Friday, January 31, 2020

Barnhardt: "Chris Ferrara said to my face 'We all think you are probably right'"

Blogger Ann Barnhardt who is famous for making the case and presenting evidence from canon law that Pope Benedict XVI's resignation was invalid stated that Catholic Remnant newspaper writer and lawyer Chris Ferrara said "Your probably right":

"Chris Ferrara... when I met him some years ago told me first 'We all think you're probably right'... Chris Ferrara said to my face 'We all think you're probably right.'"
(Barnhardt.biz, "Barnhardt Podcast #101: The ShutUpStupiSole," 24:46-25:04)

When did this happen and what was she "probably right" about?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

"The Contraceptive Pill must rank with the Splitting of the Atom which ultimately aided the Supreme Court to assume the role of Custodian of Life"

"The contraceptive pill must rank with the splitting of the atom which ultimately aided the Supreme Court to assume the role of custodian of life, ruling in "Roe" in 1973 that whatever a judicial majority agrees on binds the nation meaning that no one can say what is unjust because all is changing depending on the nose-counting of a Supreme Court majority."
- Tom Roeser

TomRoeser.com :
 
Most Commentators Agree-Griswold Opened the Door to Legalized Abortion

Posted: 08 Apr 2008 09:26 AM CDT


Griswold.

All of the commentators I read before posting this agree that "Griswold v. Connecticut" in 1965 was the open sesame that swung the door ajar to legalized abortion later in "Roe v. Wade." I am particularly indebted to Matt Nelson for his views basis his constitutional law studies and Frank Nofsinger who comes "right on" with the same judgment. With this decision the Supreme Court ruled that sexual morals and their relation to family life are matters of personal taste and choice in which the state has no interest. The decision was, as reader Frank Nofsinger relates, like turning on a faucet.

There was a time when the Supreme Court defended the concept of the family in Judeo-Christian terms on the basis that the foundation of the republic assumed as much. Ergo: In 1895 Justice Joseph P. Bradley condemned polygamy as "contrary to the spirit of Christianity and the civilization Christianity produced in the Western World." The statement was accepted as part of the fiber of jurisprudential review.

But following "Griswold," in "Eisenstadt v. Baird" in 1972 the Court reversed the Massachusetts conviction of William Baird for distributing contraceptives to unmarried persons, holding that "whatever the rights of the individual to contraceptives may be, the rights must be the same for the unmarried and married alike." The marital couple "is not an independent entity with a mind and heart of its own but an association of two individuals each with a separate intellectual and emotional makeup."

It added "If the right of privacy means anything"-enumerating the "right" that Justice Douglas had discovered rummaging around the penumbras and emanations-"it is the right of the individual married or single to be free of unwarranted governmental intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the decision whether to bear or beget a child." Thus the Court treated marriage as a mere personal contract with the family no longer the natural, primary cell of human society that precedent Supreme Courts did. Before "Griswold" but waiting in the wings was a discovery by the Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology at Clark University in Massachusetts that helped develop the contraceptive pill in 1956. The contraceptive pill must rank with the splitting of the atom which ultimately aided the Supreme Court to assume the role of custodian of life, ruling in "Roe" in 1973 that whatever a judicial majority agrees on binds the nation meaning that no one can say what is unjust because all is changing depending on the nose-counting of a Supreme Court majority.

Pray an Our Father now for the end of the killing of unborn babies and contraceptives use.

Does Bp. Barron want to start a "New Reign of Terror" against Social Media Catholics?

Bishop Robert Barron like Semi-Arians who supported the Arian heretics uses ambiguity and Catholic sounding "language" as a cloak for his "real sentiment" of promoting a soft "reign of terror" on those who reject the heretical Francis creed of Communion for adulterers and other errors.

Barron is calling for the predator Theodore McCarrick created pro-gay American bishops to police non-heretical Catholics on social media. This policing call appears to want to mirror the Arian "reign of terror" on Catholics in the early Church.

 F.A. Forbes in his book "St. Athanasius" on the Arian crisis wrote how the Arians and their allies the Semi-Arians policed Catholics in the early Church:

"[A] new reign of terror began, in which all who refused to accept the Arian creed were treated as criminals."

Now, it appears that Barron wants a "new reign of terror, in which all who refused to accept the" Francis creed of Communion for adulterers and the death penalty being "inadmissible" are "treated as criminals" in the McCarrick American Church

 Barron cloaks this "sentiment" like the Semi-Arians in Catholic sounding "language" and "eloquent ambiguity."

The Francis teaching that the death penalty is "inadmissible" is contrary to Scriptures and the irreformable teachings of the Catholic Church's ordinary Magisterium is called by Barron "eloquent ambiguity."

In the time of the Arian crisis those with forked tongues who spoke of "eloquent ambiguity" like this bishop were called Semi-Arians or semi-heretics.

St. Athanasius said Semi-Arians, that is semi-heretics, were accomplices and Arians in disguise trying to promote "the Arian madness" through ambiguous statements designed to have "an orthodox and a heretical interpretation."
(The Great Athanasius, page 136 and Bad Shepherds, page 27)

Athanasius said:

"They disguise their real sentiment, and then make use of the language of Scripture... as a bait for the ignorant, that they may inveigle them into their own wickedness."
(The Great Athanasius: An Introduction into his Life and Works, page 136)

Early Church expert Rod Bennett writing of the Arian crisis said:

"[T]he number of episcopal sees that can be shown to have remained in orthodox [Catholic] hands throughout the crisis can be counted on the fingers of one hand."
Bad Shepherds, page 29)

As far as I can see in our world today it is very much like the time of the Arian crisis. We only have one bishop who is Athanasius-like: Bishop René Gracida.

Can I ask all the Catholic Monitor readers to pray for a specific intention?

I contacted a good well known priest who says he knows a Cardinal who is supportive of Bishop Gracida's efforts to have cardinals investigate the validity of Benedict XVI's resignation and the conclave that elected Francis.

The priest told me by email that he forwarded my email to the Cardinal.

Can you pray that this Cardinal be given the grace to join Bishop Gracida in calling for a investigation?

Pray an Our Father now for that Cardinal to receive the grace to become another Athanasius with Bishop Gracida. Please keep this intention in your prayers at Mass and in your rosaries.

Do Sedevantists & AKA Catholic's Louie Verrocchio deny Vatican I?

Is Louie Verrocchio, who publishes the website AKA Catholic and launched the newspaper "The Catholic Inquisitor," a Sedevantist?

It appears that he may be toying with the idea of joining the Sedevantist camp since he apparently agrees with some of their ideas.

