francis, himself, confirmed that the idols that were prostrated before and worshipped in front of Francis in the Vatican gardens were images of the pagan goddess Pachamama:

"Pope Francis has... confirm[ed] suspicions that the ["Vatican 'Pachamama'"] statues were idols."

Moreover, the news outlet quotes Francis himself declaring the "pachamama" idols were recovered and may scandalously and sacrilegiously be "displayed... at the closing Mass of the Synod." Francis said:

"I would like to say a word about the pachamama statues that were removed from the Church at Traspontina, which were there without idolatrous intentions... the Carabinieri... commander said, 'the display of the [idol] statues [will be] at the closing Mass of the Synod.' We'll see."

"I delegate the Secretary of State who will respond to this."

"This is good news, thank you."
(LifeSiteNews, "Full transcript of the Pope's comments on pagan 'Pachamama' statues" and "Pope calls statues 'Pachamama' and apologizes for their removal from church," October 25, 2019)

The LifeSiteNews article, also, revealed that former head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Gerhard Muller on EWTN said:

"[A]ccording to the Law of God Himself - the First Commandment - idolism [idolatry] is a grave sin... to bring the idols into the Church was a grave sin, a crime against the Divine Law."


It is apparently beyond doubt that Francis is a explicit heretic in terms of the First Commandment.

Cardinal Muller said Francis actions are "a crime against Divine Law."

Even supposing that Francis's actions had no "idolatrous intentions" which can only be judged by a imperfect council, the very "bring[ing] [of] the idols into the Church" and now saying that he is open and apparently willing to commit the scandalous sacrilege of "display[ing]... the [Sachamama idol] statues at the closing Mass of the Synod" which is "a crime against" the First Commandment that means he is "knowingly corrupt[ing] the faith."

Muller showed that Francis's syncretistic (mixing Christianity with paganism) claim that it is morally justifiable "to bring the idols into the Church was a grave sin, a crime against the Divine Law" despite his claim that there was no "idolatrous intentions."

LifeSiteNews, also, reported that on the EWTN World Over show, Canon lawyer Fr. Gerald Murray said that the Francis Vatican had a "pagan religious ceremony... This should not be - ever occur in a Catholic institution."
(LifeSiteNews, "Pope Francis causes 'confusion' by participating in 'pagan' ritual," October 11, 2019)

Also, on the EWTN, The Catholic Thing editor Robert Royal called the ritual "syncretism" according to the LifeSiteNews article.

To understand the enormity of the grave heresy, crime and sin of Francis just imagine if Moses on seeing his people prostrating in front of the graven idols had said there was no "idolatrous intentions" so let's consider the possibility of"display[ing]" the idols in God's Paschal liturgy.

Now, we get to Francis collaborator Melloni's claim that actual Catholics support the idolatrous Synod which takes us to the CINOs or Catholics In Name Only problem which has been with the Church since the beginning.

Francis's ambiguity on syncretism and idolatry is contrary to Scriptures and the infallible teachings of the Catholic Church and has been called by Bishop Robert Barron in another matter "eloquent ambiguity."

In the time of the Arian crisis those with forked tongues who spoke with "eloquent ambiguity" like Francis were called Semi-Arians or semi-heretics.

St. Athanasius said Semi-Arians, that is semi-heretics, were accomplices and Arians in disguise trying to promote "the Arian madness" through ambiguous statements designed to have "an orthodox and a heretical interpretation."
(The Great Athanasius, page 136 and Bad Shepherds, page 27)

Athanasius said:

"They disguise their real sentiment, and then make use of the language of Scripture... as a bait for the ignorant, that they may inveigle them into their own wickedness."
(The Great Athanasius: An Introduction into his Life and Works, page 136)

Early Church expert Rod Bennett writing of the Arian crisis said:

"[T]he number of episcopal [bishop] sees that can be shown to have remained in orthodox [Catholic] hands throughout the crisis can be counted on the fingers of one hand."
Bad Shepherds, page 29)

As far as I can see in our world today it is very much like the time of the Arian crisis. We only have one bishop who is Athanasius-like: Bishop René Gracida who has firmly and unambiguously condemned the Vatican syncretism and idolatry.

The CINOs or Catholics In Name Only in the time of Athanasius were called Arian heretics and Semi-Arians or semi-heretics. The CINO or Catholics In Name Only in our time are called Liberal heretics and Semi-Liberals or semi-heretics. Sadly, Melloni is right in saying that "not even half the College of Cardinals, not even half the episcopate" are actually Catholic, but are CINOs or Catholics In Name Only as in the time of Athanasius.

Now, it is time to get to the laity and it is probably true as Melloni said that most of the CINOs or Catholics In Name Only lay "Catholics" who don't believe the teaching of the Church support the idolatrous and pagan Amazon Synod because they are not Catholics, but pagans who call themselves "Catholics."

However, I have no doubt that the vast majority of real or actual believing Catholics which is probably about 10% of all baptized Catholics reject the idolatrous and pagan Amazon Synod. Church Militant explained the numbers:

"A look at the numbers: Out of every 100 baptized Catholics, 80 do not go to Mass; that leaves 20 who do."

"Of those remaining 20, we know seven do not believe in the Real Presence. That leaves just 14 — and remember, this is 14 out of 100, not 14 out of 20."

"Now, of the remaining 14, there is some portion that reject some or all of the Church's teaching in the area of sexual morality, because they accept contraception or divorce and remarriage or premarital sex or their nephew or son is homosexual."

"Whatever the reason, some number of those remaining 14 sitting in Mass each Sunday simply do not believe those teachings."

"So if we are extremely conservative in our guestimations and downplay the number and say it's four who reject these teachings — knowing it's probably far higher — what are we left with?

About 10 out of every 100 Catholics — 10%  — are actual Catholics in terms of belief."
[https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/vortex-what-the-hierarchy-will-not-admit]

Finally, we get to: Was the Synod racist?

Ricochet's Scott Wilmot put it best:

"[Francis mouth piece Fr. Antonio] Spadaro labels orthodox Catholics, who want nothing more from this synod than for the Holy Father to protect the faith, as fundamentalists, racists... This is outrageous.

"If anyone can be labeled racist at this synod it is retired Bishop Erwin Kräutler of Xingu, Brazil (assumed to be one who had great influence on writing the pre-synod working document), who, when commenting on the need for married priests said that the indigenous people are not smart enough to understand the concept of celibacy." [https://ricochet.com/688579/the-pope-pachamama-politics-and-the-periphery-everything-is-connected/ ]

The German Kräutler said:

“There is no other option. The indigenous people don’t understand celibacy."
[https://cruxnow.com/amazon-synod/2019/10/09/synod-drama-features-married-priests-women-deacons-and-ecological-sins/]

My grandmother was indigenous or Native American from Northern New Mexico and I have the ancestry genetic proof to show anyone, on top of what my mother told me, unlike Pocahontas Elizabeth Warren, because of a gift I received this year.

I say to Kräutler and all those at the Synod that followed his ideology that you are racists. The indigenous or Native Americans and Latinos are not animals. We understand celibacy. Take your German Nazi racist ideology out of the Church.

I am, also, sure that the vast majority of actual Catholics do not support Kräutler and all those at the Synod that followed his racist ideology.

Moreover, recently, when I wrote a piece on the White liberal Mark Shea, I got a taste of what appeared to be racism from a follower of Francis apologist Shea. Sadly, he and his followers appear to be CINOs or Catholics In Name Only and no doubt are the "Catholics" that Melloni says support the idolatrous and pagan Amazon Synod.

Here is what one of Shea's followers said and my response:


Frank J. Tassone said...






For a blogger whose font choice makes you look like a wannabe infomercial writer, you sure spend a lot of words trying to normalize borderline schismatic, conspiratorial radtrad mouth-foaming in an vain effort to paint Mark Shea and Eric Scott Alt as deranged Catholic leftists. It’s like watching a Chihuahua nip the ankles of an Alpha male Timberwolf.
Fred Martinez said...
Thanks disciples of Mark Shea's school of argumentation. No arguing of points, but only "hatred" from Shea's "little bag of talking points" This is funny stuff.
Fred Martinez said...