If this is true then I have a question for him.

Do you deny Vatican I?

Vatican I clearly teaches that popes will reign perpetually:

"[T]he true doctrine concerning the establishment, the perpetuity, and the nature of the apostolic primacy. In this primacy, all the efficacy and all the strength of the Church are placed. (Vatican I, Pastor Aeternus, chapter 1)" (UnamSanctumCatholicm.com, "False Principles of Sedevantism (Part 1))

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Wednesday, January 29, 2020

Why are Cdl. Burke & the Faithful Catholic Media like the Leashed Dog in the Foghorn Leghorn Cartoon?

In the old Warner Brothers cartoon the rooster Foghorn Leghorn's archenemy George P. Dog was on a leash which meant he could only go as far as the length of the rope leash and had to stop.

Foghorn even painted a line on the ground with a sign reading "Rope Limit" which George P. Dog could never go beyond.

Why are Cardinal Raymond Burke and the faithful Catholic media such the Remnant's Michael Matt as well as other Catholic media like Leghorn's archenemy George P. Dog not allowed to go passed the line with the sign that reads "Rope Limit"?

Why is the once talked about Formal Correction of Francis by Burke and the faithful Catholic media now beyond the "Rope Limit"?

Why is even discussing the possibility of a imperfect council and/or a cardinal and bishop investigation into the Francis conclave and Pope Benedict XVI resignation beyond the "Rope Limit"?

Who and/or what has made Cardinal Burke and the faithful Catholic media into George P. Dog with a rope leash and a "Rope Limit."

Who or what controls them?

Why are they forbidden to even give reasoned arguments, instead of straw man agruments that don't counter our stated dissertations or name calling, against Bishop Rene Gracida and canon law expert Br. Alexis Bugnolo who put forward serious reasoned dissertations from canon law and Pope John Paul II's conclave constitution?

If they really think we who follow Bishop Gracida and Br. Bugnolo are wrong and headed to hell for being in schism from Francis then out of simple charity for our souls they should counter our dissertations and arguments.

If they really believe we are wrong and headed to hell and refuse to seriously give us real arguments then they apparently have lost the supernatural virtue of charity.

If they really believe what they say then for charity's sake they should attempt to save us from hell for being in schism from Francis:

But, all we hear are straw man agruments that don't counter our stated dissertations, name calling propaganda, silence or the noise of them running away as fast as they can from serious reasoned back and forth argumentation.

Just to give fair warning:

We are not going away.

We are growing.

Soon we will be to be too big to ignore.

As even Church Militant's Michael Voris reported we are becoming the majority of faithful Catholics in Rome. The same thing is happening in the United States and if you can't stop us now we will probably grow to be the majority of faithful Catholics in America.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of the Jesus and the Immaculate of Mary.


Tuesday, January 28, 2020

What is a Catholic's Purpose in Life?

Mass is the center of our life and shows us our purpose in life:

"At Mass we are in the company of our Lord, with Whom we associate ourselves in order to live like Him by living of Him, in order to die as He died and rise again with Him."
(Roman Catholic Sunday Missal Booklet, 1962)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Monday, January 27, 2020

Francis's Head of Italian Bishops: If you don't like Francis "become a Lutheran"

Is it possible the Italian website pierolaporta.it could be telling the truth about Archbishop Loris Capovilla who Francis made a cardinal and was praised by the president of the Italian Bishops Conference Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti?:

"In the Vatican more and more evident and disguised homosexuals, since the time of John XXIII... [and Pope John's secretary] Loris Capovilla. He the most avid persecutor of Padre Pio."
(pierolaporta.it, "Gays and pedophiles in the Vatican, October 2, 2017)

According to the pro-gay website Religious Tolerance in the post "About the Roman Catholic Church: Excluding homosexuals from Catholic seminaries":

"A Vatican document of 1961 bars persons with homosexual ordination... However, this appears to have been almost completely ignored"

On May 26, 2018, the gay activist website New Ways Ministry in the post "Pope Francis Seemingly Affirms Ban on Gay Men in Priesthood" it wrote "Bassetti, seemed to confirm that Francis mentioned the issue of [the ban on] homosexuality."

Is it possible that Francis ignored his own "seeming... ban on gay man in [the] priesthood"?

Wikipedia says on its post on Gualtiero Bassetti that he "praised the Pope's [Francis's] nomination [to be a cardinal] of Archbishop Loris Capovilla."

The Italian website From Rome's headline today was "Cardinal Bassetti: If you don't like Bergoglio, get out of the Church!"

According to the Italian website Cardinal Bessetti who Francis appointed as president of the Italian Bishops Conference said:

"If anyone does not like this Pope [Francis]... take another road... Go become a Lutheran."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Sunday, January 26, 2020

The Catholic Resistance vs. the Sedevacantist Movement & 1P5 Francis Trad Skojec who Agrees with the Sedevacantists that Pope Benedict & Francis are the Same

Italian canon law expert Br. Alexis Bugnolo recently wrote that one of the enemies of the Catholic Resistance is the "Sedevacantist Movement," but they are admitting that the Resistance is getting closer to "victory":

"There is no news more pleasant to hear, than that one’s rivals, having surveyed the battle fields in advance, announce that victory will be yours."

"It came on Facebook, from Novus Ordo Watch, the veritable Flagship of the Sedevacantist Movement:
 

"NovusOrdoWatch


14 hrs · 'It looks like this is the year the 'Benedict XVI is the real Pope' deception will find mainstream acceptance: It lets people rid themselves of Bergoglio without having to embrace the dreaded and hated Sedevacantism. The facts about Ratzinger [Pope Benedict] will be ignored — too inconvenient!'"
 

"What is a Sedevacantist?


Sedevacantists hold in general that there have been no true popes since Pius XII. They accept the error of Luther that there is no authority or unity in the Church except that which is given the individual by the virtue of Faith. Thus, holding themselves as purer than all others, after the manner of Jansenists, they judge nearly everyone a heretic and thus outside of the Church. Their special target is all who hold an office which comes down through Apostolic Succession, because that is the real threat to their error and their egos."
 
"So when these guys say you are winning, its a great day indeed! Amen. Praise God."
 
"In the end the truth wins out!"
[https://fromrome.info/2020/01/19/flagship-of-sedes-presages-ppbxvi-movement-victory-in-2020/]

Another enemy of the Catholic Resistance is Francis traditionalist One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec who agrees with the Sedevacantists that Pope Benedict XVI and Francis are the same.