Also, I thought the disciples of Shea weren't supposed to be racist. Note the analogy of the
White Mark Shea as "an Alpha male Timberwolves" and the Latino Fred Martinez as "a Chihuahua nip[ping] the ankles of the Aryan White "Alpha male" Superman. [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2019/08/mark-shea-his-patheos-lap-dog-are-good.html]

Recently, President Donald Trump supporter Kanye West after making his new album, Jesus is King, said he was sick of "White liberals" telling Black people who to vote for.

I, as a Latino and Native American on my father's side, am sick of White "Catholic" liberals telling Catholics who are Latinos and Native Americans that we are not "smart enough to understand the concept of celibacy" and must worship pagan idols to be true to our identity.

I am sick of the White liberal Francis pretending to be a Latino and leading Latinos away from the Catholic faith.

I as a actual Catholic, and I am sure I am joined by the vast majority of all actual Catholics of all races and nationalities, am sick of the liberal Francis pretending to be a Catholic and leading Catholics away from the Catholic faith.

I join Bishop Rene Gracida and the vast majority of all actual Catholics in calling on all faithful actual Catholic cardinals to convene a imperfect council and demand Francis recant all his implicit and explicit heresies or be deposed as well as investigate the validity of the Francis conclave and the Pope Benedict XVI resignation.

It is time for all actual Catholic cardinals and bishops to end this absurd charade that is called the Francis papacy.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church













 

"It’s so Pathetic that they have yet to Pronounce him [Francis] an Idol Worshipper"

Many times the comments in the Catholic Monitor section are better than many of my posts. This time a long time reader of CM and someone who I know prays for me and the website, Praypraypray, wrote a excellent comment which needed to be a posted:

Thank you for this very important article.

It’s so pathetic that they have yet to pronounce him an idol worshipper, after all of this evil pagan idol worship. It’s truly an abomination!

I’ve read countless stories and comments about the evil coming from the Vatican and Amazon Synod. It’s infuriating! Where are the true Catholics/Christians!?! So many people are saying, just wait until God or Our Lady do something about this!

Now, I'm Not saying that God or Our Lady won’t intervene. It’s just that these people seem so cowardly. It reminds me of children saying, “Just wait until I tell my Dad or Mom on you!” Moses, himself, threw the tablets to make them get rid of the golden calf. Why can’t they strongly say or do something about this!?! Where is their courage to stand up for Truth, for Christ and His Church!?!

Some of them are saying, Saint ____, (fill in the blank), would burn the idols and kick the idol worshippers out of the Church, yet these people allow all of this idol worship and these demonic pagan practices to take place in Catholic holy places.

Many of the Saints knew that they would be killed for destroying idols, yet they destroyed them and died martyrs’ deaths, because they cared more about Christ and His Church, than worrying about their own lives. Sadly, today, people don’t even speak out if they fear they might not get invited to certain parties or might get verbally scolded or arrested.

Why do the Cardinals wear the red, which stands for martyrdom, when most don’t even want to speak against this abominable evil? What are they waiting for?... human sacrifice on the altars in Catholic Churches?... before they finally utter a word against it all!

It’s PATHETIC!


Thank you for calling them to do something substantial. God bless you, Fred.
[http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2019/10/it-is-sheer-madness-if-cd-muller-doesnt.html?m=1]

Here is the post:

It is Sheer Madness if Cd. Muller doesn't Convene a Imperfect Council to Remove Francis as a Heretic against the First Commandment
Today, LifeSiteNews reported that Francis confirmed that the idols that were prostrated before and worshipped in front of Francis in the Vatican gardens were images of the pagan goddess Pachamama:

"Pope Francis has... confirm[ed] suspicions that the ["Vatican 'Pachamama'"] statues were idols."

Moreover, the news outlet quotes Francis himself declaring the "pachamama" idols were recovered and may scandalously and sacrilegiously be "displayed... at the closing Mass of the Synod":

"I would like to say a word about the pachamama statues that were removed from the Church at Traspontina, which were there without idolatrous intentions... the Carabinieri... commander said, 'the display of the [idol] statues [will be] at the closing Mass of the Synod.' We'll see."

"I delegate the Secretary of State who will respond to this."