On Twitter he said in answer to the question "You think he [Pope Benedict] agreed with ANYTHING Francis has done?" Skojec said, like the Sedevacantists, "Everything":


Laurence England Dec 7
You think he agreed with ANYTHING Francis has done?
                                                                                             
         

Reply Retweet Like
Steve Skojec Dec 7
Everything.                

 
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

 
 

Might Italian Canon Law Expert take 1P5 Skojec to an Italian Criminal Court for "Calumny"?

One of the great heroes in the present crisis canon law expert Italian Br. Alexis Bugnolo recently stated in the Catholic Monitor comment section that he thought One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec might be guilty of "calumny" against him which is "punishable with severe sentences and financial penalties" in Italy:

"The problem with name calling is that in countries like Italy, to imply that someone is not of sound mind, is calumny and punishable with severe sentences and financial penalties. Maybe those who name call should speak to an attorney and get some advice, before posting name callings on social media where they can be read in every jurisdiction and lead to consequences that they do not envision. Just saying..."
[http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/01/why-do-1p5-skojec-and-francis-use-name.html?m=1]

If Br. Bugnolo is interested in pursuing the matter further against Skojec he might want to contact the Italian Criminal Lawyers in Rome in the following website:

    http://www.legalsl.com/en/defamation-in-italy-calumny-italian-penal-code-lawyer.htm

Defamation in Italy

The crime of calumny under the Italian Penal Code.

Pursuant to Article 595 of Italian Penal Code, the person that communicating with two or more people, injures the reputation of another people, shall be punished with imprisonment up to one year or a fine of up to € 1,032.
 
If the offense is the allocation of a detailed fact, the punishment shall be imprisonment of up to two years, or a fine of up to € 2,065.
 
If the offense is done through the press or any other means of advertising, or with public act, the penalty shall be imprisonment from six months to three years or a fine of not less than EUR 516.
 
If the offense is direct to a political, administrative or judicial authority, the penalties will be increased.
 
Pursuant to Article 596-bis of the Italian Criminal Code, if the crime of defamation is committed through the press, the punishment also applies to the director, the publisher and the printer.
 
Please see also:
 
What to do if you are arrested in Italy
Production, trafficking and illegal possession of drugs or psychotropic substances in Italy
Computer Fraud in Italy
English speaking lawyers in Italy

For more information, please contact Criminal Lawyers in Rome
[http://www.legalsl.com/en/defamation-in-italy-calumny-italian-penal-code-lawyer.htm]

Br. Bugnolo wrote the above comment in this Catholic Monitor post:

Why do 1P5 Skojec and Francis use Name-calling Propaganda?

I always find One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec's Tweets hilarious. He has refined the comic use of name-calling to a fine art.
Anyone who knows the people who he name-calls knows the absurdity of his wildly unreasonable and ridiculous smears.

But, he isn't doing it for its humorous effect and for my merriment. Although, I want thank him and his Tweets for lighting up many of my days with laughter.

Sadly, Skojec is pathetically deadly serious in his poisonous name-calling propaganda.

Why does he do it?

Wikipedia's post on "Name calling" explains why he, Francis and Team Francis apparently use this propaganda technique:

"Name calling is a cognitive bias and a technique to promote propaganda. Propagandists use the name-calling technique to invoke fear in those exposed to the propaganda, resulting in the formation of a negative opinion about a person, group, or set of beliefs or ideas."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate of Mary.

 

Why haven't Pachamama Apologist Mike Lewis & Half-Chinese Cdl. Tagle Spoken out Against Communist Repression in Hong Kong?

Why haven't Pachamama and Francis apologist Where Peter Is Mike Lewis and half-Chinese Cardinal Luis Antonio Gokim Tagle spoken out against Communist Chinese repression in Hong Kong?

Second generation half-Chinese Cardinal Luis Gokim[Chinese surname of grandfather] Tagle according to the National Catholic Register has "close ties with the [Communist] People's Republic of China."
(National Catholic Register, "Cardinal Tagle's Appointment points to new Curia, China, Papacy, December 10, 2019)

It appears that Tagle has not voiced protests against the Chinese Communist regime's repression in Hong Kong against the freedom protesters.

How "close" are Tagle's "ties" with the totalitarian Communist regime?

Is it possible that extremist environmentalist Lewis, who once said the Francis Chinese deal that betrayed the Chinese underground Church was "complicated," may have ties to the Communist Chinese regime like Tagle?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Saturday, January 25, 2020

Why is the "Conservative" Breitbart pushing Francis's Gay Activist Bishop's Agenda?

Why is the "conservative" Breitbart pushing the agenda of Francis appointed gay activist Archbishop Wilton Gregory against conservative and traditional Catholics?

Might it by because the Brietbart Vatican columnist, the apparently pro-Francis Thomas Williams, was the longtime public face of the pro-Francis Legionaries of Christ founded by a gay pervert?

The ex-priest Williams, who appears to be pro-Francis, defended and lived with the homosexual pervert Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado founder of Legionaries of Christ for "many years" according to Stumbling Block:

"Throughout the early 2000s, Fr. Thomas Williams and his mistress’ mother and grandmother of his child, Mary Ann Glendon, worked in intimate cooperation to publicly assassinate the characters of any whistleblowers that tried to warn of and expose the founder of the Legionaries of Christ, Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado, who was a drug addict and bisexual incestuous pedophile.  Fr. Williams lived with Maciel for many years and was one of the top-ranking and most powerful members of the Legion of Christ. During the same period, Williams put [his mistress] Lev on the payroll of Zenit, the Legion-controlled news agency which Williams helped found and served as the publisher for ten years."
[http://stumblingblock.org/?p=10716 ]

Moreover, even the pro-gay Spanish language website Medium.com admitted that Francis is an enabler of Williams' former religious order the Legionaries of Christ founded by the incestuous homosexual pedophile Marcial Marciel:

"There is very little to re-found in the Legionaries of Christ, since its founder was a pervert and a criminal... The reality is that today, with Bergoglio [Francis], the Legionaries of Christ are commanded by the Mexican Father Eduardo Robles Gil, a character close to the previous [Marciel] dome of the band."
(Medium, "Bravo, Bergoglio," May 15, 2016)

Francis, who is famous for destroying the traditional faithful order the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, said he was "delighted" with the Legionaries of Christ founded by a gay pervert:

"Francis said, 'I am delighted to welcome you new priests of the Legionaries of Christ.'"
(Herald Malaysia Online, "Pope greets newly ordained Legionaries of Christ at General Audience," December 15, 2016)

The Remnant said that Francis attacked the traditionalist Friars to get their money and for "ideological" anti-traditionalist Catholicism reasons.
(Remnant, "Follow the Money... or the Ideology: Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate Update, June 6, 2017)

Might the apparently money-strapped Vatican and Francis be "delighted" with the pro-Francis Legionaries because they had "an annual budget of $650 million... assets of approximately $1 billion"?
(The Irish Times, "The 'gangster' superior, the Irish priest and the wealthy widow," November 11, 2017)

According to a source of the Catholic Monitor who is familiar with the Legionaries, their money and power still possibly makes them a power in Vatican politics. Maybe not as powerful as Opus Dei, the Cardinal Angelo Sodano Old Guard and the Vatican Gay Lobby, but still possibly wielding influence.

Ironically, Francis conservative George Weigel like Breitbart's Williams was a defender of the gay pervert Marciel and his corrupt order according to the National Post, but who later became a critic when Pope Benedict XVI went after Marciel is now attacking conservative and traditionalist websites which are in the forefront of exposing the corruption of Francis and his pro-gay Vatican which may goes against the wealthy Legionaries' pro-Francis agenda.
(National Post, "Church historian's blind spot on Legionaries of Christ," December 31, 2010)

Is it possible that Weigel and Breitbart's Williams who was the public face of the Legionaries of Christ might be getting money from the pro-Amoris Letitia and pro-Francis Legionaries of Christ?

How many Francis conservatives like Weigel and Willliams as well as even Francis traditionalists may possibly be getting money from the pro-Francis Legionaries or other wealthy pro-Francis so-called "conservative" foundations and organizations?

With the above in mind, why is the "conservative" Breitbart pushing the agenda of Francis appointed gay activist Archbishop Gregory against conservative and traditional Catholics?

On November 11, 2019, former gay pervert Marciel collaborator Williams in Breitbart wrote

"Speaking at a November 21 panel at Georgetown University titled 'The Francis Factor Today,' Archbishop Gregory said that Catholic resistance to the agenda of Pope Francis is 'insidious' and is aggravated by the use of social media that provides a bullhorn to [conservative] critics."
[https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2019/11/23/d-c-archbishop-decries-opposition-movement-pope-francis/]

The May 13, 2018 Catholic Standard reported that the so-called conservative, who is a "friend" of gay activist Fr. James Martin, Bishop Robert Barron (who is a collaborator of gay activist Gregory) has been closely associated with homosexuals who apparently are and were part the gay bishops network.
(Twitter, Fr. James Martin, April 30, 2012, Martin: "Here is my friend Fr. Robert Barron")

Barron's "first spiritual director when he was a seminarian for the [Bernardin] Archdiocese of Chicago" and "friend" was the reportedly homosexual and gay activist Wilton Gregory.

The Standard, also, says he was ordained by the reportedly homosexual and gay activist Cardinal Joseph Bernardin. The article shows Barron giddy in praise of the two gay activists:

"'Cardinal Bernardin's qualities... have shaped the ministry of Archbishop Gregory'... Barron said that his friend Archbishop Gregory is a excellent choice to lead Archdiocese of Washington. 'I can't think of anyone better'... in the wake of the abuse crisis, he said."
(Catholic Standard, "Friends remember how Archbishop Gregory's Chicago years shaped his ministry," May 13, 2019)

Barron, however, doesn't disclose in his praise of Gregory and Bernardin that they were apparently part of "a network of gay priests and bishops" in Chicago according to whistleblowers.

Nor does he explain how a gay activist archbishop is a "excellent choice" to stop gay predators who are responsible for almost all the priest sex abuse cases.

Here is the evidence:

The ex-priest and psychotherapist Richard Sipes, who outed ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick as a homosexual sexual predator, in 2006 outed as a "homosexual" Francis's newly appointed archbishop of Washington, D.C. Wilton Gregory.
(AWRSipes.com, "Sexual Orientation & American Roman Catholic Bishops," August 1, 2006 and Catholic News Agency, "Archbishop Gregory asked to lead Washington archdiocese," March 28, 2019)

It is well-known that Gregory has a deep-seated gay agenda who according to a LifeSiteNews report on August 14, 2018 has appointed a " pro-gay priest as a 'spiritual guide' for abuse victims" despite the fact that the 2011 John Jay report found 81 percent of abuse victims were male.

Joe Sacerdo reported Gregory's gay lobby connections and beginnings :

"Joseph Kellenyi... once a seminarian at Mundelein in the Chicago area... Says:... '[Cardinal Joseph] Bernardin fostered and promoted a network of gay priests and bishops... they protected each other, covered up each other's 'mistakes,'... Bishop Gregory is well aware that he is where he is today because a gay Cardinal [Bernardin] took a special interest in him at a young age. Bishop Gregory benefited directly from a combination of homosexuality and power in the Church.'"
(BryanHehirExposed.wordpress.com, "Fr. Bryan Hehir, Bishop Kicanas, and Cardinal Bernardin," 8 years ago)

It is a scandal that Francis according to whistleblower Sipe has appointed a "homosexual" bishop to Washington, D.C. and that Barron praised his choice.

The scandal gets worst when it is well-known that the Francis appointed bishop has a gay agenda and gay lobby history when 81 percent of abuse victims were males abused by gay predator priests.

Bizarrely and circumstantially in his gay agenda episcopal behavior, Gregory is exhibiting a behavior that Francis is known to practice.

Francis is known to promote homosexual perverts such as Theodore McCarrick to positions of higher responsibility.

The latest example is his personal friend Archbishop Gustavo Zanchetta who was promoted to a high Vatican position even though according to Argentinean Church documents he is allegedly a gay pervert.

Gregory has acted like Francis in at least one of his promotions. The one example that is explicitly known is when Gregory's priest "Fr. Juan Areiza, got entangled in a gay scandal exposed by CBS Atlanta." This same gay pervert priest was later promoted to be "pastor of St. Pius... by Wilton Gregory."
(The American Spectator, "FrancisChurch goes from  Scandal to Scandal," November 4, 2018)

It would be laughable if it was wasn't scandalous that Barron claims that gay activist Gregory and Francis, who is a promoter of gay perverts as well as gay activists, can or might do anything to end the "network of gay priests and bishops."

Read the Barron quote and weep as you laugh at its ridiculousness:

"I would suggest... the Holy Father [Francis]... form a team [probably with Gregory on the team]... to determine how Archbishop McCarrick managed... to function as a roving ambassador for the [Francis] Church and to have disproportionate influence on the appointment of bishops [even though Francis knew he was a homosexual predator]."
(Word on Fire, "The McCarrick Mess, August 9, 2018)

The question needs to be asked:

Is the spiritual son of gay activist Gregory Bishop Barron an enabler in the "conservative" wing of the Bernardin/Gregory gay mafia?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Is Amoris Laetitia's Unavoidable Logic that Unrepentant Homosexuals can receive Holy Communion?