"This is good news, thank you."
(LifeSiteNews, "Full transcript of the Pope's comments on pagan 'Pachamama' statues" and "Pope calls statues 'Pachamama' and apologizes for their removal from church," October 25, 2019)

The LifeSiteNews article, also, revealed that former head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Gerhard Muller on EWTN said:

"[A]ccording to the Law of God Himself - the First Commandment - idolism [idolatry] is a grave sin... to bring the idols into the Church was a grave sin, a crime against the Divine Law."

It is apparently beyond doubt that Francis is a explicit heretic in terms of the First Commandment.

Cardinal Muller said Francis actions are "a crime against Divine Law."

Even supposing that Francis's actions had no "idolatrous intentions" which can only be judged by a imperfect council, the very "bring[ing] [of] the idols into the Church" and now saying that he is open and apparently willing to commit the scandalous sacrilege of "display[ing]... the [Sachamama idol] statues at the closing Mass of the Synod" which is "a crime against" the First Commandment that means he is "knowingly corrupt[ing] the faith."

To understand the enormity of the grave heresy, crime and sin of Francis just imagine if Moses on seeing his people prostrating in front of the graven idols had said there was no "idolatrous intentions" so let's "display" the idols in God's Paschal liturgy.

St. Thomas Aquinas stated "idolatry is the most grievous sin" in which "heretics... knowingly corrupt the faith."

There appears to be no doubt that Francis is as Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales says is "explicitly a heretic" in terms of the First Commandment who must by the "Church... [be] declar[ed]... deprived of his Apostlic See":

"The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostlic See."
(The Catholic Controversy by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

It is now sheer madness if Cardinal Muller and the other faithful Catholic cardinals do not convene an imperfect council to "declare" Francis "deprived of his Apostlic See" after he is given canonical due process and allowed the opportunity to recant and, also, to investigate the validity of the Francis conclave and the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI which Bishop Rene Gracida has called for.

The greatest Doctor of the Church St. Thomas Aquinas in the Summa Theologiae in "3. Whether idolatry is the gravest of sins?" condemned Francis when he wrote the sin against the First Commandment idolatry is the "most grievous sin" especially when "heretics... knowingly corrupt the faith":

"[I]dolatry is the most grievous sin... heretics, if they knowingly corrupt the faith they have received, from sinning more grievously than idolaters who sin through ignorance... Idolatry presupposes internal unbelief... Idolatry includes a grievous blasphemy."
(Newadvent.org, Summa Theologiae: Idolatry (Secunda Secundea Partis, Q. 94)

Finally, this is a warning to myself and all Catholics, but especially to Cardinal Muller and all the cardinals who believe the Catholic faith.

Our God given faith united with our free will actions as well as our non-actions determine if we go to Heaven or Hell.

God is looking at you right now.

Your actions or non-actions may determine not just rather you fail to do God's will in this ultimate crisis of the Church, but rather you may spend eternity with the all-loving God or spend eternity with the all-hating Satan and his demons one of whom is Pachamama.

"For all the gods of the Gentiles [heathens] are devils."
- Douay-Rheims, Psalms 96:5

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Saturday, October 26, 2019

What the New & Improved Francis Sins might sound like in a Francis Confessional

The latest news from the Pachamama Amazon Synod is that it will vote on formally defining Francis ecological sins.

I think their focus on only ecological sins is too narrow. They need to vote to bring everyone up to speed on all the new and improved Francis sins for the confessional.

Here is what that new and improved confession at the Francis confessional might sound like:

Bless me Father or Mother for I have sinned. It has been about three years since my last Francis confession.

I feel so bad because I failed to postrate before the ecological pagan Pachamama idols in the Francis Vatican gardens.

I allowed myself in enter into the near occasion of sin against the Francis dogma of global warming by viewing on the internet websites not controlled by the liberal establishment, I am so ashamed, then I fall into sin by reading independent scientists' evidence against Francis's prediction that climate change doomday is near.

This caused me to fall into the sin of doubting Francis's teaching that only a one-world government can save the planet from global warming doomsday.

I was very faithful to the Francis teaching on adulterers going to to Communion, but one week ago I broke up with my adulterous partner and still went to Communion without trying to reunite with my partner in the adulterous relationship.

Finally, and I don't know if you or Francis can forgive me, it may be the Francis unforgivable sin, I had a moment of weakness when I doubted the George Soros and Francis gospel on unlimited mass immigration and, I, I can hardly say it, and I voted for Donald Trump.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.