Why is the Francis, who thinks a third rate thinkers such as the confused and almost unreadable Postmodernist Michael de Certeau is "the greatest theologian for today," promoting intrinsically evil acts?

One possibility is because he was "mislead" into thinking Amoris Leatitia is "Thomist" and orthodox by the heretical scholar Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez and the "great theologian" Cardinal Christoph Schonborn.

The other possibility, and in my opinion the most probable, is that the obviously above average intelligent Francis totally understands and agrees with his friend Archbishop Fernandez who is a heretical scholar.

Latin American Catholic philosopher Carlos A. Casanova shows that dissenter Tony Mifsud and Archbishop Fernandez both of whom "irrationally" misuse Thomism are bedfellows following the lead of Fr. Bernard Haring in dissent from Catholic moral doctrine:

"Mifsud... [i]n p.73 he quotes Bernard Haring holding that the fruit of the II Vatican Council was the spirit of dissent among theologians towards the "dictates of the official Church."

"... Victor Manuel Fernandez's concrete reasoning is different... [b]ut the goal is very similar to Mifsud's, to open the way for the plausibility of "righteous" (or at least not-guilty) violations of God's law."

"... What Fernandez means is that the lady of his example does not will what is just, because that does not conform her concrete situation... As one can see in pp. 158 and 160 of his paper, he applies this principle to homosexuals and to spouses who "need" to use the condom."
(Aemaet, "Humanae Vitae and Veritatis Splendor as Exposition of 'Natural Law' Contrasted with Their Irrational Rejection," Carlos A. Casanova, 2018)

Schonborn supposedly didn't explain to Francis that the heretical Fr. Haring's theology of the denial of intrinsically evil acts which was used by the heretical Fernandez as a ghostwriter of Amoris Laetitia (AL) would destroy all Catholic moral doctrine as it attempted to justify the "violation of God's law" by promoting "persistent adultery and reception of Holy Communion" with the unavoidable logic of unrepentant homosexuals eventually receiving the Eucharist.


Dubia Cardinal Brandmuller says that those who promote intrinsically evil acts are heretics:

"Whoever thinks that persistent adultery and reception of Holy Communion are compatible is a heretic."
(lifesitenews.com, "Dubia Cardinal: Anyone who opens Communion to adulterers 'some a heretic and promotes schism,'" December 23, 2016)

An example of what possibly could have happened to Francis in his promoting of heresy can be found in history.

Is Francis a material heretic like Pope Honorius?

The unscholarly Pope Honorius was "confused and mislead" into becoming a material heretic who promoted the Monothelitist heresy. He was condemned by a general council and Pope St. Agatho and Pope St. Leo II.

The Catholic Encyclopedia said of Honorius that he "was not a profound theologian, and allowed himself to be confused and mislead."
(Edward Feser.blogspot, "Denial flows into the Tiber," December 18, 2016)

Theologian Tracey Rowland wrote that Francis before the papacy said "I can't imagine anything more boring than Fundamental Theology." She quotes Ross Douthat saying:

"Francis is clearly a less systematic thinker than... his predecessors" to the papacy. (Catholic Theology, page 192)

In other words, Francis is not a profound theologian and often a "confused" thinker.

It was reported that the not very systematic thinker Francis during his visit to Colombia said:

"Amoris Laetitia is Thomist, the morality of the great Thomas. You can speak of it with a great theologian, one of the best today and one of the most mature, Cardinal Schönborn. ."
(National Catholic Register, "Pope to Jesuits: Help Critics of Amoris Leatitia to See Its Morality Is Thomist," September 28, 2017)

In a interview, with the Jesuit magazine America, Schonborn said "one who is in an objective situation of sin can receive the help of the sacraments."

Schonborn in the interview appears to deny that the truths of the Decalogue of Revelation are eternal or objective:

"The complexity of family situations, which goes far beyond what was customary in our Western societies even a few decades ago, has made it necessary to look in a more nuanced way at the complexity of these situations. To a greater degree than in the past, the objective situation of a person does not tell us everything about that person in relation to God and in relation to the church. This evolution compels us urgently to rethink what we meant when we spoke of objective situations of sin. And this implicitly entails a homogeneous evolution in the understanding and expression of the doctrine."
(America, "Cardinal Christoph Schonborn on the demands and joys of love," August 15-22, 2016)

This is not Thomist, but appears to be soft historicism which comes from Hegel.

Hegelian historicism doesn't believe with Thomism that truth is objective and eternal.

Schonborn, in his quote above, appears to believe that historical evolution changes the meaning of truth which is anti-Thomist.

The unscholarly Francis bases his statement that "Amoris Leatitia is Thomist" on Schonborn's authority as "a great theologian."

Unfortunately for Francis, Schonborn is misrepresenting the truth about Aquinas's teachings and Amoris Leatitia is not Thomist.

Thomist scholar Fr. Basil Cole OP said that Schonborn's theology and Amoris Leatitia contradicts Thomism:

"Another tangle one can encounter is when quoting Aquinas piecemeal or without full advertence to his theological project. St. Thomas was nothing if not a complete and consistent thinker. To pick and choose his statements without considering their context and relation to his other relevant insights would be about as disastrous as proof-texting Sacred Scripture."

"One might suppose that a situationist ethic is supported by Aquinas when he states, “In matters of action, truth or practical rectitude is not the same for all, as to matters of detail, but only as to the general principles; and where there is the same rectitude in matters of detail, it is not equally known to all. […] The principle will be found to fail, according as we descend further into detail” (ST I-II, q. 94, a. 4; quoted in Amoris Laetitia n. 304). Isolated from Aquinas’s other statements, it could seem as if the doctor of the Church is saying that no moral rule is absolute, but that discernment is needed in each and every situation to know whether or not a general moral principle applies in a particular situation. However, this is not authentic Thomism."

"Situation ethics contradicts Aquinas's firm affirmation that there are some moral norms that always hold for everyone: these are the precepts of the Decalogue (T I-94, q.100, a.8)... Aquinas's teaching is clear: a person should not receive Holy Communion or absolution from sin who does not intend to change his life and forsake public sin... (ST I-94, q.43, a.1)."
(National Catholic Register, "Is 'Amoris Laetitia' Really Thomistic?," December 16, 2016)

The Filial Correction give similar evidence to show how and why Pope Francis's situation ethics is spreading heresy. 