Five Myths of Why Bergogilio is Definitely the Pope

The Catholic Monitor is honored to post the following short piece by Helen M. Weir, MI. She is a excellent writer as well as a Knight of the Immaculata. This means she is a member of the Militia Immaculatae movement of Total Marian Consecration founded by Saint Maximilian Kolbe, the Hero of Auschwitz.

Five myths of why Bergogilio is definitely the pope:

1.  Myth:  He is the pope because we've had corrupt popes before.  (Answer: Just because a man is corrupt doesn't make him the pope.)

2.  Myth:  He is the pope we deserve because of our infidelity.  (Answer: What we deserve doesn't make him the pope.)

3.  Myth:  He is the pope by God's will.  (Answer: God is not chaotic. He abides by His own rules.  If it was God's will for Bergoglio to be the pope, Bergoglio would have been validly elected.)

4.  Myth:  We have to accept him as pope until a future pope says otherwise.  (Answer: Cardinal Burke has stated there are real doubts as to the validity of Bergoglio's election.  It is a staple of Catholic moral theology that one may not act on doubt.  In other words, we have no authority to accept Bergoglio as pope until competent Church authority resolves the issue.)

5.  Myth:  Only private judgment, based on pride, could be the basis for doubting that Bergoglio is the pope.  (Answer: Only private judgment based on pride could insist, in light of all we know, that he possibly could be.)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Is Cd. Newman a Precursor of Modernism, Teilhard de Chardin and the Amazon Synod?

The Catholic Monitor is honored to post James Larson's examination of the problems with Cardinal John Henry Newman's philosophy and how these errors are precursors of Modernism, Teilhard de Chardin's "theology" and the Amazon Synod. In my opinion, he is one of the best Thomist scholars in America.


"The epistemology of John Henry Newman is established upon a rejection of the abstractions and “universals” of the intellect as constituting “real” knowledge. It is also, therefore, constructed upon the rejection of abstract, dogmatic truth as the foundation of our spiritual vitality. It is, in other words, both the Gospel and Thomistic epistemology turned upside down..."

 "... Empiricism is in fact the root philosophical system from which is derived the scientific reductionism which we have explored in other articles. It is the prime cause of the retreat of modern Catholic philosophers and theologians from the metaphysics of St. Thomas, and it is the mother of all philosophical subjectivism in opposition to philosophical realism. It is also therefore the precursor of full-blown Modernism."

"... The elevation of the “illative sense” to centrality in epistemology has immense consequences for all areas of Catholic life and worship – consequences which are now endemic in the Church. Underneath all the subtleties and obfuscations, Newman’s epistemology enshrines “lived-experience” as the most vital principle in our assent of faith. As said previously, this amounts to an “empiricism of the soul,” and is a fundamental tenet of Modernism. It is no wonder, therefore, that both George Tyrrell and Alfred Loisy, generally seen to be founders of Modernism, considered Newman to be their precursor. Tyrrell in fact declared himself to be a “devout follower of Newman”. Newman has been often called the “Father of Vatican Council II. He is also a “Father” of Modernism. In understanding this fact, we should no longer in any way be bewildered by his canonization by Pope Francis..."

"... We might therefore also suspect that Newman’s canonization, along with the Amazonian Synod, will have so “softened” the universal “Catholic consciousness” as to prepare the path for the lifting of the monitum (warning) against the writings of Teilhard de Chardin, and make it possible for some bishop somewhere (very likely with the encouragement of Pope Francis) to heed the clamor for the opening of the process for his canonization. After all it was Bishop Fulton J. Sheen who declared that in 50 years it would be very likely that Teilhard “will appear like John of the Cross and St. Teresa of Avila, as the spiritual genius of the twentieth century.” (Footprints in a Darkened Forest, Meredith Press, 1967, p. 73). It has now been 52 years since this declaration. Bishop Sheen’s cause for canonization was officially opened in the year 2002 in the diocese of Peoria, Illinois, and ten years later, on June 28, 2012, Pope Benedict XVI announced that the Congregation for the Causes of Saints had recognized Archbishop Sheen’s life as one of “heroic virtue,” and proclaimed him “Venerable Servant of God Fulton J. Sheen.” Birds of a Feather are now flocking together at an accelerating pace."

-James Larson

Does God Love Us: An Examination of the Epistemology of John Henry Newman

Friday, October 25, 2019

It is Sheer Madness if Cd. Muller doesn't Convene a Imperfect Council to Remove Francis as a Heretic against the First Commandment

Today, LifeSiteNews reported that Francis confirmed that the idols that were prostrated before and worshipped in front of Francis in the Vatican gardens were images of the pagan goddess Pachamama:

"Pope Francis has... confirm[ed] suspicions that the ["Vatican 'Pachamama'"] statues were idols."

Moreover, the news outlet quotes Francis himself declaring the "pachamama" idols were recovered and may scandalously and sacrilegiously be "displayed... at the closing Mass of the Synod":

"I would like to say a word about the pachamama statues that were removed from the Church at Traspontina, which were there without idolatrous intentions... the Carabinieri... commander said, 'the display of the [idol] statues [will be] at the closing Mass of the Synod.' We'll see."

"I delegate the Secretary of State who will respond to this."

"This is good news, thank you."
(LifeSiteNews, "Full transcript of the Pope's comments on pagan 'Pachamama' statues" and "Pope calls statues 'Pachamama' and apologizes for their removal from church," October 25, 2019)

The LifeSiteNews article, also, revealed that former head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Gerhard Muller on EWTN said:

"[A]ccording to the Law of God Himself - the First Commandment - idolism [idolatry] is a grave sin... to bring the idols into the Church was a grave sin, a crime against the Divine Law."

It is apparently beyond doubt that Francis is a explicit heretic in terms of the First Commandment.

Cardinal Muller said Francis actions are "a crime against Divine Law."

Even supposing that Francis's actions had no "idolatrous intentions" which can only be judged by a imperfect council, the very "bring[ing] [of] the idols into the Church" and now saying that he is open and apparently willing to commit the scandalous sacrilege of "display[ing]... the [Sachamama idol] statues at the closing Mass of the Synod" which is "a crime against" the First Commandment that means he is "knowingly corrupt[ing] the faith."

To understand the enormity of the grave heresy, crime and sin of Francis just imagine if Moses on seeing his people prostrating in front of the graven idols had said there was no "idolatrous intentions" so let's "display" the idols in God's Paschal liturgy.

St. Thomas Aquinas stated "idolatry is the most grievous sin" in which "heretics... knowingly corrupt the faith."

There appears to be no doubt that Francis is as Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales says is "explicitly a heretic" in terms of the First Commandment who must by the "Church... [be] declar[ed]... deprived of his Apostlic See":

"The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostlic See."
(The Catholic Controversy by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

It is now sheer madness if Cardinal Muller and the other faithful Catholic cardinals do not convene an imperfect council to "declare" Francis "deprived of his Apostlic See" after he is given canonical due process and allowed the opportunity to recant and, also, to investigate the validity of the Francis conclave and the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI which Bishop Rene Gracida has called for.

The greatest Doctor of the Church St. Thomas Aquinas in the Summa Theologiae in "3. Whether idolatry is the gravest of sins?" condemned Francis when he wrote the sin against the First Commandment idolatry is the "most grievous sin" especially when "heretics... knowingly corrupt the faith":

"[I]dolatry is the most grievous sin... heretics, if they knowingly corrupt the faith they have received, from sinning more grievously than idolaters who sin through ignorance... Idolatry presupposes internal unbelief... Idolatry includes a grievous blasphemy."
(Newadvent.org, Summa Theologiae: Idolatry (Secunda Secundea Partis, Q. 94)

Finally, this is a warning to myself and all Catholics, but especially to Cardinal Muller and all the cardinals who believe the Catholic faith.

Our God given faith united with our free will actions as well as our non-actions determine if we go to Heaven or Hell.

God is looking at you right now.

Your actions or non-actions may determine not just rather you fail to do God's will in this ultimate crisis of the Church, but rather you may spend eternity with the all-loving God or spend eternity with the all-hating Satan and his demons one of whom is Pachamama.