So far, all the Filial Correction attackers, the Pope's inner circle and supporters who are defending Amoris Laetitia, it appears, are not Thomist, but soft Hegelian historicists who claim there is no objective/eternal morality or discipline.

Francis supporter theologian Giuseppe Lorizio of the Pontifical Lateran University mocked the Correction statement of "eternal discipline" in the area of the Eucharist.

He appears to have forgotten that St. Paul said you can't receive the Eucharist in a state of moral sin such as having sexual relations in an adulterous relationship.

Lorizio claims the discipline came only after the Council of Trent.
(Catholic Conclave, "Anti-Papal manipulation by enemies of the Pope and the Gospel," September 27, 2017)

Gay activist Michael Sean Winters in his attack on the Correction let the Hegelian historicism cat out of the bag.

He went so far as to attack Fr. James Martin defender Archbishop Charles Chaput for daring to criticize soft Hegelian Fr. Bernard Haring. (National Catholic Reporter, "'Correction' of Francis reveals critics don't come in good faith," September 27, 2017)

Winters pointed to the source of their problem with the Correction:

Winters, Lorizio, Schonborn and, it appears, Francis don't believe in objective morality and promote allowing intrincically evil acts which Haring brought into the Church following the Second Vatican Council.

Schonborn following in the footsteps of Haring (who Francis praised), it appears, in a America magazine interview is saying that Amoris Laetitia says that God wills evil:

"In his great experience of accompanying people spiritually, when the Holy Father speaks of “objective situations of sin,” he does not stop short at the kinds of cases that are specified in No. 84 of 'The Family in the Modern World.' He refers in a broader way to “certain situations which do not objectively embody our understanding of marriage. Every effort should be made to encourage the development of an enlightened conscience” while “recognizing the influence of concrete factors” (No. 303).

"The conscience plays a fundamental role."

"Indeed:
Conscience can do more than recognize that a given situation does not correspond objectively to the overall demands of the Gospel. It can also recognize with sincerity and honesty what for now is the most generous response which can be given to God, and come to see with a certain moral security that it is what God himself is asking amid the concrete complexity of one’s limits, while not yet fully the objective ideal (No. 303)."
(America, "Cardinal Christoph Schonborn on the demands and joys of love," August 15-22, 2016)

What is Schonborn saying?

World-renown philosopher, founding Rector of the International Academy of Philosopher and friend of Pope John Paul II, Josef Seifert in a new paper on Amoris Laetitia explains what Schonborn is saying:

"AL says that we can know with 'a certain moral security' that God himself asks us to commit intrinsically wrong acts such as adultery..."

"If only one case of an intrinsically immoral act can be permitted and even willed by God, must this not apply to all acts considered 'intrinsically wrong'?" ("Does pure logic threaten to destroy the entire moral doctrine of the Catholic Church?," August 5, 2017)

In simple words the friend of John Paul II and renown philosopher says:

Francis's Amoris Leatitia says God wills evil.

The philosopher's paper says:

"Let us read the decisive text (AL 303), which is being applied by Pope Francis to the case of adulterous or 'irregular couples'... :

'Yet conscience can do more... the most generous response which can be given to God (Relations Finalise 2015, 85) and come to see with a certain moral security that God himself is asking amid the concrete complexity of one's limits, while yet not fully the objective ideal (AL 303).'"

Again, in simple words, Amoris Laetitia says God wills intrinsically evil acts which brings us to Haring's influence on the current Pope.

Fr. Edmundus Waldstein, O. Cist., at sancrucensis.wordpress.com, gives an overview of why Francis praised dissenter Haring and why Amoris Laetitia promotes allowing intrinsically evil acts:

"In a discussion with the General Congregation of the Society of Jesus, the Holy Father praised Fr. Bernard Haring for having helped overcome a decadent scholastic moral theology that had been fixated on negative commandments, and opened up a way for moral theology to flourish. Now, Haring’s moral theology is a great example of what it might mean to begin processes as opposed to occupying spaces." (Dubia and Initiating Processes, December 7, 2016, sancrucensis.wordpress.com)

Even Amoris Laetitia supporter Jeff Mirus in a March 7, 2017 article for Catholic Culture.com said anyone who would praise Haring "as one of the first to give Catholic moral theology new life in the twentieth century must be ignorant, confused, or subversive."

In the beginning of the post, titled "Pope Francis and Bernard Haring: The literally infernal cheek of dissent," Mirus said:

"Pope Francis praised...Fr. Bernard Haring, for being one of the first to try to revive an ailing moral theology following the Second Vatican Council."

The article presented some of the moral theologian's dissenting heretical teachings:

"In his 1973 book Medical Ethics Haring defended sterilization, contraception and artificial insemination...According to Haring, under difficult circumstances, we may engage in a process of discernment which leads to the commission of intrinsically evil acts."

The Kasper proposal agenda which became Amoris Laetitia is in significant segments about allowing intrinsically evil acts such as adultery and implicitly homosexuality. Fr. Z said at his website on April 16, 2016:

"'Homosexuality' was the bigger issue with the Kasperites... This is still the Kasperite strategy."

The Kasper agenda and Amoris Laetitia's unavoidable logic is:

It follows that if unrepentant adulterers can receive Holy Communion, then unrepentant homosexuals can receive the Eucharist, too.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Friday, January 24, 2020

Why do 1P5 Skojec and Francis use Name-calling Propaganda?

I always find One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec's Tweets hilarious. He has refined the comic use of name-calling to a fine art.

Anyone who knows the people who he name-calls knows the absurdity of his wildly unreasonable and ridiculous smears.

But, he isn't doing it for its humorous effect and for my merriment. Although, I want thank him and his Tweets for lighting up many of my days with laughter.

Sadly, Skojec is pathetically deadly serious in his poisonous name-calling propaganda.

Why does he do it?

Wikipedia's post on "Name calling" explains why he, Francis and Team Francis apparently use this propaganda technique:

"Name calling is a cognitive bias and a technique to promote propaganda. Propagandists use the name-calling technique to invoke fear in those exposed to the propaganda, resulting in the formation of a negative opinion about a person, group, or set of beliefs or ideas."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate of Mary.


Does New Philly Archbishop Perez agree with Francis that the Church Moral Teachings can "Evolve"?

On October 4, 2019, the Cleveland Diocese website revealed that the newly Francis appointed Archbishop of Philadelphia Nelson Perez apparently believes with Francis that the Church "evolves." Perez's diocese website reported:

"The Church grows and evolves over time, the pope wrote in his exhortation. Bishop Perez  said that is what keeps the Church vibration and relevant."
(dioceseofcleveland.org, "Be involved in the Church, bishop tells young people at First Friday Club of Greater Akron, October 4, 2019)

In the post Perez appeared to speak against the "values" of "abortion" and "gender identity" as against the "values of the Church."

Perez, in using Personalist value language terminology which implies change is possible in speaking of the Church's infallible unchangeable teachings against abortion and homosexuality, appears to be saying it's possible that the Church's moral unchangeable teachings can "evolve."

Will Francis appointed Archbishop Perez affirm unambiguously that the Church's teachings on abortion, homosexuality and Communion for adulterers can never change unless one is in schism from the unchangeable truths of the Church established by Jesus Christ which is the Catholic Church?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.


Thursday, January 23, 2020

Has Francis Appointed Philly Archbishop Perez lacked Transparency on Clerical Sex Abuse & Child Porn Cases?

Today, Nelson Jesus Perez was named Archbishop of Philadelphia by Francis to succeed Archbishop Charles J. Chaput. It appears he and his past dioceses have apparently lacked transparency in clerical sex abuse and child pornography cases.

Archbishop Perez's episcopal service according to Wikipedia has been the following:

"Auxiliary Bishop of Rockville Centre[edit]

On June 8, 2012, Perez was appointed titular bishop of Catrum and auxiliary bishop of the Rockville Center, New York, by Pope Benedict XVI.[4] He received his episcopal consecration on July 25, 2012."

"Bishop of Cleveland[edit]

On July 11, 2017, Pope Francis appointed him Bishop of Cleveland.[5][6] He was installed as the 11th Bishop of Cleveland on September 5, 2017."
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_J._Perez]

According to Friedman & Simon, L.L.P. Injury Lawyers, Perez's first diocese as bishop has spend at a minimum of over 1 million dollars and probably very much more because of sex abuse settlements:

"Within the Rockville Centre Diocese, as of July 2019:

  • 297 claims had been filed
  • 250 settlements had already been paid or were in the process of being paid
  • Settlements have been between $25,000 and $500,000"
"Victims who settle through IRCP relinquish all rights to take legal action against the church."
[https://www.friedmansimon.com/long-island-ny-rockville-centre-sexual-abuse-lawsuit/]

Perez's first diocese was also one of "the last of the New York dioceses to release a list of credibly accused clergy members":

"The Diocese of Rockville Centre has been the last of the New York dioceses to release a list of credibly accused clergy members."

[https://www.friedmansimon.com/long-island-ny-rockville-centre-sexual-abuse-lawsuit/]

Moreover, News 5 Cleveland before it blocked access to the link revealed that Perez's present diocese's apparently has an unwillingness to "release the findings of the secret grand jury investigation" as related to this weeks, January 17, 2020, "21 count child pornography indictment" against Perez's priest Fr. Robert McWilliams. News 5 Cleveland reported:


According to the criminal complaint, McWilliams was in possession of child pornography... in 2016, again in 2018, and then again in 2019..."

"... The Survivors Network of the Abused by Priests [SNAP] thanked law enforcement for arresting McWilliams, but said there is still work to do. They released the following s
tatement:

'[W]e also call on Bishop Nelson Perez to release the findings of the secret grand jury investigation into his diocese. The only way to protect children is to be completely transparent.'"
(News 5 Cleveland, "New Charges: Strongsville Catholic priest charged 21-count child pornography indictment," January 17, 2020)
[https://www.news5cleveland.com/strongsville-catholic-priest-21-count-indictment]

Is it possible that the liberal news outlet is attempting to block information on its own new report on the Vatican Philadelphia archbishop appointment to protect the liberal Francis?

Below is all that is now found on their link. (Fortunately, the Catholic Monitor was able to type the above part of their report that applied to Perez before the news outlet totally blocked access from a previous internet phone connection that had not yet been blocked.):

"Page Not Found

We are sorry the page you are looking for cannot be found."
[Back to home  
[https://www.news5cleveland.com/strongsville-catholic-priest-21-count-indictment]

Is Francis appointed Archbishop Perez going to release "the secret grand jury investigation" into his present diocese before he goes to Philadelphia?

Is Perez going to be "transparent" on the sex abuse and child pornography in his present diocese?


Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Was Pope Benedict at War with Francis and his Teachers, the Liberal Theorists, & their Ally Islam?

Are all Catholics and all persons who believe in reason and transcendent truths such as Pope Benedict XVI at a war with liberal theorists of whom Francis appears to be a disciple and their ally Islam?

English professor Louis Markos in his book Lewis Agonistes shows that Nominalist liberal theorists of whom Francis is apparently a disciple and Nominalist Islam are at war with reason and analogy in knowing God.

Their denial of philosophic Thomistic Analogical Realism which underpins the infallible Catholic doctrines as well as traditional art and literature with transcendent truths which is conveyed in material images reveals that they are Nominalistic Modernists.

Markos says liberals of the Enlightenment mind set believed only in materially observable “facts” and denied the existence of “transcendent truths in material images” be it philosophy, art, literature or God.

Postmodernist liberals such Michael de Certeau who Francis called the "greatest theologian for today" took it a step forward by proclaiming that not only is God dead, but language is dead. They believe that words have no meaning.

Liberal theorist's thought in history brought humanity Communism and Fascism with their violence against human life. Lenin and Castro were Enlightenment men and Hitler was a follower of the proto postmodernist Nietzsche. Pro-choicer are also followers of Nietzsche’s will to power.

Nominalist Islam showed its alliance with Nominalist liberal theorists when they firebombed and shoot bullet holes through Christian churches in West Bank, killed an Italian nun and threatened to bomb the Vatican with a suicide attack when Pope Benedict XVI gave the September 12 called FAITH, REASON AND THE UNIVERSITY. MEMORIES AND REFLECTIONS. In that talk he said:

“The decisive statement in this argument against violent conversion is this: not to act in accordance with reason is contrary to God’s nature. The editor, Theodore Khoury, observes: For the emperor, as a Byzantine shaped by Greek philosophy, this statement is self-evident. But for Muslim teaching, God is absolutely transcendent. His will is not bound up with any of our categories, even that of rationality.”

“Here Khoury quotes a work of the noted French Islamist R. Arnaldez, who points out that Ibn Hazn went so far as to state that God is not bound even by his own word, and that nothing would oblige him to reveal the truth to us. Were it God’s will, we would even have to practise idolatry.”