"For all the gods of the Gentiles [heathens] are devils."
- Douay-Rheims, Psalms 96:5

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

1984 Big Brother Francis Vatican: "No Ritual" and "No Prostration took Place"

Today, Gloria.tv reported:

"At the October 25, Amazon Synod's presser, Paolo Ruffini... said, about the October 4 pagan ceremony in the Vatican gardens that there was "no ritual," and that "no prostration took place.'"

"He even insisted that 'it was explained before' as if repeating counterfactual statements would create reality."
(Gloria.tv, "Vatican Denies Idol Liturgy Video Evidence," October 25, 2019)

Here are some quotes from George Orwell's 1984 for all the remaining Francis apologists for the Francis Vatican pagan ritual which according to them was only a Santeria ritual because the obviously naked pagan idols were somehow sacrilegious nake images of the Virgin Mary:

"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."

"Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength."

"Big Brother is watching you."
(Age of-the- sage.org, "1984: George Orwell quotations and quotes")

Remember that there was not just idolatry at the Vatican gardens, but that the Catholic Francis media apologists are joining the anti-God pro-abortion world media in it's apparent idolatry of Francis as well as of it's numerous cover-ups of Francis's numerous scandals.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Thursday, October 24, 2019

Is Francis's Amazon Synod part of an Attempt to Steal the Amazon from Brazil?

Might Francis be the new Al Gore?

Vatican News reported that doomsday global warming alarmist Al Gore "praised Pope Francis' encyclical, 'Laudato si'" saying it addressed the "climate crisis ahead of the [United Nations' global warming] Paris Agreement."
(Vatican News, "Al Gore: Pope Francis a 'moral force' for solving climate crisis, July 4, 2018)

The Week in a 2018 headline proclaimed "How Pope Francis became the new Al Gore."

Francis in Laudato si (161) did become "the new Al Gore" doomsday global warming alarmist saying of climate warming:

"Doomsday predictions can no longer be met with... disdain."

It, also, appears that Francis may be "the new Al Gore" with his Amazon Synod which could be a globalist attempt to steal the Amazon from Brazil.

The New York Times reported Gore inferring the possibility of a United Nations globalist attempt to steal the Amazon from Brazil:

"Contrary to what Brazilians think, the Amazon is not their property, it belongs to all of us."
(The New York Times, "Whose Rain Forest is This, Anyway," May 18, 2008)

Francis in Laudato si (174-175) apparently backed Gore's inference of some type of globalist organization attempt to steal the Amazon by "imposing sanctions":

"[A]n agreement on systems of governance for the whole range of so-called 'global commons'... to devise stronger and more efficient international institutions... Empowered to impose sanctions."

This is exactly what is happening right now as the globalist's G-7 led by French President Emmanuel Macron according to the Internationalist which revealed the recent Amazon fires has brought about an "attempt[ed] internationalization of the Amazon."

Brazil President Jair Bolsonaro according to the Internationalist responded to this apparent attempt to steal the Amazon from Brazil by accusing Marcon of "'having a colonialist mentality' which 'instrumentalises an internal issue of Brazil and other Amazonian countries' with 'a sensationalist tone that does nothing to solve the problem".
(Internationalist, "The G-7 Exploits Fires to Attempt Internationalization of the Amazon," August 26, 2019)

Remember that Francis said the Amazon Synod is the "child" of Laudato si which wants "systems of governance" for "'global commons'" such as Brazil's Amazon.

Is the Francis Amazon Synod part of an attempt to steal the Amazon from Brazil?

If the "international institutions" are able to "internationalize" the "global common" of Brazil's Amazon where does it stop.

Do "systems of governance" for "'global commons'" ultimately end in a one-world government with the excuse of the doomsday myth of global warming?

(And, maybe, another excuse for internationalizing the Amazon might, also, include giving it to the control of the governance of the indigenous who can more easily be bought out by the one-world government advocates than the Brazilian nation.)

Remember that the New American wrote:

"Francis... claiming that planetary problems are exacerbated by 'an excessive demand for sovereignty on the part of States'... make room for 'international organizations' to develop into governing bodies, supplanting the 'state interests.'"
(The New American, "Pope Francis calls for end of  Sovereignty and Establishment of Global Government," May 9, 2019)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.