The pope in the lecture countered this anti-analogy theories which ultimately deny transcendent truth by saying:

“As opposed to this, the faith of the Church has always insisted that between God and us, between his eternal Creator Spirit and our created reason there exists a real analogy, in which unlikeness remains infinitely greater than likeness, yet not to the point of abolishing analogy and its language (cf. Lateran IV). God does not become more divine when we push him away from us in a sheer, impenetrable voluntarism; rather, the truly divine God is the God who has revealed himself as “logos” and, as “logos,” has acted and continues to act lovingly on our behalf. Certainly, love "transcends" knowledge and is thereby capable of perceiving more than thought alone (cf. Eph 3:19); nonetheless it continues to be love of the God who is “logos.” Consequently, Christian worship is “spiritual” worship in harmony with the eternal Word and with our reason (cf. Rom 12:1).”

Pray Francis, Islam and liberals be converted to Pope Benedict's philosophical teaching on Thomistic analogy and reason which is the underpinning of Catholic infallible teachings of the Eternal Word.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.


Click here for Fred Martinez's book "Hidden Axis":


http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1410746186/qid=1099936755/sr=11-1/ref

De Mattei knows "Popes [can] be Deposed... for... Heresy;" Why is he now Silent about it?

One Five publisher Skojec promoted Bishop Athanasius Schneider's claim that popes cannot be deposed for heresy which "puzzled" renowned historian and scholar Roberto de Mattei.

The renowned scholar apparently, also, has a different take on what "universal acceptance" means than Bishop Schneider promoter Skojec. It appears to means to the scholar that a heretical pope who (apparently was lawfully elected) could lose the papacy if he is not "accepted by the universal Church."

The 1P5 publisher seems to think "universal acceptance" is a "infallible fact" that a claimant for the papacy is definitely a pope even if his pontifical election was unlawful such as if he violated the conclave constitution of the previous pope for a lawful election.

De Matteo said he was "puzzled" by Schneider's claim that "popes cannot be deposed... for... heresy" because the bishop held a position contrary to Doctors of the Church, "great canonists and theologians":

"For as long as he [the heretical pope] is tolerated and accepted by the universal Church, the heretic will be true Pope, and in principle, his acts are valid... Schneider's position is somewhat acceptable... to avoid that crypto-sedevacantism... on the practical level... without excluding future scenarios, like that of a heretic Pope possibly losing the papacy."
(Catholic Family News, "Professor De Mattei Comments on Bishop Schneider's 'Heretical Popes' Text," March 20, 2019)

 Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.


Click here for Fred Martinez's book "Hidden Axis":


http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1410746186/qid=1099936755/sr=11-1/ref

Wednesday, January 22, 2020

9th Century St. Joseph Prayer: "Thou, O God- bearing Joseph"

St. Joseph the Hymnographer (816-886):

"Thou, O God-bearing Joseph, wast the guardian of the Virgin who preserved virginity intact. Be thou, with her, mindful of us, O Joseph."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Tuesday, January 21, 2020

Might Francis be "Delighted" with the Pervert Founded Legionaries of Christ because of its "$1 Billion" in Assets?

Even the pro-gay Spanish language website Medium.com admitted that Francis is an enabler of the Legionaries of Christ founded by the incestuous homosexual pedophile Marcial Marciel:

"There is very little to re-found in the Legionaries of Christ, since its founder was a pervert and a criminal... The reality is that today, with Bergoglio [Francis], the Legionaries of Christ are commanded by the Mexican Father Eduardo Robles Gil, a character close to the previous [Marciel] dome of the band."
(Medium, "Bravo, Bergoglio," May 15, 2016)

Francis, who is famous for destroying the traditional faithful order the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, said he was "delighted" with the Legionaries of Christ founded by a gay pervert:

"Francis said, 'I am delighted to welcome you new priests of the Legionaries of Christ.'"
(Herald Malaysia Online, "Pope greets newly ordained Legionaries of Christ at General Audience," December 15, 2016)

The Remnant said that Francis attacked the traditionalist Friars to get their money and for "ideological" anti-traditionalist Catholicism reasons.
(Remnant, "Follow the Money... or the Ideology: Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate Update, June 6, 2017)

Might the apparently money-strapped Vatican and Francis be "delighted" with the Legionaries because they had "an annual budget of $650 million... assets of approximately $1 billion"?
(The Irish Times, "The 'gangster' superior, the Irish priest and the wealthy widow," November 11, 2017)

According to a source of the Catholic Monitor who is familiar with the Legionaries, their money and power still possibly makes them a power in Vatican politics. Maybe not as powerful as Opus Dei, the Cardinal Angelo Sodano Old Guard and the Vatican Gay Lobby, but still possibly weilding influence.

Ironically, Francis conservative George Weigel who was a defender of the gay pervert Marciel and his corrupt order according to the National Post, but who later became a critic when Pope Benedict XVI went after Marciel is now attacking conservative and traditionalist websites which are in the forefront of exposing the corruption of Francis and his pro-gay Vatican which may goes against the wealthy Legionaries' pro-Francis agenda.
(National Post, "Church historian's blind spot on Legionaries of Christ," December 31, 2010)

Is it possible that Weigel might be getting money from the pro-Amoris Letitia and pro-Francis Legionaries of Christ?

How many Francis conservatives like Weigel and even Francis traditionalists may possibly be getting money from the pro-Francis Legionaries or other wealthy pro-Francis so-called "conservative" foundations and organizations?

The only way for faithful Catholics to trust the Francis conservatives and Francis traditionalists is for them to be transparent about where their big money funding is coming from.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Monday, January 20, 2020

Might Ganswein have Covered-up for the "Financial... [Vatican] Corruption" Revealed by Vigano that "Pushed" Pope Benedict to Resign?

On February 15, 2013, the Daily Mail in the article "Was the Pope pushed? An abuse scandal, corruption and the dark intrigue behind Benedict's shock resignation" reported:

"[P]apal aides are promoted to archbishop when an ailing Pope wishes to create an unofficial 'gatekeeper'. But if Benedict knew he was about to quit, why appoint Ganswein to the position?"

"The Pope's departure also comes at a time of scrutiny over the Vatican's alleged links to the world of organised crime."

Is it possible that Ganswein was installed by the machinations of Vatican operatives of those who were "alleged[ly] link[ed] to the world of organised crime" to be a "gatekeeper" and cover-up corrupt financial matters as well as to "push" him psychologically to resign?

Moreover, in January 2013, Inside the Vatican revealed in the piece "The Pope's Trust in Monsignor Ganswein":

"It is said in Rome that Ganswein, in staunchly protecting the time and energy of the Pope... may have prevented the Pope from being informed about certain important matters, especially financial... like the cases of corruption alleged by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano."

Might Ganswein have covered-up for the "financial... [Vatican] corruption" revealed by Vigano that "pushed" Pope Benedict to resign?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.